commit bb6cc253861bd5a7cf8439e2118659696df9619f upstream.
Commit 028ddcac477b ("bcache: Remove unnecessary NULL point check in
node allocations") replaced IS_ERR_OR_NULL by IS_ERR. This leads to a
NULL pointer dereference.
BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000080
Call Trace:
? __die_body.cold+0x1a/0x1f
? page_fault_oops+0xd2/0x2b0
? exc_page_fault+0x70/0x170
? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30
? btree_node_free+0xf/0x160 [bcache]
? up_write+0x32/0x60
btree_gc_coalesce+0x2aa/0x890 [bcache]
? bch_extent_bad+0x70/0x170 [bcache]
btree_gc_recurse+0x130/0x390 [bcache]
? btree_gc_mark_node+0x72/0x230 [bcache]
bch_btree_gc+0x5da/0x600 [bcache]
? cpuusage_read+0x10/0x10
? bch_btree_gc+0x600/0x600 [bcache]
bch_gc_thread+0x135/0x180 [bcache]
The relevant code starts with:
new_nodes[0] = NULL;
for (i = 0; i < nodes; i++) {
if (__bch_keylist_realloc(&keylist, bkey_u64s(&r[i].b->key)))
goto out_nocoalesce;
// ...
out_nocoalesce:
// ...
for (i = 0; i < nodes; i++)
if (!IS_ERR(new_nodes[i])) { // IS_ERR_OR_NULL before
028ddcac477b
btree_node_free(new_nodes[i]); // new_nodes[0] is NULL
rw_unlock(true, new_nodes[i]);
}
This patch replaces IS_ERR() by IS_ERR_OR_NULL() to fix this.
Fixes: 028ddcac477b ("bcache: Remove unnecessary NULL point check in node allocations")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/3DF4A87A-2AC1-4893-AE5F-E921478419A9@suse.de/
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Zheng Wang <zyytlz.wz@163.com>
Cc: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Markus Weippert <markus@gekmihesg.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit e34820f984512b433ee1fc291417e60c47d56727 upstream.
We had a problem with io hung because it was waiting for c->root to
release the lock.
crash> cache_set.root -l cache_set.list ffffa03fde4c0050
root = 0xffff802ef454c800
crash> btree -o 0xffff802ef454c800 | grep rw_semaphore
[ffff802ef454c858] struct rw_semaphore lock;
crash> struct rw_semaphore ffff802ef454c858
struct rw_semaphore {
count = {
counter = -4294967297
},
wait_list = {
next = 0xffff00006786fc28,
prev = 0xffff00005d0efac8
},
wait_lock = {
raw_lock = {
{
val = {
counter = 0
},
{
locked = 0 '\000',
pending = 0 '\000'
},
{
locked_pending = 0,
tail = 0
}
}
}
},
osq = {
tail = {
counter = 0
}
},
owner = 0xffffa03fdc586603
}
The "counter = -4294967297" means that lock count is -1 and a write lock
is being attempted. Then, we found that there is a btree with a counter
of 1 in btree_cache_freeable.
crash> cache_set -l cache_set.list ffffa03fde4c0050 -o|grep btree_cache
[ffffa03fde4c1140] struct list_head btree_cache;
[ffffa03fde4c1150] struct list_head btree_cache_freeable;
[ffffa03fde4c1160] struct list_head btree_cache_freed;
[ffffa03fde4c1170] unsigned int btree_cache_used;
[ffffa03fde4c1178] wait_queue_head_t btree_cache_wait;
[ffffa03fde4c1190] struct task_struct *btree_cache_alloc_lock;
crash> list -H ffffa03fde4c1140|wc -l
973
crash> list -H ffffa03fde4c1150|wc -l
1123
crash> cache_set.btree_cache_used -l cache_set.list ffffa03fde4c0050
btree_cache_used = 2097
crash> list -s btree -l btree.list -H ffffa03fde4c1140|grep -E -A2 "^ lock = {" > btree_cache.txt
crash> list -s btree -l btree.list -H ffffa03fde4c1150|grep -E -A2 "^ lock = {" > btree_cache_freeable.txt
[root@node-3 127.0.0.1-2023-08-04-16:40:28]# pwd
/var/crash/127.0.0.1-2023-08-04-16:40:28
[root@node-3 127.0.0.1-2023-08-04-16:40:28]# cat btree_cache.txt|grep counter|grep -v "counter = 0"
[root@node-3 127.0.0.1-2023-08-04-16:40:28]# cat btree_cache_freeable.txt|grep counter|grep -v "counter = 0"
counter = 1
We found that this is a bug in bch_sectors_dirty_init() when locking c->root:
(1). Thread X has locked c->root(A) write.
(2). Thread Y failed to lock c->root(A), waiting for the lock(c->root A).
(3). Thread X bch_btree_set_root() changes c->root from A to B.
(4). Thread X releases the lock(c->root A).
(5). Thread Y successfully locks c->root(A).
(6). Thread Y releases the lock(c->root B).
down_write locked ---(1)----------------------┐
| |
| down_read waiting ---(2)----┐ |
| | ┌-------------┐ ┌-------------┐
bch_btree_set_root ===(3)========>> | c->root A | | c->root B |
| | └-------------┘ └-------------┘
up_write ---(4)---------------------┘ | |
| | |
down_read locked ---(5)-----------┘ |
| |
up_read ---(6)-----------------------------┘
Since c->root may change, the correct steps to lock c->root should be
the same as bch_root_usage(), compare after locking.
static unsigned int bch_root_usage(struct cache_set *c)
{
unsigned int bytes = 0;
struct bkey *k;
struct btree *b;
struct btree_iter iter;
goto lock_root;
do {
rw_unlock(false, b);
lock_root:
b = c->root;
rw_lock(false, b, b->level);
} while (b != c->root);
for_each_key_filter(&b->keys, k, &iter, bch_ptr_bad)
bytes += bkey_bytes(k);
rw_unlock(false, b);
return (bytes * 100) / btree_bytes(c);
}
Fixes: b144e45fc576 ("bcache: make bch_sectors_dirty_init() to be multithreaded")
Signed-off-by: Mingzhe Zou <mingzhe.zou@easystack.cn>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231120052503.6122-7-colyli@suse.de
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 7cc47e64d3d69786a2711a4767e26b26ba63d7ed upstream.
We found that after long run, the dirty_data of the bcache device
will have errors. This error cannot be eliminated unless re-register.
We also found that reattach after detach, this error can accumulate.
In bch_sectors_dirty_init(), all inode <= d->id keys will be recounted
again. This is wrong, we only need to count the keys of the current
device.
Fixes: b144e45fc576 ("bcache: make bch_sectors_dirty_init() to be multithreaded")
Signed-off-by: Mingzhe Zou <mingzhe.zou@easystack.cn>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231120052503.6122-6-colyli@suse.de
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 2c7f497ac274a14330208b18f6f734000868ebf9 upstream. In SHOW(), the variable 'n' is of type 'size_t.' While there is a conditional check to verify that 'n' is not equal to zero before executing the 'do_div' macro, concerns arise regarding potential division by zero error in 64-bit environments. The concern arises when 'n' is 64 bits in size, greater than zero, and the lower 32 bits of it are zeros. In such cases, the conditional check passes because 'n' is non-zero, but the 'do_div' macro casts 'n' to 'uint32_t,' effectively truncating it to its lower 32 bits. Consequently, the 'n' value becomes zero. To fix this potential division by zero error and ensure precise division handling, this commit replaces the 'do_div' macro with div64_u64(). div64_u64() is designed to work with 64-bit operands, guaranteeing that division is performed correctly. This change enhances the robustness of the code, ensuring that division operations yield accurate results in all scenarios, eliminating the possibility of division by zero, and improving compatibility across different 64-bit environments. Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE. Signed-off-by: Rand Deeb <rand.sec96@gmail.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231120052503.6122-5-colyli@suse.de Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 777967e7e9f6f5f3e153abffb562bffaf4430d26 upstream. In btree_gc_rewrite_node(), pointer 'n' is not checked after it returns from btree_gc_rewrite_node(). There is potential possibility that 'n' is a non NULL ERR_PTR(), referencing such error code is not permitted in following code. Therefore a return value checking is necessary after 'n' is back from btree_node_alloc_replacement(). Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231120052503.6122-3-colyli@suse.de Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 2faac25d7958c4761bb8cec54adb79f806783ad6 upstream.
