linux-stable.git/drivers/md/raid10.h, branch v3.5

md/raid10: add reshape support

2012-05-22T03:53:47+00:00

A 'near' or 'offset' lay RAID10 array can be reshaped to a different
'near' or 'offset' layout, a different chunk size, and a different
number of devices.
However the number of copies cannot change.

Unlike RAID5/6, we do not support having user-space backup data that
is being relocated during a 'critical section'.  Rather, the
data_offset of each device must change so that when writing any block
to a new location, it will not over-write any data that is still
'live'.

This means that RAID10 reshape is not supportable on v0.90 metadata.

The different between the old data_offset and the new_offset must be
at least the larger of the chunksize multiplied by offset copies of
each of the old and new layout. (for 'near' mode, offset_copies == 1).

A larger difference of around 64M seems useful for in-place reshapes
as more data can be moved between metadata updates.
Very large differences (e.g. 512M) seem to slow the process down due
to lots of long seeks (on oldish consumer graded devices at least).

Metadata needs to be updated whenever the place we are about to write
to is considered - by the current metadata - to still contain data in
the old layout.

[unbalanced locking fix from Dan Carpenter ]

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown

md/raid10: Introduce 'prev' geometry to support reshape.

2012-05-20T23:28:33+00:00

When RAID10 supports reshape it will need a 'previous' and a 'current'
geometry, so introduce that here.
Use the 'prev' geometry when before the reshape_position, and the
current 'geo' when beyond it.  At other times, use both as
appropriate.

For now, both are identical (And reshape_position is never set).

When we use the 'prev' geometry, we must use the old data_offset.
When we use the current (And a reshape is happening) we must use
the new_data_offset.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown

md/raid10: collect some geometry fields into a dedicated structure.

2012-05-20T23:28:20+00:00

We will shortly be adding reshape support for RAID10 which will
require it having 2 concurrent geometries (before and after).
To make that easier, collect most geometry fields into 'struct geom'
and access them from there.  Then we will more easily be able to add
a second set of fields.

Note that 'copies' is not in this struct and so cannot be changed.
There is little need to change this number and doing so is a lot
more difficult as it requires reallocating more things.
So leave it out for now.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown

md/raid10: prepare data structures for handling replacement.

2011-12-22T23:17:54+00:00

Allow each slot in the RAID10 to have 2 devices, the want_replacement
and the replacement.

Also an r10bio to have 2 bios, and for resync/recovery allocate the
second bio if there are any replacement devices.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown

md: add proper write-congestion reporting to RAID1 and RAID10.

2011-10-11T05:50:01+00:00

RAID1 and RAID10 handle write requests by queuing them for handling by
a separate thread.  This is because when a write-intent-bitmap is
active we might need to update the bitmap first, so it is good to
queue a lot of writes, then do one big bitmap update for them all.

However writeback request devices to appear to be congested after a
while so it can make some guesstimate of throughput.  The infinite
queue defeats that (note that RAID5 has already has a finite queue so
it doesn't suffer from this problem).

So impose a limit on the number of pending write requests.  By default
it is 1024 which seems to be generally suitable.  Make it configurable
via module option just in case someone finds a regression.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown

md/raid10: typedef removal: conf_t -> struct r10conf

2011-10-11T05:49:02+00:00

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown

md: remove typedefs: mirror_info_t -> struct mirror_info

2011-10-11T05:48:46+00:00

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown

md: remove typedefs: r10bio_t -> struct r10bio and r1bio_t -> struct r1bio

2011-10-11T05:48:43+00:00

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown

md: remove typedefs: mdk_thread_t -> struct md_thread

2011-10-11T05:48:23+00:00

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown

md: remove typedefs: mddev_t -> struct mddev

2011-10-11T05:47:53+00:00

Having mddev_t and 'struct mddev_s' is ugly and not preferred

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown