[ Upstream commit 107e47cc80ec37cb332bd41b22b1c7779e22e018 ] vrf_process_v4_outbound() and vrf_process_v6_outbound() do routing using ip/ipv6 addresses, but don't make sure the header is available in skb->data[] (skb_headlen() is less then header size). Case: 1) igb driver from intel. 2) Packet size is greater then 255. 3) MPLS forwards to VRF device. So, patch adds pskb_may_pull() calls in vrf_process_v4/v6_outbound() functions. Signed-off-by: Peter Kosyh <p.kosyh@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: David Ahern <dsa@cumulusnetworks.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
There is no functional change in this patch, it only prepares the next one. rt6_nexthop() will be used by ip6_dst_lookup_neigh(), which uses const variables. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> Acked-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Based on 1 normalized pattern(s): this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify it under the terms of the gnu general public license as published by the free software foundation either version 2 of the license or at your option any later version extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier GPL-2.0-or-later has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 3029 file(s). Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net> Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190527070032.746973796@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Two easy cases of overlapping changes. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Vrf device is not able to change mac address now because lack of ndo_set_mac_address. Complete this in case some apps need to do this. Reported-by: Hui Wang <wanghui104@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
A common theme in the output path is looking up a neigh entry for a
nexthop, either the gateway in an rtable or a fallback to the daddr
in the skb:
nexthop = (__force u32)rt_nexthop(rt, ip_hdr(skb)->daddr);
neigh = __ipv4_neigh_lookup_noref(dev, nexthop);
if (unlikely(!neigh))
neigh = __neigh_create(&arp_tbl, &nexthop, dev, false);
To allow the nexthop to be an IPv6 address we need to consider the
family of the nexthop and then call __ipv{4,6}_neigh_lookup_noref based
on it.
To make this simpler, add a ip_neigh_gw4 helper similar to ip_neigh_gw6
added in an earlier patch which handles:
neigh = __ipv4_neigh_lookup_noref(dev, nexthop);
if (unlikely(!neigh))
neigh = __neigh_create(&arp_tbl, &nexthop, dev, false);
And then add a second one, ip_neigh_for_gw, that calls either
ip_neigh_gw4 or ip_neigh_gw6 based on the address family of the gateway.
Update the output paths in the VRF driver and core v4 code to use
ip_neigh_for_gw simplifying the family based lookup and making both
ready for a v6 nexthop.
ipv4_neigh_lookup has a different need - the potential to resolve a
passed in address in addition to any gateway in the rtable or skb. Since
this is a one-off, add ip_neigh_gw4 and ip_neigh_gw6 diectly. The
difference between __neigh_create used by the helpers and neigh_create
called by ipv4_neigh_lookup is taking a refcount, so add rcu_read_lock_bh
and bump the refcnt on the neigh entry.
Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
A later patch allows an IPv6 gateway with an IPv4 route. The neighbor entry will exist in the v6 ndisc table and the cached header will contain the ipv6 protocol which is wrong for an IPv4 packet. For an IPv4 packet to use the v6 neighbor entry, neigh_output needs to skip the cached header and just use the output callback for the neigh entry. A future patchset can look at expanding the hh_cache to handle 2 protocols. For now, IPv6 gateways with an IPv4 route will take the extra overhead of generating the header. Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
When the mtu of a vrf device is set to 0, it would cause ping
failed. So I think we should limit vrf mtu in a reasonable range
to solve this problem. I set dev->min_mtu to IPV6_MIN_MTU, so it
will works for both ipv4 and ipv6. And if dev->max_mtu still be 0
can be confusing, so I set dev->max_mtu to ETH_MAX_MTU.
Here is the reproduce step:
1.Config vrf interface and set mtu to 0:
3: enp4s0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc fq_codel
master vrf1 state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
link/ether 52:54:00:9e:dd:c1 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
2.Ping peer:
3: enp4s0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc fq_codel
master vrf1 state UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether 52:54:00:9e:dd:c1 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 10.0.0.1/16 scope global enp4s0
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
connect: Network is unreachable
3.Set mtu to default value, ping works:
PING 10.0.0.2 (10.0.0.2) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 10.0.0.2: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=1.88 ms
Fixes: ad49bc6361ca2 ("net: vrf: remove MTU limits for vrf device")
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
VRF devices don't work with upper devices. Currently, it's possible to
add a VRF device to a bridge or team, and to create macvlan, macsec, or
ipvlan devices on top of a VRF (bond and vlan are prevented respectively
by the lack of an ndo_set_mac_address op and the NETIF_F_VLAN_CHALLENGED
feature flag).
Fix this by setting the IFF_NO_RX_HANDLER flag (introduced in commit
f5426250a6ec ("net: introduce IFF_NO_RX_HANDLER")).
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Fixes: 193125dbd8eb ("net: Introduce VRF device driver")
Signed-off-by: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>
Acked-by: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>