linux-stable.git/drivers/mmc, branch v3.5.7 Linux kernel stable tree mmc: sh-mmcif: avoid oops on spurious interrupts 2012-10-12T20:47:24+00:00 Guennadi Liakhovetski g.liakhovetski@gmx.de 2012-09-18T06:42:42+00:00 8c6924929b212796dcab375c9ac482baef142205 commit 8464dd52d3198dd05cafb005371d76e5339eb842 upstream. On some systems, e.g., kzm9g, MMCIF interfaces can produce spurious interrupts without any active request. To prevent the Oops, that results in such cases, don't dereference the mmc request pointer until we make sure, that we are indeed processing such a request. Reported-by: Tetsuyuki Kobayashi <koba@kmckk.co.jp> Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 8464dd52d3198dd05cafb005371d76e5339eb842 upstream.

On some systems, e.g., kzm9g, MMCIF interfaces can produce spurious
interrupts without any active request. To prevent the Oops, that results
in such cases, don't dereference the mmc request pointer until we make
sure, that we are indeed processing such a request.

Reported-by: Tetsuyuki Kobayashi <koba@kmckk.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
mmc: omap_hsmmc: Pass on the suspend failure to the PM core 2012-10-12T20:47:24+00:00 Vaibhav Bedia vaibhav.bedia@ti.com 2012-09-13T06:31:03+00:00 43607369d9051678701f6f9dedfac2fbc85bc601 commit c4c8eeb4df00aabb641553d6fbcd46f458e56cd9 upstream. In some cases mmc_suspend_host() is not able to claim the host and proceed with the suspend process. The core returns -EBUSY to the host controller driver. Unfortunately, the host controller driver does not pass on this information to the PM core and hence the system suspend process continues. ret = mmc_suspend_host(host->mmc); if (ret) { host->suspended = 0; if (host->pdata->resume) { ret = host->pdata->resume(dev, host->slot_id); The return status from mmc_suspend_host() is overwritten by return status from host->pdata->resume. So the original return status is lost. In these cases the MMC core gets to an unexpected state during resume and multiple issues related to MMC crop up. 1. Host controller driver starts accessing the device registers before the clocks are enabled which leads to a prefetch abort. 2. A file copy thread which was launched before suspend gets stuck due to the host not being reclaimed during resume. To avoid such problems pass on the -EBUSY status to the PM core from the host controller driver. With this change, MMC core suspend might still fail but it does not end up making the system unusable. Suspend gets aborted and the user can try suspending the system again. Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Bedia <vaibhav.bedia@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Hebbar, Gururaja <gururaja.hebbar@ti.com> Acked-by: Venkatraman S <svenkatr@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit c4c8eeb4df00aabb641553d6fbcd46f458e56cd9 upstream.

In some cases mmc_suspend_host() is not able to claim the
host and proceed with the suspend process. The core returns
-EBUSY to the host controller driver. Unfortunately, the
host controller driver does not pass on this information
to the PM core and hence the system suspend process continues.

	ret = mmc_suspend_host(host->mmc);
	if (ret) {
		host->suspended = 0;
		if (host->pdata->resume) {
			ret = host->pdata->resume(dev, host->slot_id);

The return status from mmc_suspend_host() is overwritten by return
status from host->pdata->resume. So the original return status is lost.

In these cases the MMC core gets to an unexpected state
during resume and multiple issues related to MMC crop up.
1. Host controller driver starts accessing the device registers
before the clocks are enabled which leads to a prefetch abort.
2. A file copy thread which was launched before suspend gets
stuck due to the host not being reclaimed during resume.

To avoid such problems pass on the -EBUSY status to the PM core
from the host controller driver. With this change, MMC core
suspend might still fail but it does not end up making the
system unusable. Suspend gets aborted and the user can try
suspending the system again.

Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Bedia <vaibhav.bedia@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Hebbar, Gururaja <gururaja.hebbar@ti.com>
Acked-by: Venkatraman S <svenkatr@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
mmc: card: Skip secure erase on MoviNAND; causes unrecoverable corruption. 2012-10-02T17:39:08+00:00 Ian Chen ian.cy.chen@samsung.com 2012-08-29T06:05:36+00:00 e3b569c5ff1573af7db3ea362e67e5d24ac97344 commit 3550ccdb9d8d350e526b809bf3dd92b550a74fe1 upstream. For several MoviNAND eMMC parts, there are known issues with secure erase and secure trim. For these specific MoviNAND devices, we skip these operations. Specifically, there is a bug in the eMMC firmware that causes unrecoverable corruption when the MMC is erased with MMC_CAP_ERASE enabled. References: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1644364 https://plus.google.com/111398485184813224730/posts/21pTYfTsCkB#111398485184813224730/posts/21pTYfTsCkB Signed-off-by: Ian Chen <ian.cy.chen@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@gmail.com> Acked-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 3550ccdb9d8d350e526b809bf3dd92b550a74fe1 upstream.

For several MoviNAND eMMC parts, there are known issues with secure
erase and secure trim.  For these specific MoviNAND devices, we skip
these operations.

Specifically, there is a bug in the eMMC firmware that causes
unrecoverable corruption when the MMC is erased with MMC_CAP_ERASE
enabled.

References:

http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1644364
https://plus.google.com/111398485184813224730/posts/21pTYfTsCkB#111398485184813224730/posts/21pTYfTsCkB

Signed-off-by: Ian Chen <ian.cy.chen@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
mmc: atmel-mci: not busy flag has also to be used for read operations 2012-10-02T17:39:08+00:00 Ludovic Desroches ludovic.desroches@atmel.com 2012-07-24T09:42:04+00:00 30545f24d99ae348670402ccc193381f7e591857 commit 077d40731edc90ee9dedf63249034c8cd5f694ce upstream. Even if the datasheet says that the not busy flag has to be used only for write operations, it's false except for version lesser than v2xx. Not waiting on the not busy flag for read operations can cause the controller to hang-up during the initialization of some SD cards with DMA after the first CMD6 -- the next command is sent too early. Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 077d40731edc90ee9dedf63249034c8cd5f694ce upstream.

Even if the datasheet says that the not busy flag has to be used only
for write operations, it's false except for version lesser than v2xx.

Not waiting on the not busy flag for read operations can cause the
controller to hang-up during the initialization of some SD cards
with DMA after the first CMD6 -- the next command is sent too early.

Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
mmc: sdhci-esdhc: break out early if clock is 0 2012-10-02T17:39:08+00:00 Shawn Guo shawn.guo@linaro.org 2012-08-22T15:10:01+00:00 1a9422ec45b63e7d6703b5b668a750039956ba09 commit 74f330bceaa7b88d06062e1cac3d519a3dfc041e upstream. Since commit 30832ab56 ("mmc: sdhci: Always pass clock request value zero to set_clock host op") was merged, esdhc_set_clock starts hitting "if (clock == 0)" where ESDHC_SYSTEM_CONTROL has been operated. This causes SDHCI card-detection function being broken. Fix the regression by moving "if (clock == 0)" above ESDHC_SYSTEM_CONTROL operation. Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 74f330bceaa7b88d06062e1cac3d519a3dfc041e upstream.

Since commit 30832ab56 ("mmc: sdhci: Always pass clock request value
zero to set_clock host op") was merged, esdhc_set_clock starts hitting
"if (clock == 0)" where ESDHC_SYSTEM_CONTROL has been operated.  This
causes SDHCI card-detection function being broken.  Fix the regression
by moving "if (clock == 0)" above ESDHC_SYSTEM_CONTROL operation.

Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
mmc: mxs-mmc: fix deadlock caused by recursion loop 2012-10-02T17:39:08+00:00 Lauri Hintsala lauri.hintsala@bluegiga.com 2012-07-17T14:16:10+00:00 3dd2bf1c4b2f5feed0486d706f6020ce78ffb93c commit fc108d24d3a6da63576a460e122fa1df0cbdea20 upstream. Release the lock before mmc_signal_sdio_irq is called by mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq. Backtrace: [ 65.470000] ============================================= [ 65.470000] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] [ 65.470000] 3.5.0-rc5 #2 Not tainted [ 65.470000] --------------------------------------------- [ 65.470000] ksdioirqd/mmc0/73 is trying to acquire lock: [ 65.470000] (&(&host->lock)->rlock#2){-.-...}, at: [<bf054120>] mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0x18/0xdc [mxs_mmc] [ 65.470000] [ 65.470000] but task is already holding lock: [ 65.470000] (&(&host->lock)->rlock#2){-.-...}, at: [<bf054120>] mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0x18/0xdc [mxs_mmc] [ 65.470000] [ 65.470000] other info that might help us debug this: [ 65.470000] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 65.470000] [ 65.470000] CPU0 [ 65.470000] ---- [ 65.470000] lock(&(&host->lock)->rlock#2); [ 65.470000] lock(&(&host->lock)->rlock#2); [ 65.470000] [ 65.470000] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 65.470000] [ 65.470000] May be due to missing lock nesting notation [ 65.470000] [ 65.470000] 1 lock held by ksdioirqd/mmc0/73: [ 65.470000] #0: (&(&host->lock)->rlock#2){-.-...}, at: [<bf054120>] mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0x18/0xdc [mxs_mmc] [ 65.470000] [ 65.470000] stack backtrace: [ 65.470000] [<c0014990>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0xf4) from [<c005ccb8>] (__lock_acquire+0x14f8/0x1b98) [ 65.470000] [<c005ccb8>] (__lock_acquire+0x14f8/0x1b98) from [<c005d3f8>] (lock_acquire+0xa0/0x108) [ 65.470000] [<c005d3f8>] (lock_acquire+0xa0/0x108) from [<c02f671c>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x48/0x5c) [ 65.470000] [<c02f671c>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x48/0x5c) from [<bf054120>] (mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0x18/0xdc [mxs_mmc]) [ 65.470000] [<bf054120>] (mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0x18/0xdc [mxs_mmc]) from [<bf0541d0>] (mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0xc8/0xdc [mxs_mmc]) [ 65.470000] [<bf0541d0>] (mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0xc8/0xdc [mxs_mmc]) from [<c0219b38>] (sdio_irq_thread+0x1bc/0x274) [ 65.470000] [<c0219b38>] (sdio_irq_thread+0x1bc/0x274) from [<c003c324>] (kthread+0x8c/0x98) [ 65.470000] [<c003c324>] (kthread+0x8c/0x98) from [<c00101ac>] (kernel_thread_exit+0x0/0x8) [ 65.470000] BUG: spinlock lockup suspected on CPU#0, ksdioirqd/mmc0/73 [ 65.470000] lock: 0xc3358724, .magic: dead4ead, .owner: ksdioirqd/mmc0/73, .owner_cpu: 0 [ 65.470000] [<c0014990>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0xf4) from [<c01b46b0>] (do_raw_spin_lock+0x100/0x144) [ 65.470000] [<c01b46b0>] (do_raw_spin_lock+0x100/0x144) from [<c02f6724>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x50/0x5c) [ 65.470000] [<c02f6724>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x50/0x5c) from [<bf054120>] (mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0x18/0xdc [mxs_mmc]) [ 65.470000] [<bf054120>] (mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0x18/0xdc [mxs_mmc]) from [<bf0541d0>] (mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0xc8/0xdc [mxs_mmc]) [ 65.470000] [<bf0541d0>] (mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0xc8/0xdc [mxs_mmc]) from [<c0219b38>] (sdio_irq_thread+0x1bc/0x274) [ 65.470000] [<c0219b38>] (sdio_irq_thread+0x1bc/0x274) from [<c003c324>] (kthread+0x8c/0x98) [ 65.470000] [<c003c324>] (kthread+0x8c/0x98) from [<c00101ac>] (kernel_thread_exit+0x0/0x8) Reported-by: Attila Kinali <attila@kinali.ch> Signed-off-by: Lauri Hintsala <lauri.hintsala@bluegiga.com> Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit fc108d24d3a6da63576a460e122fa1df0cbdea20 upstream.

Release the lock before mmc_signal_sdio_irq is called by
mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq.

Backtrace:
[   65.470000] =============================================
[   65.470000] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
[   65.470000] 3.5.0-rc5 #2 Not tainted
[   65.470000] ---------------------------------------------
[   65.470000] ksdioirqd/mmc0/73 is trying to acquire lock:
[   65.470000]  (&(&host->lock)->rlock#2){-.-...}, at: [<bf054120>] mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0x18/0xdc [mxs_mmc]
[   65.470000]
[   65.470000] but task is already holding lock:
[   65.470000]  (&(&host->lock)->rlock#2){-.-...}, at: [<bf054120>] mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0x18/0xdc [mxs_mmc]
[   65.470000]
[   65.470000] other info that might help us debug this:
[   65.470000]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[   65.470000]
[   65.470000]        CPU0
[   65.470000]        ----
[   65.470000]   lock(&(&host->lock)->rlock#2);
[   65.470000]   lock(&(&host->lock)->rlock#2);
[   65.470000]
[   65.470000]  *** DEADLOCK ***
[   65.470000]
[   65.470000]  May be due to missing lock nesting notation
[   65.470000]
[   65.470000] 1 lock held by ksdioirqd/mmc0/73:
[   65.470000]  #0:  (&(&host->lock)->rlock#2){-.-...}, at: [<bf054120>] mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0x18/0xdc [mxs_mmc]
[   65.470000]
[   65.470000] stack backtrace:
[   65.470000] [<c0014990>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0xf4) from [<c005ccb8>] (__lock_acquire+0x14f8/0x1b98)
[   65.470000] [<c005ccb8>] (__lock_acquire+0x14f8/0x1b98) from [<c005d3f8>] (lock_acquire+0xa0/0x108)
[   65.470000] [<c005d3f8>] (lock_acquire+0xa0/0x108) from [<c02f671c>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x48/0x5c)
[   65.470000] [<c02f671c>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x48/0x5c) from [<bf054120>] (mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0x18/0xdc [mxs_mmc])
[   65.470000] [<bf054120>] (mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0x18/0xdc [mxs_mmc]) from [<bf0541d0>] (mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0xc8/0xdc [mxs_mmc])
[   65.470000] [<bf0541d0>] (mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0xc8/0xdc [mxs_mmc]) from [<c0219b38>] (sdio_irq_thread+0x1bc/0x274)
[   65.470000] [<c0219b38>] (sdio_irq_thread+0x1bc/0x274) from [<c003c324>] (kthread+0x8c/0x98)
[   65.470000] [<c003c324>] (kthread+0x8c/0x98) from [<c00101ac>] (kernel_thread_exit+0x0/0x8)
[   65.470000] BUG: spinlock lockup suspected on CPU#0, ksdioirqd/mmc0/73
[   65.470000]  lock: 0xc3358724, .magic: dead4ead, .owner: ksdioirqd/mmc0/73, .owner_cpu: 0
[   65.470000] [<c0014990>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0xf4) from [<c01b46b0>] (do_raw_spin_lock+0x100/0x144)
[   65.470000] [<c01b46b0>] (do_raw_spin_lock+0x100/0x144) from [<c02f6724>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x50/0x5c)
[   65.470000] [<c02f6724>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x50/0x5c) from [<bf054120>] (mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0x18/0xdc [mxs_mmc])
[   65.470000] [<bf054120>] (mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0x18/0xdc [mxs_mmc]) from [<bf0541d0>] (mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0xc8/0xdc [mxs_mmc])
[   65.470000] [<bf0541d0>] (mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0xc8/0xdc [mxs_mmc]) from [<c0219b38>] (sdio_irq_thread+0x1bc/0x274)
[   65.470000] [<c0219b38>] (sdio_irq_thread+0x1bc/0x274) from [<c003c324>] (kthread+0x8c/0x98)
[   65.470000] [<c003c324>] (kthread+0x8c/0x98) from [<c00101ac>] (kernel_thread_exit+0x0/0x8)

Reported-by: Attila Kinali <attila@kinali.ch>
Signed-off-by: Lauri Hintsala <lauri.hintsala@bluegiga.com>
Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
mmc: mxs-mmc: fix deadlock in SDIO IRQ case 2012-10-02T17:39:08+00:00 Lauri Hintsala lauri.hintsala@bluegiga.com 2012-07-17T14:16:09+00:00 f58f96c17afa66e4f67b3711c0d28ba30d97edbd commit 1af36b2a993dddfa3d6860ec4879c9e8abc9b976 upstream. Release the lock before mmc_signal_sdio_irq is called by mxs_mmc_irq_handler. Backtrace: [ 79.660000] ============================================= [ 79.660000] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] [ 79.660000] 3.4.0-00009-g3e96082-dirty #11 Not tainted [ 79.660000] --------------------------------------------- [ 79.660000] swapper/0 is trying to acquire lock: [ 79.660000] (&(&host->lock)->rlock#2){-.....}, at: [<c026ea3c>] mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0x18/0xd4 [ 79.660000] [ 79.660000] but task is already holding lock: [ 79.660000] (&(&host->lock)->rlock#2){-.....}, at: [<c026f744>] mxs_mmc_irq_handler+0x1c/0xe8 [ 79.660000] [ 79.660000] other info that might help us debug this: [ 79.660000] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 79.660000] [ 79.660000] CPU0 [ 79.660000] ---- [ 79.660000] lock(&(&host->lock)->rlock#2); [ 79.660000] lock(&(&host->lock)->rlock#2); [ 79.660000] [ 79.660000] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 79.660000] [ 79.660000] May be due to missing lock nesting notation [ 79.660000] [ 79.660000] 1 lock held by swapper/0: [ 79.660000] #0: (&(&host->lock)->rlock#2){-.....}, at: [<c026f744>] mxs_mmc_irq_handler+0x1c/0xe8 [ 79.660000] [ 79.660000] stack backtrace: [ 79.660000] [<c0014bd0>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0xf4) from [<c005f9c0>] (__lock_acquire+0x1948/0x1d48) [ 79.660000] [<c005f9c0>] (__lock_acquire+0x1948/0x1d48) from [<c005fea0>] (lock_acquire+0xe0/0xf8) [ 79.660000] [<c005fea0>] (lock_acquire+0xe0/0xf8) from [<c03a8460>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x44/0x58) [ 79.660000] [<c03a8460>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x44/0x58) from [<c026ea3c>] (mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0x18/0xd4) [ 79.660000] [<c026ea3c>] (mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0x18/0xd4) from [<c026f7fc>] (mxs_mmc_irq_handler+0xd4/0xe8) [ 79.660000] [<c026f7fc>] (mxs_mmc_irq_handler+0xd4/0xe8) from [<c006bdd8>] (handle_irq_event_percpu+0x70/0x254) [ 79.660000] [<c006bdd8>] (handle_irq_event_percpu+0x70/0x254) from [<c006bff8>] (handle_irq_event+0x3c/0x5c) [ 79.660000] [<c006bff8>] (handle_irq_event+0x3c/0x5c) from [<c006e6d0>] (handle_level_irq+0x90/0x110) [ 79.660000] [<c006e6d0>] (handle_level_irq+0x90/0x110) from [<c006b930>] (generic_handle_irq+0x38/0x50) [ 79.660000] [<c006b930>] (generic_handle_irq+0x38/0x50) from [<c00102fc>] (handle_IRQ+0x30/0x84) [ 79.660000] [<c00102fc>] (handle_IRQ+0x30/0x84) from [<c000f058>] (__irq_svc+0x38/0x60) [ 79.660000] [<c000f058>] (__irq_svc+0x38/0x60) from [<c0010520>] (default_idle+0x2c/0x40) [ 79.660000] [<c0010520>] (default_idle+0x2c/0x40) from [<c0010a90>] (cpu_idle+0x64/0xcc) [ 79.660000] [<c0010a90>] (cpu_idle+0x64/0xcc) from [<c04ff858>] (start_kernel+0x244/0x2c8) [ 79.660000] BUG: spinlock lockup on CPU#0, swapper/0 [ 79.660000] lock: c398cb2c, .magic: dead4ead, .owner: swapper/0, .owner_cpu: 0 [ 79.660000] [<c0014bd0>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0xf4) from [<c01ddb1c>] (do_raw_spin_lock+0xf0/0x144) [ 79.660000] [<c01ddb1c>] (do_raw_spin_lock+0xf0/0x144) from [<c03a8468>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x4c/0x58) [ 79.660000] [<c03a8468>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x4c/0x58) from [<c026ea3c>] (mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0x18/0xd4) [ 79.660000] [<c026ea3c>] (mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0x18/0xd4) from [<c026f7fc>] (mxs_mmc_irq_handler+0xd4/0xe8) [ 79.660000] [<c026f7fc>] (mxs_mmc_irq_handler+0xd4/0xe8) from [<c006bdd8>] (handle_irq_event_percpu+0x70/0x254) [ 79.660000] [<c006bdd8>] (handle_irq_event_percpu+0x70/0x254) from [<c006bff8>] (handle_irq_event+0x3c/0x5c) [ 79.660000] [<c006bff8>] (handle_irq_event+0x3c/0x5c) from [<c006e6d0>] (handle_level_irq+0x90/0x110) [ 79.660000] [<c006e6d0>] (handle_level_irq+0x90/0x110) from [<c006b930>] (generic_handle_irq+0x38/0x50) [ 79.660000] [<c006b930>] (generic_handle_irq+0x38/0x50) from [<c00102fc>] (handle_IRQ+0x30/0x84) [ 79.660000] [<c00102fc>] (handle_IRQ+0x30/0x84) from [<c000f058>] (__irq_svc+0x38/0x60) [ 79.660000] [<c000f058>] (__irq_svc+0x38/0x60) from [<c0010520>] (default_idle+0x2c/0x40) [ 79.660000] [<c0010520>] (default_idle+0x2c/0x40) from [<c0010a90>] (cpu_idle+0x64/0xcc) [ 79.660000] [<c0010a90>] (cpu_idle+0x64/0xcc) from [<c04ff858>] (start_kernel+0x244/0x2c8) Signed-off-by: Lauri Hintsala <lauri.hintsala@bluegiga.com> Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 1af36b2a993dddfa3d6860ec4879c9e8abc9b976 upstream.

