linux-stable.git/drivers/md/raid5.c, branch v5.8

raid5: update code comment of scribble_alloc()

2020-05-13T18:22:31+00:00

Code comments of scribble_alloc() is outdated for a while. This patch
update the comments in function header for the new parameter list.

Suggested-by: Song Liu 
Signed-off-by: Coly Li 
Signed-off-by: Song Liu

raid5: remove gfp flags from scribble_alloc()

2020-05-13T18:22:31+00:00

Using GFP_NOIO flag to call scribble_alloc() from resize_chunk() does
not have the expected behavior. kvmalloc_array() inside scribble_alloc()
which receives the GFP_NOIO flag will eventually call kmalloc_node() to
allocate physically continuous pages.

Now we have memalloc scope APIs in mddev_suspend()/mddev_resume() to
prevent memory reclaim I/Os during raid array suspend context, calling
to kvmalloc_array() with GFP_KERNEL flag may avoid deadlock of recursive
I/O as expected.

This patch removes the useless gfp flags from parameters list of
scribble_alloc(), and call kvmalloc_array() with GFP_KERNEL flag. The
incorrect GFP_NOIO flag does not exist anymore.

Fixes: b330e6a49dc3 ("md: convert to kvmalloc")
Suggested-by: Michal Hocko 
Signed-off-by: Coly Li 
Signed-off-by: Song Liu

raid5: remove worker_cnt_per_group argument from alloc_thread_groups

2020-01-13T19:44:09+00:00

We can use "cnt" directly to update conf->worker_cnt_per_group
if alloc_thread_groups returns 0.

Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang 
Signed-off-by: Song Liu

raid5: need to set STRIPE_HANDLE for batch head

2019-12-11T18:12:09+00:00

With commit 6ce220dd2f8ea71d6afc29b9a7524c12e39f374a ("raid5: don't set
STRIPE_HANDLE to stripe which is in batch list"), we don't want to set
STRIPE_HANDLE flag for sh which is already in batch list.

However, the stripe which is the head of batch list should set this flag,
otherwise panic could happen inside init_stripe at BUG_ON(sh->batch_head),
it is reproducible with raid5 on top of nvdimm devices per Xiao oberserved.

Thanks for Xiao's effort to verify the change.

Fixes: 6ce220dd2f8ea ("raid5: don't set STRIPE_HANDLE to stripe which is in batch list")
Reported-by: Xiao Ni 
Tested-by: Xiao Ni 
Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang 
Signed-off-by: Song Liu

drivers/md/raid5.c: use the new spelling of RWH_WRITE_LIFE_NOT_SET

2019-11-14T22:59:15+00:00

As it is consistent with prefixes of other write life time hints.

Signed-off-by: Eugene Syromiatnikov 
Signed-off-by: Song Liu

md: improve handling of bio with REQ_PREFLUSH in md_flush_request()

2019-10-24T22:22:40+00:00

If pers->make_request fails in md_flush_request(), the bio is lost. To
fix this, pass back a bool to indicate if the original make_request call
should continue to handle the I/O and instead of assuming the flush logic
will push it to completion.

Convert md_flush_request to return a bool and no longer calls the raid
driver's make_request function.  If the return is true, then the md flush
logic has or will complete the bio and the md make_request call is done.
If false, then the md make_request function needs to keep processing like
it is a normal bio. Let the original call to md_handle_request handle any
need to retry sending the bio to the raid driver's make_request function
should it be needed.

Also mark md_flush_request and the make_request function pointer as
__must_check to issue warnings should these critical return values be
ignored.

Fixes: 2bc13b83e629 ("md: batch flush requests.")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # # v4.19+
Cc: NeilBrown 
Signed-off-by: David Jeffery 
Reviewed-by: Xiao Ni 
Signed-off-by: Song Liu

raid5: remove STRIPE_OPS_REQ_PENDING

2019-09-13T20:14:39+00:00

This stripe state is not used anymore after commit 51acbcec6c42b24
("md: remove CONFIG_MULTICORE_RAID456"), so remove the obsoleted
state.

gjiang@nb01257:~/md$ grep STRIPE_OPS_REQ_PENDING drivers/md/ -r
drivers/md/raid5.c:					  (1 << STRIPE_OPS_REQ_PENDING) |
drivers/md/raid5.h:	STRIPE_OPS_REQ_PENDING,

Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang 
Signed-off-by: Song Liu

raid5: don't set STRIPE_HANDLE to stripe which is in batch list

2019-09-13T20:10:05+00:00

If stripe in batch list is set with STRIPE_HANDLE flag, then the stripe
could be set with STRIPE_ACTIVE by the handle_stripe function. And if
error happens to the batch_head at the same time, break_stripe_batch_list
is called, then below warning could happen (the same report in [1]), it
means a member of batch list was set with STRIPE_ACTIVE.

[7028915.431770] stripe state: 2001
[7028915.431815] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[7028915.431828] WARNING: CPU: 18 PID: 29089 at drivers/md/raid5.c:4614 break_stripe_batch_list+0x203/0x240 [raid456]
[...]
[7028915.431879] CPU: 18 PID: 29089 Comm: kworker/u82:5 Tainted: G           O    4.14.86-1-storage #4.14.86-1.2~deb9
[7028915.431881] Hardware name: Supermicro SSG-2028R-ACR24L/X10DRH-iT, BIOS 3.1 06/18/2018
[7028915.431888] Workqueue: raid5wq raid5_do_work [raid456]
[7028915.431890] task: ffff9ab0ef36d7c0 task.stack: ffffb72926f84000
[7028915.431896] RIP: 0010:break_stripe_batch_list+0x203/0x240 [raid456]
[7028915.431898] RSP: 0018:ffffb72926f87ba8 EFLAGS: 00010286
[7028915.431900] RAX: 0000000000000012 RBX: ffff9aaa84a98000 RCX: 0000000000000000
[7028915.431901] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff9ab2bfa15458 RDI: ffff9ab2bfa15458
[7028915.431902] RBP: ffff9aaa8fb4e900 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000002eb4
[7028915.431903] R10: 00000000ffffffff R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff9ab1736f1b00
[7028915.431904] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff9aaa8fb4e900 R15: 0000000000000001
[7028915.431906] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff9ab2bfa00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[7028915.431907] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[7028915.431908] CR2: 00007ff953b9f5d8 CR3: 0000000bf4009002 CR4: 00000000003606e0
[7028915.431909] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
[7028915.431910] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
[7028915.431910] Call Trace:
[7028915.431923]  handle_stripe+0x8e7/0x2020 [raid456]
[7028915.431930]  ? __wake_up_common_lock+0x89/0xc0
[7028915.431935]  handle_active_stripes.isra.58+0x35f/0x560 [raid456]
[7028915.431939]  raid5_do_work+0xc6/0x1f0 [raid456]

Also commit 59fc630b8b5f9f ("RAID5: batch adjacent full stripe write")
said "If a stripe is added to batch list, then only the first stripe
of the list should be put to handle_list and run handle_stripe."

So don't set STRIPE_HANDLE to stripe which is already in batch list,
otherwise the stripe could be put to handle_list and run handle_stripe,
then the above warning could be triggered.

[1]. https://www.spinics.net/lists/raid/msg62552.html

Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang 
Signed-off-by: Song Liu

raid5: don't increment read_errors on EILSEQ return

2019-09-13T20:10:05+00:00

While MD continues to count read errors returned by the lower layer.
If those errors are -EILSEQ, instead of -EIO, it should NOT increase
the read_errors count.

When RAID6 is set up on dm-integrity target that detects massive
corruption, the leg will be ejected from the array.  Even if the
issue is correctable with a sector re-write and the array has
necessary redundancy to correct it.

The leg is ejected because it runs up the rdev->read_errors beyond
conf->max_nr_stripes.  The return status in dm-drypt when there is
a data integrity error is -EILSEQ (BLK_STS_PROTECTION).

Signed-off-by: Nigel Croxon 
Signed-off-by: Song Liu

md/raid5: use bio_end_sector to calculate last_sector

2019-09-03T21:52:38+00:00

Use the common way to get last_sector.

Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang 
Signed-off-by: Song Liu