Don Bailey noticed that our page zeroing for compression at end-io time
isn't complete.  This reworks a patch from Linus to push the zeroing
into the zlib and lzo specific functions instead of trying to handle the
corners inside btrfs_decompress_buf2page

Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Reported-by: Don A. Bailey <donb@securitymouse.com>
cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Pull btrfs deadlock fix from Chris Mason:
 "This has a fix for a long standing deadlock that we've been trying to
  nail down for a while.  It ended up being a bad interaction with the
  fair reader/writer locks and the order btrfs reacquires locks in the
  btree"

* 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs:
  btrfs: fix lockups from btrfs_clear_path_blocking

The fair reader/writer locks mean that btrfs_clear_path_blocking needs
to strictly follow lock ordering rules even when we already have
blocking locks on a given path.

Before we can clear a blocking lock on the path, we need to make sure
all of the locks have been converted to blocking.  This will remove lock
inversions against anyone spinning in write_lock() against the buffers
we're trying to get read locks on.  These inversions didn't exist before
the fair read/writer locks, but now we need to be more careful.

We papered over this deadlock in the past by changing
btrfs_try_read_lock() to be a true trylock against both the spinlock and
the blocking lock.  This was slower, and not sufficient to fix all the
deadlocks.  This patch adds a btrfs_tree_read_lock_atomic(), which
basically means get the spinlock but trylock on the blocking lock.

Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Reported-by: Patrick Schmid <schmid@phys.ethz.ch>
cc: stable@vger.kernel.org #v3.15+

Pull btrfs fix from Chris Mason:
 "It's a one liner for an error cleanup path that leads to crashes"

* 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs:
  Btrfs: fix kfree on list_head in btrfs_lookup_csums_range error cleanup

If we hit any errors in btrfs_lookup_csums_range, we'll loop through all
the csums we allocate and free them.  But the code was using list_entry
incorrectly, and ended up trying to free the on-stack list_head instead.

This bug came from commit 0678b6185

btrfs: Don't BUG_ON kzalloc error in btrfs_lookup_csums_range()

Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Reported-by: Erik Berg <btrfs@slipsprogrammoer.no>
cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.3 or newer

Pull btrfs fixes from Chris Mason:
 "Filipe is nailing down some problems with our skinny extent variation,
  and Dave's patch fixes endian problems in the new super block checks"

* 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs:
  Btrfs: fix race that makes btrfs_lookup_extent_info miss skinny extent items
  Btrfs: properly clean up btrfs_end_io_wq_cache
  Btrfs: fix invalid leaf slot access in btrfs_lookup_extent()
  btrfs: use macro accessors in superblock validation checks

We have a race that can lead us to miss skinny extent items in the function
btrfs_lookup_extent_info() when the skinny metadata feature is enabled.
So basically the sequence of steps is:

1) We search in the extent tree for the skinny extent, which returns > 0
   (not found);

2) We check the previous item in the returned leaf for a non-skinny extent,
   and we don't find it;

3) Because we didn't find the non-skinny extent in step 2), we release our
   path to search the extent tree again, but this time for a non-skinny
   extent key;

4) Right after we released our path in step 3), a skinny extent was inserted
   in the extent tree (delayed refs were run) - our second extent tree search
   will miss it, because it's not looking for a skinny extent;

5) After the second search returned (with ret > 0), we look for any delayed
   ref for our extent's bytenr (and we do it while holding a read lock on the
   leaf), but we won't find any, as such delayed ref had just run and completed
   after we released out path in step 3) before doing the second search.

Fix this by removing completely the path release and re-search logic. This is
safe, because if we seach for a metadata item and we don't find it, we have the
guarantee that the returned leaf is the one where the item would be inserted,
and so path->slots[0] > 0 and path->slots[0] - 1 must be the slot where the
non-skinny extent item is if it exists. The only case where path->slots[0] is
zero is when there are no smaller keys in the tree (i.e. no left siblings for
our leaf), in which case the re-search logic isn't needed as well.

This race has been present since the introduction of skinny metadata (change
3173a18f70554fe7880bb2d85c7da566e364eb3c).

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

In one of Dave's cleanup commits he forgot to call btrfs_end_io_wq_exit on
unload, which makes us unable to unload and then re-load the btrfs module.  This
fixes the problem.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

If we couldn't find our extent item, we accessed the current slot
(path->slots[0]) to check if it corresponds to an equivalent skinny
metadata item. However this slot could be beyond our last item in the
leaf (i.e. path->slots[0] >= btrfs_header_nritems(leaf)), in which case
we shouldn't process it.

Since btrfs_lookup_extent() is only used to find extent items for data
extents, fix this by removing completely the logic that looks up for an
equivalent skinny metadata item, since it can not exist.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

The initial patch c926093ec516f5d316 (btrfs: add more superblock checks)
did not properly use the macro accessors that wrap endianness and the
code would not work correctly on big endian machines.

Reported-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>