linux-stable.git/fs/btrfs/relocation.c, branch linux-4.9.y Linux kernel stable tree btrfs: convert logic BUG_ON()'s in replace_path to ASSERT()'s 2021-05-22T08:40:17+00:00 Josef Bacik josef@toxicpanda.com 2021-03-12T20:25:21+00:00 35721513d35c7cc1f3dcc42d67263d84670001ea [ Upstream commit 7a9213a93546e7eaef90e6e153af6b8fc7553f10 ] A few BUG_ON()'s in replace_path are purely to keep us from making logical mistakes, so replace them with ASSERT()'s. Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 7a9213a93546e7eaef90e6e153af6b8fc7553f10 ]

A few BUG_ON()'s in replace_path are purely to keep us from making
logical mistakes, so replace them with ASSERT()'s.

Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
btrfs: fix reloc root leak with 0 ref reloc roots on recovery 2021-03-03T16:44:42+00:00 Josef Bacik josef@toxicpanda.com 2021-01-14T19:02:42+00:00 fb0f1f49386e53f9b08c2f331201bdabc3907fc7 commit c78a10aebb275c38d0cfccae129a803fe622e305 upstream. When recovering a relocation, if we run into a reloc root that has 0 refs we simply add it to the reloc_control->reloc_roots list, and then clean it up later. The problem with this is __del_reloc_root() doesn't do anything if the root isn't in the radix tree, which in this case it won't be because we never call __add_reloc_root() on the reloc_root. This exit condition simply isn't correct really. During normal operation we can remove ourselves from the rb tree and then we're meant to clean up later at merge_reloc_roots() time, and this happens correctly. During recovery we're depending on free_reloc_roots() to drop our references, but we're short-circuiting. Fix this by continuing to check if we're on the list and dropping ourselves from the reloc_control root list and dropping our reference appropriately. Change the corresponding BUG_ON() to an ASSERT() that does the correct thing if we aren't in the rb tree. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit c78a10aebb275c38d0cfccae129a803fe622e305 upstream.

When recovering a relocation, if we run into a reloc root that has 0
refs we simply add it to the reloc_control->reloc_roots list, and then
clean it up later.  The problem with this is __del_reloc_root() doesn't
do anything if the root isn't in the radix tree, which in this case it
won't be because we never call __add_reloc_root() on the reloc_root.

This exit condition simply isn't correct really.  During normal
operation we can remove ourselves from the rb tree and then we're meant
to clean up later at merge_reloc_roots() time, and this happens
correctly.  During recovery we're depending on free_reloc_roots() to
drop our references, but we're short-circuiting.

Fix this by continuing to check if we're on the list and dropping
ourselves from the reloc_control root list and dropping our reference
appropriately.  Change the corresponding BUG_ON() to an ASSERT() that
does the correct thing if we aren't in the rb tree.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
btrfs: check commit root generation in should_ignore_root 2020-04-24T05:59:04+00:00 Josef Bacik josef@toxicpanda.com 2020-04-02T19:51:18+00:00 32bb4ca97b2cd22117367b4d620ca02b21defb60 commit 4d4225fc228e46948486d8b8207955f0c031b92e upstream. Previously we would set the reloc root's last snapshot to transid - 1. However there was a problem with doing this, and we changed it to setting the last snapshot to the generation of the commit node of the fs root. This however broke should_ignore_root(). The assumption is that if we are in a generation newer than when the reloc root was created, then we would find the reloc root through normal backref lookups, and thus can ignore any fs roots we find with an old enough reloc root. Now that the last snapshot could be considerably further in the past than before, we'd end up incorrectly ignoring an fs root. Thus we'd find no nodes for the bytenr we were searching for, and we'd fail to relocate anything. We'd loop through the relocate code again and see that there were still used space in that block group, attempt to relocate those bytenr's again, fail in the same way, and just loop like this forever. This is tricky in that we have to not modify the fs root at all during this time, so we need to have a block group that has data in this fs root that is not shared by any other root, which is why this has been difficult to reproduce. Fixes: 054570a1dc94 ("Btrfs: fix relocation incorrectly dropping data references") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.9+ Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 4d4225fc228e46948486d8b8207955f0c031b92e upstream.

Previously we would set the reloc root's last snapshot to transid - 1.
However there was a problem with doing this, and we changed it to
setting the last snapshot to the generation of the commit node of the fs
root.

This however broke should_ignore_root().  The assumption is that if we
are in a generation newer than when the reloc root was created, then we
would find the reloc root through normal backref lookups, and thus can
ignore any fs roots we find with an old enough reloc root.

Now that the last snapshot could be considerably further in the past
than before, we'd end up incorrectly ignoring an fs root.  Thus we'd
find no nodes for the bytenr we were searching for, and we'd fail to
relocate anything.  We'd loop through the relocate code again and see
that there were still used space in that block group, attempt to
relocate those bytenr's again, fail in the same way, and just loop like
this forever.  This is tricky in that we have to not modify the fs root
at all during this time, so we need to have a block group that has data
in this fs root that is not shared by any other root, which is why this
has been difficult to reproduce.

Fixes: 054570a1dc94 ("Btrfs: fix relocation incorrectly dropping data references")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.9+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
btrfs: drop block from cache on error in relocation 2020-04-24T05:58:56+00:00 Josef Bacik josef@toxicpanda.com 2020-03-04T16:18:23+00:00 c7b7daf956babcde75c4fddd99244d20f25ddedc commit 8e19c9732ad1d127b5575a10f4fbcacf740500ff upstream. If we have an error while building the backref tree in relocation we'll process all the pending edges and then free the node. However if we integrated some edges into the cache we'll lose our link to those edges by simply freeing this node, which means we'll leak memory and references to any roots that we've found. Instead we need to use remove_backref_node(), which walks through all of the edges that are still linked to this node and free's them up and drops any root references we may be holding. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.9+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 8e19c9732ad1d127b5575a10f4fbcacf740500ff upstream.

If we have an error while building the backref tree in relocation we'll
process all the pending edges and then free the node.  However if we
integrated some edges into the cache we'll lose our link to those edges
by simply freeing this node, which means we'll leak memory and
references to any roots that we've found.

Instead we need to use remove_backref_node(), which walks through all of
the edges that are still linked to this node and free's them up and
drops any root references we may be holding.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.9+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
btrfs: track reloc roots based on their commit root bytenr 2020-04-24T05:58:49+00:00 Josef Bacik josef@toxicpanda.com 2020-03-13T21:17:08+00:00 ce216cff2d58b1fce51bb47b9a66666b8c21ed47 [ Upstream commit ea287ab157c2816bf12aad4cece41372f9d146b4 ] We always search the commit root of the extent tree for looking up back references, however we track the reloc roots based on their current bytenr. This is wrong, if we commit the transaction between relocating tree blocks we could end up in this code in build_backref_tree if (key.objectid == key.offset) { /* * Only root blocks of reloc trees use backref * pointing to itself. */ root = find_reloc_root(rc, cur->bytenr); ASSERT(root); cur->root = root; break; } find_reloc_root() is looking based on the bytenr we had in the commit root, but if we've COWed this reloc root we will not find that bytenr, and we will trip over the ASSERT(root). Fix this by using the commit_root->start bytenr for indexing the commit root. Then we change the __update_reloc_root() caller to be used when we switch the commit root for the reloc root during commit. This fixes the panic I was seeing when we started throttling relocation for delayed refs. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit ea287ab157c2816bf12aad4cece41372f9d146b4 ]

We always search the commit root of the extent tree for looking up back
references, however we track the reloc roots based on their current
bytenr.

This is wrong, if we commit the transaction between relocating tree
blocks we could end up in this code in build_backref_tree

  if (key.objectid == key.offset) {
	  /*
	   * Only root blocks of reloc trees use backref
	   * pointing to itself.
	   */
	  root = find_reloc_root(rc, cur->bytenr);
	  ASSERT(root);
	  cur->root = root;
	  break;
  }

find_reloc_root() is looking based on the bytenr we had in the commit
root, but if we've COWed this reloc root we will not find that bytenr,
and we will trip over the ASSERT(root).

Fix this by using the commit_root->start bytenr for indexing the commit
root.  Then we change the __update_reloc_root() caller to be used when
we switch the commit root for the reloc root during commit.

This fixes the panic I was seeing when we started throttling relocation
for delayed refs.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
btrfs: remove a BUG_ON() from merge_reloc_roots() 2020-04-24T05:58:49+00:00 Josef Bacik josef@toxicpanda.com 2020-03-04T16:18:30+00:00 daa2bddfcffacedf995c846427c88209e6f99023 [ Upstream commit 7b7b74315b24dc064bc1c683659061c3d48f8668 ] This was pretty subtle, we default to reloc roots having 0 root refs, so if we crash in the middle of the relocation they can just be deleted. If we successfully complete the relocation operations we'll set our root refs to 1 in prepare_to_merge() and then go on to merge_reloc_roots(). At prepare_to_merge() time if any of the reloc roots have a 0 reference still, we will remove that reloc root from our reloc root rb tree, and then clean it up later. However this only happens if we successfully start a transaction. If we've aborted previously we will skip this step completely, and only have reloc roots with a reference count of 0, but were never properly removed from the reloc control's rb tree. This isn't a problem per-se, our references are held by the list the reloc roots are on, and by the original root the reloc root belongs to. If we end up in this situation all the reloc roots will be added to the dirty_reloc_list, and then properly dropped at that point. The reloc control will be free'd and the rb tree is no longer used. There were two options when fixing this, one was to remove the BUG_ON(), the other was to make prepare_to_merge() handle the case where we couldn't start a trans handle. IMO this is the cleaner solution. I started with handling the error in prepare_to_merge(), but it turned out super ugly. And in the end this BUG_ON() simply doesn't matter, the cleanup was happening properly, we were just panicing because this BUG_ON() only matters in the success case. So I've opted to just remove it and add a comment where it was. Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 7b7b74315b24dc064bc1c683659061c3d48f8668 ]

This was pretty subtle, we default to reloc roots having 0 root refs, so
if we crash in the middle of the relocation they can just be deleted.
If we successfully complete the relocation operations we'll set our root
refs to 1 in prepare_to_merge() and then go on to merge_reloc_roots().

At prepare_to_merge() time if any of the reloc roots have a 0 reference
still, we will remove that reloc root from our reloc root rb tree, and
then clean it up later.

However this only happens if we successfully start a transaction.  If
we've aborted previously we will skip this step completely, and only
have reloc roots with a reference count of 0, but were never properly
removed from the reloc control's rb tree.

This isn't a problem per-se, our references are held by the list the
reloc roots are on, and by the original root the reloc root belongs to.
If we end up in this situation all the reloc roots will be added to the
dirty_reloc_list, and then properly dropped at that point.  The reloc
control will be free'd and the rb tree is no longer used.

There were two options when fixing this, one was to remove the BUG_ON(),
the other was to make prepare_to_merge() handle the case where we
couldn't start a trans handle.

IMO this is the cleaner solution.  I started with handling the error in
prepare_to_merge(), but it turned out super ugly.  And in the end this
BUG_ON() simply doesn't matter, the cleanup was happening properly, we
were just panicing because this BUG_ON() only matters in the success
case.  So I've opted to just remove it and add a comment where it was.

Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
btrfs: do not leak reloc root if we fail to read the fs root 2020-01-04T12:38:56+00:00 Josef Bacik josef@toxicpanda.com 2019-12-06T14:37:18+00:00 96657a555855ccbb1aa3b0aaee0647ea31c5dab2 commit ca1aa2818a53875cfdd175fb5e9a2984e997cce9 upstream. If we fail to read the fs root corresponding with a reloc root we'll just break out and free the reloc roots. But we remove our current reloc_root from this list higher up, which means we'll leak this reloc_root. Fix this by adding ourselves back to the reloc_roots list so we are properly cleaned up. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit ca1aa2818a53875cfdd175fb5e9a2984e997cce9 upstream.

If we fail to read the fs root corresponding with a reloc root we'll
just break out and free the reloc roots.  But we remove our current
reloc_root from this list higher up, which means we'll leak this
reloc_root.  Fix this by adding ourselves back to the reloc_roots list
so we are properly cleaned up.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
btrfs: Handle owner mismatch gracefully when walking up tree 2018-11-13T19:17:04+00:00 Qu Wenruo wqu@suse.com 2018-08-21T01:42:03+00:00 20d8180c6053e9cd122ae248b65a1c1cf0639fba commit 65c6e82becec33731f48786e5a30f98662c86b16 upstream. [BUG] When mounting certain crafted image, btrfs will trigger kernel BUG_ON() when trying to recover balance: kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:8956! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI CPU: 1 PID: 662 Comm: mount Not tainted 4.18.0-rc1-custom+ #10 RIP: 0010:walk_up_proc+0x336/0x480 [btrfs] RSP: 0018:ffffb53540c9b890 EFLAGS: 00010202 Call Trace: walk_up_tree+0x172/0x1f0 [btrfs] btrfs_drop_snapshot+0x3a4/0x830 [btrfs] merge_reloc_roots+0xe1/0x1d0 [btrfs] btrfs_recover_relocation+0x3ea/0x420 [btrfs] open_ctree+0x1af3/0x1dd0 [btrfs] btrfs_mount_root+0x66b/0x740 [btrfs] mount_fs+0x3b/0x16a vfs_kern_mount.part.9+0x54/0x140 btrfs_mount+0x16d/0x890 [btrfs] mount_fs+0x3b/0x16a vfs_kern_mount.part.9+0x54/0x140 do_mount+0x1fd/0xda0 ksys_mount+0xba/0xd0 __x64_sys_mount+0x21/0x30 do_syscall_64+0x60/0x210 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [CAUSE] Extent tree corruption. In this particular case, reloc tree root's owner is DATA_RELOC_TREE (should be TREE_RELOC), thus its backref is corrupted and we failed the owner check in walk_up_tree(). [FIX] It's pretty hard to take care of every extent tree corruption, but at least we can remove such BUG_ON() and exit more gracefully. And since in this particular image, DATA_RELOC_TREE and TREE_RELOC share the same root (which is obviously invalid), we needs to make __del_reloc_root() more robust to detect such invalid sharing to avoid possible NULL dereference as root->node can be NULL in this case. Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200411 Reported-by: Xu Wen <wen.xu@gatech.edu> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 65c6e82becec33731f48786e5a30f98662c86b16 upstream.

[BUG]
When mounting certain crafted image, btrfs will trigger kernel BUG_ON()
when trying to recover balance:

  kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:8956!
  invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
  CPU: 1 PID: 662 Comm: mount Not tainted 4.18.0-rc1-custom+ #10
  RIP: 0010:walk_up_proc+0x336/0x480 [btrfs]
  RSP: 0018:ffffb53540c9b890 EFLAGS: 00010202
  Call Trace:
   walk_up_tree+0x172/0x1f0 [btrfs]
   btrfs_drop_snapshot+0x3a4/0x830 [btrfs]
   merge_reloc_roots+0xe1/0x1d0 [btrfs]
   btrfs_recover_relocation+0x3ea/0x420 [btrfs]
   open_ctree+0x1af3/0x1dd0 [btrfs]
   btrfs_mount_root+0x66b/0x740 [btrfs]
   mount_fs+0x3b/0x16a
   vfs_kern_mount.part.9+0x54/0x140
   btrfs_mount+0x16d/0x890 [btrfs]
   mount_fs+0x3b/0x16a
   vfs_kern_mount.part.9+0x54/0x140
   do_mount+0x1fd/0xda0
   ksys_mount+0xba/0xd0
   __x64_sys_mount+0x21/0x30
   do_syscall_64+0x60/0x210
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe

[CAUSE]
Extent tree corruption.  In this particular case, reloc tree root's
owner is DATA_RELOC_TREE (should be TREE_RELOC), thus its backref is
corrupted and we failed the owner check in walk_up_tree().

[FIX]
It's pretty hard to take care of every extent tree corruption, but at
least we can remove such BUG_ON() and exit more gracefully.

And since in this particular image, DATA_RELOC_TREE and TREE_RELOC share
the same root (which is obviously invalid), we needs to make
__del_reloc_root() more robust to detect such invalid sharing to avoid
possible NULL dereference as root->node can be NULL in this case.

Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200411
Reported-by: Xu Wen <wen.xu@gatech.edu>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
btrfs: relocation: Only remove reloc rb_trees if reloc control has been initialized 2018-09-15T07:43:00+00:00 Qu Wenruo wqu@suse.com 2018-07-03T09:10:07+00:00 93d960de56cef4582088dfc0ba9494143351772f [ Upstream commit 389305b2aa68723c754f88d9dbd268a400e10664 ] Invalid reloc tree can cause kernel NULL pointer dereference when btrfs does some cleanup of the reloc roots. It turns out that fs_info::reloc_ctl can be NULL in btrfs_recover_relocation() as we allocate relocation control after all reloc roots have been verified. So when we hit: note, we haven't called set_reloc_control() thus fs_info::reloc_ctl is still NULL. Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199833 Reported-by: Xu Wen <wen.xu@gatech.edu> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Tested-by: Gu Jinxiang <gujx@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
[ Upstream commit 389305b2aa68723c754f88d9dbd268a400e10664 ]

Invalid reloc tree can cause kernel NULL pointer dereference when btrfs
does some cleanup of the reloc roots.

It turns out that fs_info::reloc_ctl can be NULL in
btrfs_recover_relocation() as we allocate relocation control after all
reloc roots have been verified.
So when we hit: note, we haven't called set_reloc_control() thus
fs_info::reloc_ctl is still NULL.

Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199833
Reported-by: Xu Wen <wen.xu@gatech.edu>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Tested-by: Gu Jinxiang <gujx@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
btrfs: fix NULL pointer dereference from free_reloc_roots() 2017-10-05T07:44:03+00:00 Naohiro Aota naohiro.aota@wdc.com 2017-08-25T05:15:14+00:00 b86b6c226beafc28d5935ebb99590348cb48b633 commit bb166d7207432d3c7d10c45dc052f12ba3a2121d upstream. __del_reloc_root should be called before freeing up reloc_root->node. If not, calling __del_reloc_root() dereference reloc_root->node, causing the system BUG. Fixes: 6bdf131fac23 ("Btrfs: don't leak reloc root nodes on error") Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit bb166d7207432d3c7d10c45dc052f12ba3a2121d upstream.

__del_reloc_root should be called before freeing up reloc_root->node.
If not, calling __del_reloc_root() dereference reloc_root->node, causing
the system BUG.

Fixes: 6bdf131fac23 ("Btrfs: don't leak reloc root nodes on error")
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>