linux-stable.git/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml, branch linux-5.5.y Linux kernel stable tree drm/amd/display: fixup DML dependencies 2020-02-24T07:38:33+00:00 Jun Lei Jun.Lei@amd.com 2019-12-18T19:40:56+00:00 e3e70f500d08c1ec58f85e7c725be80863ec624b [ Upstream commit 34ad0230062c39cdcba564d16d122c0fb467a7d6 ] [why] Need to fix DML portability issues to enable SW unit testing around DML [how] Move calcs into dc include folder since multiple components reference it Remove relative paths to external dependencies Signed-off-by: Jun Lei <Jun.Lei@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Anthony Koo <Anthony.Koo@amd.com> Acked-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com> Acked-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 34ad0230062c39cdcba564d16d122c0fb467a7d6 ]

[why]
Need to fix DML portability issues to enable SW unit testing around DML

[how]
Move calcs into dc include folder since multiple components reference it
Remove relative paths to external dependencies

Signed-off-by: Jun Lei <Jun.Lei@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Anthony Koo <Anthony.Koo@amd.com>
Acked-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Acked-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Merge v5.4-rc7 into drm-next 2019-11-13T19:53:10+00:00 Dave Airlie airlied@redhat.com 2019-11-13T19:53:10+00:00 77e0723bd27f830d0903225372aa778fe2975648 We have the i915 security fixes to backmerge, but first let's clear the decks for other drivers to avoid a bigger mess. Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com> 
We have the i915 security fixes to backmerge, but first
let's clear the decks for other drivers to avoid a bigger
mess.

Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Merge tag 'drm-next-5.5-2019-11-01' of git://people.freedesktop.org/~agd5f/linux into drm-next 2019-11-04T00:22:53+00:00 Dave Airlie airlied@redhat.com 2019-11-04T00:22:53+00:00 8a86b00a437ec06b298477463c7a9b8774570507 drm-next-5.5-2019-11-01: amdgpu: - Add EEPROM support for Arcturus - Enable VCN encode support for Arcturus - Misc PSP fixes - Misc DC fixes - swSMU cleanup amdkfd: - Misc cleanups - Fix typo in cu bitmap parsing Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com> From: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191101190607.3763-1-alexander.deucher@amd.com 
drm-next-5.5-2019-11-01:

amdgpu:
- Add EEPROM support for Arcturus
- Enable VCN encode support for Arcturus
- Misc PSP fixes
- Misc DC fixes
- swSMU cleanup

amdkfd:
- Misc cleanups
- Fix typo in cu bitmap parsing

Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
From: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191101190607.3763-1-alexander.deucher@amd.com
drm/amdgpu: enable -msse2 for GCC 7.1+ users 2019-10-30T15:56:20+00:00 Nick Desaulniers ndesaulniers@google.com 2019-10-16T23:02:09+00:00 e8a170ff9a3576730e43c0dbdd27b7cd3dc56848 A final attempt at enabling sse2 for GCC users. Orininally attempted in: commit 10117450735c ("drm/amd/display: add -msse2 to prevent Clang from emitting libcalls to undefined SW FP routines") Reverted due to "reported instability" in: commit 193392ed9f69 ("Revert "drm/amd/display: add -msse2 to prevent Clang from emitting libcalls to undefined SW FP routines"") Re-added just for Clang in: commit 0f0727d971f6 ("drm/amd/display: readd -msse2 to prevent Clang from emitting libcalls to undefined SW FP routines") The original report didn't have enough information to know if the GPF was due to misalignment, but I suspect that it was. (The missing information was the disassembly of the function at the bottom of the trace, to see if the instruction pointer pointed to an instruction with 16B alignment memory operand requirements. The stack trace does show the stack was only 8B but not 16B aligned though, which makes this a strong possibility). Now that the stack misalignment issue has been fixed for users of GCC 7.1+, reattempt adding -msse2. This matches Clang. It will likely never be safe to enable this for pre-GCC 7.1 AND use a 16B aligned stack in these translation units. This is only a functional change for GCC 7.1+ users, and should be boot tested. Link: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109487 Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> 
A final attempt at enabling sse2 for GCC users.

Orininally attempted in:
commit 10117450735c ("drm/amd/display: add -msse2 to prevent Clang from emitting libcalls to undefined SW FP routines")

Reverted due to "reported instability" in:
commit 193392ed9f69 ("Revert "drm/amd/display: add -msse2 to prevent Clang from emitting libcalls to undefined SW FP routines"")

Re-added just for Clang in:
commit 0f0727d971f6 ("drm/amd/display: readd -msse2 to prevent Clang from emitting libcalls to undefined SW FP routines")

The original report didn't have enough information to know if the GPF
was due to misalignment, but I suspect that it was. (The missing
information was the disassembly of the function at the bottom of the
trace, to see if the instruction pointer pointed to an instruction with
16B alignment memory operand requirements.  The stack trace does show
the stack was only 8B but not 16B aligned though, which makes this a
strong possibility).

Now that the stack misalignment issue has been fixed for users of GCC
7.1+, reattempt adding -msse2. This matches Clang.

It will likely never be safe to enable this for pre-GCC 7.1 AND use a
16B aligned stack in these translation units.

This is only a functional change for GCC 7.1+ users, and should be boot
tested.

Link: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109487
Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
drm/amdgpu: fix stack alignment ABI mismatch for GCC 7.1+ 2019-10-30T15:56:20+00:00 Nick Desaulniers ndesaulniers@google.com 2019-10-16T23:02:08+00:00 00db297106e81770e7c4319014a67896053b5a22 GCC earlier than 7.1 errors when compiling code that makes use of `double`s and sets a stack alignment outside of the range of [2^4-2^12]: $ cat foo.c double foo(double x, double y) { return x + y; } $ gcc-4.9 -mpreferred-stack-boundary=3 foo.c error: -mpreferred-stack-boundary=3 is not between 4 and 12 This is likely why the AMDGPU driver was ever compiled with a different stack alignment (and thus different ABI) than the rest of the x86 kernel. The kernel uses 8B stack alignment, while the driver was using 16B stack alignment in a few places. Since GCC 7.1+ doesn't error, fix the ABI mismatch for users of newer versions of GCC. There was discussion about whether to mark the driver broken or not for users of GCC earlier than 7.1, but since the driver currently is working, don't explicitly break the driver for them here. Relying on differing stack alignment is unspecified behavior, and brittle, and may break in the future. This patch is no functional change for GCC users earlier than 7.1. It's been compile tested on GCC 4.9 and 8.3 to check the correct flags. It should be boot tested when built with GCC 7.1+. -mincoming-stack-boundary= or -mstackrealign may help keep this code building for pre-GCC 7.1 users. The version check for GCC is broken into two conditionals, both because cc-ifversion is currently GCC specific, and it simplifies a subsequent patch. Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> 
GCC earlier than 7.1 errors when compiling code that makes use of
`double`s and sets a stack alignment outside of the range of [2^4-2^12]:

$ cat foo.c
double foo(double x, double y) {
  return x + y;
}
$ gcc-4.9 -mpreferred-stack-boundary=3 foo.c
error: -mpreferred-stack-boundary=3 is not between 4 and 12

This is likely why the AMDGPU driver was ever compiled with a different
stack alignment (and thus different ABI) than the rest of the x86
kernel. The kernel uses 8B stack alignment, while the driver was using
16B stack alignment in a few places.

Since GCC 7.1+ doesn't error, fix the ABI mismatch for users of newer
versions of GCC.

There was discussion about whether to mark the driver broken or not for
users of GCC earlier than 7.1, but since the driver currently is
working, don't explicitly break the driver for them here.

Relying on differing stack alignment is unspecified behavior, and
brittle, and may break in the future.

This patch is no functional change for GCC users earlier than 7.1. It's
been compile tested on GCC 4.9 and 8.3 to check the correct flags. It
should be boot tested when built with GCC 7.1+.

-mincoming-stack-boundary= or -mstackrealign may help keep this code
building for pre-GCC 7.1 users.

The version check for GCC is broken into two conditionals, both because
cc-ifversion is currently GCC specific, and it simplifies a subsequent
patch.

Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
drm/amdgpu: fix stack alignment ABI mismatch for Clang 2019-10-30T15:56:20+00:00 Nick Desaulniers ndesaulniers@google.com 2019-10-16T23:02:07+00:00 c868868f6b6a5272350781f9a19b3a5ba1c00b02 The x86 kernel is compiled with an 8B stack alignment via `-mpreferred-stack-boundary=3` for GCC since 3.6-rc1 via commit d9b0cde91c60 ("x86-64, gcc: Use -mpreferred-stack-boundary=3 if supported") or `-mstack-alignment=8` for Clang. Parts of the AMDGPU driver are compiled with 16B stack alignment. Generally, the stack alignment is part of the ABI. Linking together two different translation units with differing stack alignment is dangerous, particularly when the translation unit with the smaller stack alignment makes calls into the translation unit with the larger stack alignment. While 8B aligned stacks are sometimes also 16B aligned, they are not always. Multiple users have reported General Protection Faults (GPF) when using the AMDGPU driver compiled with Clang. Clang is placing objects in stack slots assuming the stack is 16B aligned, and selecting instructions that require 16B aligned memory operands. At runtime, syscall handlers with 8B aligned stack call into code that assumes 16B stack alignment. When the stack is a multiple of 8B but not 16B, these instructions result in a GPF. Remove the code that added compatibility between the differing compiler flags, as it will result in runtime GPFs when built with Clang. Cleanups for GCC will be sent in later patches in the series. Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/735 Debugged-by: Yuxuan Shui <yshuiv7@gmail.com> Reported-by: Shirish S <shirish.s@amd.com> Reported-by: Yuxuan Shui <yshuiv7@gmail.com> Suggested-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> 
The x86 kernel is compiled with an 8B stack alignment via
`-mpreferred-stack-boundary=3` for GCC since 3.6-rc1 via
commit d9b0cde91c60 ("x86-64, gcc: Use -mpreferred-stack-boundary=3 if supported")
or `-mstack-alignment=8` for Clang. Parts of the AMDGPU driver are
compiled with 16B stack alignment.

Generally, the stack alignment is part of the ABI. Linking together two
different translation units with differing stack alignment is dangerous,
particularly when the translation unit with the smaller stack alignment
makes calls into the translation unit with the larger stack alignment.
While 8B aligned stacks are sometimes also 16B aligned, they are not
always.

Multiple users have reported General Protection Faults (GPF) when using
the AMDGPU driver compiled with Clang. Clang is placing objects in stack
slots assuming the stack is 16B aligned, and selecting instructions that
require 16B aligned memory operands.

At runtime, syscall handlers with 8B aligned stack call into code that
assumes 16B stack alignment.  When the stack is a multiple of 8B but not
16B, these instructions result in a GPF.

Remove the code that added compatibility between the differing compiler
flags, as it will result in runtime GPFs when built with Clang. Cleanups
for GCC will be sent in later patches in the series.

Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/735
Debugged-by: Yuxuan Shui <yshuiv7@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Shirish S <shirish.s@amd.com>
Reported-by: Yuxuan Shui <yshuiv7@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
drm/amd/display: add 50us buffer as WA for pstate switch in active 2019-10-30T15:56:15+00:00 Jun Lei Jun.Lei@amd.com 2019-09-19T21:43:45+00:00 7c37d399c2b84d4b79de4d512a38373f1d71ab90 Signed-off-by: Jun Lei <Jun.Lei@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Aric Cyr <Aric.Cyr@amd.com> Acked-by: Leo Li <sunpeng.li@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> 
Signed-off-by: Jun Lei <Jun.Lei@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Aric Cyr <Aric.Cyr@amd.com>
Acked-by: Leo Li <sunpeng.li@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Merge tag 'drm-next-5.5-2019-10-25' of git://people.freedesktop.org/~agd5f/linux into drm-next 2019-10-29T19:46:09+00:00 Dave Airlie airlied@redhat.com 2019-10-29T19:46:00+00:00 60845e34f0c5c19a9e86af477b429993952f585b drm-next-5.5-2019-10-25: amdgpu: - BACO support for CI and VI asics - Quick memory training support for navi - MSI-X support - RAS fixes - Display AVI infoframe fixes - Display ref clock fixes for renoir - Fix number of audio endpoints in renoir - Fix for discovery tables - Powerplay fixes - Documentation fixes - Misc cleanups radeon: - revert a PPC fix which broke x86 Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com> From: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191025221020.203546-1-alexander.deucher@amd.com 
drm-next-5.5-2019-10-25:

amdgpu:
- BACO support for CI and VI asics
- Quick memory training support for navi
- MSI-X support
- RAS fixes
- Display AVI infoframe fixes
- Display ref clock fixes for renoir
- Fix number of audio endpoints in renoir
- Fix for discovery tables
- Powerplay fixes
- Documentation fixes
- Misc cleanups

radeon:
- revert a PPC fix which broke x86

Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
From: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191025221020.203546-1-alexander.deucher@amd.com
drm/amd/display: Apply vactive dram clock change workaround to dcn2 DMLv2 2019-10-25T20:50:09+00:00 Joshua Aberback joshua.aberback@amd.com 2019-10-11T19:49:07+00:00 6fcca317cb70c4298b832d04935d6445097f597d [Why] This workaround was put in dcn2 DMLv1, and now we need it in DMLv2. Signed-off-by: Joshua Aberback <joshua.aberback@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <Jun.Lei@amd.com> Acked-by: Leo Li <sunpeng.li@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> 
[Why]
This workaround was put in dcn2 DMLv1, and now we need it in DMLv2.

Signed-off-by: Joshua Aberback <joshua.aberback@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <Jun.Lei@amd.com>
Acked-by: Leo Li <sunpeng.li@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
drm/amd/display: add embedded flag to dml 2019-10-25T20:50:08+00:00 Dmytro Laktyushkin Dmytro.Laktyushkin@amd.com 2019-10-01T20:08:31+00:00 d5ac4ff211a3208b343c2c4d8a8da82f3ce4e948 Signed-off-by: Dmytro Laktyushkin <Dmytro.Laktyushkin@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Bernstein <Eric.Bernstein@amd.com> Acked-by: Leo Li <sunpeng.li@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> 
Signed-off-by: Dmytro Laktyushkin <Dmytro.Laktyushkin@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Bernstein <Eric.Bernstein@amd.com>
Acked-by: Leo Li <sunpeng.li@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>