For some reason the vfio_mdev shim mdev_driver has its own module and
kconfig. As the next patch requires access to it from mdev.ko merge the
two modules together and remove VFIO_MDEV_DEVICE.

A later patch deletes this driver entirely.

Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210617142218.1877096-7-hch@lst.de
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>

Remove code duplication and move module refcounting to the subsystem
module.

Signed-off-by: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210518192133.59195-2-mgurtovoy@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>

mdev_device->type->parent is the same thing.

The struct mdev_device was relying on the kref on the mdev_parent to also
indirectly hold a kref on the mdev_type pointer. Now that the type holds a
kref on the parent we can directly kref the mdev_type and remove this
implicit relationship.

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Message-Id: <10-v2-d36939638fc6+d54-vfio2_jgg@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>

This is only done once, we don't need to generate code to initialize a
structure stored in the ELF .data segment. Fill in the three required
.driver members directly instead of copying data into them during
mdev_register_driver().

Further the to_mdev_driver() function doesn't belong in a public header,
just inline it into the two places that need it. Finally, we can now
clearly see that 'drv' derived from dev->driver cannot be NULL, firstly
because the driver core forbids it, and secondly because NULL won't pass
through the container_of(). Remove the dead code.

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Message-Id: <4-v2-d36939638fc6+d54-vfio2_jgg@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>

The mdev API should accept and pass a 'struct mdev_device *' in all
places, not pass a 'struct device *' and cast it internally with
to_mdev_device(). Particularly in its struct mdev_driver functions, the
whole point of a bus's struct device_driver wrapper is to provide type
safety compared to the default struct device_driver.

Further, the driver core standard is for bus drivers to expose their
device structure in their public headers that can be used with
container_of() inlines and '&foo->dev' to go between the class levels, and
'&foo->dev' to be used with dev_err/etc driver core helper functions. Move
'struct mdev_device' to mdev.h

Once done this allows moving some one instruction exported functions to
static inlines, which in turns allows removing one of the two grotesque
symbol_get()'s related to mdev in the core code.

Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Message-Id: <3-v2-d36939638fc6+d54-vfio2_jgg@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>

There are no longer any users, so it can go away. Everything is using
container_of now.

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Message-Id: <14-v3-225de1400dfc+4e074-vfio1_jgg@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>

This is the standard kernel pattern, the ops associated with a struct get
the struct pointer in for typesafety. The expected design is to use
container_of to cleanly go from the subsystem level type to the driver
level type without having any type erasure in a void *.

Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Message-Id: <12-v3-225de1400dfc+4e074-vfio1_jgg@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>

mdev gets little benefit because it doesn't actually do anything, however
it is the last user, so move the vfio_init/register/unregister_group_dev()
code here for now.

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Message-Id: <10-v3-225de1400dfc+4e074-vfio1_jgg@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>

While performing some destructive tests with vfio-ccw, where the
paths to a device are forcible removed and thus the device itself
is unreachable, it is rather easy to end up in an endless loop in
vfio_del_group_dev() due to the lack of a request callback for the
associated device.

In this example, one MDEV (77c) is used by a guest, while another
(77b) is not. The symptom is that the iommu is detached from the
mdev for 77b, but not 77c, until that guest is shutdown:

    [  238.794867] vfio_ccw 0.0.077b: MDEV: Unregistering
    [  238.794996] vfio_mdev 11f2d2bc-4083-431d-a023-eff72715c4f0: Removing from iommu group 2
    [  238.795001] vfio_mdev 11f2d2bc-4083-431d-a023-eff72715c4f0: MDEV: detaching iommu
    [  238.795036] vfio_ccw 0.0.077c: MDEV: Unregistering
    ...silence...

Let's wire in the request call back to the mdev device, so that a
device being physically removed from the host can be (gracefully?)
handled by the parent device at the time the device is removed.

Add a message when registering the device if a driver doesn't
provide this callback, so a clue is given that this same loop
may be encountered in a similar situation, and a message when
this occurs instead of the awkward silence noted above.

Signed-off-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>