linux-stable.git/drivers/usb/storage, branch v5.3.17

USB: uas: heed CAPACITY_HEURISTICS

2019-12-17T19:06:49+00:00

commit 335cbbd5762d5e5c67a8ddd6e6362c2aa42a328f upstream.

There is no need to ignore this flag. We should be as close
to storage in that regard as makes sense, so honor flags whose
cost is tiny.

Signed-off-by: Oliver Neukum 
Cc: stable 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191114112758.32747-3-oneukum@suse.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

USB: uas: honor flag to avoid CAPACITY16

2019-12-17T19:06:48+00:00

commit bff000cae1eec750d62e265c4ba2db9af57b17e1 upstream.

Copy the support over from usb-storage to get feature parity

Signed-off-by: Oliver Neukum 
Cc: stable 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191114112758.32747-2-oneukum@suse.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

usb-storage: Revert commit 747668dbc061 ("usb-storage: Set virt_boundary_mask to avoid SG overflows")

2019-11-06T12:09:00+00:00

commit 9a976949613132977098fc49510b46fa8678d864 upstream.

Commit 747668dbc061 ("usb-storage: Set virt_boundary_mask to avoid SG
overflows") attempted to solve a problem involving scatter-gather I/O
and USB/IP by setting the virt_boundary_mask for mass-storage devices.

However, it now turns out that this interacts badly with commit
09324d32d2a0 ("block: force an unlimited segment size on queues with a
virt boundary"), which was added later.  A typical error message is:

	ehci-pci 0000:00:13.2: swiotlb buffer is full (sz: 327680 bytes),
	total 32768 (slots), used 97 (slots)

There is no longer any reason to keep the virt_boundary_mask setting
for usb-storage.  It was needed in the first place only for handling
devices with a block size smaller than the maxpacket size and where
the host controller was not capable of fully general scatter-gather
operation (that is, able to merge two SG segments into a single USB
packet).  But:

	High-speed or slower connections never use a bulk maxpacket
	value larger than 512;

	The SCSI layer does not handle block devices with a block size
	smaller than 512 bytes;

	All the host controllers capable of SuperSpeed operation can
	handle fully general SG;

	Since commit ea44d190764b ("usbip: Implement SG support to
	vhci-hcd and stub driver") was merged, the USB/IP driver can
	also handle SG.

Therefore all supported device/controller combinations should be okay
with no need for any special virt_boundary_mask.  So in order to fix
the swiotlb problem, this patch reverts commit 747668dbc061.

Reported-and-tested-by: Piergiorgio Sartor 
Link: https://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=157134199501202&w=2
Signed-off-by: Alan Stern 
CC: Seth Bollinger 
CC: 
Fixes: 747668dbc061 ("usb-storage: Set virt_boundary_mask to avoid SG overflows")
Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1910211145520.1673-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

UAS: Revert commit 3ae62a42090f ("UAS: fix alignment of scatter/gather segments")

2019-11-06T12:08:58+00:00

commit 1186f86a71130a7635a20843e355bb880c7349b2 upstream.

Commit 3ae62a42090f ("UAS: fix alignment of scatter/gather segments"),
copying a similar commit for usb-storage, attempted to solve a problem
involving scatter-gather I/O and USB/IP by setting the
virt_boundary_mask for mass-storage devices.

However, it now turns out that the analogous change in usb-storage
interacted badly with commit 09324d32d2a0 ("block: force an unlimited
segment size on queues with a virt boundary"), which was added later.
A typical error message is:

	ehci-pci 0000:00:13.2: swiotlb buffer is full (sz: 327680 bytes),
	total 32768 (slots), used 97 (slots)

There is no longer any reason to keep the virt_boundary_mask setting
in the uas driver.  It was needed in the first place only for
handling devices with a block size smaller than the maxpacket size and
where the host controller was not capable of fully general
scatter-gather operation (that is, able to merge two SG segments into
a single USB packet).  But:

	High-speed or slower connections never use a bulk maxpacket
	value larger than 512;

	The SCSI layer does not handle block devices with a block size
	smaller than 512 bytes;

	All the host controllers capable of SuperSpeed operation can
	handle fully general SG;

	Since commit ea44d190764b ("usbip: Implement SG support to
	vhci-hcd and stub driver") was merged, the USB/IP driver can
	also handle SG.

Therefore all supported device/controller combinations should be okay
with no need for any special virt_boundary_mask.  So in order to head
off potential problems similar to those affecting usb-storage, this
patch reverts commit 3ae62a42090f.

Signed-off-by: Alan Stern 
CC: Oliver Neukum 
CC: 
Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig 
Fixes: 3ae62a42090f ("UAS: fix alignment of scatter/gather segments")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1910231132470.1878-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

USB: storage: ums-realtek: Whitelist auto-delink support

2019-08-28T20:48:37+00:00

Auto-delink requires writing special registers to ums-realtek devices.
Unconditionally enable auto-delink may break newer devices.

So only enable auto-delink by default for the original three IDs,
0x0138, 0x0158 and 0x0159.

Realtek is working on a patch to properly support auto-delink for other
IDs.

BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1838886
Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng 
Acked-by: Alan Stern 
Cc: stable 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190827173450.13572-2-kai.heng.feng@canonical.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

USB: storage: ums-realtek: Update module parameter description for auto_delink_en

2019-08-28T20:48:37+00:00

The option named "auto_delink_en" is a bit misleading, as setting it to
false doesn't really disable auto-delink but let auto-delink be firmware
controlled.

Update the description to reflect the real usage of this parameter.

Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng 
Cc: stable 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190827173450.13572-1-kai.heng.feng@canonical.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

usb-storage: Add new JMS567 revision to unusual_devs

2019-08-21T16:45:49+00:00

Revision 0x0117 suffers from an identical issue to earlier revisions,
therefore it should be added to the quirks list.

Signed-off-by: Henk van der Laan 
Cc: stable 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190816200847.21366-1-opensource@henkvdlaan.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

usb-storage: Add a limitation for blk_queue_max_hw_sectors()

2019-07-25T08:40:02+00:00

This patch fixes an issue that the following error happens on
swiotlb environment:

	xhci-hcd ee000000.usb: swiotlb buffer is full (sz: 524288 bytes), total 32768 (slots), used 1338 (slots)

On the kernel v5.1, block settings of a usb-storage with SuperSpeed
were the following so that the block layer will allocate buffers
up to 64 KiB, and then the issue didn't happen.

	max_segment_size = 65536
	max_hw_sectors_kb = 1024

After the commit 09324d32d2a0 ("block: force an unlimited segment
size on queues with a virt boundary") is applied, the block settings
are the following. So, the block layer will allocate buffers up to
1024 KiB, and then the issue happens:

	max_segment_size = 4294967295
	max_hw_sectors_kb = 1024

To fix the issue, the usb-storage driver checks the maximum size of
a mapping for the device and then adjusts the max_hw_sectors_kb
if required. After this patch is applied, the block settings will
be the following, and then the issue doesn't happen.

	max_segment_size = 4294967295
	max_hw_sectors_kb = 256

Fixes: 09324d32d2a0 ("block: force an unlimited segment size on queues with a virt boundary")
Cc: stable 
Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda 
Acked-by: Alan Stern 
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1563793105-20597-1-git-send-email-yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

usb: storage: scsiglue: Do not skip VPD if try_vpd_pages is set

2019-07-03T16:40:49+00:00

If BLIST_TRY_VPD_PAGES is set for a device, even for an USB, it should
be honored, so only set skip_vpd_pages is try_vpd_pages is not set.

Signed-off-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza 
Acked-by: Alan Stern 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

USB: usb-storage: Add new ID to ums-realtek

2019-06-05T09:52:42+00:00

There is one more Realtek card reader requires ums-realtek to work
correctly.

Add the device ID to support it.

Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng 
Cc: stable 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman