linux-stable.git/drivers/md, branch linux-5.0.y

bcache: avoid clang -Wunintialized warning

2019-05-31T13:45:00+00:00

[ Upstream commit 78d4eb8ad9e1d413449d1b7a060f50b6efa81ebd ]

clang has identified a code path in which it thinks a
variable may be unused:

drivers/md/bcache/alloc.c:333:4: error: variable 'bucket' is used uninitialized whenever 'if' condition is false
      [-Werror,-Wsometimes-uninitialized]
                        fifo_pop(&ca->free_inc, bucket);
                        ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/md/bcache/util.h:219:27: note: expanded from macro 'fifo_pop'
 #define fifo_pop(fifo, i)       fifo_pop_front(fifo, (i))
                                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/md/bcache/util.h:189:6: note: expanded from macro 'fifo_pop_front'
        if (_r) {                                                       \
            ^~
drivers/md/bcache/alloc.c:343:46: note: uninitialized use occurs here
                        allocator_wait(ca, bch_allocator_push(ca, bucket));
                                                                  ^~~~~~
drivers/md/bcache/alloc.c:287:7: note: expanded from macro 'allocator_wait'
                if (cond)                                               \
                    ^~~~
drivers/md/bcache/alloc.c:333:4: note: remove the 'if' if its condition is always true
                        fifo_pop(&ca->free_inc, bucket);
                        ^
drivers/md/bcache/util.h:219:27: note: expanded from macro 'fifo_pop'
 #define fifo_pop(fifo, i)       fifo_pop_front(fifo, (i))
                                ^
drivers/md/bcache/util.h:189:2: note: expanded from macro 'fifo_pop_front'
        if (_r) {                                                       \
        ^
drivers/md/bcache/alloc.c:331:15: note: initialize the variable 'bucket' to silence this warning
                        long bucket;
                                   ^

This cannot happen in practice because we only enter the loop
if there is at least one element in the list.

Slightly rearranging the code makes this clearer to both the
reader and the compiler, which avoids the warning.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann 
Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor 
Signed-off-by: Coly Li 
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

bcache: add failure check to run_cache_set() for journal replay

2019-05-31T13:45:00+00:00

[ Upstream commit ce3e4cfb59cb382f8e5ce359238aa580d4ae7778 ]

Currently run_cache_set() has no return value, if there is failure in
bch_journal_replay(), the caller of run_cache_set() has no idea about
such failure and just continue to execute following code after
run_cache_set().  The internal failure is triggered inside
bch_journal_replay() and being handled in async way. This behavior is
inefficient, while failure handling inside bch_journal_replay(), cache
register code is still running to start the cache set. Registering and
unregistering code running as same time may introduce some rare race
condition, and make the code to be more hard to be understood.

This patch adds return value to run_cache_set(), and returns -EIO if
bch_journal_rreplay() fails. Then caller of run_cache_set() may detect
such failure and stop registering code flow immedidately inside
register_cache_set().

If journal replay fails, run_cache_set() can report error immediately
to register_cache_set(). This patch makes the failure handling for
bch_journal_replay() be in synchronized way, easier to understand and
debug, and avoid poetential race condition for register-and-unregister
in same time.

Signed-off-by: Coly Li 
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

bcache: fix failure in journal relplay

2019-05-31T13:45:00+00:00

[ Upstream commit 631207314d88e9091be02fbdd1fdadb1ae2ed79a ]

journal replay failed with messages:
Sep 10 19:10:43 ceph kernel: bcache: error on
bb379a64-e44e-4812-b91d-a5599871a3b1: bcache: journal entries
2057493-2057567 missing! (replaying 2057493-2076601), disabling
caching

The reason is in journal_reclaim(), when discard is enabled, we send
discard command and reclaim those journal buckets whose seq is old
than the last_seq_now, but before we write a journal with last_seq_now,
the machine is restarted, so the journal with the last_seq_now is not
written to the journal bucket, and the last_seq_wrote in the newest
journal is old than last_seq_now which we expect to be, so when we doing
replay, journals from last_seq_wrote to last_seq_now are missing.

It's hard to write a journal immediately after journal_reclaim(),
and it harmless if those missed journal are caused by discarding
since those journals are already wrote to btree node. So, if miss
seqs are started from the beginning journal, we treat it as normal,
and only print a message to show the miss journal, and point out
it maybe caused by discarding.

Patch v2 add a judgement condition to ignore the missed journal
only when discard enabled as Coly suggested.

(Coly Li: rebase the patch with other changes in bch_journal_replay())

Signed-off-by: Tang Junhui 
Tested-by: Dennis Schridde 
Signed-off-by: Coly Li 
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

bcache: return error immediately in bch_journal_replay()

2019-05-31T13:45:00+00:00

[ Upstream commit 68d10e6979a3b59e3cd2e90bfcafed79c4cf180a ]

When failure happens inside bch_journal_replay(), calling
cache_set_err_on() and handling the failure in async way is not a good
idea. Because after bch_journal_replay() returns, registering code will
continue to execute following steps, and unregistering code triggered
by cache_set_err_on() is running in same time. First it is unnecessary
to handle failure and unregister cache set in an async way, second there
might be potential race condition to run register and unregister code
for same cache set.

So in this patch, if failure happens in bch_journal_replay(), we don't
call cache_set_err_on(), and just print out the same error message to
kernel message buffer, then return -EIO immediately caller. Then caller
can detect such failure and handle it in synchrnozied way.

Signed-off-by: Coly Li 
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke 
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

bcache: avoid potential memleak of list of journal_replay(s) in the CACHE_SYNC branch of run_cache_set

2019-05-31T13:45:00+00:00

[ Upstream commit 95f18c9d1310730d075499a75aaf13bcd60405a7 ]

In the CACHE_SYNC branch of run_cache_set(), LIST_HEAD(journal) is used
to collect journal_replay(s) and filled by bch_journal_read().

If all goes well, bch_journal_replay() will release the list of
jounal_replay(s) at the end of the branch.

If something goes wrong, code flow will jump to the label "err:" and leave
the list unreleased.

This patch will release the list of journal_replay(s) in the case of
error detected.

v1 -> v2:
* Move the release code to the location after label 'err:' to
  simply the change.

Signed-off-by: Shenghui Wang 
Signed-off-by: Coly Li 
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

md/raid: raid5 preserve the writeback action after the parity check

2019-05-25T16:22:31+00:00

commit b2176a1dfb518d870ee073445d27055fea64dfb8 upstream.

The problem is that any 'uptodate' vs 'disks' check is not precise
in this path. Put a "WARN_ON(!test_bit(R5_UPTODATE, &dev->flags)" on the
device that might try to kick off writes and then skip the action.
Better to prevent the raid driver from taking unexpected action *and* keep
the system alive vs killing the machine with BUG_ON.

Note: fixed warning reported by kbuild test robot 

Signed-off-by: Dan Williams 
Signed-off-by: Nigel Croxon 
Signed-off-by: Song Liu 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

Revert "Don't jump to compute_result state from check_result state"

2019-05-25T16:22:30+00:00

commit a25d8c327bb41742dbd59f8c545f59f3b9c39983 upstream.

This reverts commit 4f4fd7c5798bbdd5a03a60f6269cf1177fbd11ef.

Cc: Dan Williams 
Cc: Nigel Croxon 
Cc: Xiao Ni 
Signed-off-by: Song Liu 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

dm mpath: always free attached_handler_name in parse_path()

2019-05-25T16:22:20+00:00

commit 940bc471780b004a5277c1931f52af363c2fc9da upstream.

Commit b592211c33f7 ("dm mpath: fix attached_handler_name leak and
dangling hw_handler_name pointer") fixed a memory leak for the case
where setup_scsi_dh() returns failure. But setup_scsi_dh may return
success and not "use" attached_handler_name if the
retain_attached_hwhandler flag is not set on the map. As setup_scsi_sh
properly "steals" the pointer by nullifying it, freeing it
unconditionally in parse_path() is safe.

Fixes: b592211c33f7 ("dm mpath: fix attached_handler_name leak and dangling hw_handler_name pointer")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: Yufen Yu 
Signed-off-by: Martin Wilck 
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

dm integrity: correctly calculate the size of metadata area

2019-05-25T16:22:20+00:00

commit 30bba430ddf737978e40561198693ba91386dac1 upstream.

When we use separate devices for data and metadata, dm-integrity would
incorrectly calculate the size of the metadata device as if it had
512-byte block size - and it would refuse activation with larger block
size and smaller metadata device.

Fix this so that it takes actual block size into account, which fixes
the following reported issue:
https://gitlab.com/cryptsetup/cryptsetup/issues/450

Fixes: 356d9d52e122 ("dm integrity: allow separate metadata device")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.19+
Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka 
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

dm crypt: move detailed message into debug level

2019-05-25T16:22:19+00:00

commit 7a1cd7238fde6ab367384a4a2998cba48330c398 upstream.

The information about tag size should not be printed without debug info
set. Also print device major:minor in the error message to identify the
device instance.

Also use rate limiting and debug level for info about used crypto API
implementaton.  This is important because during online reencryption
the existing message saturates syslog (because we are moving hotzone
across the whole device).

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Milan Broz 
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman