linux-stable.git/drivers/net/macvlan.c, branch v3.16 Linux kernel stable tree Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net 2014-06-11T23:02:55+00:00 David S. Miller davem@davemloft.net 2014-06-11T23:02:55+00:00 902455e00720018d1dbd38327c3fd5bda6d844ee Conflicts: net/core/rtnetlink.c net/core/skbuff.c Both conflicts were very simple overlapping changes. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> 
Conflicts:
	net/core/rtnetlink.c
	net/core/skbuff.c

Both conflicts were very simple overlapping changes.

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
net: force a list_del() in unregister_netdevice_many() 2014-06-08T21:15:14+00:00 Eric Dumazet edumazet@google.com 2014-06-06T13:44:03+00:00 87757a917b0b3c0787e0563c679762152be81312 unregister_netdevice_many() API is error prone and we had too many bugs because of dangling LIST_HEAD on stacks. See commit f87e6f47933e3e ("net: dont leave active on stack LIST_HEAD") In fact, instead of making sure no caller leaves an active list_head, just force a list_del() in the callee. No one seems to need to access the list after unregister_netdevice_many() Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> 
unregister_netdevice_many() API is error prone and we had too
many bugs because of dangling LIST_HEAD on stacks.

See commit f87e6f47933e3e ("net: dont leave active on stack LIST_HEAD")

In fact, instead of making sure no caller leaves an active list_head,
just force a list_del() in the callee. No one seems to need to access
the list after unregister_netdevice_many()

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
macvlan: Support bonding events 2014-06-04T22:13:54+00:00 Vlad Yasevich vyasevic@redhat.com 2014-06-04T20:23:37+00:00 4c9912556867bf89e7bb6946fd218a40b1d12139 Bonding and team drivers generate specific events during failover that trigger switch updates. When a macvlan device is configured on top of bonding, we want switches to learn about the macvlan devices as well. This patch adds a handler to macvlan driver to propagate these events to all macvlan devices. We let the generic inetdev event handler do the work. This allows macvlan to operated correctly over active-backup mode bond. Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> 
Bonding and team drivers generate specific events during failover
that trigger switch updates.  When a macvlan device is configured
on top of bonding, we want switches to learn about the macvlan
devices as well.   This patch adds a handler to macvlan driver to
propagate these events to all macvlan devices.  We let the generic
inetdev event handler do the work.

This allows macvlan to operated correctly over active-backup
mode bond.

Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
macvlan: add netpoll support 2014-06-02T23:05:24+00:00 dingtianhong dingtianhong@huawei.com 2014-05-30T08:00:56+00:00 688cea83f4396fa98b77a126ed278b89daccccdc Add netpoll support to macvlan devices. Based on the netpoll support in the 802.1q vlan code. Tested and macvlan could work well with netconsole. Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> 
Add netpoll support to macvlan devices. Based on the netpoll support in the 802.1q vlan code.

Tested and macvlan could work well with netconsole.

Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
macvlan: fix the problem when mac address changes for passthru mode 2014-06-02T22:57:34+00:00 dingtianhong dingtianhong@huawei.com 2014-05-30T06:32:49+00:00 e289fd28176b78de7e54bf6c8e2b558afefaf6df The macvlan dev should always have the same mac address like lowerdev when in the passthru mode, change the mac address alone will break the work mechanism, so when the lowerdev or macvlan mac address changes, we should propagate the changes to another dev. v1->v2: Allow macvlan dev to change mac address for passthru mode and propagate to lowerdev. v2->v3: Don't set the mac address to the lower dev's unicast address for passthru mode when mac address changes. Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> 
The macvlan dev should always have the same mac address like lowerdev
when in the passthru mode, change the mac address alone will break the
work mechanism, so when the lowerdev or macvlan mac address changes,
we should propagate the changes to another dev.

v1->v2: Allow macvlan dev to change mac address for passthru mode and propagate to
	lowerdev.

v2->v3: Don't set the mac address to the lower dev's unicast address for
	passthru mode when mac address changes.

Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net 2014-05-24T04:32:30+00:00 David S. Miller davem@davemloft.net 2014-05-24T04:32:30+00:00 54e5c4def0614ab540fbdf68e45342a4af141702 Conflicts: drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c drivers/net/ethernet/altera/altera_msgdma.c drivers/net/ethernet/altera/altera_sgdma.c net/ipv6/xfrm6_output.c Several cases of overlapping changes. The xfrm6_output.c has a bug fix which overlaps the renaming of skb->local_df to skb->ignore_df. In the Altera TSE driver cases, the register access cleanups in net-next overlapped with bug fixes done in net. Similarly a bug fix to send ALB packets in the bonding driver using the right source address overlaps with cleanups in net-next. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> 
Conflicts:
	drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
	drivers/net/ethernet/altera/altera_msgdma.c
	drivers/net/ethernet/altera/altera_sgdma.c
	net/ipv6/xfrm6_output.c

Several cases of overlapping changes.

The xfrm6_output.c has a bug fix which overlaps the renaming
of skb->local_df to skb->ignore_df.

In the Altera TSE driver cases, the register access cleanups
in net-next overlapped with bug fixes done in net.

Similarly a bug fix to send ALB packets in the bonding driver using
the right source address overlaps with cleanups in net-next.

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
macvlan: Fix lockdep warnings with stacked macvlan devices 2014-05-17T02:14:49+00:00 Vlad Yasevich vyasevic@redhat.com 2014-05-16T21:04:56+00:00 c674ac30c549596295eb0a5af7f4714c0b905b6f Macvlan devices try to avoid stacking, but that's not always successfull or even desired. As an example, the following configuration is perefectly legal and valid: eth0 <--- macvlan0 <---- vlan0.10 <--- macvlan1 However, this configuration produces the following lockdep trace: [ 115.620418] ====================================================== [ 115.620477] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] [ 115.620516] 3.15.0-rc1+ #24 Not tainted [ 115.620540] ------------------------------------------------------- [ 115.620577] ip/1704 is trying to acquire lock: [ 115.620604] (&vlan_netdev_addr_lock_key/1){+.....}, at: [<ffffffff815df49c>] dev_uc_sync+0x3c/0x80 [ 115.620686] but task is already holding lock: [ 115.620723] (&macvlan_netdev_addr_lock_key){+.....}, at: [<ffffffff815da5be>] dev_set_rx_mode+0x1e/0x40 [ 115.620795] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 115.620853] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 115.620894] -> #1 (&macvlan_netdev_addr_lock_key){+.....}: [ 115.620935] [<ffffffff810d57f2>] lock_acquire+0xa2/0x130 [ 115.620974] [<ffffffff816f62e7>] _raw_spin_lock_nested+0x37/0x50 [ 115.621019] [<ffffffffa07296c3>] vlan_dev_set_rx_mode+0x53/0x110 [8021q] [ 115.621066] [<ffffffff815da557>] __dev_set_rx_mode+0x57/0xa0 [ 115.621105] [<ffffffff815da5c6>] dev_set_rx_mode+0x26/0x40 [ 115.621143] [<ffffffff815da6be>] __dev_open+0xde/0x140 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815da9ad>] __dev_change_flags+0x9d/0x170 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815daaa9>] dev_change_flags+0x29/0x60 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815e7f11>] do_setlink+0x321/0x9a0 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815ea59f>] rtnl_newlink+0x51f/0x730 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815e6e75>] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x95/0x250 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff81608b19>] netlink_rcv_skb+0xa9/0xc0 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815e6dca>] rtnetlink_rcv+0x2a/0x40 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff81608150>] netlink_unicast+0xf0/0x1c0 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff8160851f>] netlink_sendmsg+0x2ff/0x740 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815bc9db>] sock_sendmsg+0x8b/0xc0 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815bd4b9>] ___sys_sendmsg+0x369/0x380 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815bdbb2>] __sys_sendmsg+0x42/0x80 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815bdc02>] SyS_sendmsg+0x12/0x20 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff816ffd69>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [ 115.621174] -> #0 (&vlan_netdev_addr_lock_key/1){+.....}: [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff810d4d43>] __lock_acquire+0x1773/0x1a60 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff810d57f2>] lock_acquire+0xa2/0x130 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff816f62e7>] _raw_spin_lock_nested+0x37/0x50 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815df49c>] dev_uc_sync+0x3c/0x80 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffffa0696d2a>] macvlan_set_mac_lists+0xca/0x110 [macvlan] [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815da557>] __dev_set_rx_mode+0x57/0xa0 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815da5c6>] dev_set_rx_mode+0x26/0x40 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815da6be>] __dev_open+0xde/0x140 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815da9ad>] __dev_change_flags+0x9d/0x170 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815daaa9>] dev_change_flags+0x29/0x60 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815e7f11>] do_setlink+0x321/0x9a0 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815ea59f>] rtnl_newlink+0x51f/0x730 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815e6e75>] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x95/0x250 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff81608b19>] netlink_rcv_skb+0xa9/0xc0 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815e6dca>] rtnetlink_rcv+0x2a/0x40 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff81608150>] netlink_unicast+0xf0/0x1c0 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff8160851f>] netlink_sendmsg+0x2ff/0x740 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815bc9db>] sock_sendmsg+0x8b/0xc0 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815bd4b9>] ___sys_sendmsg+0x369/0x380 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815bdbb2>] __sys_sendmsg+0x42/0x80 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815bdc02>] SyS_sendmsg+0x12/0x20 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff816ffd69>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [ 115.621174] other info that might help us debug this: [ 115.621174] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 115.621174] CPU0 CPU1 [ 115.621174] ---- ---- [ 115.621174] lock(&macvlan_netdev_addr_lock_key); [ 115.621174] lock(&vlan_netdev_addr_lock_key/1); [ 115.621174] lock(&macvlan_netdev_addr_lock_key); [ 115.621174] lock(&vlan_netdev_addr_lock_key/1); [ 115.621174] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 115.621174] 2 locks held by ip/1704: [ 115.621174] #0: (rtnl_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff815e6dbb>] rtnetlink_rcv+0x1b/0x40 [ 115.621174] #1: (&macvlan_netdev_addr_lock_key){+.....}, at: [<ffffffff815da5be>] dev_set_rx_mode+0x1e/0x40 [ 115.621174] stack backtrace: [ 115.621174] CPU: 3 PID: 1704 Comm: ip Not tainted 3.15.0-rc1+ #24 [ 115.621174] Hardware name: Hewlett-Packard HP xw8400 Workstation/0A08h, BIOS 786D5 v02.38 10/25/2010 [ 115.621174] ffffffff82339ae0 ffff880465f79568 ffffffff816ee20c ffffffff82339ae0 [ 115.621174] ffff880465f795a8 ffffffff816e9e1b ffff880465f79600 ffff880465b019c8 [ 115.621174] 0000000000000001 0000000000000002 ffff880465b019c8 ffff880465b01230 [ 115.621174] Call Trace: [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff816ee20c>] dump_stack+0x4d/0x66 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff816e9e1b>] print_circular_bug+0x200/0x20e [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff810d4d43>] __lock_acquire+0x1773/0x1a60 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff810d3172>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xb2/0x1d0 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff810d57f2>] lock_acquire+0xa2/0x130 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815df49c>] ? dev_uc_sync+0x3c/0x80 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff816f62e7>] _raw_spin_lock_nested+0x37/0x50 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815df49c>] ? dev_uc_sync+0x3c/0x80 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815df49c>] dev_uc_sync+0x3c/0x80 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffffa0696d2a>] macvlan_set_mac_lists+0xca/0x110 [macvlan] [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815da557>] __dev_set_rx_mode+0x57/0xa0 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815da5c6>] dev_set_rx_mode+0x26/0x40 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815da6be>] __dev_open+0xde/0x140 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815da9ad>] __dev_change_flags+0x9d/0x170 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815daaa9>] dev_change_flags+0x29/0x60 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff811e1db1>] ? mem_cgroup_bad_page_check+0x21/0x30 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815e7f11>] do_setlink+0x321/0x9a0 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff810d394c>] ? __lock_acquire+0x37c/0x1a60 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815ea59f>] rtnl_newlink+0x51f/0x730 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815ea169>] ? rtnl_newlink+0xe9/0x730 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815e6e75>] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x95/0x250 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff810d329d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815e6dbb>] ? rtnetlink_rcv+0x1b/0x40 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815e6de0>] ? rtnetlink_rcv+0x40/0x40 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff81608b19>] netlink_rcv_skb+0xa9/0xc0 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815e6dca>] rtnetlink_rcv+0x2a/0x40 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff81608150>] netlink_unicast+0xf0/0x1c0 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff8160851f>] netlink_sendmsg+0x2ff/0x740 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815bc9db>] sock_sendmsg+0x8b/0xc0 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff8119d4af>] ? might_fault+0x5f/0xb0 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff8119d4f8>] ? might_fault+0xa8/0xb0 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff8119d4af>] ? might_fault+0x5f/0xb0 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815cb51e>] ? verify_iovec+0x5e/0xe0 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815bd4b9>] ___sys_sendmsg+0x369/0x380 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff816faa0d>] ? __do_page_fault+0x11d/0x570 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff810cfe9f>] ? up_read+0x1f/0x40 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff816fab04>] ? __do_page_fault+0x214/0x570 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff8120a10b>] ? mntput_no_expire+0x6b/0x1c0 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff8120a0b7>] ? mntput_no_expire+0x17/0x1c0 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff8120a284>] ? mntput+0x24/0x40 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815bdbb2>] __sys_sendmsg+0x42/0x80 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff815bdc02>] SyS_sendmsg+0x12/0x20 [ 115.621174] [<ffffffff816ffd69>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b Fix this by correctly providing macvlan lockdep class. Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> 
Macvlan devices try to avoid stacking, but that's not always
successfull or even desired.  As an example, the following
configuration is perefectly legal and valid:

eth0 <--- macvlan0 <---- vlan0.10 <--- macvlan1

However, this configuration produces the following lockdep
trace:
[  115.620418] ======================================================
[  115.620477] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
[  115.620516] 3.15.0-rc1+ #24 Not tainted
[  115.620540] -------------------------------------------------------
[  115.620577] ip/1704 is trying to acquire lock:
[  115.620604]  (&vlan_netdev_addr_lock_key/1){+.....}, at: [<ffffffff815df49c>] dev_uc_sync+0x3c/0x80
[  115.620686]
but task is already holding lock:
[  115.620723]  (&macvlan_netdev_addr_lock_key){+.....}, at: [<ffffffff815da5be>] dev_set_rx_mode+0x1e/0x40
[  115.620795]
which lock already depends on the new lock.

[  115.620853]
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[  115.620894]
-> #1 (&macvlan_netdev_addr_lock_key){+.....}:
[  115.620935]        [<ffffffff810d57f2>] lock_acquire+0xa2/0x130
[  115.620974]        [<ffffffff816f62e7>] _raw_spin_lock_nested+0x37/0x50
[  115.621019]        [<ffffffffa07296c3>] vlan_dev_set_rx_mode+0x53/0x110 [8021q]
[  115.621066]        [<ffffffff815da557>] __dev_set_rx_mode+0x57/0xa0
[  115.621105]        [<ffffffff815da5c6>] dev_set_rx_mode+0x26/0x40
[  115.621143]        [<ffffffff815da6be>] __dev_open+0xde/0x140
[  115.621174]        [<ffffffff815da9ad>] __dev_change_flags+0x9d/0x170
[  115.621174]        [<ffffffff815daaa9>] dev_change_flags+0x29/0x60
[  115.621174]        [<ffffffff815e7f11>] do_setlink+0x321/0x9a0
[  115.621174]        [<ffffffff815ea59f>] rtnl_newlink+0x51f/0x730
[  115.621174]        [<ffffffff815e6e75>] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x95/0x250
[  115.621174]        [<ffffffff81608b19>] netlink_rcv_skb+0xa9/0xc0
[  115.621174]        [<ffffffff815e6dca>] rtnetlink_rcv+0x2a/0x40
[  115.621174]        [<ffffffff81608150>] netlink_unicast+0xf0/0x1c0
[  115.621174]        [<ffffffff8160851f>] netlink_sendmsg+0x2ff/0x740
[  115.621174]        [<ffffffff815bc9db>] sock_sendmsg+0x8b/0xc0
[  115.621174]        [<ffffffff815bd4b9>] ___sys_sendmsg+0x369/0x380
[  115.621174]        [<ffffffff815bdbb2>] __sys_sendmsg+0x42/0x80
[  115.621174]        [<ffffffff815bdc02>] SyS_sendmsg+0x12/0x20
[  115.621174]        [<ffffffff816ffd69>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[  115.621174]
-> #0 (&vlan_netdev_addr_lock_key/1){+.....}:
[  115.621174]        [<ffffffff810d4d43>] __lock_acquire+0x1773/0x1a60
[  115.621174]        [<ffffffff810d57f2>] lock_acquire+0xa2/0x130
[  115.621174]        [<ffffffff816f62e7>] _raw_spin_lock_nested+0x37/0x50
[  115.621174]        [<ffffffff815df49c>] dev_uc_sync+0x3c/0x80
[  115.621174]        [<ffffffffa0696d2a>] macvlan_set_mac_lists+0xca/0x110 [macvlan]
[  115.621174]        [<ffffffff815da557>] __dev_set_rx_mode+0x57/0xa0
[  115.621174]        [<ffffffff815da5c6>] dev_set_rx_mode+0x26/0x40
[  115.621174]        [<ffffffff815da6be>] __dev_open+0xde/0x140
[  115.621174]        [<ffffffff815da9ad>] __dev_change_flags+0x9d/0x170
[  115.621174]        [<ffffffff815daaa9>] dev_change_flags+0x29/0x60
[  115.621174]        [<ffffffff815e7f11>] do_setlink+0x321/0x9a0
[  115.621174]        [<ffffffff815ea59f>] rtnl_newlink+0x51f/0x730
[  115.621174]        [<ffffffff815e6e75>] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x95/0x250
[  115.621174]        [<ffffffff81608b19>] netlink_rcv_skb+0xa9/0xc0
[  115.621174]        [<ffffffff815e6dca>] rtnetlink_rcv+0x2a/0x40
[  115.621174]        [<ffffffff81608150>] netlink_unicast+0xf0/0x1c0
[  115.621174]        [<ffffffff8160851f>] netlink_sendmsg+0x2ff/0x740
[  115.621174]        [<ffffffff815bc9db>] sock_sendmsg+0x8b/0xc0
[  115.621174]        [<ffffffff815bd4b9>] ___sys_sendmsg+0x369/0x380
[  115.621174]        [<ffffffff815bdbb2>] __sys_sendmsg+0x42/0x80
[  115.621174]        [<ffffffff815bdc02>] SyS_sendmsg+0x12/0x20
[  115.621174]        [<ffffffff816ffd69>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[  115.621174]
other info that might help us debug this:

