linux-stable.git/drivers/hwmon, branch v5.4.136 Linux kernel stable tree hwmon: (max31790) Fix fan speed reporting for fan7..12 2021-07-14T14:53:23+00:00 Guenter Roeck linux@roeck-us.net 2021-05-26T15:40:16+00:00 a90a2466dde5e38d37f479725dd2d660ff1a4110 [ Upstream commit cbbf244f0515af3472084f22b6213121b4a63835 ] Fans 7..12 do not have their own set of configuration registers. So far the code ignored that and read beyond the end of the configuration register range to get the tachometer period. This resulted in more or less random fan speed values for those fans. The datasheet is quite vague when it comes to defining the tachometer period for fans 7..12. Experiments confirm that the period is the same for both fans associated with a given set of configuration registers. Fixes: 54187ff9d766 ("hwmon: (max31790) Convert to use new hwmon registration API") Fixes: 195a4b4298a7 ("hwmon: Driver for Maxim MAX31790") Cc: Jan Kundrát <jan.kundrat@cesnet.cz> Reviewed-by: Jan Kundrát <jan.kundrat@cesnet.cz> Cc: Václav Kubernát <kubernat@cesnet.cz> Reviewed-by: Jan Kundrát <jan.kundrat@cesnet.cz> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210526154022.3223012-2-linux@roeck-us.net Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit cbbf244f0515af3472084f22b6213121b4a63835 ]

Fans 7..12 do not have their own set of configuration registers.
So far the code ignored that and read beyond the end of the configuration
register range to get the tachometer period. This resulted in more or less
random fan speed values for those fans.

The datasheet is quite vague when it comes to defining the tachometer
period for fans 7..12. Experiments confirm that the period is the same
for both fans associated with a given set of configuration registers.

Fixes: 54187ff9d766 ("hwmon: (max31790) Convert to use new hwmon registration API")
Fixes: 195a4b4298a7 ("hwmon: Driver for Maxim MAX31790")
Cc: Jan Kundrát <jan.kundrat@cesnet.cz>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kundrát <jan.kundrat@cesnet.cz>
Cc: Václav Kubernát <kubernat@cesnet.cz>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kundrát <jan.kundrat@cesnet.cz>
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210526154022.3223012-2-linux@roeck-us.net
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
hwmon: (max31722) Remove non-standard ACPI device IDs 2021-07-14T14:53:23+00:00 Guenter Roeck linux@roeck-us.net 2021-05-08T16:50:25+00:00 93110513bcfd18487065695490324eac2700c791 [ Upstream commit 97387c2f06bcfd79d04a848d35517b32ee6dca7c ] Valid Maxim Integrated ACPI device IDs would start with MXIM, not with MAX1. On top of that, ACPI device IDs reflecting chip names are almost always invalid. Remove the invalid ACPI IDs. Fixes: 04e1e70afec6 ("hwmon: (max31722) Add support for MAX31722/MAX31723 temperature sensors") Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 97387c2f06bcfd79d04a848d35517b32ee6dca7c ]

Valid Maxim Integrated ACPI device IDs would start with MXIM,
not with MAX1. On top of that, ACPI device IDs reflecting chip names
are almost always invalid.

Remove the invalid ACPI IDs.

Fixes: 04e1e70afec6 ("hwmon: (max31722) Add support for MAX31722/MAX31723 temperature sensors")
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
hwmon: (max31790) Fix pwmX_enable attributes 2021-07-14T14:53:14+00:00 Guenter Roeck linux@roeck-us.net 2021-05-26T15:40:18+00:00 2e23607e65dc13446a8f65ee22080e0dcb815d59 [ Upstream commit 148c847c9e5a54b99850617bf9c143af9a344f92 ] pwmX_enable supports three possible values: 0: Fan control disabled. Duty cycle is fixed to 0% 1: Fan control enabled, pwm mode. Duty cycle is determined by values written into Target Duty Cycle registers. 2: Fan control enabled, rpm mode Duty cycle is adjusted such that fan speed matches the values in Target Count registers The current code does not do this; instead, it mixes pwm control configuration with fan speed monitoring configuration. Worse, it reports that pwm control would be disabled (pwmX_enable==0) when it is in fact enabled in pwm mode. Part of the problem may be that the chip sets the "TACH input enable" bit on its own whenever the mode bit is set to RPM mode, but that doesn't mean that "TACH input enable" accurately reflects the pwm mode. Fix it up and only handle pwm control with the pwmX_enable attributes. In the documentation, clarify that disabling pwm control (pwmX_enable=0) sets the pwm duty cycle to 0%. In the code, explain why TACH_INPUT_EN is set together with RPM_MODE. While at it, only update the configuration register if the configuration has changed, and only update the cached configuration if updating the chip configuration was successful. Cc: Jan Kundrát <jan.kundrat@cesnet.cz> Cc: Václav Kubernát <kubernat@cesnet.cz> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Tested-by: Václav Kubernát <kubernat@cesnet.cz> Reviewed-by: Jan Kundrát <jan.kundrat@cesnet.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210526154022.3223012-4-linux@roeck-us.net Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 148c847c9e5a54b99850617bf9c143af9a344f92 ]

pwmX_enable supports three possible values:

0: Fan control disabled. Duty cycle is fixed to 0%
1: Fan control enabled, pwm mode. Duty cycle is determined by
   values written into Target Duty Cycle registers.
2: Fan control enabled, rpm mode
   Duty cycle is adjusted such that fan speed matches
   the values in Target Count registers

The current code does not do this; instead, it mixes pwm control
configuration with fan speed monitoring configuration. Worse, it
reports that pwm control would be disabled (pwmX_enable==0) when
it is in fact enabled in pwm mode. Part of the problem may be that
the chip sets the "TACH input enable" bit on its own whenever the
mode bit is set to RPM mode, but that doesn't mean that "TACH input
enable" accurately reflects the pwm mode.

Fix it up and only handle pwm control with the pwmX_enable attributes.
In the documentation, clarify that disabling pwm control (pwmX_enable=0)
sets the pwm duty cycle to 0%. In the code, explain why TACH_INPUT_EN
is set together with RPM_MODE.

While at it, only update the configuration register if the configuration
has changed, and only update the cached configuration if updating the
chip configuration was successful.

Cc: Jan Kundrát <jan.kundrat@cesnet.cz>
Cc: Václav Kubernát <kubernat@cesnet.cz>
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Tested-by: Václav Kubernát <kubernat@cesnet.cz>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kundrát <jan.kundrat@cesnet.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210526154022.3223012-4-linux@roeck-us.net
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
hwmon: (max31790) Report correct current pwm duty cycles 2021-07-14T14:53:14+00:00 Guenter Roeck linux@roeck-us.net 2021-05-26T15:40:17+00:00 d284b53193fa488bd9a1ed9323ce7c670294de56 [ Upstream commit 897f6339893b741a5d68ae8e2475df65946041c2 ] The MAX31790 has two sets of registers for pwm duty cycles, one to request a duty cycle and one to read the actual current duty cycle. Both do not have to be the same. When reporting the pwm duty cycle to the user, the actual pwm duty cycle from pwm duty cycle registers needs to be reported. When setting it, the pwm target duty cycle needs to be written. Since we don't know the actual pwm duty cycle after a target pwm duty cycle has been written, set the valid flag to false to indicate that actual pwm duty cycle should be read from the chip instead of using cached values. Cc: Jan Kundrát <jan.kundrat@cesnet.cz> Cc: Václav Kubernát <kubernat@cesnet.cz> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Tested-by: Václav Kubernát <kubernat@ceesnet.cz> Reviewed-by: Jan Kundrát <jan.kundrat@cesnet.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210526154022.3223012-3-linux@roeck-us.net Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 897f6339893b741a5d68ae8e2475df65946041c2 ]

The MAX31790 has two sets of registers for pwm duty cycles, one to request
a duty cycle and one to read the actual current duty cycle. Both do not
have to be the same.

When reporting the pwm duty cycle to the user, the actual pwm duty cycle
from pwm duty cycle registers needs to be reported. When setting it, the
pwm target duty cycle needs to be written. Since we don't know the actual
pwm duty cycle after a target pwm duty cycle has been written, set the
valid flag to false to indicate that actual pwm duty cycle should be read
from the chip instead of using cached values.

Cc: Jan Kundrát <jan.kundrat@cesnet.cz>
Cc: Václav Kubernát <kubernat@cesnet.cz>
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Tested-by: Václav Kubernát <kubernat@ceesnet.cz>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kundrát <jan.kundrat@cesnet.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210526154022.3223012-3-linux@roeck-us.net
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
hwmon: (scpi-hwmon) shows the negative temperature properly 2021-06-23T12:41:27+00:00 Riwen Lu luriwen@kylinos.cn 2021-06-04T03:09:59+00:00 35b651d6bdf3e60349a36dd1e6bc50428e51bea1 [ Upstream commit 78d13552346289bad4a9bf8eabb5eec5e5a321a5 ] The scpi hwmon shows the sub-zero temperature in an unsigned integer, which would confuse the users when the machine works in low temperature environment. This shows the sub-zero temperature in an signed value and users can get it properly from sensors. Signed-off-by: Riwen Lu <luriwen@kylinos.cn> Tested-by: Xin Chen <chenxin@kylinos.cn> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210604030959.736379-1-luriwen@kylinos.cn Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 78d13552346289bad4a9bf8eabb5eec5e5a321a5 ]

The scpi hwmon shows the sub-zero temperature in an unsigned integer,
which would confuse the users when the machine works in low temperature
environment. This shows the sub-zero temperature in an signed value and
users can get it properly from sensors.

Signed-off-by: Riwen Lu <luriwen@kylinos.cn>
Tested-by: Xin Chen <chenxin@kylinos.cn>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210604030959.736379-1-luriwen@kylinos.cn
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
hwmon: (dell-smm-hwmon) Fix index values 2021-06-10T11:37:02+00:00 Armin Wolf W_Armin@gmx.de 2021-05-13T15:45:46+00:00 90870b45fc6204d4a619c3bc0ed45eadab3df4fc [ Upstream commit 35d470b5fbc9f82feb77b56bb0d5d0b5cd73e9da ] When support for up to 10 temp sensors and for disabling automatic BIOS fan control was added, noone updated the index values used for disallowing fan support and fan type calls. Fix those values. Signed-off-by: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de> Reviewed-by: Pali Rohár <pali@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210513154546.12430-1-W_Armin@gmx.de Fixes: 1bb46a20e73b ("hwmon: (dell-smm) Support up to 10 temp sensors") Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 35d470b5fbc9f82feb77b56bb0d5d0b5cd73e9da ]

When support for up to 10 temp sensors and for disabling automatic BIOS
fan control was added, noone updated the index values used for
disallowing fan support and fan type calls.
Fix those values.

Signed-off-by: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Pali Rohár <pali@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210513154546.12430-1-W_Armin@gmx.de
Fixes: 1bb46a20e73b ("hwmon: (dell-smm) Support up to 10 temp sensors")
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Revert "hwmon: (lm80) fix a missing check of bus read in lm80 probe" 2021-05-26T10:05:18+00:00 Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org 2021-05-03T11:56:31+00:00 bd2a12549fc2baabaee5864809d206cefb5bf0f1 commit 99ae3417672a6d4a3bf68d4fc43d7c6ca074d477 upstream. This reverts commit 9aa3aa15f4c2f74f47afd6c5db4b420fadf3f315. Because of recent interactions with developers from @umn.edu, all commits from them have been recently re-reviewed to ensure if they were correct or not. Upon review, it was determined that this commit is not needed at all so just revert it. Also, the call to lm80_init_client() was not properly handled, so if error handling is needed in the lm80_probe() function, then it should be done properly, not half-baked like the commit being reverted here did. Cc: Kangjie Lu <kjlu@umn.edu> Fixes: 9aa3aa15f4c2 ("hwmon: (lm80) fix a missing check of bus read in lm80 probe") Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org> Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210503115736.2104747-5-gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 99ae3417672a6d4a3bf68d4fc43d7c6ca074d477 upstream.

This reverts commit 9aa3aa15f4c2f74f47afd6c5db4b420fadf3f315.

Because of recent interactions with developers from @umn.edu, all
commits from them have been recently re-reviewed to ensure if they were
correct or not.

Upon review, it was determined that this commit is not needed at all so
just revert it.  Also, the call to lm80_init_client() was not properly
handled, so if error handling is needed in the lm80_probe() function,
then it should be done properly, not half-baked like the commit being
reverted here did.

Cc: Kangjie Lu <kjlu@umn.edu>
Fixes: 9aa3aa15f4c2 ("hwmon: (lm80) fix a missing check of bus read in lm80 probe")
Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210503115736.2104747-5-gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
hwmon: (occ) Fix poll rate limiting 2021-05-19T08:08:30+00:00 Eddie James eajames@linux.ibm.com 2021-04-29T15:13:36+00:00 1648505d1353ab336bfe3165b6765d179b14c815 [ Upstream commit 5216dff22dc2bbbbe6f00335f9fd2879670e753b ] The poll rate limiter time was initialized at zero. This breaks the comparison in time_after if jiffies is large. Switch to storing the next update time rather than the previous time, and initialize the time when the device is probed. Fixes: c10e753d43eb ("hwmon (occ): Add sensor types and versions") Signed-off-by: Eddie James <eajames@linux.ibm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210429151336.18980-1-eajames@linux.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 5216dff22dc2bbbbe6f00335f9fd2879670e753b ]

The poll rate limiter time was initialized at zero. This breaks the
comparison in time_after if jiffies is large. Switch to storing the
next update time rather than the previous time, and initialize the
time when the device is probed.

Fixes: c10e753d43eb ("hwmon (occ): Add sensor types and versions")
Signed-off-by: Eddie James <eajames@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210429151336.18980-1-eajames@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
hwmon: (pwm-fan) Ensure that calculation doesn't discard big period values 2021-01-19T17:26:15+00:00 Uwe Kleine-König u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de 2020-12-15T09:20:30+00:00 1d05b91ab72eb31289f877f9932380ad251f06e4 [ Upstream commit 1eda52334e6d13eb1a85f713ce06dd39342b5020 ] With MAX_PWM being defined to 255 the code unsigned long period; ... period = ctx->pwm->args.period; state.duty_cycle = DIV_ROUND_UP(pwm * (period - 1), MAX_PWM); calculates a too small value for duty_cycle if the configured period is big (either by discarding the 64 bit value ctx->pwm->args.period or by overflowing the multiplication). As this results in a too slow fan and so maybe an overheating machine better be safe than sorry and error out in .probe. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201215092031.152243-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 1eda52334e6d13eb1a85f713ce06dd39342b5020 ]

With MAX_PWM being defined to 255 the code

	unsigned long period;
	...
	period = ctx->pwm->args.period;
	state.duty_cycle = DIV_ROUND_UP(pwm * (period - 1), MAX_PWM);

calculates a too small value for duty_cycle if the configured period is
big (either by discarding the 64 bit value ctx->pwm->args.period or by
overflowing the multiplication). As this results in a too slow fan and
so maybe an overheating machine better be safe than sorry and error out
in .probe.

Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201215092031.152243-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
hwmon: (ina3221) Fix PM usage counter unbalance in ina3221_write_enable 2020-12-30T10:51:17+00:00 Zhang Qilong zhangqilong3@huawei.com 2020-12-02T14:53:20+00:00 bfdf000e5dd92a97938446ba4524d659f3f1e533 [ Upstream commit bce776f10069c806290eaac712ba73432ae8ecd7 ] pm_runtime_get_sync will increment pm usage counter even it failed. Forgetting to putting operation will result in reference leak here. We fix it by replacing it with pm_runtime_resume_and_get to keep usage counter balanced. It depends on the mainline commit[PM: runtime: Add pm_runtime_resume_and_get to deal with usagecounter]. Fixes: 323aeb0eb5d9a ("hwmon: (ina3221) Add PM runtime support") Signed-off-by: Zhang Qilong <zhangqilong3@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201202145320.1135614-1-zhangqilong3@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit bce776f10069c806290eaac712ba73432ae8ecd7 ]

pm_runtime_get_sync will increment pm usage counter
even it failed. Forgetting to putting operation will
result in reference leak here. We fix it by replacing
it with pm_runtime_resume_and_get to keep usage counter
balanced. It depends on the mainline commit[PM: runtime:
Add pm_runtime_resume_and_get to deal with usagecounter].

Fixes: 323aeb0eb5d9a ("hwmon: (ina3221) Add PM runtime support")
Signed-off-by: Zhang Qilong <zhangqilong3@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201202145320.1135614-1-zhangqilong3@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>