linux-stable.git/drivers/thermal, branch v3.18.136

thermal: hwmon: inline helpers when CONFIG_THERMAL_HWMON is not set

2019-02-20T09:09:04+00:00

commit 03334ba8b425b2ad275c8f390cf83c7b081c3095 upstream.

Avoid warnings like this:
thermal_hwmon.h:29:1: warning: ‘thermal_remove_hwmon_sysfs’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
 thermal_remove_hwmon_sysfs(struct thermal_zone_device *tz)

Fixes: 0dd88793aacd ("thermal: hwmon: move hwmon support to single file")
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven 
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

thermal: of-thermal: disable passive polling when thermal zone is disabled

2018-10-13T07:09:28+00:00

[ Upstream commit 152395fd03d4ce1e535a75cdbf58105e50587611 ]

When thermal zone is in passive mode, disabling its mode from
sysfs is NOT taking effect at all, it is still polling the
temperature of the disabled thermal zone and handling all thermal
trips, it makes user confused. The disabling operation should
disable the thermal zone behavior completely, for both active and
passive mode, this patch clears the passive_delay when thermal
zone is disabled and restores it when it is enabled.

Signed-off-by: Anson Huang 
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

thermal: imx: Fix race condition in imx_thermal_probe()

2018-04-24T07:29:27+00:00

commit cf1ba1d73a33944d8c1a75370a35434bf146b8a7 upstream.

When device boots with T > T_trip_1 and requests interrupt,
the race condition takes place. The interrupt comes before
THERMAL_DEVICE_ENABLED is set. This leads to an attempt to
reading sensor value from irq and disabling the sensor, based on
the data->mode field, which expected to be THERMAL_DEVICE_ENABLED,
but still stays as THERMAL_DEVICE_DISABLED. Afher this issue
sensor is never re-enabled, as the driver state is wrong.

Fix this problem by setting the 'data' members prior to
requesting the interrupts.

Fixes: 37713a1e8e4c ("thermal: imx: implement thermal alarm interrupt handling")
Cc: 
Signed-off-by: Mikhail Lappo 
Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam 
Reviewed-by: Philipp Zabel 
Acked-by: Dong Aisheng 
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

thermal/drivers/step_wise: Fix temperature regulation misbehavior

2017-12-20T09:01:33+00:00

[ Upstream commit 07209fcf33542c1ff1e29df2dbdf8f29cdaacb10 ]

There is a particular situation when the cooling device is cpufreq and the heat
dissipation is not efficient enough where the temperature increases little by
little until reaching the critical threshold and leading to a SoC reset.

The behavior is reproducible on a hikey6220 with bad heat dissipation (eg.
stacked with other boards).

Running a simple C program doing while(1); for each CPU of the SoC makes the
temperature to reach the passive regulation trip point and ends up to the
maximum allowed temperature followed by a reset.

This issue has been also reported by running the libhugetlbfs test suite.

What is observed is a ping pong between two cpu frequencies, 1.2GHz and 900MHz
while the temperature continues to grow.

It appears the step wise governor calls get_target_state() the first time with
the throttle set to true and the trend to 'raising'. The code selects logically
the next state, so the cpu frequency decreases from 1.2GHz to 900MHz, so far so
good. The temperature decreases immediately but still stays greater than the
trip point, then get_target_state() is called again, this time with the
throttle set to true *and* the trend to 'dropping'. From there the algorithm
assumes we have to step down the state and the cpu frequency jumps back to
1.2GHz. But the temperature is still higher than the trip point, so
get_target_state() is called with throttle=1 and trend='raising' again, we jump
to 900MHz, then get_target_state() is called with throttle=1 and
trend='dropping', we jump to 1.2GHz, etc ... but the temperature does not
stabilizes and continues to increase.

[  237.922654] thermal thermal_zone0: Trip0[type=1,temp=65000]:trend=1,throttle=1
[  237.922678] thermal thermal_zone0: Trip1[type=1,temp=75000]:trend=1,throttle=1
[  237.922690] thermal cooling_device0: cur_state=0
[  237.922701] thermal cooling_device0: old_target=0, target=1
[  238.026656] thermal thermal_zone0: Trip0[type=1,temp=65000]:trend=2,throttle=1
[  238.026680] thermal thermal_zone0: Trip1[type=1,temp=75000]:trend=2,throttle=1
[  238.026694] thermal cooling_device0: cur_state=1
[  238.026707] thermal cooling_device0: old_target=1, target=0
[  238.134647] thermal thermal_zone0: Trip0[type=1,temp=65000]:trend=1,throttle=1
[  238.134667] thermal thermal_zone0: Trip1[type=1,temp=75000]:trend=1,throttle=1
[  238.134679] thermal cooling_device0: cur_state=0
[  238.134690] thermal cooling_device0: old_target=0, target=1

In this situation the temperature continues to increase while the trend is
oscillating between 'dropping' and 'raising'. We need to keep the current state
untouched if the throttle is set, so the temperature can decrease or a higher
state could be selected, thus preventing this oscillation.

Keeping the next_target untouched when 'throttle' is true at 'dropping' time
fixes the issue.

The following traces show the governor does not change the next state if
trend==2 (dropping) and throttle==1.

[ 2306.127987] thermal thermal_zone0: Trip0[type=1,temp=65000]:trend=1,throttle=1
[ 2306.128009] thermal thermal_zone0: Trip1[type=1,temp=75000]:trend=1,throttle=1
[ 2306.128021] thermal cooling_device0: cur_state=0
[ 2306.128031] thermal cooling_device0: old_target=0, target=1
[ 2306.231991] thermal thermal_zone0: Trip0[type=1,temp=65000]:trend=2,throttle=1
[ 2306.232016] thermal thermal_zone0: Trip1[type=1,temp=75000]:trend=2,throttle=1
[ 2306.232030] thermal cooling_device0: cur_state=1
[ 2306.232042] thermal cooling_device0: old_target=1, target=1
[ 2306.335982] thermal thermal_zone0: Trip0[type=1,temp=65000]:trend=0,throttle=1
[ 2306.336006] thermal thermal_zone0: Trip1[type=1,temp=75000]:trend=0,throttle=1
[ 2306.336021] thermal cooling_device0: cur_state=1
[ 2306.336034] thermal cooling_device0: old_target=1, target=1
[ 2306.439984] thermal thermal_zone0: Trip0[type=1,temp=65000]:trend=2,throttle=1
[ 2306.440008] thermal thermal_zone0: Trip1[type=1,temp=75000]:trend=2,throttle=0
[ 2306.440022] thermal cooling_device0: cur_state=1
[ 2306.440034] thermal cooling_device0: old_target=1, target=0

[ ... ]

After a while, if the temperature continues to increase, the next state becomes
2 which is 720MHz on the hikey. That results in the temperature stabilizing
around the trip point.

[ 2455.831982] thermal thermal_zone0: Trip0[type=1,temp=65000]:trend=1,throttle=1
[ 2455.832006] thermal thermal_zone0: Trip1[type=1,temp=75000]:trend=1,throttle=0
[ 2455.832019] thermal cooling_device0: cur_state=1
[ 2455.832032] thermal cooling_device0: old_target=1, target=1
[ 2455.935985] thermal thermal_zone0: Trip0[type=1,temp=65000]:trend=0,throttle=1
[ 2455.936013] thermal thermal_zone0: Trip1[type=1,temp=75000]:trend=0,throttle=0
[ 2455.936027] thermal cooling_device0: cur_state=1
[ 2455.936040] thermal cooling_device0: old_target=1, target=1
[ 2456.043984] thermal thermal_zone0: Trip0[type=1,temp=65000]:trend=0,throttle=1
[ 2456.044009] thermal thermal_zone0: Trip1[type=1,temp=75000]:trend=0,throttle=0
[ 2456.044023] thermal cooling_device0: cur_state=1
[ 2456.044036] thermal cooling_device0: old_target=1, target=1
[ 2456.148001] thermal thermal_zone0: Trip0[type=1,temp=65000]:trend=1,throttle=1
[ 2456.148028] thermal thermal_zone0: Trip1[type=1,temp=75000]:trend=1,throttle=1
[ 2456.148042] thermal cooling_device0: cur_state=1
[ 2456.148055] thermal cooling_device0: old_target=1, target=2
[ 2456.252009] thermal thermal_zone0: Trip0[type=1,temp=65000]:trend=2,throttle=1
[ 2456.252041] thermal thermal_zone0: Trip1[type=1,temp=75000]:trend=2,throttle=0
[ 2456.252058] thermal cooling_device0: cur_state=2
[ 2456.252075] thermal cooling_device0: old_target=2, target=1

IOW, this change is needed to keep the state for a cooling device if the
temperature trend is oscillating while the temperature increases slightly.

Without this change, the situation above leads to a catastrophic crash by a
hardware reset on hikey. This issue has been reported to happen on an OMAP
dra7xx also.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano 
Cc: Keerthy 
Cc: John Stultz 
Cc: Leo Yan 
Tested-by: Keerthy 
Reviewed-by: Keerthy 
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

thermal: hwmon: Properly report critical temperature in sysfs

2017-01-15T14:49:50+00:00

[ Upstream commit f37fabb8643eaf8e3b613333a72f683770c85eca ]

In the critical sysfs entry the thermal hwmon was returning wrong
temperature to the user-space.  It was reporting the temperature of the
first trip point instead of the temperature of critical trip point.

For example:
	/sys/class/hwmon/hwmon0/temp1_crit:50000
	/sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone0/trip_point_0_temp:50000
	/sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone0/trip_point_0_type:active
	/sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone0/trip_point_3_temp:120000
	/sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone0/trip_point_3_type:critical

Since commit e68b16abd91d ("thermal: add hwmon sysfs I/F") the driver
have been registering a sysfs entry if get_crit_temp() callback was
provided.  However when accessed, it was calling get_trip_temp() instead
of the get_crit_temp().

Fixes: e68b16abd91d ("thermal: add hwmon sysfs I/F")
Cc: 
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski 
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

Correct backport of fa3c776 ("Thermal: Ignore invalid trip points")

2016-04-23T00:38:23+00:00

Backport of 81ad4276b505e987dd8ebbdf63605f92cd172b52 failed to adjust
for intervening ->get_trip_temp() argument type change, thus causing
stack protector to panic.

drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c: In function ‘thermal_zone_device_register’:
drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c:1569:41: warning: passing argument 3 of
‘tz->ops->get_trip_temp’ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
   if (tz->ops->get_trip_temp(tz, count, &trip_temp))
                                         ^
drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c:1569:41: note: expected ‘long unsigned int *’
but argument is of type ‘int *’

CC:  #3.18,#4.1
Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith

Thermal: Ignore invalid trip points

2016-04-18T12:49:34+00:00

[ Upstream commit 81ad4276b505e987dd8ebbdf63605f92cd172b52 ]

In some cases, platform thermal driver may report invalid trip points,
thermal core should not take any action for these trip points.

This fixed a regression that bogus trip point starts to screw up thermal
control on some Lenovo laptops, after
commit bb431ba26c5cd0a17c941ca6c3a195a3a6d5d461
Author: Zhang Rui 
Date:   Fri Oct 30 16:31:47 2015 +0800

    Thermal: initialize thermal zone device correctly

    After thermal zone device registered, as we have not read any
    temperature before, thus tz->temperature should not be 0,
    which actually means 0C, and thermal trend is not available.
    In this case, we need specially handling for the first
    thermal_zone_device_update().

    Both thermal core framework and step_wise governor is
    enhanced to handle this. And since the step_wise governor
    is the only one that uses trends, so it's the only thermal
    governor that needs to be updated.

    Tested-by: Manuel Krause 
    Tested-by: szegad 
    Tested-by: prash 
    Tested-by: amish 
    Tested-by: Matthias 
    Reviewed-by: Javi Merino 
    Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui 
    Signed-off-by: Chen Yu 

CC:  #3.18+
Link: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317190
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114551
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

Thermal: do thermal zone update after a cooling device registered

2016-02-10T03:55:43+00:00

[ Upstream commit 4511f7166a2deb5f7a578cf87fd2fe1ae83527e3 ]

When a new cooling device is registered, we need to update the
thermal zone to set the new registered cooling device to a proper
state.

This fixes a problem that the system is cool, while the fan devices
are left running on full speed after boot, if fan device is registered
after thermal zone device.

Here is the history of why current patch looks like this:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/7273041/

CC:  #3.18+
Reference:https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92431
Tested-by: Manuel Krause 
Tested-by: szegad 
Tested-by: prash 
Tested-by: amish 
Reviewed-by: Javi Merino 
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui 
Signed-off-by: Chen Yu 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

Thermal: handle thermal zone device properly during system sleep

2016-02-10T03:55:43+00:00

[ Upstream commit ff140fea847e1c2002a220571ab106c2456ed252 ]

Current thermal code does not handle system sleep well because
1. the cooling device cooling state may be changed during suspend
2. the previous temperature reading becomes invalid after resumed because
   it is got before system sleep
3. updating thermal zone device during suspending/resuming
   is wrong because some devices may have already been suspended
   or may have not been resumed.

Thus, the proper way to do this is to cancel all thermal zone
device update requirements during suspend/resume, and after all
the devices have been resumed, reset and update every registered
thermal zone devices.

This also fixes a regression introduced by:
Commit 19593a1fb1f6 ("ACPI / fan: convert to platform driver")
Because, with above commit applied, all the fan devices are attached
to the acpi_general_pm_domain, and they are turned on by the pm_domain
automatically after resume, without the awareness of thermal core.

CC:  #3.18+
Reference: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78201
Reference: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91411
Tested-by: Manuel Krause 
Tested-by: szegad 
Tested-by: prash 
Tested-by: amish 
Tested-by: Matthias 
Reviewed-by: Javi Merino 
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui 
Signed-off-by: Chen Yu 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

Thermal: initialize thermal zone device correctly

2016-02-10T03:55:42+00:00

[ Upstream commit bb431ba26c5cd0a17c941ca6c3a195a3a6d5d461 ]

After thermal zone device registered, as we have not read any
temperature before, thus tz->temperature should not be 0,
which actually means 0C, and thermal trend is not available.
In this case, we need specially handling for the first
thermal_zone_device_update().

Both thermal core framework and step_wise governor is
enhanced to handle this. And since the step_wise governor
is the only one that uses trends, so it's the only thermal
governor that needs to be updated.

CC:  #3.18+
Tested-by: Manuel Krause 
Tested-by: szegad 
Tested-by: prash 
Tested-by: amish 
Tested-by: Matthias 
Reviewed-by: Javi Merino 
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui 
Signed-off-by: Chen Yu 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin