Fix the following sparse warning: drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7038-l1.c:419:12: warning: symbol 'bcm7038_l1_of_init' was not declared. Should it be static? Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jason Yan <yanaijie@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200417074036.46594-1-yanaijie@huawei.com
Fix the following sparse warning: drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-icu.c:69:1: warning: symbol 'legacy_bindings' was not declared. Should it be static? Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jason Yan <yanaijie@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200417074046.46771-1-yanaijie@huawei.com
Running a lockedp-enabled kernel on a vim3l board (Amlogic SM1)
leads to the following splat:
[ 13.557138] WARNING: HARDIRQ-safe -> HARDIRQ-unsafe lock order detected
[ 13.587485] ip/456 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] is trying to acquire:
[ 13.625922] ffff000059908cf0 (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: __setup_irq+0xf8/0x8d8
[ 13.632273] which would create a new lock dependency:
[ 13.637272] (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}-{2:2} -> (&ctl->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}
[ 13.644209]
[ 13.644209] but this new dependency connects a HARDIRQ-irq-safe lock:
[ 13.654122] (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}-{2:2}
[ 13.654125]
[ 13.654125] ... which became HARDIRQ-irq-safe at:
[ 13.664759] lock_acquire+0xec/0x368
[ 13.666926] _raw_spin_lock+0x60/0x88
[ 13.669979] handle_fasteoi_irq+0x30/0x178
[ 13.674082] generic_handle_irq+0x38/0x50
[ 13.678098] __handle_domain_irq+0x6c/0xc8
[ 13.682209] gic_handle_irq+0x5c/0xb0
[ 13.685872] el1_irq+0xd0/0x180
[ 13.689010] arch_cpu_idle+0x40/0x220
[ 13.692732] default_idle_call+0x54/0x60
[ 13.696677] do_idle+0x23c/0x2e8
[ 13.699903] cpu_startup_entry+0x30/0x50
[ 13.703852] rest_init+0x1e0/0x2b4
[ 13.707301] arch_call_rest_init+0x18/0x24
[ 13.711449] start_kernel+0x4ec/0x51c
[ 13.715167]
[ 13.715167] to a HARDIRQ-irq-unsafe lock:
[ 13.722426] (&ctl->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}
[ 13.722430]
[ 13.722430] ... which became HARDIRQ-irq-unsafe at:
[ 13.732319] ...
[ 13.732324] lock_acquire+0xec/0x368
[ 13.735985] _raw_spin_lock+0x60/0x88
[ 13.739452] meson_gpio_irq_domain_alloc+0xcc/0x290
[ 13.744392] irq_domain_alloc_irqs_hierarchy+0x24/0x60
[ 13.749586] __irq_domain_alloc_irqs+0x160/0x2f0
[ 13.754254] irq_create_fwspec_mapping+0x118/0x320
[ 13.759073] irq_create_of_mapping+0x78/0xa0
[ 13.763360] of_irq_get+0x6c/0x80
[ 13.766701] of_mdiobus_register_phy+0x10c/0x238 [of_mdio]
[ 13.772227] of_mdiobus_register+0x158/0x380 [of_mdio]
[ 13.777388] mdio_mux_init+0x180/0x2e8 [mdio_mux]
[ 13.782128] g12a_mdio_mux_probe+0x290/0x398 [mdio_mux_meson_g12a]
[ 13.788349] platform_drv_probe+0x5c/0xb0
[ 13.792379] really_probe+0xe4/0x448
[ 13.795979] driver_probe_device+0xe8/0x140
[ 13.800189] __device_attach_driver+0x94/0x120
[ 13.804639] bus_for_each_drv+0x84/0xd8
[ 13.808474] __device_attach+0xe4/0x168
[ 13.812361] device_initial_probe+0x1c/0x28
[ 13.816592] bus_probe_device+0xa4/0xb0
[ 13.820430] deferred_probe_work_func+0xa8/0x100
[ 13.825064] process_one_work+0x264/0x688
[ 13.829088] worker_thread+0x4c/0x458
[ 13.832768] kthread+0x154/0x158
[ 13.836018] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18
[ 13.839612]
[ 13.839612] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 13.839612]
[ 13.850354] Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario:
[ 13.850354]
[ 13.855720] CPU0 CPU1
[ 13.858774] ---- ----
[ 13.863242] lock(&ctl->lock);
[ 13.866330] local_irq_disable();
[ 13.872233] lock(&irq_desc_lock_class);
[ 13.878705] lock(&ctl->lock);
[ 13.884297] <Interrupt>
[ 13.886857] lock(&irq_desc_lock_class);
[ 13.891014]
[ 13.891014] *** DEADLOCK ***
The issue can occur when CPU1 is doing something like irq_set_type()
and CPU0 performing an interrupt allocation, for example. Taking
an interrupt (like the one being reconfigured) would lead to a deadlock.
