linux-stable.git/drivers/md, branch v4.14.44

dm integrity: use kvfree for kvmalloc'd memory

2018-05-16T08:10:27+00:00

commit fc8cec113904a47396bf0a1afc62920d66319d36 upstream.

Use kvfree instead of kfree because the array is allocated with kvmalloc.

Fixes: 7eada909bfd7a ("dm: add integrity target")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.12+
Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka 
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

bcache: return attach error when no cache set exist

2018-04-26T09:02:18+00:00

[ Upstream commit 7f4fc93d4713394ee8f1cd44c238e046e11b4f15 ]

I attach a back-end device to a cache set, and the cache set is not
registered yet, this back-end device did not attach successfully, and no
error returned:
[root]# echo 87859280-fec6-4bcc-20df7ca8f86b > /sys/block/sde/bcache/attach
[root]#

In sysfs_attach(), the return value "v" is initialized to "size" in
the beginning, and if no cache set exist in bch_cache_sets, the "v" value
would not change any more, and return to sysfs, sysfs regard it as success
since the "size" is a positive number.

This patch fixes this issue by assigning "v" with "-ENOENT" in the
initialization.

Signed-off-by: Tang Junhui 
Reviewed-by: Michael Lyle 
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

bcache: fix for data collapse after re-attaching an attached device

2018-04-26T09:02:18+00:00

[ Upstream commit 73ac105be390c1de42a2f21643c9778a5e002930 ]

back-end device sdm has already attached a cache_set with ID
f67ebe1f-f8bc-4d73-bfe5-9dc88607f119, then try to attach with
another cache set, and it returns with an error:
[root]# cd /sys/block/sdm/bcache
[root]# echo 5ccd0a63-148e-48b8-afa2-aca9cbd6279f > attach
-bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument

After that, execute a command to modify the label of bcache
device:
[root]# echo data_disk1 > label

Then we reboot the system, when the system power on, the back-end
device can not attach to cache_set, a messages show in the log:
Feb  5 12:05:52 ceph152 kernel: [922385.508498] bcache:
bch_cached_dev_attach() couldn't find uuid for sdm in set

In sysfs_attach(), dc->sb.set_uuid was assigned to the value
which input through sysfs, no matter whether it is success
or not in bch_cached_dev_attach(). For example, If the back-end
device has already attached to an cache set, bch_cached_dev_attach()
would fail, but dc->sb.set_uuid was changed. Then modify the
label of bcache device, it will call bch_write_bdev_super(),
which would write the dc->sb.set_uuid to the super block, so we
record a wrong cache set ID in the super block, after the system
reboot, the cache set couldn't find the uuid of the back-end
device, so the bcache device couldn't exist and use any more.

In this patch, we don't assigned cache set ID to dc->sb.set_uuid
in sysfs_attach() directly, but input it into bch_cached_dev_attach(),
and assigned dc->sb.set_uuid to the cache set ID after the back-end
device attached to the cache set successful.

Signed-off-by: Tang Junhui 
Reviewed-by: Michael Lyle 
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

bcache: fix for allocator and register thread race

2018-04-26T09:02:18+00:00

[ Upstream commit 682811b3ce1a5a4e20d700939a9042f01dbc66c4 ]

After long time running of random small IO writing,
I reboot the machine, and after the machine power on,
I found bcache got stuck, the stack is:
[root@ceph153 ~]# cat /proc/2510/task/*/stack
[] closure_sync+0x25/0x90 [bcache]
[] bch_journal+0x118/0x2b0 [bcache]
[] bch_journal_meta+0x47/0x70 [bcache]
[] bch_prio_write+0x237/0x340 [bcache]
[] bch_allocator_thread+0x3c8/0x3d0 [bcache]
[] kthread+0xcf/0xe0
[] ret_from_fork+0x58/0x90
[] 0xffffffffffffffff
[root@ceph153 ~]# cat /proc/2038/task/*/stack
[] __bch_btree_map_nodes+0x12d/0x150 [bcache]
[] bch_btree_insert+0xf1/0x170 [bcache]
[] bch_journal_replay+0x13f/0x230 [bcache]
[] run_cache_set+0x79a/0x7c2 [bcache]
[] register_bcache+0xd48/0x1310 [bcache]
[] kobj_attr_store+0xf/0x20
[] sysfs_write_file+0xc6/0x140
[] vfs_write+0xbd/0x1e0
[] SyS_write+0x7f/0xe0
[] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1
The stack shows the register thread and allocator thread
were getting stuck when registering cache device.

I reboot the machine several times, the issue always
exsit in this machine.

I debug the code, and found the call trace as bellow:
register_bcache()
   ==>run_cache_set()
      ==>bch_journal_replay()
         ==>bch_btree_insert()
            ==>__bch_btree_map_nodes()
               ==>btree_insert_fn()
                  ==>btree_split() //node need split
                     ==>btree_check_reserve()
In btree_check_reserve(), It will check if there is enough buckets
of RESERVE_BTREE type, since allocator thread did not work yet, so
no buckets of RESERVE_BTREE type allocated, so the register thread
waits on c->btree_cache_wait, and goes to sleep.

Then the allocator thread initialized, the call trace is bellow:
bch_allocator_thread()
==>bch_prio_write()
   ==>bch_journal_meta()
      ==>bch_journal()
         ==>journal_wait_for_write()
In journal_wait_for_write(), It will check if journal is full by
journal_full(), but the long time random small IO writing
causes the exhaustion of journal buckets(journal.blocks_free=0),
In order to release the journal buckets,
the allocator calls btree_flush_write() to flush keys to
btree nodes, and waits on c->journal.wait until btree nodes writing
over or there has already some journal buckets space, then the
allocator thread goes to sleep. but in btree_flush_write(), since
bch_journal_replay() is not finished, so no btree nodes have journal
(condition "if (btree_current_write(b)->journal)" never satisfied),
so we got no btree node to flush, no journal bucket released,
and allocator sleep all the times.

Through the above analysis, we can see that:
1) Register thread wait for allocator thread to allocate buckets of
   RESERVE_BTREE type;
2) Alloctor thread wait for register thread to replay journal, so it
   can flush btree nodes and get journal bucket.
   then they are all got stuck by waiting for each other.

Hua Rui provided a patch for me, by allocating some buckets of
RESERVE_BTREE type in advance, so the register thread can get bucket
when btree node splitting and no need to waiting for the allocator
thread. I tested it, it has effect, and register thread run a step
forward, but finally are still got stuck, the reason is only 8 bucket
of RESERVE_BTREE type were allocated, and in bch_journal_replay(),
after 2 btree nodes splitting, only 4 bucket of RESERVE_BTREE type left,
then btree_check_reserve() is not satisfied anymore, so it goes to sleep
again, and in the same time, alloctor thread did not flush enough btree
nodes to release a journal bucket, so they all got stuck again.

So we need to allocate more buckets of RESERVE_BTREE type in advance,
but how much is enough?  By experience and test, I think it should be
as much as journal buckets. Then I modify the code as this patch,
and test in the machine, and it works.

This patch modified base on Hua Rui’s patch, and allocate more buckets
of RESERVE_BTREE type in advance to avoid register thread and allocate
thread going to wait for each other.

[patch v2] ca->sb.njournal_buckets would be 0 in the first time after
cache creation, and no journal exists, so just 8 btree buckets is OK.

Signed-off-by: Hua Rui 
Signed-off-by: Tang Junhui 
Reviewed-by: Michael Lyle 
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

bcache: properly set task state in bch_writeback_thread()

2018-04-26T09:02:18+00:00

[ Upstream commit 99361bbf26337186f02561109c17a4c4b1a7536a ]

Kernel thread routine bch_writeback_thread() has the following code block,

447         down_write(&dc->writeback_lock);
448~450     if (check conditions) {
451                 up_write(&dc->writeback_lock);
452                 set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
453
454                 if (kthread_should_stop())
455                         return 0;
456
457                 schedule();
458                 continue;
459         }

If condition check is true, its task state is set to TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE
and call schedule() to wait for others to wake up it.

There are 2 issues in current code,
1, Task state is set to TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE after the condition checks, if
   another process changes the condition and call wake_up_process(dc->
   writeback_thread), then at line 452 task state is set back to
   TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, the writeback kernel thread will lose a chance to be
   waken up.
2, At line 454 if kthread_should_stop() is true, writeback kernel thread
   will return to kernel/kthread.c:kthread() with TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE and
   call do_exit(). It is not good to enter do_exit() with task state
   TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, in following code path might_sleep() is called and a
   warning message is reported by __might_sleep(): "WARNING: do not call
   blocking ops when !TASK_RUNNING; state=1 set at [xxxx]".

For the first issue, task state should be set before condition checks.
Ineed because dc->writeback_lock is required when modifying all the
conditions, calling set_current_state() inside code block where dc->
writeback_lock is hold is safe. But this is quite implicit, so I still move
set_current_state() before all the condition checks.

For the second issue, frankley speaking it does not hurt when kernel thread
exits with TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE state, but this warning message scares users,
makes them feel there might be something risky with bcache and hurt their
data.  Setting task state to TASK_RUNNING before returning fixes this
problem.

In alloc.c:allocator_wait(), there is also a similar issue, and is also
fixed in this patch.

Changelog:
v3: merge two similar fixes into one patch
v2: fix the race issue in v1 patch.
v1: initial buggy fix.

Signed-off-by: Coly Li 
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke 
Reviewed-by: Michael Lyle 
Cc: Michael Lyle 
Cc: Junhui Tang 
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

dm mpath: return DM_MAPIO_REQUEUE on blk-mq rq allocation failure

2018-04-26T09:02:07+00:00

[ Upstream commit 050af08ffb1b62af69196d61c22a0755f9a3cdbd ]

blk-mq will rerun queue via RESTART or dispatch wake after one request
is completed, so not necessary to wait random time for requeuing, we
should trust blk-mq to do it.

More importantly, we need to return BLK_STS_RESOURCE to blk-mq so that
dequeuing from the I/O scheduler can be stopped, this results in
improved I/O merging.

Signed-off-by: Ming Lei 
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

dm crypt: limit the number of allocated pages

2018-04-24T07:36:31+00:00

commit 5059353df86e2573ccd9d43fd9d9396dcec47ca2 upstream.

dm-crypt consumes an excessive amount memory when the user attempts to
zero a dm-crypt device with "blkdiscard -z". The command "blkdiscard -z"
calls the BLKZEROOUT ioctl, it goes to the function __blkdev_issue_zeroout,
__blkdev_issue_zeroout sends a large amount of write bios that contain
the zero page as their payload.

For each incoming page, dm-crypt allocates another page that holds the
encrypted data, so when processing "blkdiscard -z", dm-crypt tries to
allocate the amount of memory that is equal to the size of the device.
This can trigger OOM killer or cause system crash.

Fix this by limiting the amount of memory that dm-crypt allocates to 2%
of total system memory. This limit is system-wide and is divided by the
number of active dm-crypt devices and each device receives an equal
share.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka 
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

bcache: segregate flash only volume write streams

2018-04-12T10:32:18+00:00

[ Upstream commit 4eca1cb28d8b0574ca4f1f48e9331c5f852d43b9 ]

In such scenario that there are some flash only volumes
, and some cached devices, when many tasks request these devices in
writeback mode, the write IOs may fall to the same bucket as bellow:
| cached data | flash data | cached data | cached data| flash data|
then after writeback of these cached devices, the bucket would
be like bellow bucket:
| free | flash data | free | free | flash data |

So, there are many free space in this bucket, but since data of flash
only volumes still exists, so this bucket cannot be reclaimable,
which would cause waste of bucket space.

In this patch, we segregate flash only volume write streams from
cached devices, so data from flash only volumes and cached devices
can store in different buckets.

Compare to v1 patch, this patch do not add a additionally open bucket
list, and it is try best to segregate flash only volume write streams
from cached devices, sectors of flash only volumes may still be mixed
with dirty sectors of cached device, but the number is very small.

[mlyle: fixed commit log formatting, permissions, line endings]

Signed-off-by: Tang Junhui 
Reviewed-by: Michael Lyle 
Signed-off-by: Michael Lyle 
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

bcache: stop writeback thread after detaching

2018-04-12T10:32:18+00:00

[ Upstream commit 8d29c4426b9f8afaccf28de414fde8a722b35fdf ]

Currently, when a cached device detaching from cache, writeback thread is
not stopped, and writeback_rate_update work is not canceled. For example,
after the following command:
echo 1 >/sys/block/sdb/bcache/detach
you can still see the writeback thread. Then you attach the device to the
cache again, bcache will create another writeback thread, for example,
after below command:
echo  ba0fb5cd-658a-4533-9806-6ce166d883b9 > /sys/block/sdb/bcache/attach
then you will see 2 writeback threads.
This patch stops writeback thread and cancels writeback_rate_update work
when cached device detaching from cache.

Compare with patch v1, this v2 patch moves code down into the register
lock for safety in case of any future changes as Coly and Mike suggested.

[edit by mlyle: commit log spelling/formatting]

Signed-off-by: Tang Junhui 
Reviewed-by: Michael Lyle 
Signed-off-by: Michael Lyle 
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

bcache: ret IOERR when read meets metadata error

2018-04-12T10:32:18+00:00

[ Upstream commit b221fc130c49c50f4c2250d22e873420765a9fa2 ]

The read request might meet error when searching the btree, but the error
was not handled in cache_lookup(), and this kind of metadata failure will
not go into cached_dev_read_error(), finally, the upper layer will receive
bi_status=0.  In this patch we judge the metadata error by the return
value of bch_btree_map_keys(), there are two potential paths give rise to
the error:

1. Because the btree is not totally cached in memery, we maybe get error
   when read btree node from cache device (see bch_btree_node_get()), the
   likely errno is -EIO, -ENOMEM

2. When read miss happens, bch_btree_insert_check_key() will be called to
   insert a "replace_key" to btree(see cached_dev_cache_miss(), just for
   doing preparatory work before insert the missed data to cache device),
   a failure can also happen in this situation, the likely errno is
   -ENOMEM

bch_btree_map_keys() will return MAP_DONE in normal scenario, but we will
get either -EIO or -ENOMEM in above two cases. if this happened, we should
NOT recover data from backing device (when cache device is dirty) because
we don't know whether bkeys the read request covered are all clean.  And
after that happened, s->iop.status is still its initially value(0) before
we submit s->bio.bio, we set it to BLK_STS_IOERR, so it can go into
cached_dev_read_error(), and finally it can be passed to upper layer, or
recovered by reread from backing device.

[edit by mlyle: patch formatting, word-wrap, comment spelling,
commit log format]

Signed-off-by: Hua Rui 
Reviewed-by: Michael Lyle 
Signed-off-by: Michael Lyle 
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman