linux-stable.git/fs/btrfs, branch v3.2.85

posix_acl: Clear SGID bit when setting file permissions

2016-11-20T01:01:44+00:00

commit 073931017b49d9458aa351605b43a7e34598caef upstream.

When file permissions are modified via chmod(2) and the user is not in
the owning group or capable of CAP_FSETID, the setgid bit is cleared in
inode_change_ok().  Setting a POSIX ACL via setxattr(2) sets the file
permissions as well as the new ACL, but doesn't clear the setgid bit in
a similar way; this allows to bypass the check in chmod(2).  Fix that.

References: CVE-2016-7097
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig 
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton 
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara 
Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher 
[bwh: Backported to 3.2:
 - Drop changes to ceph, f2fs, hfsplus, orangefs
 - Use capable() instead of capable_wrt_inode_uidgid()
 - Update ext3 and generic_acl.c as well
 - In gfs2, jfs, and xfs, take care to avoid leaking the allocated ACL if
   posix_acl_update_mode() determines it's not needed
 - Adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings

Btrfs: skip adding an acl attribute if we don't have to

2016-11-20T01:01:44+00:00

commit 755ac67f83e515af55adbfe55134eb7d90839cdb upstream.

If the acl can be exactly represented in the traditional file
mode permission bits, we don't set another acl attribute.

Signed-off-by: Liu Bo 
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason 
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings

fs: Give dentry to inode_change_ok() instead of inode

2016-11-20T01:01:43+00:00

commit 31051c85b5e2aaaf6315f74c72a732673632a905 upstream.

inode_change_ok() will be resposible for clearing capabilities and IMA
extended attributes and as such will need dentry. Give it as an argument
to inode_change_ok() instead of an inode. Also rename inode_change_ok()
to setattr_prepare() to better relect that it does also some
modifications in addition to checks.

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig 
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara 
[bwh: Backported to 3.2:
 - Drop changes to f2fs, lustre, orangefs, overlayfs
 - Adjust filenames, context
 - In nfsd, pass dentry to nfsd_sanitize_attrs()
 - In xfs, pass dentry to xfs_change_file_space(), xfs_set_mode(),
   xfs_setattr_nonsize(), and xfs_setattr_size()
 - Update ext3 as well
 - Mark pohmelfs as BROKEN; it's long dead upstream]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings

btrfs: ensure that file descriptor used with subvol ioctls is a dir

2016-11-20T01:01:42+00:00

commit 325c50e3cebb9208009083e841550f98a863bfa0 upstream.

If the subvol/snapshot create/destroy ioctls are passed a regular file
with execute permissions set, we'll eventually Oops while trying to do
inode->i_op->lookup via lookup_one_len.

This patch ensures that the file descriptor refers to a directory.

Fixes: cb8e70901d (Btrfs: Fix subvolume creation locking rules)
Fixes: 76dda93c6a (Btrfs: add snapshot/subvolume destroy ioctl)
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney 
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason 
[bwh: Backported to 3.2:
 - Open-code file_inode()
 - Adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings

btrfs: bugfix: handle FS_IOC32_{GETFLAGS,SETFLAGS,GETVERSION} in btrfs_ioctl

2016-08-22T21:37:08+00:00

commit 4c63c2454eff996c5e27991221106eb511f7db38 upstream.

32-bit ioctl uses these rather than the regular FS_IOC_* versions. They can
be handled in btrfs using the same code. Without this, 32-bit {ch,ls}attr
fail.

Signed-off-by: Luke Dashjr 
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik 
Reviewed-by: David Sterba 
Signed-off-by: David Sterba 
[bwh: Backported to 3.2: adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings

btrfs: properly set the termination value of ctx->pos in readdir

2016-02-27T14:28:48+00:00

commit bc4ef7592f657ae81b017207a1098817126ad4cb upstream.

The value of ctx->pos in the last readdir call is supposed to be set to
INT_MAX due to 32bit compatibility, unless 'pos' is intentially set to a
larger value, then it's LLONG_MAX.

There's a report from PaX SIZE_OVERFLOW plugin that "ctx->pos++"
overflows (https://forums.grsecurity.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=4284), on a
64bit arch, where the value is 0x7fffffffffffffff ie. LLONG_MAX before
the increment.

We can get to that situation like that:

* emit all regular readdir entries
* still in the same call to readdir, bump the last pos to INT_MAX
* next call to readdir will not emit any entries, but will reach the
  bump code again, finds pos to be INT_MAX and sets it to LLONG_MAX

Normally this is not a problem, but if we call readdir again, we'll find
'pos' set to LLONG_MAX and the unconditional increment will overflow.

The report from Victor at
(http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/49500) with debugging
print shows that pattern:

 Overflow: e
 Overflow: 7fffffff
 Overflow: 7fffffffffffffff
 PAX: size overflow detected in function btrfs_real_readdir
   fs/btrfs/inode.c:5760 cicus.935_282 max, count: 9, decl: pos; num: 0;
   context: dir_context;
 CPU: 0 PID: 2630 Comm: polkitd Not tainted 4.2.3-grsec #1
 Hardware name: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. H81ND2H/H81ND2H, BIOS F3 08/11/2015
  ffffffff81901608 0000000000000000 ffffffff819015e6 ffffc90004973d48
  ffffffff81742f0f 0000000000000007 ffffffff81901608 ffffc90004973d78
  ffffffff811cb706 0000000000000000 ffff8800d47359e0 ffffc90004973ed8
 Call Trace:
  [] dump_stack+0x4c/0x7f
  [] report_size_overflow+0x36/0x40
  [] btrfs_real_readdir+0x69c/0x6d0
  [] iterate_dir+0xa8/0x150
  [] ? __fget_light+0x2d/0x70
  [] SyS_getdents+0xba/0x1c0
 Overflow: 1a
  [] ? iterate_dir+0x150/0x150
  [] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x83

The jump from 7fffffff to 7fffffffffffffff happens when new dir entries
are not yet synced and are processed from the delayed list. Then the code
could go to the bump section again even though it might not emit any new
dir entries from the delayed list.

The fix avoids entering the "bump" section again once we've finished
emitting the entries, both for synced and delayed entries.

References: https://forums.grsecurity.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=4284
Reported-by: Victor 
Signed-off-by: David Sterba 
Tested-by: Holger Hoffstätte 
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason 
[bwh: Backported to 3.2:
 - s/ctx->pos/filp->f_pos/
 - Adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings

Btrfs: fix race when listing an inode's xattrs

2015-11-27T12:48:24+00:00

commit f1cd1f0b7d1b5d4aaa5711e8f4e4898b0045cb6d upstream.

When listing a inode's xattrs we have a time window where we race against
a concurrent operation for adding a new hard link for our inode that makes
us not return any xattr to user space. In order for this to happen, the
first xattr of our inode needs to be at slot 0 of a leaf and the previous
leaf must still have room for an inode ref (or extref) item, and this can
happen because an inode's listxattrs callback does not lock the inode's
i_mutex (nor does the VFS does it for us), but adding a hard link to an
inode makes the VFS lock the inode's i_mutex before calling the inode's
link callback.

If we have the following leafs:

               Leaf X (has N items)                    Leaf Y

 [ ... (257 INODE_ITEM 0) (257 INODE_REF 256) ]  [ (257 XATTR_ITEM 12345), ... ]
           slot N - 2         slot N - 1              slot 0

The race illustrated by the following sequence diagram is possible:

       CPU 1                                               CPU 2

  btrfs_listxattr()

    searches for key (257 XATTR_ITEM 0)

    gets path with path->nodes[0] == leaf X
    and path->slots[0] == N

    because path->slots[0] is >=
    btrfs_header_nritems(leaf X), it calls
    btrfs_next_leaf()

    btrfs_next_leaf()
      releases the path

                                                   adds key (257 INODE_REF 666)
                                                   to the end of leaf X (slot N),
                                                   and leaf X now has N + 1 items

      searches for the key (257 INODE_REF 256),
      with path->keep_locks == 1, because that
      is the last key it saw in leaf X before
      releasing the path

      ends up at leaf X again and it verifies
      that the key (257 INODE_REF 256) is no
      longer the last key in leaf X, so it
      returns with path->nodes[0] == leaf X
      and path->slots[0] == N, pointing to
      the new item with key (257 INODE_REF 666)

    btrfs_listxattr's loop iteration sees that
    the type of the key pointed by the path is
    different from the type BTRFS_XATTR_ITEM_KEY
    and so it breaks the loop and stops looking
    for more xattr items
      --> the application doesn't get any xattr
          listed for our inode

So fix this by breaking the loop only if the key's type is greater than
BTRFS_XATTR_ITEM_KEY and skip the current key if its type is smaller.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana 
[bwh: Backported to 3.2: old code used the trivial accessor btrfs_key_type()]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings

Btrfs: fix race leading to BUG_ON when running delalloc for nodatacow

2015-11-27T12:48:23+00:00

commit 1d512cb77bdbda80f0dd0620a3b260d697fd581d upstream.

If we are using the NO_HOLES feature, we have a tiny time window when
running delalloc for a nodatacow inode where we can race with a concurrent
link or xattr add operation leading to a BUG_ON.

This happens because at run_delalloc_nocow() we end up casting a leaf item
of type BTRFS_INODE_[REF|EXTREF]_KEY or of type BTRFS_XATTR_ITEM_KEY to a
file extent item (struct btrfs_file_extent_item) and then analyse its
extent type field, which won't match any of the expected extent types
(values BTRFS_FILE_EXTENT_[REG|PREALLOC|INLINE]) and therefore trigger an
explicit BUG_ON(1).

The following sequence diagram shows how the race happens when running a
no-cow dellaloc range [4K, 8K[ for inode 257 and we have the following
neighbour leafs:

             Leaf X (has N items)                    Leaf Y

 [ ... (257 INODE_ITEM 0) (257 INODE_REF 256) ]  [ (257 EXTENT_DATA 8192), ... ]
              slot N - 2         slot N - 1              slot 0

 (Note the implicit hole for inode 257 regarding the [0, 8K[ range)

       CPU 1                                         CPU 2

 run_dealloc_nocow()
   btrfs_lookup_file_extent()
     --> searches for a key with value
         (257 EXTENT_DATA 4096) in the
         fs/subvol tree
     --> returns us a path with
         path->nodes[0] == leaf X and
         path->slots[0] == N

   because path->slots[0] is >=
   btrfs_header_nritems(leaf X), it
   calls btrfs_next_leaf()

   btrfs_next_leaf()
     --> releases the path

                                              hard link added to our inode,
                                              with key (257 INODE_REF 500)
                                              added to the end of leaf X,
                                              so leaf X now has N + 1 keys

     --> searches for the key
         (257 INODE_REF 256), because
         it was the last key in leaf X
         before it released the path,
         with path->keep_locks set to 1

     --> ends up at leaf X again and
         it verifies that the key
         (257 INODE_REF 256) is no longer
         the last key in the leaf, so it
         returns with path->nodes[0] ==
         leaf X and path->slots[0] == N,
         pointing to the new item with
         key (257 INODE_REF 500)

   the loop iteration of run_dealloc_nocow()
   does not break out the loop and continues
   because the key referenced in the path
   at path->nodes[0] and path->slots[0] is
   for inode 257, its type is < BTRFS_EXTENT_DATA_KEY
   and its offset (500) is less then our delalloc
   range's end (8192)

   the item pointed by the path, an inode reference item,
   is (incorrectly) interpreted as a file extent item and
   we get an invalid extent type, leading to the BUG_ON(1):

   if (extent_type == BTRFS_FILE_EXTENT_REG ||
      extent_type == BTRFS_FILE_EXTENT_PREALLOC) {
       (...)
   } else if (extent_type == BTRFS_FILE_EXTENT_INLINE) {
       (...)
   } else {
       BUG_ON(1)
   }

The same can happen if a xattr is added concurrently and ends up having
a key with an offset smaller then the delalloc's range end.

So fix this by skipping keys with a type smaller than
BTRFS_EXTENT_DATA_KEY.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana 
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings

Btrfs: fix race leading to incorrect item deletion when dropping extents

2015-11-27T12:48:23+00:00

commit aeafbf8486c9e2bd53f5cc3c10c0b7fd7149d69c upstream.

While running a stress test I got the following warning triggered:

  [191627.672810] ------------[ cut here ]------------
  [191627.673949] WARNING: CPU: 8 PID: 8447 at fs/btrfs/file.c:779 __btrfs_drop_extents+0x391/0xa50 [btrfs]()
  (...)
  [191627.701485] Call Trace:
  [191627.702037]  [] dump_stack+0x4f/0x7b
  [191627.702992]  [] ? console_unlock+0x356/0x3a2
  [191627.704091]  [] warn_slowpath_common+0xa1/0xbb
  [191627.705380]  [] ? __btrfs_drop_extents+0x391/0xa50 [btrfs]
  [191627.706637]  [] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x1c
  [191627.707789]  [] __btrfs_drop_extents+0x391/0xa50 [btrfs]
  [191627.709155]  [] ? cache_alloc_debugcheck_after.isra.32+0x171/0x1d0
  [191627.712444]  [] ? kmemleak_alloc_recursive.constprop.40+0x16/0x18
  [191627.714162]  [] insert_reserved_file_extent.constprop.40+0x83/0x24e [btrfs]
  [191627.715887]  [] ? start_transaction+0x3bb/0x610 [btrfs]
  [191627.717287]  [] btrfs_finish_ordered_io+0x273/0x4e2 [btrfs]
  [191627.728865]  [] finish_ordered_fn+0x15/0x17 [btrfs]
  [191627.730045]  [] normal_work_helper+0x14c/0x32c [btrfs]
  [191627.731256]  [] btrfs_endio_write_helper+0x12/0x14 [btrfs]
  [191627.732661]  [] process_one_work+0x24c/0x4ae
  [191627.733822]  [] worker_thread+0x206/0x2c2
  [191627.734857]  [] ? process_scheduled_works+0x2f/0x2f
  [191627.736052]  [] ? process_scheduled_works+0x2f/0x2f
  [191627.737349]  [] kthread+0xef/0xf7
  [191627.738267]  [] ? time_hardirqs_on+0x15/0x28
  [191627.739330]  [] ? __kthread_parkme+0xad/0xad
  [191627.741976]  [] ret_from_fork+0x42/0x70
  [191627.743080]  [] ? __kthread_parkme+0xad/0xad
  [191627.744206] ---[ end trace bbfddacb7aaada8d ]---

  $ cat -n fs/btrfs/file.c
  691  int __btrfs_drop_extents(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
  (...)
  758                  btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(leaf, &key, path->slots[0]);
  759                  if (key.objectid > ino ||
  760                      key.type > BTRFS_EXTENT_DATA_KEY || key.offset >= end)
  761                          break;
  762
  763                  fi = btrfs_item_ptr(leaf, path->slots[0],
  764                                      struct btrfs_file_extent_item);
  765                  extent_type = btrfs_file_extent_type(leaf, fi);
  766
  767                  if (extent_type == BTRFS_FILE_EXTENT_REG ||
  768                      extent_type == BTRFS_FILE_EXTENT_PREALLOC) {
  (...)
  774                  } else if (extent_type == BTRFS_FILE_EXTENT_INLINE) {
  (...)
  778                  } else {
  779                          WARN_ON(1);
  780                          extent_end = search_start;
  781                  }
  (...)

This happened because the item we were processing did not match a file
extent item (its key type != BTRFS_EXTENT_DATA_KEY), and even on this
case we cast the item to a struct btrfs_file_extent_item pointer and
then find a type field value that does not match any of the expected
values (BTRFS_FILE_EXTENT_[REG|PREALLOC|INLINE]). This scenario happens
due to a tiny time window where a race can happen as exemplified below.
For example, consider the following scenario where we're using the
NO_HOLES feature and we have the following two neighbour leafs:

               Leaf X (has N items)                    Leaf Y

[ ... (257 INODE_ITEM 0) (257 INODE_REF 256) ]  [ (257 EXTENT_DATA 8192), ... ]
          slot N - 2         slot N - 1              slot 0

Our inode 257 has an implicit hole in the range [0, 8K[ (implicit rather
than explicit because NO_HOLES is enabled). Now if our inode has an
ordered extent for the range [4K, 8K[ that is finishing, the following
can happen:

          CPU 1                                       CPU 2

  btrfs_finish_ordered_io()
    insert_reserved_file_extent()
      __btrfs_drop_extents()
         Searches for the key
          (257 EXTENT_DATA 4096) through
          btrfs_lookup_file_extent()

         Key not found and we get a path where
         path->nodes[0] == leaf X and
         path->slots[0] == N

         Because path->slots[0] is >=
         btrfs_header_nritems(leaf X), we call
         btrfs_next_leaf()

         btrfs_next_leaf() releases the path

                                                  inserts key
                                                  (257 INODE_REF 4096)
                                                  at the end of leaf X,
                                                  leaf X now has N + 1 keys,
                                                  and the new key is at
                                                  slot N

         btrfs_next_leaf() searches for
         key (257 INODE_REF 256), with
         path->keep_locks set to 1,
         because it was the last key it
         saw in leaf X

           finds it in leaf X again and
           notices it's no longer the last
           key of the leaf, so it returns 0
           with path->nodes[0] == leaf X and
           path->slots[0] == N (which is now
           < btrfs_header_nritems(leaf X)),
           pointing to the new key
           (257 INODE_REF 4096)

         __btrfs_drop_extents() casts the
         item at path->nodes[0], slot
         path->slots[0], to a struct
         btrfs_file_extent_item - it does
         not skip keys for the target
         inode with a type less than
         BTRFS_EXTENT_DATA_KEY
         (BTRFS_INODE_REF_KEY < BTRFS_EXTENT_DATA_KEY)

         sees a bogus value for the type
         field triggering the WARN_ON in
         the trace shown above, and sets
         extent_end = search_start (4096)

         does the if-then-else logic to
         fixup 0 length extent items created
         by a past bug from hole punching:

           if (extent_end == key.offset &&
               extent_end >= search_start)
               goto delete_extent_item;

         that evaluates to true and it ends
         up deleting the key pointed to by
         path->slots[0], (257 INODE_REF 4096),
         from leaf X

The same could happen for example for a xattr that ends up having a key
with an offset value that matches search_start (very unlikely but not
impossible).

So fix this by ensuring that keys smaller than BTRFS_EXTENT_DATA_KEY are
skipped, never casted to struct btrfs_file_extent_item and never deleted
by accident. Also protect against the unexpected case of getting a key
for a lower inode number by skipping that key and issuing a warning.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana 
[bwh: Backported to 3.2: drop use of ASSERT()]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings

Btrfs: fix truncation of compressed and inlined extents

2015-11-27T12:48:21+00:00

commit 0305cd5f7fca85dae392b9ba85b116896eb7c1c7 upstream.

When truncating a file to a smaller size which consists of an inline
extent that is compressed, we did not discard (or made unusable) the
data between the new file size and the old file size, wasting metadata
space and allowing for the truncated data to be leaked and the data
corruption/loss mentioned below.
We were also not correctly decrementing the number of bytes used by the
inode, we were setting it to zero, giving a wrong report for callers of
the stat(2) syscall. The fsck tool also reported an error about a mismatch
between the nbytes of the file versus the real space used by the file.

Now because we weren't discarding the truncated region of the file, it
was possible for a caller of the clone ioctl to actually read the data
that was truncated, allowing for a security breach without requiring root
access to the system, using only standard filesystem operations. The
scenario is the following:

   1) User A creates a file which consists of an inline and compressed
      extent with a size of 2000 bytes - the file is not accessible to
      any other users (no read, write or execution permission for anyone
      else);

   2) The user truncates the file to a size of 1000 bytes;

   3) User A makes the file world readable;

   4) User B creates a file consisting of an inline extent of 2000 bytes;

   5) User B issues a clone operation from user A's file into its own
      file (using a length argument of 0, clone the whole range);

   6) User B now gets to see the 1000 bytes that user A truncated from
      its file before it made its file world readbale. User B also lost
      the bytes in the range [1000, 2000[ bytes from its own file, but
      that might be ok if his/her intention was reading stale data from
      user A that was never supposed to be public.

Note that this contrasts with the case where we truncate a file from 2000
bytes to 1000 bytes and then truncate it back from 1000 to 2000 bytes. In
this case reading any byte from the range [1000, 2000[ will return a value
of 0x00, instead of the original data.

This problem exists since the clone ioctl was added and happens both with
and without my recent data loss and file corruption fixes for the clone
ioctl (patch "Btrfs: fix file corruption and data loss after cloning
inline extents").

So fix this by truncating the compressed inline extents as we do for the
non-compressed case, which involves decompressing, if the data isn't already
in the page cache, compressing the truncated version of the extent, writing
the compressed content into the inline extent and then truncate it.

The following test case for fstests reproduces the problem. In order for
the test to pass both this fix and my previous fix for the clone ioctl
that forbids cloning a smaller inline extent into a larger one,
which is titled "Btrfs: fix file corruption and data loss after cloning
inline extents", are needed. Without that other fix the test fails in a
different way that does not leak the truncated data, instead part of
destination file gets replaced with zeroes (because the destination file
has a larger inline extent than the source).

  seq=`basename $0`
  seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq
  echo "QA output created by $seq"
  tmp=/tmp/$$
  status=1	# failure is the default!
  trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15

  _cleanup()
  {
      rm -f $tmp.*
  }

  # get standard environment, filters and checks
  . ./common/rc
  . ./common/filter

  # real QA test starts here
  _need_to_be_root
  _supported_fs btrfs
  _supported_os Linux
  _require_scratch
  _require_cloner

  rm -f $seqres.full

  _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1
  _scratch_mount "-o compress"

