commit f4380a915823dbed0bf8e3cf502ebcf2b7c7f833 upstream.

If r1bio->sectors % 8 != 0,then the memcmp and a later
memcpy will omit the last bio_vec.

This is suitable for any stable kernel since 3.1 when bad-block
management was introduced.

Signed-off-by: majianpeng <majianpeng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

commit d6b42dcb995e6acd7cc276774e751ffc9f0ef4bf upstream.

If RAID1 or RAID10 is used under LVM or some other stacking
block device, it is possible to enter a deadlock during
resync or recovery.
This can happen if the upper level block device creates
two requests to the RAID1 or RAID10.  The first request gets
processed, blocks recovery and queue requests for underlying
requests in current->bio_list.  A resync request then starts
which will wait for those requests and block new IO.

But then the second request to the RAID1/10 will be attempted
and it cannot progress until the resync request completes,
which cannot progress until the underlying device requests complete,
which are on a queue behind that second request.

So allow that second request to proceed even though there is
a resync request about to start.

This is suitable for any -stable kernel.

Reported-by: Ray Morris <support@bettercgi.com>
Tested-by: Ray Morris <support@bettercgi.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Since we added 'replacement' capability, RAID1 can have twice
as many devices as ->raid_disks indicates.
So md_raid1_congested needs to check that many possible devices,
not just ->raid_disks many.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>

We normally try to avoid reading from write-mostly devices, but when
we do we really have to check for bad blocks and be sure not to
try reading them.

With the current code, best_good_sectors might not get set and that
causes zero-length read requests to be send down which is very
confusing.

This bug was introduced in commit d2eb35acfdccbe2 and so the patch
is suitable for 3.1.x and 3.2.x

Reported-and-tested-by: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>
Reported-and-tested-by: Art -kwaak- van Breemen <ard@telegraafnet.nl>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

Now that WantReplacement drives are replaced cleanly, mark a drive
as want_replacement when we see a write error.  It might get failed soon so
the WantReplacement flag is irrelevant, but if the write error is recorded
in the bad block log, we still want to activate any spare that might
be available.

Signed-off-by:  NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>

When attempting to add a spare to a RAID1 array, also consider
adding it as a replacement for a want_replacement device.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>

If a Replacement is seen, file it as such.

If we see two replacements (or two normal devices) for the one slot,
abort.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>

When recovery completes ->spare_active is called.
This checks if the replacement is ready and if so it fails
the original.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>

Replacement devices are stored at a different offset, so look
there too.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>

In RAID1, a replacement is much like a normal device, so we just
double the size of the relevant arrays and look at all possible
devices for reads and writes.

This means that the array looks like it is now double the size in some
way - we need to be careful about that.
In particular, we checking if the array is still degraded while
creating a recovery request we need to only consider the first 'half'
- i.e. the real (non-replacement) devices.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>