Release the lock before mmc_signal_sdio_irq is called by mxs_mmc_irq_handler.

Backtrace:
[   79.660000] =============================================
[   79.660000] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
[   79.660000] 3.4.0-00009-g3e96082-dirty #11 Not tainted
[   79.660000] ---------------------------------------------
[   79.660000] swapper/0 is trying to acquire lock:
[   79.660000]  (&(&host->lock)->rlock#2){-.....}, at: [<c026ea3c>] mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0x18/0xd4
[   79.660000]
[   79.660000] but task is already holding lock:
[   79.660000]  (&(&host->lock)->rlock#2){-.....}, at: [<c026f744>] mxs_mmc_irq_handler+0x1c/0xe8
[   79.660000]
[   79.660000] other info that might help us debug this:
[   79.660000]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[   79.660000]
[   79.660000]        CPU0
[   79.660000]        ----
[   79.660000]   lock(&(&host->lock)->rlock#2);
[   79.660000]   lock(&(&host->lock)->rlock#2);
[   79.660000]
[   79.660000]  *** DEADLOCK ***
[   79.660000]
[   79.660000]  May be due to missing lock nesting notation
[   79.660000]
[   79.660000] 1 lock held by swapper/0:
[   79.660000]  #0:  (&(&host->lock)->rlock#2){-.....}, at: [<c026f744>] mxs_mmc_irq_handler+0x1c/0xe8
[   79.660000]
[   79.660000] stack backtrace:
[   79.660000] [<c0014bd0>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0xf4) from [<c005f9c0>] (__lock_acquire+0x1948/0x1d48)
[   79.660000] [<c005f9c0>] (__lock_acquire+0x1948/0x1d48) from [<c005fea0>] (lock_acquire+0xe0/0xf8)
[   79.660000] [<c005fea0>] (lock_acquire+0xe0/0xf8) from [<c03a8460>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x44/0x58)
[   79.660000] [<c03a8460>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x44/0x58) from [<c026ea3c>] (mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0x18/0xd4)
[   79.660000] [<c026ea3c>] (mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0x18/0xd4) from [<c026f7fc>] (mxs_mmc_irq_handler+0xd4/0xe8)
[   79.660000] [<c026f7fc>] (mxs_mmc_irq_handler+0xd4/0xe8) from [<c006bdd8>] (handle_irq_event_percpu+0x70/0x254)
[   79.660000] [<c006bdd8>] (handle_irq_event_percpu+0x70/0x254) from [<c006bff8>] (handle_irq_event+0x3c/0x5c)
[   79.660000] [<c006bff8>] (handle_irq_event+0x3c/0x5c) from [<c006e6d0>] (handle_level_irq+0x90/0x110)
[   79.660000] [<c006e6d0>] (handle_level_irq+0x90/0x110) from [<c006b930>] (generic_handle_irq+0x38/0x50)
[   79.660000] [<c006b930>] (generic_handle_irq+0x38/0x50) from [<c00102fc>] (handle_IRQ+0x30/0x84)
[   79.660000] [<c00102fc>] (handle_IRQ+0x30/0x84) from [<c000f058>] (__irq_svc+0x38/0x60)
[   79.660000] [<c000f058>] (__irq_svc+0x38/0x60) from [<c0010520>] (default_idle+0x2c/0x40)
[   79.660000] [<c0010520>] (default_idle+0x2c/0x40) from [<c0010a90>] (cpu_idle+0x64/0xcc)
[   79.660000] [<c0010a90>] (cpu_idle+0x64/0xcc) from [<c04ff858>] (start_kernel+0x244/0x2c8)
[   79.660000] BUG: spinlock lockup on CPU#0, swapper/0
[   79.660000]  lock: c398cb2c, .magic: dead4ead, .owner: swapper/0, .owner_cpu: 0
[   79.660000] [<c0014bd0>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0xf4) from [<c01ddb1c>] (do_raw_spin_lock+0xf0/0x144)
[   79.660000] [<c01ddb1c>] (do_raw_spin_lock+0xf0/0x144) from [<c03a8468>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x4c/0x58)
[   79.660000] [<c03a8468>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x4c/0x58) from [<c026ea3c>] (mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0x18/0xd4)
[   79.660000] [<c026ea3c>] (mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0x18/0xd4) from [<c026f7fc>] (mxs_mmc_irq_handler+0xd4/0xe8)
[   79.660000] [<c026f7fc>] (mxs_mmc_irq_handler+0xd4/0xe8) from [<c006bdd8>] (handle_irq_event_percpu+0x70/0x254)
[   79.660000] [<c006bdd8>] (handle_irq_event_percpu+0x70/0x254) from [<c006bff8>] (handle_irq_event+0x3c/0x5c)
[   79.660000] [<c006bff8>] (handle_irq_event+0x3c/0x5c) from [<c006e6d0>] (handle_level_irq+0x90/0x110)
[   79.660000] [<c006e6d0>] (handle_level_irq+0x90/0x110) from [<c006b930>] (generic_handle_irq+0x38/0x50)
[   79.660000] [<c006b930>] (generic_handle_irq+0x38/0x50) from [<c00102fc>] (handle_IRQ+0x30/0x84)
[   79.660000] [<c00102fc>] (handle_IRQ+0x30/0x84) from [<c000f058>] (__irq_svc+0x38/0x60)
[   79.660000] [<c000f058>] (__irq_svc+0x38/0x60) from [<c0010520>] (default_idle+0x2c/0x40)
[   79.660000] [<c0010520>] (default_idle+0x2c/0x40) from [<c0010a90>] (cpu_idle+0x64/0xcc)
[   79.660000] [<c0010a90>] (cpu_idle+0x64/0xcc) from [<c04ff858>] (start_kernel+0x244/0x2c8)