A solution to this is:
- Reorder the locking so that meson_gpio_irq_update_bits takes the lock
itself at all times, instead of relying on the caller to lock or not,
hence making the RMW sequence atomic,
- Rework the critical section in meson_gpio_irq_request_channel to only
cover the allocation itself, and let the gpio_irq_sel_pin callback
deal with its own locking if required,
- Take the private spin-lock with interrupts disabled at all times
Reviewed-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
As per the PLIC specification, maximum priority threshold value is 0x7
not 0xF. Even though it doesn't cause any error in qemu/hifive unleashed,
there may be some implementation which checks the upper bound resulting in
an illegal access.
Fixes: ccbe80bad571 ("irqchip/sifive-plic: Enable/Disable external interrupts upon cpu online/offline")
Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200403014609.71831-1-atish.patra@wdc.com
The ti_sci_inta_irq_handler() does not take into account INTA IRQs state
(masked/unmasked) as it uses INTA_STATUS_CLEAR_j register to get INTA IRQs
status, which provides raw status value.
This causes hard IRQ handlers to be called or threaded handlers to be
scheduled many times even if corresponding INTA IRQ is masked.
Above, first of all, affects the LEVEL interrupts processing and causes
unexpected behavior up the system stack or crash.
Fix it by using the Interrupt Masked Status INTA_STATUSM_j register which
provides masked INTA IRQs status.
Fixes: 9f1463b86c13 ("irqchip/ti-sci-inta: Add support for Interrupt Aggregator driver")
Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200408191532.31252-1-grygorii.strashko@ti.com
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Using irq_domain_free_irqs_common() on the irqdomain free path will
leave the MSI descriptor unfreed when platform devices get removed.
Properly free it by MSI domain free function.
Fixes: 9650c60ebfec0 ("irqchip/mbigen: Create irq domain for each mbigen device")
Signed-off-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200408114352.1604-1-yuzenghui@huawei.com
Although the vSGIs are not directly visible to the host, they still get moved around by the CPU hotplug, for example. This results in the kernel moaning on the console, such as: genirq: irq_chip GICv4.1-sgi did not update eff. affinity mask of irq 38 Updating the effective affinity on set_affinity() fixes it. Reviewed-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
When a vPE is made resident, the GIC starts parsing the virtual pending table to deliver pending interrupts. This takes place asynchronously, and can at times take a long while. Long enough that the vcpu enters the guest and hits WFI before any interrupt has been signaled yet. The vcpu then exits, blocks, and now gets a doorbell. Rince, repeat. In order to avoid the above, a (optional on GICv4, mandatory on v4.1) feature allows the GIC to feedback to the hypervisor whether it is done parsing the VPT by clearing the GICR_VPENDBASER.Dirty bit. The hypervisor can then wait until the GIC is ready before actually running the vPE. Plug the detection code as well as polling on vPE schedule. While at it, tidy-up the kernel message that displays the GICv4 optional features. Reviewed-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Pull irq fixes from Thomas Gleixner: "Two reverts addressing regressions of the Xilinx interrupt controller driver which affected the PPC users" * tag 'irq-urgent-2020-04-05' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: Revert "irqchip/xilinx: Enable generic irq multi handler" Revert "irqchip/xilinx: Do not call irq_set_default_host()"