linux-stable.git/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm, branch v5.2 Linux kernel stable tree drm/amd: fix fb references in async update 2019-06-04T08:13:17+00:00 Helen Koike helen.koike@collabora.com 2019-06-03T16:56:07+00:00 332af874db929f92931727bfe191b2c666438c81 Async update callbacks are expected to set the old_fb in the new_state so prepare/cleanup framebuffers are balanced. Calling drm_atomic_set_fb_for_plane() (which gets a reference of the new fb and put the old fb) is not required, as it's taken care by drm_mode_cursor_universal() when calling drm_atomic_helper_update_plane(). Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.20+ Fixes: 674e78acae0d ("drm/amd/display: Add fast path for cursor plane updates") Suggested-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com> Signed-off-by: Helen Koike <helen.koike@collabora.com> Reviewed-by: Nicholas Kazlauskas <nicholas.kazlauskas@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190603165610.24614-3-helen.koike@collabora.com 
Async update callbacks are expected to set the old_fb in the new_state
so prepare/cleanup framebuffers are balanced.

Calling drm_atomic_set_fb_for_plane() (which gets a reference of the new
fb and put the old fb) is not required, as it's taken care by
drm_mode_cursor_universal() when calling drm_atomic_helper_update_plane().

Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.20+
Fixes: 674e78acae0d ("drm/amd/display: Add fast path for cursor plane updates")
Suggested-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Helen Koike <helen.koike@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Nicholas Kazlauskas <nicholas.kazlauskas@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190603165610.24614-3-helen.koike@collabora.com
drm/amd/display: Don't load DMCU for Raven 1 (v2) 2019-05-24T15:16:36+00:00 Harry Wentland harry.wentland@amd.com 2019-04-29T13:39:15+00:00 c08e56c647ba8e4964ffc9e43360f16c9740337e [WHY] Some early Raven boards had a bad SBIOS that doesn't play nicely with the DMCU FW. We thought the issues were fixed by ignoring errors on DMCU load but that doesn't seem to be the case. We've still seen reports of users unable to boot their systems at all. [HOW] Disable DMCU load on Raven 1. Only load it for Raven 2 and Picasso. v2: Fix ifdef (Alex) Signed-off-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Nicholas Kazlauskas <nicholas.kazlauskas@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org 
[WHY]
Some early Raven boards had a bad SBIOS that doesn't play nicely with
the DMCU FW. We thought the issues were fixed by ignoring errors on DMCU
load but that doesn't seem to be the case. We've still seen reports of
users unable to boot their systems at all.

[HOW]
Disable DMCU load on Raven 1. Only load it for Raven 2 and Picasso.

v2: Fix ifdef (Alex)

Signed-off-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Nicholas Kazlauskas <nicholas.kazlauskas@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Revert "drm/amd/display: Don't load DMCU for Raven 1" 2019-05-24T09:56:50+00:00 Dave Airlie airlied@redhat.com 2019-05-24T09:55:32+00:00 c074989171801171af6c5f53dd16b27f36b31deb This reverts commit 55143dc23ca4792868ea8c17bce65ca7b3d3e8c4. This causes build breakags with some Kconfigs so revert for now. Fixes: 55143dc23ca4 ("drm/amd/display: Don't load DMCU for Raven 1") Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com> 
This reverts commit 55143dc23ca4792868ea8c17bce65ca7b3d3e8c4.

This causes build breakags with some Kconfigs so revert for now.

Fixes: 55143dc23ca4 ("drm/amd/display: Don't load DMCU for Raven 1")

Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
drm/amd/display: Don't load DMCU for Raven 1 2019-05-20T17:42:40+00:00 Harry Wentland harry.wentland@amd.com 2019-04-29T13:39:15+00:00 55143dc23ca4792868ea8c17bce65ca7b3d3e8c4 [WHY] Some early Raven boards had a bad SBIOS that doesn't play nicely with the DMCU FW. We thought the issues were fixed by ignoring errors on DMCU load but that doesn't seem to be the case. We've still seen reports of users unable to boot their systems at all. [HOW] Disable DMCU load on Raven 1. Only load it for Raven 2 and Picasso. Signed-off-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Nicholas Kazlauskas <nicholas.kazlauskas@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org 
[WHY]
Some early Raven boards had a bad SBIOS that doesn't play nicely with
the DMCU FW. We thought the issues were fixed by ignoring errors on DMCU
load but that doesn't seem to be the case. We've still seen reports of
users unable to boot their systems at all.

[HOW]
Disable DMCU load on Raven 1. Only load it for Raven 2 and Picasso.

Signed-off-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Nicholas Kazlauskas <nicholas.kazlauskas@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
drm/amd/display: Use long for signed error code checks in commit planes 2019-05-06T14:36:48+00:00 Nicholas Kazlauskas nicholas.kazlauskas@amd.com 2019-05-02T13:14:27+00:00 570c91d51b337053a90ac91710b5fa5d2aacd311 [Why] The type of 'r' is uint32_t and the return codes for both: - reservation_object_wait_timeout_rcu - amdgpu_bo_reserve ...are signed. While it works for the latter since the check is done on != 0 it doesn't work for the former since we check <= 0. [How] Make 'r' a long in commit planes so we're not doing any unsigned/signed conversion here in the first place. v2: use long instead of int (Christian) Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Kazlauskas <nicholas.kazlauskas@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> 
[Why]

The type of 'r' is uint32_t and the return codes for both:

- reservation_object_wait_timeout_rcu
- amdgpu_bo_reserve

...are signed. While it works for the latter since the check is
done on != 0 it doesn't work for the former since we check <= 0.

[How]

Make 'r' a long in commit planes so we're not doing any unsigned/signed
conversion here in the first place.

v2: use long instead of int (Christian)

Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Kazlauskas <nicholas.kazlauskas@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Merge branch 'drm-next-5.2' of git://people.freedesktop.org/~agd5f/linux into drm-next 2019-05-03T00:31:07+00:00 Dave Airlie airlied@redhat.com 2019-05-03T00:00:42+00:00 422449238e9853458283beffed77562d4b40a2fa - SR-IOV fixes - Raven flickering fix - Misc spelling fixes - Vega20 power fixes - Freesync improvements - DC fixes Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com> From: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190502193020.3562-1-alexander.deucher@amd.com 
- SR-IOV fixes
- Raven flickering fix
- Misc spelling fixes
- Vega20 power fixes
- Freesync improvements
- DC fixes

Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
From: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190502193020.3562-1-alexander.deucher@amd.com
drm/amd/display: Compensate for pre-DCE12 BTR-VRR hw limitations. (v3) 2019-04-29T19:59:44+00:00 Mario Kleiner mario.kleiner.de@gmail.com 2019-04-26T21:40:16+00:00 09aef2c48e799b39d1595038c3a993c0279c292d Pre-DCE12 needs special treatment for BTR / low framerate compensation for more stable behaviour: According to comments in the code and some testing on DCE-8 and DCE-11, DCE-11 and earlier only apply VTOTAL_MIN/MAX programming with a lag of one frame, so the special BTR hw programming for intermediate fixed duration frames must be done inside the current frame at flip submission in atomic commit tail, ie. one vblank earlier, and the fixed refresh intermediate frame mode must be also terminated one vblank earlier on pre-DCE12 display engines. To achieve proper termination on < DCE-12 shift the point when the switch-back from fixed vblank duration to variable vblank duration happens from the start of VBLANK (vblank irq, as done on DCE-12+) to back-porch or end of VBLANK (handled by vupdate irq handler). We must leave the switch-back code inside VBLANK irq for DCE12+, as before. Doing this, we get much better behaviour of BTR for up-sweeps, ie. going from short to long frame durations (~high to low fps) and for constant framerate flips, as tested on DCE-8 and DCE-11. Behaviour is still not quite as good as on DCN-1 though. On down-sweeps, going from long to short frame durations (low fps to high fps) < DCE-12 is a little bit improved, although by far not as much as for up-sweeps and constant fps. v2: Fix some wrong locking, as pointed out by Nicholas. v3: Simplify if-condition in vupdate-irq - nit by Nicholas. Signed-off-by: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Nicholas Kazlauskas <nicholas.kazlauskas@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> 
Pre-DCE12 needs special treatment for BTR / low framerate
compensation for more stable behaviour:

According to comments in the code and some testing on DCE-8
and DCE-11, DCE-11 and earlier only apply VTOTAL_MIN/MAX
programming with a lag of one frame, so the special BTR hw
programming for intermediate fixed duration frames must be
done inside the current frame at flip submission in atomic
commit tail, ie. one vblank earlier, and the fixed refresh
intermediate frame mode must be also terminated one vblank
earlier on pre-DCE12 display engines.

To achieve proper termination on < DCE-12 shift the point
when the switch-back from fixed vblank duration to variable
vblank duration happens from the start of VBLANK (vblank irq,
as done on DCE-12+) to back-porch or end of VBLANK (handled
by vupdate irq handler). We must leave the switch-back code
inside VBLANK irq for DCE12+, as before.

Doing this, we get much better behaviour of BTR for up-sweeps,
ie. going from short to long frame durations (~high to low fps)
and for constant framerate flips, as tested on DCE-8 and
DCE-11. Behaviour is still not quite as good as on DCN-1
though.

On down-sweeps, going from long to short frame durations
(low fps to high fps) < DCE-12 is a little bit improved,
although by far not as much as for up-sweeps and constant
fps.

v2: Fix some wrong locking, as pointed out by Nicholas.
v3: Simplify if-condition in vupdate-irq - nit by Nicholas.
Signed-off-by: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Nicholas Kazlauskas <nicholas.kazlauskas@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
drm/amd/display: Expose DRM_FORMAT_RGB565 on overlay planes 2019-04-29T19:59:29+00:00 Nicholas Kazlauskas nicholas.kazlauskas@amd.com 2019-04-23T13:26:43+00:00 7267a1a9745071d6c7cfec4063895750063b30ac RGB565 support isn't restricted to just the primary plane in DC, so also expose support for it on overlays. Signed-off-by: Nicholas Kazlauskas <nicholas.kazlauskas@amd.com> Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Reviewed-by: David Francis <david.francis@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> 
RGB565 support isn't restricted to just the primary plane in DC, so
also expose support for it on overlays.

Signed-off-by: Nicholas Kazlauskas <nicholas.kazlauskas@amd.com>
Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: David Francis <david.francis@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
drm/amd/display: Do VRR transition before enable_crc_interrupts 2019-04-29T19:59:20+00:00 Nicholas Kazlauskas nicholas.kazlauskas@amd.com 2019-04-15T16:18:53+00:00 057be086603feb2669c0eff540d72ac26e2b3fcf [Why] Originally we did the amdgpu_dm_handle_vrr_transition call before interrupts were enabled. After the interrupt toggling logic was moved around for support enabling CRTCs with no primary planes active this was no longer being called in the case where there wasn't a modeset. This fixes failures in igt@kms_vrr@* with error "Timed out: Waiting for vblank event". [How] Shift them back into the loop that always ran before interrupts were enabled. Pull out the logic that updated VRR state into the same loop since there's no reason these need to be split. In the case where we're going from VRR off, no planes to VRR on, some active planes we'll still be covered for having the VRR vupdate handler enabled - vblank will be re-enabled at this point, it will see that VRR is active and set the vupdate interrupt on there. Signed-off-by: Nicholas Kazlauskas <nicholas.kazlauskas@amd.com> Reviewed-by: David Francis <David.Francis@amd.com> Acked-by: Leo Li <sunpeng.li@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> 
[Why]
Originally we did the amdgpu_dm_handle_vrr_transition call before
interrupts were enabled. After the interrupt toggling logic was
moved around for support enabling CRTCs with no primary planes
active this was no longer being called in the case where there
wasn't a modeset.

This fixes failures in igt@kms_vrr@* with error
"Timed out: Waiting for vblank event".

[How]
Shift them back into the loop that always ran before interrupts were
enabled.

Pull out the logic that updated VRR state into the same loop since
there's no reason these need to be split.

In the case where we're going from VRR off, no planes to VRR on, some
active planes we'll still be covered for having the VRR vupdate
handler enabled - vblank will be re-enabled at this point, it will
see that VRR is active and set the vupdate interrupt on there.

Signed-off-by: Nicholas Kazlauskas <nicholas.kazlauskas@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: David Francis <David.Francis@amd.com>
Acked-by: Leo Li <sunpeng.li@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
drm/amd/display: Add power down display on boot flag 2019-04-29T19:58:53+00:00 Thomas Lim Thomas.Lim@amd.com 2019-04-10T21:06:07+00:00 27eaa4927dc3be669ed70670241597ac73595caf [Why] Due to the generic introduction of seamless boot, the display is no longer blanked upon boot. However, this causes corruption on some systems that does not lock the memory in the non-secure boot case, resulting in brief corruption on boot due to garbage being written into the frame buffer. [How] Add a flag, read during DC init, to determine whether display should be blanked on boot. Default to true. Signed-off-by: Thomas Lim <Thomas.Lim@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Aric Cyr <Aric.Cyr@amd.com> Acked-by: Anthony Koo <Anthony.Koo@amd.com> Acked-by: Leo Li <sunpeng.li@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> 
[Why]

Due to the generic introduction of seamless boot, the display is no
longer blanked upon boot. However, this causes corruption on some
systems that does not lock the memory in the non-secure boot case,
resulting in brief corruption on boot due to garbage being written into
the frame buffer.

[How]
Add a flag, read during DC init, to determine whether display should be
blanked on boot. Default to true.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Lim <Thomas.Lim@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Aric Cyr <Aric.Cyr@amd.com>
Acked-by: Anthony Koo <Anthony.Koo@amd.com>
Acked-by: Leo Li <sunpeng.li@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>