Signed-off-by: Lauri Hintsala <lauri.hintsala@bluegiga.com>
Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
mmc: sdhci: fix incorrect command used in tuning 2012-08-09T15:22:35+00:00 Aaron Lu aaron.lu@amd.com 2012-07-03T09:27:49+00:00 471963efff64303be0d80ac6a47a70ef55b8e7b6 commit 473b095a72a95ba719905b1f2e82cd18d099a427 upstream. For SD hosts using retuning mode 1, when retuning timer expired, it will need to do retuning in sdhci_request before processing the actual request. But the retuning command is fixed: cmd19 for SD card and cmd21 for eMMC card, so we can't use the original request's command to do the tuning. And since the tuning command depends on the card type attached to the host, we will need to know the card type to use the correct tuning command. Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Philip Rakity <prakity@marvell.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 473b095a72a95ba719905b1f2e82cd18d099a427 upstream.

For SD hosts using retuning mode 1, when retuning timer expired, it will
need to do retuning in sdhci_request before processing the actual
request. But the retuning command is fixed: cmd19 for SD card and cmd21
for eMMC card, so we can't use the original request's command to do the
tuning.

And since the tuning command depends on the card type attached to the
host, we will need to know the card type to use the correct tuning
command.

Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Philip Rakity <prakity@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
mmc: sdhci-pci: CaFe has broken card detection 2012-08-09T15:22:35+00:00 Daniel Drake dsd@laptop.org 2012-07-03T22:13:39+00:00 8f475b5ca690666cf4f4e465eb4e90dda08567e6 commit 55fc05b7414274f17795cd0e8a3b1546f3649d5e upstream. At http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/11980 we have determined that the Marvell CaFe SDHCI controller reports bad card presence during resume. It reports that no card is present even when it is. This is a regression -- resume worked back around 2.6.37. Around 400ms after resuming, a "card inserted" interrupt is generated, at which point it starts reporting presence. Work around this hardware oddity by setting the SDHCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_CARD_DETECTION flag. Thanks to Chris Ball for helping with diagnosis. Signed-off-by: Daniel Drake <dsd@laptop.org> Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 55fc05b7414274f17795cd0e8a3b1546f3649d5e upstream.

At http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/11980 we have determined that the
Marvell CaFe SDHCI controller reports bad card presence during
resume. It reports that no card is present even when it is.
This is a regression -- resume worked back around 2.6.37.

Around 400ms after resuming, a "card inserted" interrupt is
generated, at which point it starts reporting presence.

Work around this hardware oddity by setting the
SDHCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_CARD_DETECTION flag.
Thanks to Chris Ball for helping with diagnosis.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Drake <dsd@laptop.org>
Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
mmc: cd-gpio: pass IRQF_ONESHOT to request_threaded_irq() 2012-07-11T03:03:57+00:00 Guennadi Liakhovetski g.liakhovetski@gmx.de 2012-07-11T02:54:11+00:00 623b51fc8642fd3c795fa9903be3adaa537ad9c5 Fix a boot regression on Mackerel boards with sh_mobile_sdhi in existing kernels causing: genirq: Threaded irq requested with handler=NULL and !ONESHOT for irq XXX caused by 1c6c6952 (genirq: Reject bogus threaded irq requests). This is backported from Guennadi's patch: "mmc: extend and rename cd-gpio helpers to handle more slot GPIO functions" Reported-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org> 
Fix a boot regression on Mackerel boards with sh_mobile_sdhi
in existing kernels causing:

genirq: Threaded irq requested with handler=NULL and !ONESHOT for irq XXX

caused by 1c6c6952 (genirq: Reject bogus threaded irq requests).

This is backported from Guennadi's patch:
"mmc: extend and rename cd-gpio helpers to handle more slot GPIO functions"

Reported-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>