  # Create our test files. File foo is going to be the source of a clone operation
  # and consists of a single inline extent with an uncompressed size of 512 bytes,
  # while file bar consists of a single inline extent with an uncompressed size of
  # 256 bytes. For our test's purpose, it's important that file bar has an inline
  # extent with a size smaller than foo's inline extent.
  $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -S 0xa1 0 128"   \
          -c "pwrite -S 0x2a 128 384" \
          $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io
  $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -S 0xbb 0 256" $SCRATCH_MNT/bar | _filter_xfs_io

  # Now durably persist all metadata and data. We do this to make sure that we get
  # on disk an inline extent with a size of 512 bytes for file foo.
  sync

  # Now truncate our file foo to a smaller size. Because it consists of a
  # compressed and inline extent, btrfs did not shrink the inline extent to the
  # new size (if the extent was not compressed, btrfs would shrink it to 128
  # bytes), it only updates the inode's i_size to 128 bytes.
  $XFS_IO_PROG -c "truncate 128" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo

  # Now clone foo's inline extent into bar.
  # This clone operation should fail with errno EOPNOTSUPP because the source
  # file consists only of an inline extent and the file's size is smaller than
  # the inline extent of the destination (128 bytes < 256 bytes). However the
  # clone ioctl was not prepared to deal with a file that has a size smaller
  # than the size of its inline extent (something that happens only for compressed
  # inline extents), resulting in copying the full inline extent from the source
  # file into the destination file.
  #
  # Note that btrfs' clone operation for inline extents consists of removing the
  # inline extent from the destination inode and copy the inline extent from the
  # source inode into the destination inode, meaning that if the destination
  # inode's inline extent is larger (N bytes) than the source inode's inline
  # extent (M bytes), some bytes (N - M bytes) will be lost from the destination
  # file. Btrfs could copy the source inline extent's data into the destination's
  # inline extent so that we would not lose any data, but that's currently not
  # done due to the complexity that would be needed to deal with such cases
  # (specially when one or both extents are compressed), returning EOPNOTSUPP, as
  # it's normally not a very common case to clone very small files (only case
  # where we get inline extents) and copying inline extents does not save any
  # space (unlike for normal, non-inlined extents).
  $CLONER_PROG -s 0 -d 0 -l 0 $SCRATCH_MNT/foo $SCRATCH_MNT/bar

  # Now because the above clone operation used to succeed, and due to foo's inline
  # extent not being shinked by the truncate operation, our file bar got the whole
  # inline extent copied from foo, making us lose the last 128 bytes from bar
  # which got replaced by the bytes in range [128, 256[ from foo before foo was
  # truncated - in other words, data loss from bar and being able to read old and
  # stale data from foo that should not be possible to read anymore through normal
  # filesystem operations. Contrast with the case where we truncate a file from a
  # size N to a smaller size M, truncate it back to size N and then read the range
  # [M, N[, we should always get the value 0x00 for all the bytes in that range.

  # We expected the clone operation to fail with errno EOPNOTSUPP and therefore
  # not modify our file's bar data/metadata. So its content should be 256 bytes
  # long with all bytes having the value 0xbb.
  #
  # Without the btrfs bug fix, the clone operation succeeded and resulted in
  # leaking truncated data from foo, the bytes that belonged to its range
  # [128, 256[, and losing data from bar in that same range. So reading the
  # file gave us the following content:
  #
  # 0000000 a1 a1 a1 a1 a1 a1 a1 a1 a1 a1 a1 a1 a1 a1 a1 a1
  # *
  # 0000200 2a 2a 2a 2a 2a 2a 2a 2a 2a 2a 2a 2a 2a 2a 2a 2a
  # *
  # 0000400
  echo "File bar's content after the clone operation:"
  od -t x1 $SCRATCH_MNT/bar

  # Also because the foo's inline extent was not shrunk by the truncate
  # operation, btrfs' fsck, which is run by the fstests framework everytime a
  # test completes, failed reporting the following error:
  #
  #  root 5 inode 257 errors 400, nbytes wrong

  status=0
  exit

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana 
[bwh: Backported to 3.2:
 - Adjust parameters to btrfs_truncate_page() and btrfs_truncate_item()
 - Pass transaction pointer into truncate_inline_extent()
 - Add prototype of btrfs_truncate_page()
 - s/test_bit(BTRFS_ROOT_REF_COWS, &root->state)/root->ref_cows/
 - Keep using BUG_ON() for other error cases, as there is no
   btrfs_abort_transaction()
 - Adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings