commit aa972409951e0675e07918620427517cad5090e0 upstream. Unfortunately, ForcePad capability is not actually exported over PS/2, so we have to resort to DMI checks. Reported-by: Nicole Faerber <nicole.faerber@kernelconcepts.de> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> [bwh: Backported to 3.2: adjust context] Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
commit 5715fc764f7753d464dbe094b5ef9cffa6e479a4 upstream. ForcePads are found on HP EliteBook 1040 laptops. They lack any kind of physical buttons, instead they generate primary button click when user presses somewhat hard on the surface of the touchpad. Unfortunately they also report primary button click whenever there are 2 or more contacts on the pad, messing up all multi-finger gestures (2-finger scrolling, multi-finger tapping, etc). To cope with this behavior we introduce a delay (currently 50 msecs) in reporting primary press in case more contacts appear. Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
commit d49cb7aeebb974713f9f7ab2991352d3050b095b upstream. commit 421e08c41fda fixed the reported min/max for the X and Y axis, but unfortunately, it broke the resolution of those same axis. On the t540p, the resolution is the same regarding X and Y. It is not a problem for xf86-input-synaptics because this driver is only interested in the ratio between X and Y. Unfortunately, xf86-input-cmt uses directly the resolution, and having a null resolution leads to some divide by 0 errors, which are translated by -infinity in the resulting coordinates. Reported-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> [bwh: Backported to 3.2: I didn't apply the PNP ID changes, so the code being moved looks different] Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
commit 6d396ede224dc596d92d7cab433713536e68916c upstream. The T540p has a touchpad with pnp-id LEN0034, all the models with this pnp-id have the same min/max values, except the T540p where the values are slightly off. Fix them to be identical. This is a preparation patch for simplifying the quirk table. Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
commit 0b5fe736fe923f1f5e05413878d5990e92ffbdf5 upstream. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1096436 Tested-and-reported-by: ajayr@bigfoot.com Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
commit 27a38856a948c3e8de30dc71647ff9e1778c99fc upstream. Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
commit 46a2986ebbe18757c2d8c352f8fb6e0f4f0754e3 upstream. We expect that all the Haswell series will need such quirks, sigh. The T431s seems to be T430 hardware in a T440s case, using the T440s touchpad, with the same min/max issue. The X1 Carbon 3rd generation name says 2nd while it is a 3rd generation. The X1 and T431s share a PnPID with the T540p, but the reported ranges are closer to those of the T440s. HdG: Squashed 5 quirk patches into one. T431s + L440 + L540 are written by me, S1 Yoga and X1 are written by Benjamin Tissoires. Hdg: Standardized S1 Yoga and X1 values, Yoga uses the same touchpad as the X240, X1 uses the same touchpad as the T440. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
commit 8a0435d958fb36d93b8df610124a0e91e5675c82 upstream. This extends Benjamin Tissoires manual min/max quirk table with support for the ThinkPad X240. Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
commit 421e08c41fda1f0c2ff6af81a67b491389b653a5 upstream. The new Lenovo Haswell series (-40's) contains a new Synaptics touchpad. However, these new Synaptics devices report bad axis ranges. Under Windows, it is not a problem because the Windows driver uses RMI4 over SMBus to talk to the device. Under Linux, we are using the PS/2 fallback interface and it occurs the reported ranges are wrong. Of course, it would be too easy to have only one range for the whole series, each touchpad seems to be calibrated in a different way. We can not use SMBus to get the actual range because I suspect the firmware will switch into the SMBus mode and stop talking through PS/2 (this is the case for hybrid HID over I2C / PS/2 Synaptics touchpads). So as a temporary solution (until RMI4 land into upstream), start a new list of quirks with the min/max manually set. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
commit 824efd37415961d38821ecbd9694e213fb2e8b32 upstream. Commit c039450 (Input: synaptics - handle out of bounds values from the hardware) caused any hardware reported values over 7167 to be treated as a wrapped-around negative value. It turns out that some firmware uses the value 8176 to indicate a finger near the edge of the touchpad whose actual position cannot be determined. This value now gets treated as negative, which can cause pointer jumps and broken edge scrolling on these machines. I only know of one touchpad which reports negative values, and this hardware never reports any value lower than -8 (i.e. 8184). Moving the threshold for treating a value as negative up to 8176 should work fine then for any hardware we currently know about, and since we're dealing with unspecified behavior it's probably the best we can do. The special 8176 value is also likely to result in sudden jumps in position, so let's also clamp this to the maximum specified value for the axis. BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1046512 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46371 Signed-off-by: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@chromium.org> Tested-by: Alan Swanson <swanson@ukfsn.org> Tested-by: Arteom <arutemus@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>