linux-stable.git/fs/btrfs, branch v3.12 Linux kernel stable tree Merge branch 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs 2013-10-18T23:46:21+00:00 Linus Torvalds torvalds@linux-foundation.org 2013-10-18T23:46:21+00:00 bdeeab62a611f1f7cd48fd285ce568e8dcd0455a Pull btrfs fix from Chris Mason: "Sage hit a deadlock with ceph on btrfs, and Josef tracked it down to a regression in our initial rc1 pull. When doing nocow writes we were sometimes starting a transaction with locks held" * 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs: Btrfs: release path before starting transaction in can_nocow_extent 
Pull btrfs fix from Chris Mason:
 "Sage hit a deadlock with ceph on btrfs, and Josef tracked it down to a
  regression in our initial rc1 pull.  When doing nocow writes we were
  sometimes starting a transaction with locks held"

* 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs:
  Btrfs: release path before starting transaction in can_nocow_extent
Btrfs: release path before starting transaction in can_nocow_extent 2013-10-18T16:43:40+00:00 Josef Bacik jbacik@fusionio.com 2013-10-18T16:10:36+00:00 1bda19eb73d68b304148e67253e47cef049a419d We can't be holding tree locks while we try to start a transaction, we will deadlock. Thanks, Reported-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com> 
We can't be holding tree locks while we try to start a transaction, we will
deadlock.  Thanks,

Reported-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Merge branch 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs 2013-10-12T19:54:24+00:00 Linus Torvalds torvalds@linux-foundation.org 2013-10-12T19:54:24+00:00 d64dab903fb3abb42ef2a3fc2d8aa064105e5dca Pull btrfs fixes from Chris Mason: "We've got more bug fixes in my for-linus branch: One of these fixes another corner of the compression oops from last time. Miao nailed down some problems with concurrent snapshot deletion and drive balancing. I kept out one of his patches for more testing, but these are all stable" * 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs: Btrfs: fix oops caused by the space balance and dead roots Btrfs: insert orphan roots into fs radix tree Btrfs: limit delalloc pages outside of find_delalloc_range Btrfs: use right root when checking for hash collision 
Pull btrfs fixes from Chris Mason:
 "We've got more bug fixes in my for-linus branch:

  One of these fixes another corner of the compression oops from last
  time.  Miao nailed down some problems with concurrent snapshot
  deletion and drive balancing.

  I kept out one of his patches for more testing, but these are all
  stable"

* 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs:
  Btrfs: fix oops caused by the space balance and dead roots
  Btrfs: insert orphan roots into fs radix tree
  Btrfs: limit delalloc pages outside of find_delalloc_range
  Btrfs: use right root when checking for hash collision
Btrfs: fix oops caused by the space balance and dead roots 2013-10-11T01:31:02+00:00 Miao Xie miaox@cn.fujitsu.com 2013-09-25T13:47:44+00:00 c00869f1ae6a8fa49802d5e60d843b7051a112ec When doing space balance and subvolume destroy at the same time, we met the following oops: kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/relocation.c:2247! RIP: 0010: [<ffffffffa04cec16>] prepare_to_merge+0x154/0x1f0 [btrfs] Call Trace: [<ffffffffa04b5ab7>] relocate_block_group+0x466/0x4e6 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa04b5c7a>] btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x143/0x275 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa0495c56>] btrfs_relocate_chunk.isra.27+0x5c/0x5a2 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa0459871>] ? btrfs_item_key_to_cpu+0x15/0x31 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa048b46a>] ? btrfs_get_token_64+0x7e/0xcd [btrfs] [<ffffffffa04a3467>] ? btrfs_tree_read_unlock_blocking+0xb2/0xb7 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa049907d>] btrfs_balance+0x9c7/0xb6f [btrfs] [<ffffffffa049ef84>] btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x234/0x2ac [btrfs] [<ffffffffa04a1e8e>] btrfs_ioctl+0xd87/0x1ef9 [btrfs] [<ffffffff81122f53>] ? path_openat+0x234/0x4db [<ffffffff813c3b78>] ? __do_page_fault+0x31d/0x391 [<ffffffff810f8ab6>] ? vma_link+0x74/0x94 [<ffffffff811250f5>] vfs_ioctl+0x1d/0x39 [<ffffffff811258c8>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x32d/0x3e2 [<ffffffff811259d4>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x83 [<ffffffff813c3bfa>] ? do_page_fault+0xe/0x10 [<ffffffff813c73c2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b It is because we returned the error number if the reference of the root was 0 when doing space relocation. It was not right here, because though the root was dead(refs == 0), but the space it held still need be relocated, or we could not remove the block group. So in this case, we should return the root no matter it is dead or not. Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com> 
When doing space balance and subvolume destroy at the same time, we met
the following oops:

kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/relocation.c:2247!
RIP: 0010: [<ffffffffa04cec16>] prepare_to_merge+0x154/0x1f0 [btrfs]
Call Trace:
 [<ffffffffa04b5ab7>] relocate_block_group+0x466/0x4e6 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa04b5c7a>] btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x143/0x275 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa0495c56>] btrfs_relocate_chunk.isra.27+0x5c/0x5a2 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa0459871>] ? btrfs_item_key_to_cpu+0x15/0x31 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa048b46a>] ? btrfs_get_token_64+0x7e/0xcd [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa04a3467>] ? btrfs_tree_read_unlock_blocking+0xb2/0xb7 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa049907d>] btrfs_balance+0x9c7/0xb6f [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa049ef84>] btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x234/0x2ac [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa04a1e8e>] btrfs_ioctl+0xd87/0x1ef9 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffff81122f53>] ? path_openat+0x234/0x4db
 [<ffffffff813c3b78>] ? __do_page_fault+0x31d/0x391
 [<ffffffff810f8ab6>] ? vma_link+0x74/0x94
 [<ffffffff811250f5>] vfs_ioctl+0x1d/0x39
 [<ffffffff811258c8>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x32d/0x3e2
 [<ffffffff811259d4>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x83
 [<ffffffff813c3bfa>] ? do_page_fault+0xe/0x10
 [<ffffffff813c73c2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b

It is because we returned the error number if the reference of the root was 0
when doing space relocation. It was not right here, because though the root
was dead(refs == 0), but the space it held still need be relocated, or we
could not remove the block group. So in this case, we should return the root
no matter it is dead or not.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Btrfs: insert orphan roots into fs radix tree 2013-10-11T01:30:53+00:00 Miao Xie miaox@cn.fujitsu.com 2013-09-25T13:47:43+00:00 14927d95464956ffe8af4278331a6bfea94ab780 Now we don't drop all the deleted snapshots/subvolumes before the space balance. It means we have to relocate the space which is held by the dead snapshots/subvolumes. So we must into them into fs radix tree, or we would forget to commit the change of them when doing transaction commit, and it would corrupt the metadata. Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com> 
Now we don't drop all the deleted snapshots/subvolumes before the space
balance. It means we have to relocate the space which is held by the dead
snapshots/subvolumes. So we must into them into fs radix tree, or we would
forget to commit the change of them when doing transaction commit, and it
would corrupt the metadata.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Btrfs: limit delalloc pages outside of find_delalloc_range 2013-10-11T01:27:56+00:00 Josef Bacik jbacik@fusionio.com 2013-10-08T02:11:09+00:00 7bf811a595a895b7a886dcf218d0d34f97df76dc Liu fixed part of this problem and unfortunately I steered him in slightly the wrong direction and so didn't completely fix the problem. The problem is we limit the size of the delalloc range we are looking for to max bytes and then we try to lock that range. If we fail to lock the pages in that range we will shrink the max bytes to a single page and re loop. However if our first page is inside of the delalloc range then we will end up limiting the end of the range to a period before our first page. This is illustrated below [0 -------- delalloc range --------- 256mb] [page] So find_delalloc_range will return with delalloc_start as 0 and end as 128mb, and then we will notice that delalloc_start < *start and adjust it up, but not adjust delalloc_end up, so things go sideways. To fix this we need to not limit the max bytes in find_delalloc_range, but in find_lock_delalloc_range and that way we don't end up with this confusion. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com> 
Liu fixed part of this problem and unfortunately I steered him in slightly the
wrong direction and so didn't completely fix the problem.  The problem is we
limit the size of the delalloc range we are looking for to max bytes and then we
try to lock that range.  If we fail to lock the pages in that range we will
shrink the max bytes to a single page and re loop.  However if our first page is
inside of the delalloc range then we will end up limiting the end of the range
to a period before our first page.  This is illustrated below

[0 -------- delalloc range --------- 256mb]
                                  [page]

So find_delalloc_range will return with delalloc_start as 0 and end as 128mb,
and then we will notice that delalloc_start < *start and adjust it up, but not
adjust delalloc_end up, so things go sideways.  To fix this we need to not limit
the max bytes in find_delalloc_range, but in find_lock_delalloc_range and that
way we don't end up with this confusion.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Btrfs: use right root when checking for hash collision 2013-10-11T01:27:45+00:00 Josef Bacik jbacik@fusionio.com 2013-10-09T16:24:04+00:00 4871c1588f92c6c13f4713a7009f25f217055807 btrfs_rename was using the root of the old dir instead of the root of the new dir when checking for a hash collision, so if you tried to move a file into a subvol it would freak out because it would see the file you are trying to move in its current root. This fixes the bug where this would fail btrfs subvol create test1 btrfs subvol create test2 mv test1 test2. Thanks to Chris Murphy for catching this, Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reported-by: Chris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com> 
btrfs_rename was using the root of the old dir instead of the root of the new
dir when checking for a hash collision, so if you tried to move a file into a
subvol it would freak out because it would see the file you are trying to move
in its current root.  This fixes the bug where this would fail

btrfs subvol create test1
btrfs subvol create test2
mv test1 test2.