[  115.621174]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

[  115.621174]        CPU0                    CPU1
[  115.621174]        ----                    ----
[  115.621174]   lock(&macvlan_netdev_addr_lock_key);
[  115.621174]                                lock(&vlan_netdev_addr_lock_key/1);
[  115.621174]                                lock(&macvlan_netdev_addr_lock_key);
[  115.621174]   lock(&vlan_netdev_addr_lock_key/1);
[  115.621174]
 *** DEADLOCK ***

[  115.621174] 2 locks held by ip/1704:
[  115.621174]  #0:  (rtnl_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff815e6dbb>] rtnetlink_rcv+0x1b/0x40
[  115.621174]  #1:  (&macvlan_netdev_addr_lock_key){+.....}, at: [<ffffffff815da5be>] dev_set_rx_mode+0x1e/0x40
[  115.621174]
stack backtrace:
[  115.621174] CPU: 3 PID: 1704 Comm: ip Not tainted 3.15.0-rc1+ #24
[  115.621174] Hardware name: Hewlett-Packard HP xw8400 Workstation/0A08h, BIOS 786D5 v02.38 10/25/2010
[  115.621174]  ffffffff82339ae0 ffff880465f79568 ffffffff816ee20c ffffffff82339ae0
[  115.621174]  ffff880465f795a8 ffffffff816e9e1b ffff880465f79600 ffff880465b019c8
[  115.621174]  0000000000000001 0000000000000002 ffff880465b019c8 ffff880465b01230
[  115.621174] Call Trace:
[  115.621174]  [<ffffffff816ee20c>] dump_stack+0x4d/0x66
[  115.621174]  [<ffffffff816e9e1b>] print_circular_bug+0x200/0x20e
[  115.621174]  [<ffffffff810d4d43>] __lock_acquire+0x1773/0x1a60
[  115.621174]  [<ffffffff810d3172>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xb2/0x1d0
[  115.621174]  [<ffffffff810d57f2>] lock_acquire+0xa2/0x130
[  115.621174]  [<ffffffff815df49c>] ? dev_uc_sync+0x3c/0x80
[  115.621174]  [<ffffffff816f62e7>] _raw_spin_lock_nested+0x37/0x50
[  115.621174]  [<ffffffff815df49c>] ? dev_uc_sync+0x3c/0x80
[  115.621174]  [<ffffffff815df49c>] dev_uc_sync+0x3c/0x80
[  115.621174]  [<ffffffffa0696d2a>] macvlan_set_mac_lists+0xca/0x110 [macvlan]
[  115.621174]  [<ffffffff815da557>] __dev_set_rx_mode+0x57/0xa0
[  115.621174]  [<ffffffff815da5c6>] dev_set_rx_mode+0x26/0x40
[  115.621174]  [<ffffffff815da6be>] __dev_open+0xde/0x140
[  115.621174]  [<ffffffff815da9ad>] __dev_change_flags+0x9d/0x170
[  115.621174]  [<ffffffff815daaa9>] dev_change_flags+0x29/0x60
[  115.621174]  [<ffffffff811e1db1>] ? mem_cgroup_bad_page_check+0x21/0x30
[  115.621174]  [<ffffffff815e7f11>] do_setlink+0x321/0x9a0
[  115.621174]  [<ffffffff810d394c>] ? __lock_acquire+0x37c/0x1a60
[  115.621174]  [<ffffffff815ea59f>] rtnl_newlink+0x51f/0x730
[  115.621174]  [<ffffffff815ea169>] ? rtnl_newlink+0xe9/0x730
[  115.621174]  [<ffffffff815e6e75>] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x95/0x250
[  115.621174]  [<ffffffff810d329d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
[  115.621174]  [<ffffffff815e6dbb>] ? rtnetlink_rcv+0x1b/0x40
[  115.621174]  [<ffffffff815e6de0>] ? rtnetlink_rcv+0x40/0x40
[  115.621174]  [<ffffffff81608b19>] netlink_rcv_skb+0xa9/0xc0
[  115.621174]  [<ffffffff815e6dca>] rtnetlink_rcv+0x2a/0x40
[  115.621174]  [<ffffffff81608150>] netlink_unicast+0xf0/0x1c0
[  115.621174]  [<ffffffff8160851f>] netlink_sendmsg+0x2ff/0x740
[  115.621174]  [<ffffffff815bc9db>] sock_sendmsg+0x8b/0xc0
[  115.621174]  [<ffffffff8119d4af>] ? might_fault+0x5f/0xb0
[  115.621174]  [<ffffffff8119d4f8>] ? might_fault+0xa8/0xb0
[  115.621174]  [<ffffffff8119d4af>] ? might_fault+0x5f/0xb0
[  115.621174]  [<ffffffff815cb51e>] ? verify_iovec+0x5e/0xe0
[  115.621174]  [<ffffffff815bd4b9>] ___sys_sendmsg+0x369/0x380
[  115.621174]  [<ffffffff816faa0d>] ? __do_page_fault+0x11d/0x570
[  115.621174]  [<ffffffff810cfe9f>] ? up_read+0x1f/0x40
[  115.621174]  [<ffffffff816fab04>] ? __do_page_fault+0x214/0x570
[  115.621174]  [<ffffffff8120a10b>] ? mntput_no_expire+0x6b/0x1c0
[  115.621174]  [<ffffffff8120a0b7>] ? mntput_no_expire+0x17/0x1c0
[  115.621174]  [<ffffffff8120a284>] ? mntput+0x24/0x40
[  115.621174]  [<ffffffff815bdbb2>] __sys_sendmsg+0x42/0x80
[  115.621174]  [<ffffffff815bdc02>] SyS_sendmsg+0x12/0x20
[  115.621174]  [<ffffffff816ffd69>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b

Fix this by correctly providing macvlan lockdep class.

Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
macvlan: simplify the structure port 2014-05-16T03:35:16+00:00 dingtianhong dingtianhong@huawei.com 2014-05-15T11:11:36+00:00 a188a54d11629bef2169052297e61f3767ca8ce5 The port->count was used to count the number of macvlan devs in the same port, but the list vlans could play the same role to do that, so free the port if the list vlans is empty and no need to use the parameter count. Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> 
The port->count was used to count the number of macvlan devs
in the same port, but the list vlans could play the same role
to do that, so free the port if the list vlans is empty and
no need to use the parameter count.

Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
macvlan: Propagate lowerdev MTU changes 2014-05-14T19:35:03+00:00 dingtianhong dingtianhong@huawei.com 2014-05-13T06:39:27+00:00 3763e7ef17143f5e9ae044638e65d2b0c0305fcf When the physical MTU changes we should ensure that all existing MACVLAN dev MTU do not exceed the new lowerdev MTU. This patch adds that propagation. Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> 
When the physical MTU changes we should ensure that all existing MACVLAN
dev MTU do not exceed the new lowerdev MTU. This patch adds that
propagation.

Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
macvlan: Don't propagate IFF_ALLMULTI changes on down interfaces. 2014-05-12T18:15:37+00:00 Peter Christensen pch@ordbogen.com 2014-05-08T09:15:37+00:00 bbeb0eadcf9fe74fb2b9b1a6fea82cd538b1e556 Clearing the IFF_ALLMULTI flag on a down interface could cause an allmulti overflow on the underlying interface. Attempting the set IFF_ALLMULTI on the underlying interface would cause an error and the log message: "allmulti touches root, set allmulti failed." Signed-off-by: Peter Christensen <pch@ordbogen.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> 
Clearing the IFF_ALLMULTI flag on a down interface could cause an allmulti
overflow on the underlying interface.

Attempting the set IFF_ALLMULTI on the underlying interface would cause an
error and the log message:

"allmulti touches root, set allmulti failed."

Signed-off-by: Peter Christensen <pch@ordbogen.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>