linux-stable.git/drivers/mmc, branch v3.2.30 Linux kernel stable tree mmc: card: Skip secure erase on MoviNAND; causes unrecoverable corruption. 2012-09-19T14:04:40+00:00 Ian Chen ian.cy.chen@samsung.com 2012-08-29T06:05:36+00:00 3b75588b26cc22a16ff812e38ba7720b3e2d9b38 commit 3550ccdb9d8d350e526b809bf3dd92b550a74fe1 upstream. For several MoviNAND eMMC parts, there are known issues with secure erase and secure trim. For these specific MoviNAND devices, we skip these operations. Specifically, there is a bug in the eMMC firmware that causes unrecoverable corruption when the MMC is erased with MMC_CAP_ERASE enabled. References: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1644364 https://plus.google.com/111398485184813224730/posts/21pTYfTsCkB#111398485184813224730/posts/21pTYfTsCkB Signed-off-by: Ian Chen <ian.cy.chen@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@gmail.com> Acked-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org> [bwh: Backported to 3.2: adjust context] Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> 
commit 3550ccdb9d8d350e526b809bf3dd92b550a74fe1 upstream.

For several MoviNAND eMMC parts, there are known issues with secure
erase and secure trim.  For these specific MoviNAND devices, we skip
these operations.

Specifically, there is a bug in the eMMC firmware that causes
unrecoverable corruption when the MMC is erased with MMC_CAP_ERASE
enabled.

References:

http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1644364
https://plus.google.com/111398485184813224730/posts/21pTYfTsCkB#111398485184813224730/posts/21pTYfTsCkB

Signed-off-by: Ian Chen <ian.cy.chen@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
[bwh: Backported to 3.2: adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
mmc: sdhci-esdhc: break out early if clock is 0 2012-09-19T14:04:39+00:00 Shawn Guo shawn.guo@linaro.org 2012-08-22T15:10:01+00:00 a0d9ef18e6578ebce77372896fa8fb1ba19e1612 commit 74f330bceaa7b88d06062e1cac3d519a3dfc041e upstream. Since commit 30832ab56 ("mmc: sdhci: Always pass clock request value zero to set_clock host op") was merged, esdhc_set_clock starts hitting "if (clock == 0)" where ESDHC_SYSTEM_CONTROL has been operated. This causes SDHCI card-detection function being broken. Fix the regression by moving "if (clock == 0)" above ESDHC_SYSTEM_CONTROL operation. Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> 
commit 74f330bceaa7b88d06062e1cac3d519a3dfc041e upstream.

Since commit 30832ab56 ("mmc: sdhci: Always pass clock request value
zero to set_clock host op") was merged, esdhc_set_clock starts hitting
"if (clock == 0)" where ESDHC_SYSTEM_CONTROL has been operated.  This
causes SDHCI card-detection function being broken.  Fix the regression
by moving "if (clock == 0)" above ESDHC_SYSTEM_CONTROL operation.

Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
mmc: mxs-mmc: fix deadlock caused by recursion loop 2012-09-19T14:04:39+00:00 Lauri Hintsala lauri.hintsala@bluegiga.com 2012-07-17T14:16:10+00:00 3a0ae8e18c188a90c8a54fd26d18d6da5a084892 commit fc108d24d3a6da63576a460e122fa1df0cbdea20 upstream. Release the lock before mmc_signal_sdio_irq is called by mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq. Backtrace: [ 65.470000] ============================================= [ 65.470000] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] [ 65.470000] 3.5.0-rc5 #2 Not tainted [ 65.470000] --------------------------------------------- [ 65.470000] ksdioirqd/mmc0/73 is trying to acquire lock: [ 65.470000] (&(&host->lock)->rlock#2){-.-...}, at: [<bf054120>] mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0x18/0xdc [mxs_mmc] [ 65.470000] [ 65.470000] but task is already holding lock: [ 65.470000] (&(&host->lock)->rlock#2){-.-...}, at: [<bf054120>] mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0x18/0xdc [mxs_mmc] [ 65.470000] [ 65.470000] other info that might help us debug this: [ 65.470000] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 65.470000] [ 65.470000] CPU0 [ 65.470000] ---- [ 65.470000] lock(&(&host->lock)->rlock#2); [ 65.470000] lock(&(&host->lock)->rlock#2); [ 65.470000] [ 65.470000] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 65.470000] [ 65.470000] May be due to missing lock nesting notation [ 65.470000] [ 65.470000] 1 lock held by ksdioirqd/mmc0/73: [ 65.470000] #0: (&(&host->lock)->rlock#2){-.-...}, at: [<bf054120>] mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0x18/0xdc [mxs_mmc] [ 65.470000] [ 65.470000] stack backtrace: [ 65.470000] [<c0014990>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0xf4) from [<c005ccb8>] (__lock_acquire+0x14f8/0x1b98) [ 65.470000] [<c005ccb8>] (__lock_acquire+0x14f8/0x1b98) from [<c005d3f8>] (lock_acquire+0xa0/0x108) [ 65.470000] [<c005d3f8>] (lock_acquire+0xa0/0x108) from [<c02f671c>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x48/0x5c) [ 65.470000] [<c02f671c>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x48/0x5c) from [<bf054120>] (mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0x18/0xdc [mxs_mmc]) [ 65.470000] [<bf054120>] (mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0x18/0xdc [mxs_mmc]) from [<bf0541d0>] (mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0xc8/0xdc [mxs_mmc]) [ 65.470000] [<bf0541d0>] (mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0xc8/0xdc [mxs_mmc]) from [<c0219b38>] (sdio_irq_thread+0x1bc/0x274) [ 65.470000] [<c0219b38>] (sdio_irq_thread+0x1bc/0x274) from [<c003c324>] (kthread+0x8c/0x98) [ 65.470000] [<c003c324>] (kthread+0x8c/0x98) from [<c00101ac>] (kernel_thread_exit+0x0/0x8) [ 65.470000] BUG: spinlock lockup suspected on CPU#0, ksdioirqd/mmc0/73 [ 65.470000] lock: 0xc3358724, .magic: dead4ead, .owner: ksdioirqd/mmc0/73, .owner_cpu: 0 [ 65.470000] [<c0014990>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0xf4) from [<c01b46b0>] (do_raw_spin_lock+0x100/0x144) [ 65.470000] [<c01b46b0>] (do_raw_spin_lock+0x100/0x144) from [<c02f6724>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x50/0x5c) [ 65.470000] [<c02f6724>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x50/0x5c) from [<bf054120>] (mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0x18/0xdc [mxs_mmc]) [ 65.470000] [<bf054120>] (mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0x18/0xdc [mxs_mmc]) from [<bf0541d0>] (mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0xc8/0xdc [mxs_mmc]) [ 65.470000] [<bf0541d0>] (mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0xc8/0xdc [mxs_mmc]) from [<c0219b38>] (sdio_irq_thread+0x1bc/0x274) [ 65.470000] [<c0219b38>] (sdio_irq_thread+0x1bc/0x274) from [<c003c324>] (kthread+0x8c/0x98) [ 65.470000] [<c003c324>] (kthread+0x8c/0x98) from [<c00101ac>] (kernel_thread_exit+0x0/0x8) Reported-by: Attila Kinali <attila@kinali.ch> Signed-off-by: Lauri Hintsala <lauri.hintsala@bluegiga.com> Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org> [bwh: Backported to 3.2: - Adjust context - HW_SSP_STATUS is a simple rather than function-like macro] Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> 
commit fc108d24d3a6da63576a460e122fa1df0cbdea20 upstream.

Release the lock before mmc_signal_sdio_irq is called by
mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq.

Backtrace:
[   65.470000] =============================================
[   65.470000] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
[   65.470000] 3.5.0-rc5 #2 Not tainted
[   65.470000] ---------------------------------------------
[   65.470000] ksdioirqd/mmc0/73 is trying to acquire lock:
[   65.470000]  (&(&host->lock)->rlock#2){-.-...}, at: [<bf054120>] mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0x18/0xdc [mxs_mmc]
[   65.470000]
[   65.470000] but task is already holding lock:
[   65.470000]  (&(&host->lock)->rlock#2){-.-...}, at: [<bf054120>] mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0x18/0xdc [mxs_mmc]
[   65.470000]
[   65.470000] other info that might help us debug this:
[   65.470000]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[   65.470000]
[   65.470000]        CPU0
[   65.470000]        ----
[   65.470000]   lock(&(&host->lock)->rlock#2);
[   65.470000]   lock(&(&host->lock)->rlock#2);
[   65.470000]
[   65.470000]  *** DEADLOCK ***
[   65.470000]
[   65.470000]  May be due to missing lock nesting notation
[   65.470000]
[   65.470000] 1 lock held by ksdioirqd/mmc0/73:
[   65.470000]  #0:  (&(&host->lock)->rlock#2){-.-...}, at: [<bf054120>] mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0x18/0xdc [mxs_mmc]
[   65.470000]
[   65.470000] stack backtrace:
[   65.470000] [<c0014990>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0xf4) from [<c005ccb8>] (__lock_acquire+0x14f8/0x1b98)
[   65.470000] [<c005ccb8>] (__lock_acquire+0x14f8/0x1b98) from [<c005d3f8>] (lock_acquire+0xa0/0x108)
[   65.470000] [<c005d3f8>] (lock_acquire+0xa0/0x108) from [<c02f671c>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x48/0x5c)
[   65.470000] [<c02f671c>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x48/0x5c) from [<bf054120>] (mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0x18/0xdc [mxs_mmc])
[   65.470000] [<bf054120>] (mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0x18/0xdc [mxs_mmc]) from [<bf0541d0>] (mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0xc8/0xdc [mxs_mmc])
[   65.470000] [<bf0541d0>] (mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0xc8/0xdc [mxs_mmc]) from [<c0219b38>] (sdio_irq_thread+0x1bc/0x274)
[   65.470000] [<c0219b38>] (sdio_irq_thread+0x1bc/0x274) from [<c003c324>] (kthread+0x8c/0x98)
[   65.470000] [<c003c324>] (kthread+0x8c/0x98) from [<c00101ac>] (kernel_thread_exit+0x0/0x8)
[   65.470000] BUG: spinlock lockup suspected on CPU#0, ksdioirqd/mmc0/73
[   65.470000]  lock: 0xc3358724, .magic: dead4ead, .owner: ksdioirqd/mmc0/73, .owner_cpu: 0
[   65.470000] [<c0014990>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0xf4) from [<c01b46b0>] (do_raw_spin_lock+0x100/0x144)
[   65.470000] [<c01b46b0>] (do_raw_spin_lock+0x100/0x144) from [<c02f6724>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x50/0x5c)
[   65.470000] [<c02f6724>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x50/0x5c) from [<bf054120>] (mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0x18/0xdc [mxs_mmc])
[   65.470000] [<bf054120>] (mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0x18/0xdc [mxs_mmc]) from [<bf0541d0>] (mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0xc8/0xdc [mxs_mmc])
[   65.470000] [<bf0541d0>] (mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0xc8/0xdc [mxs_mmc]) from [<c0219b38>] (sdio_irq_thread+0x1bc/0x274)
[   65.470000] [<c0219b38>] (sdio_irq_thread+0x1bc/0x274) from [<c003c324>] (kthread+0x8c/0x98)
[   65.470000] [<c003c324>] (kthread+0x8c/0x98) from [<c00101ac>] (kernel_thread_exit+0x0/0x8)

Reported-by: Attila Kinali <attila@kinali.ch>
Signed-off-by: Lauri Hintsala <lauri.hintsala@bluegiga.com>
Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
[bwh: Backported to 3.2:
 - Adjust context
 - HW_SSP_STATUS is a simple rather than function-like macro]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
mmc: mxs-mmc: fix deadlock in SDIO IRQ case 2012-09-19T14:04:39+00:00 Lauri Hintsala lauri.hintsala@bluegiga.com 2012-07-17T14:16:09+00:00 2fa07abbe88fa0452121d13c44c95595b19ed67d commit 1af36b2a993dddfa3d6860ec4879c9e8abc9b976 upstream. Release the lock before mmc_signal_sdio_irq is called by mxs_mmc_irq_handler. Backtrace: [ 79.660000] ============================================= [ 79.660000] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] [ 79.660000] 3.4.0-00009-g3e96082-dirty #11 Not tainted [ 79.660000] --------------------------------------------- [ 79.660000] swapper/0 is trying to acquire lock: [ 79.660000] (&(&host->lock)->rlock#2){-.....}, at: [<c026ea3c>] mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0x18/0xd4 [ 79.660000] [ 79.660000] but task is already holding lock: [ 79.660000] (&(&host->lock)->rlock#2){-.....}, at: [<c026f744>] mxs_mmc_irq_handler+0x1c/0xe8 [ 79.660000] [ 79.660000] other info that might help us debug this: [ 79.660000] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 79.660000] [ 79.660000] CPU0 [ 79.660000] ---- [ 79.660000] lock(&(&host->lock)->rlock#2); [ 79.660000] lock(&(&host->lock)->rlock#2); [ 79.660000] [ 79.660000] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 79.660000] [ 79.660000] May be due to missing lock nesting notation [ 79.660000] [ 79.660000] 1 lock held by swapper/0: [ 79.660000] #0: (&(&host->lock)->rlock#2){-.....}, at: [<c026f744>] mxs_mmc_irq_handler+0x1c/0xe8 [ 79.660000] [ 79.660000] stack backtrace: [ 79.660000] [<c0014bd0>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0xf4) from [<c005f9c0>] (__lock_acquire+0x1948/0x1d48) [ 79.660000] [<c005f9c0>] (__lock_acquire+0x1948/0x1d48) from [<c005fea0>] (lock_acquire+0xe0/0xf8) [ 79.660000] [<c005fea0>] (lock_acquire+0xe0/0xf8) from [<c03a8460>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x44/0x58) [ 79.660000] [<c03a8460>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x44/0x58) from [<c026ea3c>] (mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0x18/0xd4) [ 79.660000] [<c026ea3c>] (mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0x18/0xd4) from [<c026f7fc>] (mxs_mmc_irq_handler+0xd4/0xe8) [ 79.660000] [<c026f7fc>] (mxs_mmc_irq_handler+0xd4/0xe8) from [<c006bdd8>] (handle_irq_event_percpu+0x70/0x254) [ 79.660000] [<c006bdd8>] (handle_irq_event_percpu+0x70/0x254) from [<c006bff8>] (handle_irq_event+0x3c/0x5c) [ 79.660000] [<c006bff8>] (handle_irq_event+0x3c/0x5c) from [<c006e6d0>] (handle_level_irq+0x90/0x110) [ 79.660000] [<c006e6d0>] (handle_level_irq+0x90/0x110) from [<c006b930>] (generic_handle_irq+0x38/0x50) [ 79.660000] [<c006b930>] (generic_handle_irq+0x38/0x50) from [<c00102fc>] (handle_IRQ+0x30/0x84) [ 79.660000] [<c00102fc>] (handle_IRQ+0x30/0x84) from [<c000f058>] (__irq_svc+0x38/0x60) [ 79.660000] [<c000f058>] (__irq_svc+0x38/0x60) from [<c0010520>] (default_idle+0x2c/0x40) [ 79.660000] [<c0010520>] (default_idle+0x2c/0x40) from [<c0010a90>] (cpu_idle+0x64/0xcc) [ 79.660000] [<c0010a90>] (cpu_idle+0x64/0xcc) from [<c04ff858>] (start_kernel+0x244/0x2c8) [ 79.660000] BUG: spinlock lockup on CPU#0, swapper/0 [ 79.660000] lock: c398cb2c, .magic: dead4ead, .owner: swapper/0, .owner_cpu: 0 [ 79.660000] [<c0014bd0>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0xf4) from [<c01ddb1c>] (do_raw_spin_lock+0xf0/0x144) [ 79.660000] [<c01ddb1c>] (do_raw_spin_lock+0xf0/0x144) from [<c03a8468>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x4c/0x58) [ 79.660000] [<c03a8468>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x4c/0x58) from [<c026ea3c>] (mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0x18/0xd4) [ 79.660000] [<c026ea3c>] (mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0x18/0xd4) from [<c026f7fc>] (mxs_mmc_irq_handler+0xd4/0xe8) [ 79.660000] [<c026f7fc>] (mxs_mmc_irq_handler+0xd4/0xe8) from [<c006bdd8>] (handle_irq_event_percpu+0x70/0x254) [ 79.660000] [<c006bdd8>] (handle_irq_event_percpu+0x70/0x254) from [<c006bff8>] (handle_irq_event+0x3c/0x5c) [ 79.660000] [<c006bff8>] (handle_irq_event+0x3c/0x5c) from [<c006e6d0>] (handle_level_irq+0x90/0x110) [ 79.660000] [<c006e6d0>] (handle_level_irq+0x90/0x110) from [<c006b930>] (generic_handle_irq+0x38/0x50) [ 79.660000] [<c006b930>] (generic_handle_irq+0x38/0x50) from [<c00102fc>] (handle_IRQ+0x30/0x84) [ 79.660000] [<c00102fc>] (handle_IRQ+0x30/0x84) from [<c000f058>] (__irq_svc+0x38/0x60) [ 79.660000] [<c000f058>] (__irq_svc+0x38/0x60) from [<c0010520>] (default_idle+0x2c/0x40) [ 79.660000] [<c0010520>] (default_idle+0x2c/0x40) from [<c0010a90>] (cpu_idle+0x64/0xcc) [ 79.660000] [<c0010a90>] (cpu_idle+0x64/0xcc) from [<c04ff858>] (start_kernel+0x244/0x2c8) Signed-off-by: Lauri Hintsala <lauri.hintsala@bluegiga.com> Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org> [bwh: Backported to 3.2: adjust context] Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> 
commit 1af36b2a993dddfa3d6860ec4879c9e8abc9b976 upstream.

Release the lock before mmc_signal_sdio_irq is called by mxs_mmc_irq_handler.

Backtrace:
[   79.660000] =============================================
[   79.660000] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
[   79.660000] 3.4.0-00009-g3e96082-dirty #11 Not tainted
[   79.660000] ---------------------------------------------
[   79.660000] swapper/0 is trying to acquire lock:
[   79.660000]  (&(&host->lock)->rlock#2){-.....}, at: [<c026ea3c>] mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0x18/0xd4
[   79.660000]
[   79.660000] but task is already holding lock:
[   79.660000]  (&(&host->lock)->rlock#2){-.....}, at: [<c026f744>] mxs_mmc_irq_handler+0x1c/0xe8
[   79.660000]
[   79.660000] other info that might help us debug this:
[   79.660000]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[   79.660000]
[   79.660000]        CPU0
[   79.660000]        ----
[   79.660000]   lock(&(&host->lock)->rlock#2);
[   79.660000]   lock(&(&host->lock)->rlock#2);
[   79.660000]
[   79.660000]  *** DEADLOCK ***
[   79.660000]
[   79.660000]  May be due to missing lock nesting notation
[   79.660000]
[   79.660000] 1 lock held by swapper/0:
[   79.660000]  #0:  (&(&host->lock)->rlock#2){-.....}, at: [<c026f744>] mxs_mmc_irq_handler+0x1c/0xe8
[   79.660000]
[   79.660000] stack backtrace:
[   79.660000] [<c0014bd0>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0xf4) from [<c005f9c0>] (__lock_acquire+0x1948/0x1d48)
[   79.660000] [<c005f9c0>] (__lock_acquire+0x1948/0x1d48) from [<c005fea0>] (lock_acquire+0xe0/0xf8)
[   79.660000] [<c005fea0>] (lock_acquire+0xe0/0xf8) from [<c03a8460>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x44/0x58)
[   79.660000] [<c03a8460>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x44/0x58) from [<c026ea3c>] (mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0x18/0xd4)
[   79.660000] [<c026ea3c>] (mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0x18/0xd4) from [<c026f7fc>] (mxs_mmc_irq_handler+0xd4/0xe8)
[   79.660000] [<c026f7fc>] (mxs_mmc_irq_handler+0xd4/0xe8) from [<c006bdd8>] (handle_irq_event_percpu+0x70/0x254)
[   79.660000] [<c006bdd8>] (handle_irq_event_percpu+0x70/0x254) from [<c006bff8>] (handle_irq_event+0x3c/0x5c)
[   79.660000] [<c006bff8>] (handle_irq_event+0x3c/0x5c) from [<c006e6d0>] (handle_level_irq+0x90/0x110)
[   79.660000] [<c006e6d0>] (handle_level_irq+0x90/0x110) from [<c006b930>] (generic_handle_irq+0x38/0x50)
[   79.660000] [<c006b930>] (generic_handle_irq+0x38/0x50) from [<c00102fc>] (handle_IRQ+0x30/0x84)
[   79.660000] [<c00102fc>] (handle_IRQ+0x30/0x84) from [<c000f058>] (__irq_svc+0x38/0x60)
[   79.660000] [<c000f058>] (__irq_svc+0x38/0x60) from [<c0010520>] (default_idle+0x2c/0x40)
[   79.660000] [<c0010520>] (default_idle+0x2c/0x40) from [<c0010a90>] (cpu_idle+0x64/0xcc)
[   79.660000] [<c0010a90>] (cpu_idle+0x64/0xcc) from [<c04ff858>] (start_kernel+0x244/0x2c8)
[   79.660000] BUG: spinlock lockup on CPU#0, swapper/0
[   79.660000]  lock: c398cb2c, .magic: dead4ead, .owner: swapper/0, .owner_cpu: 0
[   79.660000] [<c0014bd0>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0xf4) from [<c01ddb1c>] (do_raw_spin_lock+0xf0/0x144)
[   79.660000] [<c01ddb1c>] (do_raw_spin_lock+0xf0/0x144) from [<c03a8468>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x4c/0x58)
[   79.660000] [<c03a8468>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x4c/0x58) from [<c026ea3c>] (mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0x18/0xd4)
[   79.660000] [<c026ea3c>] (mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0x18/0xd4) from [<c026f7fc>] (mxs_mmc_irq_handler+0xd4/0xe8)
[   79.660000] [<c026f7fc>] (mxs_mmc_irq_handler+0xd4/0xe8) from [<c006bdd8>] (handle_irq_event_percpu+0x70/0x254)
[   79.660000] [<c006bdd8>] (handle_irq_event_percpu+0x70/0x254) from [<c006bff8>] (handle_irq_event+0x3c/0x5c)
[   79.660000] [<c006bff8>] (handle_irq_event+0x3c/0x5c) from [<c006e6d0>] (handle_level_irq+0x90/0x110)
[   79.660000] [<c006e6d0>] (handle_level_irq+0x90/0x110) from [<c006b930>] (generic_handle_irq+0x38/0x50)
[   79.660000] [<c006b930>] (generic_handle_irq+0x38/0x50) from [<c00102fc>] (handle_IRQ+0x30/0x84)
[   79.660000] [<c00102fc>] (handle_IRQ+0x30/0x84) from [<c000f058>] (__irq_svc+0x38/0x60)
[   79.660000] [<c000f058>] (__irq_svc+0x38/0x60) from [<c0010520>] (default_idle+0x2c/0x40)
[   79.660000] [<c0010520>] (default_idle+0x2c/0x40) from [<c0010a90>] (cpu_idle+0x64/0xcc)
[   79.660000] [<c0010a90>] (cpu_idle+0x64/0xcc) from [<c04ff858>] (start_kernel+0x244/0x2c8)

Signed-off-by: Lauri Hintsala <lauri.hintsala@bluegiga.com>
Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
[bwh: Backported to 3.2: adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
mmc: sdhci-pci: CaFe has broken card detection 2012-08-02T13:37:57+00:00 Daniel Drake dsd@laptop.org 2012-07-03T22:13:39+00:00 99a779227aef0e93a77f7b962b266416f0ead9a6 commit 55fc05b7414274f17795cd0e8a3b1546f3649d5e upstream. At http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/11980 we have determined that the Marvell CaFe SDHCI controller reports bad card presence during resume. It reports that no card is present even when it is. This is a regression -- resume worked back around 2.6.37. Around 400ms after resuming, a "card inserted" interrupt is generated, at which point it starts reporting presence. Work around this hardware oddity by setting the SDHCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_CARD_DETECTION flag. Thanks to Chris Ball for helping with diagnosis. Signed-off-by: Daniel Drake <dsd@laptop.org> [stable@: please apply to 3.0+] Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> 
commit 55fc05b7414274f17795cd0e8a3b1546f3649d5e upstream.

At http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/11980 we have determined that the
Marvell CaFe SDHCI controller reports bad card presence during
resume. It reports that no card is present even when it is.
This is a regression -- resume worked back around 2.6.37.

Around 400ms after resuming, a "card inserted" interrupt is
generated, at which point it starts reporting presence.

Work around this hardware oddity by setting the
SDHCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_CARD_DETECTION flag.
Thanks to Chris Ball for helping with diagnosis.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Drake <dsd@laptop.org>
[stable@: please apply to 3.0+]
Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
mmc: sdio: avoid spurious calls to interrupt handlers 2012-05-30T23:43:57+00:00 Nicolas Pitre nicolas.pitre@linaro.org 2012-04-16T23:16:54+00:00 e2538ce447011463817a5365455b163a826bea88 commit bbbc4c4d8c5face097d695f9bf3a39647ba6b7e7 upstream. Commit 06e8935feb ("optimized SDIO IRQ handling for single irq") introduced some spurious calls to SDIO function interrupt handlers, such as when the SDIO IRQ thread is started, or the safety check performed upon a system resume. Let's add a flag to perform the optimization only when a real interrupt is signaled by the host driver and we know there is no point confirming it. Reported-by: Sujit Reddy Thumma <sthumma@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> 
commit bbbc4c4d8c5face097d695f9bf3a39647ba6b7e7 upstream.

Commit 06e8935feb ("optimized SDIO IRQ handling for single irq")
introduced some spurious calls to SDIO function interrupt handlers,
such as when the SDIO IRQ thread is started, or the safety check
performed upon a system resume.  Let's add a flag to perform the
optimization only when a real interrupt is signaled by the host
driver and we know there is no point confirming it.

Reported-by: Sujit Reddy Thumma <sthumma@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
mmc: unbreak sdhci-esdhc-imx on i.MX25 2012-05-11T12:13:52+00:00 Eric Bénard eric@eukrea.com 2012-04-18T00:30:20+00:00 7efde257ac4e92ca6b403b72873126ebfd0e9308 commit b89152824f993a9572b47eb31f4579feadeac34c upstream. This was broken by me in 37865fe91582582a6f6c00652f6a2b1ff71f8a78 ("mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: fix timeout on i.MX's sdhci") where more extensive tests would have shown that read or write of data to the card were failing (even if the partition table was correctly read). Signed-off-by: Eric Bénard <eric@eukrea.com> Acked-by: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> 
commit b89152824f993a9572b47eb31f4579feadeac34c upstream.

This was broken by me in 37865fe91582582a6f6c00652f6a2b1ff71f8a78
("mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: fix timeout on i.MX's sdhci") where more
extensive tests would have shown that read or write of data to the
card were failing (even if the partition table was correctly read).

Signed-off-by: Eric Bénard <eric@eukrea.com>
Acked-by: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
mmc: fixes for eMMC v4.5 sanitize operation 2012-05-11T12:13:52+00:00 Adrian Hunter adrian.hunter@intel.com 2012-04-05T11:45:48+00:00 2e4e5f0d0317d1d9b01326e79f8dce7215fc3c41 commit 283028122db37621b124f079ca8eae5b64807ad4 upstream. eMMC v4.5 sanitize operation erases all copies of unmapped data. However trim or erase operations must be used first to unmap the required sectors. That was not being done. Fixes apply to linux 3.2 on. Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Acked-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> 
commit 283028122db37621b124f079ca8eae5b64807ad4 upstream.

eMMC v4.5 sanitize operation erases all copies of unmapped
data.  However trim or erase operations must be used first
to unmap the required sectors.  That was not being done.

Fixes apply to linux 3.2 on.

Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Acked-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
mmc: fixes for eMMC v4.5 discard operation 2012-05-11T12:13:51+00:00 Adrian Hunter adrian.hunter@intel.com 2012-04-05T11:45:47+00:00 531503404e61ab77da44f0ea7e6b2ae16bcf004a commit 7194efb8f063ee3aa0cb50d9002348887e68ec10 upstream. eMMC v4.5 discard operation is significantly different from the existing trim operation because it is not guaranteed to work with the new sanitize operation. Consequently mmc_can_trim() is separated from mmc_can_discard(). Also the new discard operation does not result in the sectors being set to all-zeros, so discard_zeroes_data must not be set. In addition, the new discard has the same timeout as trim, but from v4.5 trim is defined to use the hc timeout. The timeout calculation is adjusted accordingly. Fixes apply to linux 3.2 on. Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Acked-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> 
commit 7194efb8f063ee3aa0cb50d9002348887e68ec10 upstream.

eMMC v4.5 discard operation is significantly different from the
existing trim operation because it is not guaranteed to work with
the new sanitize operation.  Consequently mmc_can_trim() is
separated from mmc_can_discard().

Also the new discard operation does not result in the sectors being
set to all-zeros, so discard_zeroes_data must not be set.

In addition, the new discard has the same timeout as trim, but from
v4.5 trim is defined to use the hc timeout.  The timeout calculation
is adjusted accordingly.

Fixes apply to linux 3.2 on.

Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Acked-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
mmc: atmel-mci: correct data timeout computation 2012-04-13T15:33:49+00:00 Ludovic Desroches ludovic.desroches@atmel.com 2012-03-28T10:28:33+00:00 bd4a0cb6f12b87c701f25519acb89308321023d9 commit 66292ad92c6d3f2f1c137a1c826b331ca8595dfd upstream. The HSMCI operates at a rate of up to Master Clock divided by two. Moreover previous calculation can cause overflows and so wrong timeouts. Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com> Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 66292ad92c6d3f2f1c137a1c826b331ca8595dfd upstream.

The HSMCI operates at a rate of up to Master Clock divided by two.
Moreover previous calculation can cause overflows and so wrong
timeouts.

Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>