Thanks to Chris Murphy for catching this,

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: Chris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
btrfs: Fix crash due to not allocating integrity data for a bioset 2013-10-05T14:52:10+00:00 Darrick J. Wong darrick.wong@oracle.com 2013-09-20T03:37:07+00:00 b208c2f7ceafacbc44f13d1b5a9fbada98226183 When btrfs creates a bioset, we must also allocate the integrity data pool. Otherwise btrfs will crash when it tries to submit a bio to a checksumming disk: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000018 IP: [<ffffffff8111e28a>] mempool_alloc+0x4a/0x150 PGD 2305e4067 PUD 23063d067 PMD 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP Modules linked in: btrfs scsi_debug xfs ext4 jbd2 ext3 jbd mbcache sch_fq_codel eeprom lpc_ich mfd_core nfsd exportfs auth_rpcgss af_packet raid6_pq xor zlib_deflate libcrc32c [last unloaded: scsi_debug] CPU: 1 PID: 4486 Comm: mount Not tainted 3.12.0-rc1-mcsum #2 Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 task: ffff8802451c9720 ti: ffff880230698000 task.ti: ffff880230698000 RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8111e28a>] [<ffffffff8111e28a>] mempool_alloc+0x4a/0x150 RSP: 0018:ffff880230699688 EFLAGS: 00010286 RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00000000005f8445 RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000010 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: ffff8802306996f8 R08: 0000000000011200 R09: 0000000000000008 R10: 0000000000000020 R11: ffff88009d6e8000 R12: 0000000000011210 R13: 0000000000000030 R14: ffff8802306996b8 R15: ffff8802451c9720 FS: 00007f25b8a16800(0000) GS:ffff88024fc80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b CR2: 0000000000000018 CR3: 0000000230576000 CR4: 00000000000007e0 Stack: ffff8802451c9720 0000000000000002 ffffffff81a97100 0000000000281250 ffffffff81a96480 ffff88024fc99150 ffff880228d18200 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000040 ffff880230e8c2e8 ffff8802459dc900 Call Trace: [<ffffffff811b2208>] bio_integrity_alloc+0x48/0x1b0 [<ffffffff811b26fc>] bio_integrity_prep+0xac/0x360 [<ffffffff8111e298>] ? mempool_alloc+0x58/0x150 [<ffffffffa03e8041>] ? alloc_extent_state+0x31/0x110 [btrfs] [<ffffffff81241579>] blk_queue_bio+0x1c9/0x460 [<ffffffff8123e58a>] generic_make_request+0xca/0x100 [<ffffffff8123e639>] submit_bio+0x79/0x160 [<ffffffffa03f865e>] btrfs_map_bio+0x48e/0x5b0 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa03c821a>] btree_submit_bio_hook+0xda/0x110 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa03e7eba>] submit_one_bio+0x6a/0xa0 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa03ef450>] read_extent_buffer_pages+0x250/0x310 [btrfs] [<ffffffff8125eef6>] ? __radix_tree_preload+0x66/0xf0 [<ffffffff8125f1c5>] ? radix_tree_insert+0x95/0x260 [<ffffffffa03c66f6>] btree_read_extent_buffer_pages.constprop.128+0xb6/0x120 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa03c8c1a>] read_tree_block+0x3a/0x60 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa03caefd>] open_ctree+0x139d/0x2030 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa03a282a>] btrfs_mount+0x53a/0x7d0 [btrfs] [<ffffffff8113ab0b>] ? pcpu_alloc+0x8eb/0x9f0 [<ffffffff81167305>] ? __kmalloc_track_caller+0x35/0x1e0 [<ffffffff81176ba0>] mount_fs+0x20/0xd0 [<ffffffff81191096>] vfs_kern_mount+0x76/0x120 [<ffffffff81193320>] do_mount+0x200/0xa40 [<ffffffff81135cdb>] ? strndup_user+0x5b/0x80 [<ffffffff81193bf0>] SyS_mount+0x90/0xe0 [<ffffffff8156d31d>] system_call_fastpath+0x1a/0x1f Code: 4c 8d 75 a8 4c 89 6d e8 45 89 e0 4c 8d 6f 30 48 89 5d d8 41 83 e0 af 48 89 fb 49 83 c6 18 4c 89 7d f8 65 4c 8b 3c 25 c0 b8 00 00 <48> 8b 73 18 44 89 c7 44 89 45 98 ff 53 20 48 85 c0 48 89 c2 74 RIP [<ffffffff8111e28a>] mempool_alloc+0x4a/0x150 RSP <ffff880230699688> CR2: 0000000000000018 ---[ end trace 7a96042017ed21e2 ]--- Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com> 
When btrfs creates a bioset, we must also allocate the integrity data pool.
Otherwise btrfs will crash when it tries to submit a bio to a checksumming
disk:

 BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000018
 IP: [<ffffffff8111e28a>] mempool_alloc+0x4a/0x150
 PGD 2305e4067 PUD 23063d067 PMD 0
 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
 Modules linked in: btrfs scsi_debug xfs ext4 jbd2 ext3 jbd mbcache
sch_fq_codel eeprom lpc_ich mfd_core nfsd exportfs auth_rpcgss af_packet
raid6_pq xor zlib_deflate libcrc32c [last unloaded: scsi_debug]
 CPU: 1 PID: 4486 Comm: mount Not tainted 3.12.0-rc1-mcsum #2
 Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
 task: ffff8802451c9720 ti: ffff880230698000 task.ti: ffff880230698000
 RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8111e28a>]  [<ffffffff8111e28a>] mempool_alloc+0x4a/0x150
 RSP: 0018:ffff880230699688  EFLAGS: 00010286
 RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00000000005f8445
 RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000010 RDI: 0000000000000000
 RBP: ffff8802306996f8 R08: 0000000000011200 R09: 0000000000000008
 R10: 0000000000000020 R11: ffff88009d6e8000 R12: 0000000000011210
 R13: 0000000000000030 R14: ffff8802306996b8 R15: ffff8802451c9720
 FS:  00007f25b8a16800(0000) GS:ffff88024fc80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
 CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
 CR2: 0000000000000018 CR3: 0000000230576000 CR4: 00000000000007e0
 Stack:
  ffff8802451c9720 0000000000000002 ffffffff81a97100 0000000000281250
  ffffffff81a96480 ffff88024fc99150 ffff880228d18200 0000000000000000
  0000000000000000 0000000000000040 ffff880230e8c2e8 ffff8802459dc900
 Call Trace:
  [<ffffffff811b2208>] bio_integrity_alloc+0x48/0x1b0
  [<ffffffff811b26fc>] bio_integrity_prep+0xac/0x360
  [<ffffffff8111e298>] ? mempool_alloc+0x58/0x150
  [<ffffffffa03e8041>] ? alloc_extent_state+0x31/0x110 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffff81241579>] blk_queue_bio+0x1c9/0x460
  [<ffffffff8123e58a>] generic_make_request+0xca/0x100
  [<ffffffff8123e639>] submit_bio+0x79/0x160
  [<ffffffffa03f865e>] btrfs_map_bio+0x48e/0x5b0 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffffa03c821a>] btree_submit_bio_hook+0xda/0x110 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffffa03e7eba>] submit_one_bio+0x6a/0xa0 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffffa03ef450>] read_extent_buffer_pages+0x250/0x310 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffff8125eef6>] ? __radix_tree_preload+0x66/0xf0
  [<ffffffff8125f1c5>] ? radix_tree_insert+0x95/0x260
  [<ffffffffa03c66f6>] btree_read_extent_buffer_pages.constprop.128+0xb6/0x120
[btrfs]
  [<ffffffffa03c8c1a>] read_tree_block+0x3a/0x60 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffffa03caefd>] open_ctree+0x139d/0x2030 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffffa03a282a>] btrfs_mount+0x53a/0x7d0 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffff8113ab0b>] ? pcpu_alloc+0x8eb/0x9f0
  [<ffffffff81167305>] ? __kmalloc_track_caller+0x35/0x1e0
  [<ffffffff81176ba0>] mount_fs+0x20/0xd0
  [<ffffffff81191096>] vfs_kern_mount+0x76/0x120
  [<ffffffff81193320>] do_mount+0x200/0xa40
  [<ffffffff81135cdb>] ? strndup_user+0x5b/0x80
  [<ffffffff81193bf0>] SyS_mount+0x90/0xe0
  [<ffffffff8156d31d>] system_call_fastpath+0x1a/0x1f
 Code: 4c 8d 75 a8 4c 89 6d e8 45 89 e0 4c 8d 6f 30 48 89 5d d8 41 83 e0 af 48
89 fb 49 83 c6 18 4c 89 7d f8 65 4c 8b 3c 25 c0 b8 00 00 <48> 8b 73 18 44 89 c7
44 89 45 98 ff 53 20 48 85 c0 48 89 c2 74
 RIP  [<ffffffff8111e28a>] mempool_alloc+0x4a/0x150
  RSP <ffff880230699688>
 CR2: 0000000000000018
 ---[ end trace 7a96042017ed21e2 ]---

Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Merge branch 'for-linus' into for-linus-3.12 2013-10-05T14:51:32+00:00 Chris Mason chris.mason@fusionio.com 2013-10-05T14:51:32+00:00 1329dfc8bb8932976844438cd5e757c720d6f1ff 






Btrfs: fix a use-after-free bug in btrfs_dev_replace_finishing
2013-10-04T20:02:14+00:00

Ilya Dryomov
idryomov@gmail.com

2013-10-02T17:41:01+00:00

1357272fc7deeebb7b3c5d1a071562edc273cdaf

free_device rcu callback, scheduled from btrfs_rm_dev_replace_srcdev,
can be processed before btrfs_scratch_superblock is called, which would
result in a use-after-free on btrfs_device contents.  Fix this by
zeroing the superblock before the rcu callback is registered.

Cc: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>





free_device rcu callback, scheduled from btrfs_rm_dev_replace_srcdev,
can be processed before btrfs_scratch_superblock is called, which would
result in a use-after-free on btrfs_device contents.  Fix this by
zeroing the superblock before the rcu callback is registered.

Cc: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>