We get a kernel crash about "unable to handle kernel paging request":
```dmesg
[368033.032005] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffffffffad9ae4b5
[368033.032007] PGD fc3a0d067 P4D fc3a0d067 PUD fc3a0e063 PMD 8000000fc38000e1
[368033.032012] Oops: 0003 [#1] SMP PTI
[368033.032015] CPU: 23 PID: 55090 Comm: bch_dirtcnt[0] Kdump: loaded Tainted: G OE --------- - - 4.18.0-147.5.1.es8_24.x86_64 #1
[368033.032017] Hardware name: Tsinghua Tongfang THTF Chaoqiang Server/072T6D, BIOS 2.4.3 01/17/2017
[368033.032027] RIP: 0010:native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x183/0x1d0
[368033.032029] Code: 8b 02 48 85 c0 74 f6 48 89 c1 eb d0 c1 e9 12 83 e0
03 83 e9 01 48 c1 e0 05 48 63 c9 48 05 c0 3d 02 00 48 03 04 cd 60 68 93
ad <48> 89 10 8b 42 08 85 c0 75 09 f3 90 8b 42 08 85 c0 74 f7 48 8b 02
[368033.032031] RSP: 0018:ffffbb48852abe00 EFLAGS: 00010082
[368033.032032] RAX: ffffffffad9ae4b5 RBX: 0000000000000246 RCX: 0000000000003bf3
[368033.032033] RDX: ffff97b0ff8e3dc0 RSI: 0000000000600000 RDI: ffffbb4884743c68
[368033.032034] RBP: 0000000000000001 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 000007ffffffffff
[368033.032035] R10: ffffbb486bb01000 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffffffffc068da70
[368033.032036] R13: 0000000000000003 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
[368033.032038] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff97b0ff8c0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[368033.032039] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[368033.032040] CR2: ffffffffad9ae4b5 CR3: 0000000fc3a0a002 CR4: 00000000003626e0
[368033.032042] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
[368033.032043] bcache: bch_cached_dev_attach() Caching rbd479 as bcache462 on set 8cff3c36-4a76-4242-afaa-7630206bc70b
[368033.032045] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
[368033.032046] Call Trace:
[368033.032054] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x32/0x40
[368033.032061] __wake_up_common_lock+0x63/0xc0
[368033.032073] ? bch_ptr_invalid+0x10/0x10 [bcache]
[368033.033502] bch_dirty_init_thread+0x14c/0x160 [bcache]
[368033.033511] ? read_dirty_submit+0x60/0x60 [bcache]
[368033.033516] kthread+0x112/0x130
[368033.033520] ? kthread_flush_work_fn+0x10/0x10
[368033.034505] ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
```
The crash occurred when call wake_up(&state->wait), and then we want
to look at the value in the state. However, bch_sectors_dirty_init()
is not found in the stack of any task. Since state is allocated on
the stack, we guess that bch_sectors_dirty_init() has exited, causing
bch_dirty_init_thread() to be unable to handle kernel paging request.
In order to verify this idea, we added some printing information during
wake_up(&state->wait). We find that "wake up" is printed twice, however
we only expect the last thread to wake up once.
```dmesg
[ 994.641004] alcache: bch_dirty_init_thread() wake up
[ 994.641018] alcache: bch_dirty_init_thread() wake up
[ 994.641523] alcache: bch_sectors_dirty_init() init exit
```
There is a race. If bch_sectors_dirty_init() exits after the first wake
up, the second wake up will trigger this bug("unable to handle kernel
paging request").
Proceed as follows:
bch_sectors_dirty_init
kthread_run ==============> bch_dirty_init_thread(bch_dirtcnt[0])
... ...
atomic_inc(&state.started) ...
... ...
atomic_read(&state.enough) ...
... atomic_set(&state->enough, 1)
kthread_run ======================================================> bch_dirty_init_thread(bch_dirtcnt[1])
... atomic_dec_and_test(&state->started) ...
atomic_inc(&state.started) ... ...
... wake_up(&state->wait) ...
atomic_read(&state.enough) atomic_dec_and_test(&state->started)
... ...
wait_event(state.wait, atomic_read(&state.started) == 0) ...
return ...
wake_up(&state->wait)
We believe it is very common to wake up twice if there is no dirty, but
crash is an extremely low probability event. It's hard for us to reproduce
this issue. We attached and detached continuously for a week, with a total
of more than one million attaches and only one crash.
Putting atomic_inc(&state.started) before kthread_run() can avoid waking
up twice.
Fixes: b144e45fc576 ("bcache: make bch_sectors_dirty_init() to be multithreaded")
Signed-off-by: Mingzhe Zou <mingzhe.zou@easystack.cn>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231120052503.6122-8-colyli@suse.de
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit f72f4312d4388376fc8a1f6cf37cb21a0d41758b upstream.
Commit 028ddcac477b ("bcache: Remove unnecessary NULL point check in
node allocations") do the following change inside btree_gc_coalesce(),
31 @@ -1340,7 +1340,7 @@ static int btree_gc_coalesce(
32 memset(new_nodes, 0, sizeof(new_nodes));
33 closure_init_stack(&cl);
34
35 - while (nodes < GC_MERGE_NODES && !IS_ERR_OR_NULL(r[nodes].b))
36 + while (nodes < GC_MERGE_NODES && !IS_ERR(r[nodes].b))
37 keys += r[nodes++].keys;
38
39 blocks = btree_default_blocks(b->c) * 2 / 3;
At line 35 the original r[nodes].b is not always allocatored from
__bch_btree_node_alloc(), and possibly initialized as NULL pointer by
caller of btree_gc_coalesce(). Therefore the change at line 36 is not
correct.
This patch replaces the mistaken IS_ERR() by IS_ERR_OR_NULL() to avoid
potential issue.
Fixes: 028ddcac477b ("bcache: Remove unnecessary NULL point check in node allocations")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 6.5+
Cc: Zheng Wang <zyytlz.wz@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231120052503.6122-9-colyli@suse.de
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
* for-6.5/block-late: blk-sysfs: add a new attr_group for blk_mq blk-iocost: move wbt_enable/disable_default() out of spinlock blk-wbt: cleanup rwb_enabled() and wbt_disabled() blk-wbt: remove dead code to handle wbt enable/disable with io inflight blk-wbt: don't create wbt sysfs entry if CONFIG_BLK_WBT is disabled blk-mq: fix two misuses on RQF_USE_SCHED blk-throttle: Fix io statistics for cgroup v1 bcache: Fix bcache device claiming bcache: Alloc holder object before async registration raid10: avoid spin_lock from fastpath from raid10_unplug() md: fix 'delete_mutex' deadlock md: use mddev->external to select holder in export_rdev() md/raid1-10: fix casting from randomized structure in raid1_submit_write() md/raid10: fix the condition to call bio_end_io_acct()
Pull locking updates from Ingo Molnar:
- Introduce cmpxchg128() -- aka. the demise of cmpxchg_double()
The cmpxchg128() family of functions is basically & functionally the
same as cmpxchg_double(), but with a saner interface.
Instead of a 6-parameter horror that forced u128 - u64/u64-halves
layout details on the interface and exposed users to complexity,
fragility & bugs, use a natural 3-parameter interface with u128
types.
- Restructure the generated atomic headers, and add kerneldoc comments
for all of the generic atomic{,64,_long}_t operations.
The generated definitions are much cleaner now, and come with
documentation.
- Implement lock_set_cmp_fn() on lockdep, for defining an ordering when
taking multiple locks of the same type.
This gets rid of one use of lockdep_set_novalidate_class() in the
bcache code.
- Fix raw_cpu_generic_try_cmpxchg() bug due to an unintended variable
shadowing generating garbage code on Clang on certain ARM builds.
* tag 'locking-core-2023-06-27' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (43 commits)
locking/atomic: scripts: fix ${atomic}_dec_if_positive() kerneldoc
percpu: Fix self-assignment of __old in raw_cpu_generic_try_cmpxchg()
locking/atomic: treewide: delete arch_atomic_*() kerneldoc
locking/atomic: docs: Add atomic operations to the driver basic API documentation
locking/atomic: scripts: generate kerneldoc comments
docs: scripts: kernel-doc: accept bitwise negation like ~@var
locking/atomic: scripts: simplify raw_atomic*() definitions
locking/atomic: scripts: simplify raw_atomic_long*() definitions
locking/atomic: scripts: split pfx/name/sfx/order
locking/atomic: scripts: restructure fallback ifdeffery
locking/atomic: scripts: build raw_atomic_long*() directly
locking/atomic: treewide: use raw_atomic*_<op>()
locking/atomic: scripts: add trivial raw_atomic*_<op>()
locking/atomic: scripts: factor out order template generation
locking/atomic: scripts: remove leftover "${mult}"
locking/atomic: scripts: remove bogus order parameter
locking/atomic: xtensa: add preprocessor symbols
locking/atomic: x86: add preprocessor symbols
locking/atomic: sparc: add preprocessor symbols
locking/atomic: sh: add preprocessor symbols
...
Commit 2736e8eeb0cc ("block: use the holder as indication for exclusive
opens") introduced a change that blkdev_put() has to get exclusive
holder of the bdev as an argument. However it overlooked that
register_bdev() and register_cache() overwrite the bdev->bd_holder field
in the block device to point to the real owning object which was not
available at the time we called blkdev_get_by_path(). Messing with bdev
internals like this is a layering violation and it also causes
blkdev_put() to issue warning about mismatching holders.
Fix bcache to reopen the block device with appropriate holder once it is
available which also restores the behavior that multiple bcache caches
cannot claim the same device which was broken by commit 29499ab060fe
("bcache: don't pass a stack address to blkdev_get_by_path").
Fixes: 2736e8eeb0cc ("block: use the holder as indication for exclusive opens")
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Acked-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230622164658.12861-2-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>