linux-stable.git/drivers/md/raid1.c, branch v3.16.78

md: don't use flush_signals in userspace processes

2017-10-12T14:27:48+00:00

commit f9c79bc05a2a91f4fba8bfd653579e066714b1ec upstream.

The function flush_signals clears all pending signals for the process. It
may be used by kernel threads when we need to prepare a kernel thread for
responding to signals. However using this function for an userspaces
processes is incorrect - clearing signals without the program expecting it
can cause misbehavior.

The raid1 and raid5 code uses flush_signals in its request routine because
it wants to prepare for an interruptible wait. This patch drops
flush_signals and uses sigprocmask instead to block all signals (including
SIGKILL) around the schedule() call. The signals are not lost, but the
schedule() call won't respond to them.

Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka 
Acked-by: NeilBrown 
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li 
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings

md/raid1: submit_bio_wait() returns 0 on success

2015-11-16T11:27:10+00:00

commit 203d27b0226a05202438ddb39ef0ef1acb14a759 upstream.

This was introduced with 9e882242c6193ae6f416f2d8d8db0d9126bd996b
which changed the return value of submit_bio_wait() to return != 0 on
error, but didn't update the caller accordingly.

Fixes: 9e882242c6 ("block: Add submit_bio_wait(), remove from md")
Reported-by: Bill Kuzeja 
Signed-off-by: Jes Sorensen 
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown 
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques

md/raid1: extend spinlock to protect raid1_end_read_request against inconsistencies

2015-08-27T11:08:08+00:00

commit 423f04d63cf421ea436bcc5be02543d549ce4b28 upstream.

raid1_end_read_request() assumes that the In_sync bits are consistent
with the ->degaded count.
raid1_spare_active updates the In_sync bit before the ->degraded count
and so exposes an inconsistency, as does error()
So extend the spinlock in raid1_spare_active() and error() to hide those
inconsistencies.

This should probably be part of
  Commit: 34cab6f42003 ("md/raid1: fix test for 'was read error from
  last working device'.")
as it addresses the same issue.  It fixes the same bug and should go
to -stable for same reasons.

Fixes: 76073054c95b ("md/raid1: clean up read_balance.")
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown 
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques

md/raid1: fix test for 'was read error from last working device'.

2015-08-11T08:57:45+00:00

commit 34cab6f42003cb06f48f86a86652984dec338ae9 upstream.

When we get a read error from the last working device, we don't
try to repair it, and don't fail the device.  We simple report a
read error to the caller.

However the current test for 'is this the last working device' is
wrong.
When there is only one fully working device, it assumes that a
non-faulty device is that device.  However a spare which is rebuilding
would be non-faulty but so not the only working device.

So change the test from "!Faulty" to "In_sync".  If ->degraded says
there is only one fully working device and this device is in_sync,
this must be the one.

This bug has existed since we allowed read_balance to read from
a recovering spare in v3.0

Reported-and-tested-by: Alexander Lyakas 
Fixes: 76073054c95b ("md/raid1: clean up read_balance.")
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown 
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques

md/raid1: fix read balance when a drive is write-mostly.

2015-03-18T09:59:00+00:00

commit d1901ef099c38afd11add4cfb3312c02ef21ec4a upstream.

When a drive is marked write-mostly it should only be the
target of reads if there is no other option.

This behaviour was broken by

commit 9dedf60313fa4dddfd5b9b226a0ef12a512bf9dc
    md/raid1: read balance chooses idlest disk for SSD

which causes a write-mostly device to be *preferred* is some cases.

Restore correct behaviour by checking and setting
best_dist_disk and best_pending_disk rather than best_disk.

We only need to test one of these as they are both changed
from -1 or >=0 at the same time.

As we leave min_pending and best_dist unchanged, any non-write-mostly
device will appear better than the write-mostly device.

Reported-by: Tomáš Hodek 
Reported-by: Dark Penguin 
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown 
Link: http://marc.info/?l=linux-raid&m=135982797322422
Fixes: 9dedf60313fa4dddfd5b9b226a0ef12a512bf9dc
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques

md/raid1: intialise start_next_window for READ case to avoid hang

2014-10-05T20:41:11+00:00

commit f0cc9a057151892b885be21a1d19b0185568281d upstream.

r1_bio->start_next_window is not initialised in the READ
case, so allow_barrier may incorrectly decrement
   conf->current_window_requests
which can cause raise_barrier() to block forever.

Fixes: 79ef3a8aa1cb1523cc231c9a90a278333c21f761
Reported-by: Brassow Jonathan 
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

md/raid1: fix_read_error should act on all non-faulty devices.

2014-10-05T20:41:11+00:00

commit b8cb6b4c121e1bf1963c16ed69e7adcb1bc301cd upstream.

If a devices is being recovered it is not InSync and is not Faulty.

If a read error is experienced on that device, fix_read_error()
will be called, but it ignores non-InSync devices.  So it will
neither fix the error nor fail the device.

It is incorrect that fix_read_error() ignores non-InSync devices.
It should only ignore Faulty devices.  So fix it.

This became a bug when we allowed reading from a device that was being
recovered.  It is suitable for any subsequent -stable kernel.

Fixes: da8840a747c0dbf49506ec906757a6b87b9741e9
Reported-by: Alexander Lyakas 
Tested-by: Alexander Lyakas 
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

md/raid1: count resync requests in nr_pending.

2014-10-05T20:41:11+00:00

commit 34e97f170149bfa14979581c4c748bc9b4b79d5b upstream.

Both normal IO and resync IO can be retried with reschedule_retry()
and so be counted into ->nr_queued, but only normal IO gets counted in
->nr_pending.

Before the recent improvement to RAID1 resync there could only
possibly have been one or the other on the queue.  When handling a
read failure it could only be normal IO.  So when handle_read_error()
called freeze_array() the fact that freeze_array only compares
->nr_queued against ->nr_pending was safe.

But now that these two types can interleave, we can have both normal
and resync IO requests queued, so we need to count them both in
nr_pending.

This error can lead to freeze_array() hanging if there is a read
error, so it is suitable for -stable.

Fixes: 79ef3a8aa1cb1523cc231c9a90a278333c21f761
Reported-by: Brassow Jonathan 
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

md/raid1: update next_resync under resync_lock.

2014-10-05T20:41:11+00:00

commit c2fd4c94deedb89ac1746c4a53219be499372c06 upstream.

raise_barrier() uses next_resync as part of its calculations, so it
really should be updated first, instead of afterwards.

next_resync is always used under resync_lock so update it under
resync lock to, just before it is used.  That is safest.

This could cause normal IO and resync IO to interact badly so
it suitable for -stable.

Fixes: 79ef3a8aa1cb1523cc231c9a90a278333c21f761
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

md/raid1: Don't use next_resync to determine how far resync has progressed

2014-10-05T20:41:11+00:00

commit 235549605eb7f1c5a37cef8b09d12e6d412c5cd6 upstream.

next_resync is (approximately) the location for the next resync request.
However it does *not* reliably determine the earliest location
at which resync might be happening.
This is because resync requests can complete out of order, and
we only limit the number of current requests, not the distance
from the earliest pending request to the latest.

mddev->curr_resync_completed is a reliable indicator of the earliest
position at which resync could be happening.   It is updated less
frequently, but is actually reliable which is more important.

So use it to determine if a write request is before the region
being resynced and so safe from conflict.

This error can allow resync IO to interfere with normal IO which
could lead to data corruption. Hence: stable.

Fixes: 79ef3a8aa1cb1523cc231c9a90a278333c21f761
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman