<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>linux-stable.git/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_crtc.c, branch v6.14</title>
<subtitle>Linux kernel stable tree</subtitle>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/'/>
<entry>
<title>drm/amd/display: Disable replay and psr while VRR is enabled</title>
<updated>2025-01-13T19:21:36+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Tom Chung</name>
<email>chiahsuan.chung@amd.com</email>
</author>
<published>2024-12-05T15:20:45+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=67edb81d6e9af43a0d58edf74630f82cfda4155d'/>
<id>67edb81d6e9af43a0d58edf74630f82cfda4155d</id>
<content type='text'>
[Why]
Replay and PSR will cause some video corruption while VRR is enabled.

[How]
1. Disable the Replay and PSR while VRR is enabled.
2. Change the amdgpu_dm_crtc_vrr_active() parameter to const.
   Because the function will only read data from dm_crtc_state.

Reviewed-by: Sun peng Li &lt;sunpeng.li@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Tom Chung &lt;chiahsuan.chung@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Roman Li &lt;roman.li@amd.com&gt;
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler &lt;daniel.wheeler@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher &lt;alexander.deucher@amd.com&gt;
(cherry picked from commit d7879340e987b3056b8ae39db255b6c19c170a0d)
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
[Why]
Replay and PSR will cause some video corruption while VRR is enabled.

[How]
1. Disable the Replay and PSR while VRR is enabled.
2. Change the amdgpu_dm_crtc_vrr_active() parameter to const.
   Because the function will only read data from dm_crtc_state.

Reviewed-by: Sun peng Li &lt;sunpeng.li@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Tom Chung &lt;chiahsuan.chung@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Roman Li &lt;roman.li@amd.com&gt;
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler &lt;daniel.wheeler@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher &lt;alexander.deucher@amd.com&gt;
(cherry picked from commit d7879340e987b3056b8ae39db255b6c19c170a0d)
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>drm/amd/display: Do not wait for PSR disable on vbl enable</title>
<updated>2025-01-10T18:40:47+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Leo Li</name>
<email>sunpeng.li@amd.com</email>
</author>
<published>2024-12-09T17:58:33+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=ff2e4d874726c549130308b6b46aa0f8a34e04cb'/>
<id>ff2e4d874726c549130308b6b46aa0f8a34e04cb</id>
<content type='text'>
[Why]

Outside of a modeset/link configuration change, we should not have to
wait for the panel to exit PSR. Depending on the panel and it's state,
it may take multiple frames for it to exit PSR. Therefore, waiting in
all scenarios may cause perceived stuttering, especially in combination
with faster vblank shutdown.

[How]

PSR1 disable is hooked up to the vblank enable event, and vice versa. In
case of vblank enable, do not wait for panel to exit PSR, but still wait
in all other cases.

We also avoid a call to unnecessarily change power_opts on disable -
this ends up sending another command to dmcub fw.

When testing against IGT, some crc tests like kms_plane_alpha_blend and
amd_hotplug were failing due to CRC timeouts. This was found to be
caused by the early return before HW has fully exited PSR1. Fix this by
first making sure we grab a vblank reference, then waiting for panel to
exit PSR1, before programming hw for CRC generation.

Fixes: 58a261bfc967 ("drm/amd/display: use a more lax vblank enable policy for older ASICs")
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/3743
Reviewed-by: Tom Chung &lt;chiahsuan.chung@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Leo Li &lt;sunpeng.li@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Tom Chung &lt;chiahsuan.chung@amd.com&gt;
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler &lt;daniel.wheeler@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher &lt;alexander.deucher@amd.com&gt;
(cherry picked from commit aa6713fa2046f4c09bf3013dd1420ae15603ca6f)
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
[Why]

Outside of a modeset/link configuration change, we should not have to
wait for the panel to exit PSR. Depending on the panel and it's state,
it may take multiple frames for it to exit PSR. Therefore, waiting in
all scenarios may cause perceived stuttering, especially in combination
with faster vblank shutdown.

[How]

PSR1 disable is hooked up to the vblank enable event, and vice versa. In
case of vblank enable, do not wait for panel to exit PSR, but still wait
in all other cases.

We also avoid a call to unnecessarily change power_opts on disable -
this ends up sending another command to dmcub fw.

When testing against IGT, some crc tests like kms_plane_alpha_blend and
amd_hotplug were failing due to CRC timeouts. This was found to be
caused by the early return before HW has fully exited PSR1. Fix this by
first making sure we grab a vblank reference, then waiting for panel to
exit PSR1, before programming hw for CRC generation.

Fixes: 58a261bfc967 ("drm/amd/display: use a more lax vblank enable policy for older ASICs")
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/3743
Reviewed-by: Tom Chung &lt;chiahsuan.chung@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Leo Li &lt;sunpeng.li@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Tom Chung &lt;chiahsuan.chung@amd.com&gt;
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler &lt;daniel.wheeler@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher &lt;alexander.deucher@amd.com&gt;
(cherry picked from commit aa6713fa2046f4c09bf3013dd1420ae15603ca6f)
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>drm/amd/display: Fix Panel Replay not update screen correctly</title>
<updated>2024-11-08T16:45:30+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Tom Chung</name>
<email>chiahsuan.chung@amd.com</email>
</author>
<published>2024-10-29T09:28:23+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=ca628f0eddd73adfccfcc06b2a55d915bca4a342'/>
<id>ca628f0eddd73adfccfcc06b2a55d915bca4a342</id>
<content type='text'>
[Why]
In certain use case such as KDE login screen, there will be no atomic
commit while do the frame update.
If the Panel Replay enabled, it will cause the screen not updated and
looks like system hang.

[How]
Delay few atomic commits before enabled the Panel Replay just like PSR.

Fixes: be64336307a6c ("drm/amd/display: Re-enable panel replay feature")
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/3686
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/3682
Tested-By: Corey Hickey &lt;bugfood-c@fatooh.org&gt;
Tested-By: James Courtier-Dutton &lt;james.dutton@gmail.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Leo Li &lt;sunpeng.li@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Tom Chung &lt;chiahsuan.chung@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Hamza Mahfooz &lt;hamza.mahfooz@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher &lt;alexander.deucher@amd.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
[Why]
In certain use case such as KDE login screen, there will be no atomic
commit while do the frame update.
If the Panel Replay enabled, it will cause the screen not updated and
looks like system hang.

[How]
Delay few atomic commits before enabled the Panel Replay just like PSR.

Fixes: be64336307a6c ("drm/amd/display: Re-enable panel replay feature")
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/3686
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/3682
Tested-By: Corey Hickey &lt;bugfood-c@fatooh.org&gt;
Tested-By: James Courtier-Dutton &lt;james.dutton@gmail.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Leo Li &lt;sunpeng.li@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Tom Chung &lt;chiahsuan.chung@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Hamza Mahfooz &lt;hamza.mahfooz@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher &lt;alexander.deucher@amd.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>drm/amd/display: Change some variable name of psr</title>
<updated>2024-11-08T16:45:29+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Tom Chung</name>
<email>chiahsuan.chung@amd.com</email>
</author>
<published>2024-10-29T07:38:16+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=c7fafb7a46b38a11a19342d153f505749bf56f3e'/>
<id>c7fafb7a46b38a11a19342d153f505749bf56f3e</id>
<content type='text'>
Panel Replay feature may also use the same variable with PSR.
Change the variable name and make it not specify for PSR.

Reviewed-by: Leo Li &lt;sunpeng.li@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Tom Chung &lt;chiahsuan.chung@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Hamza Mahfooz &lt;hamza.mahfooz@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher &lt;alexander.deucher@amd.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Panel Replay feature may also use the same variable with PSR.
Change the variable name and make it not specify for PSR.

Reviewed-by: Leo Li &lt;sunpeng.li@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Tom Chung &lt;chiahsuan.chung@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Hamza Mahfooz &lt;hamza.mahfooz@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher &lt;alexander.deucher@amd.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>drm/amd/display: Fix idle optimizations entry log</title>
<updated>2024-10-28T20:36:43+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Aurabindo Pillai</name>
<email>aurabindo.pillai@amd.com</email>
</author>
<published>2024-10-16T17:08:02+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=1b7ac448cc544f6a4f8543423d9c2b726f3313fd'/>
<id>1b7ac448cc544f6a4f8543423d9c2b726f3313fd</id>
<content type='text'>
[Why &amp; How]
Whether we really enter idle optimizations are decided within DC.
Printing into dmesg before calling the DC API gives an incorrect
indication that we are entering idle optimization in cases where its
disabled manually.

To fix this, remove the print in DM and add them in DC

Reviewed-by: Alvin Lee &lt;alvin.lee2@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Aurabindo Pillai &lt;aurabindo.pillai@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Tom Chung &lt;chiahsuan.chung@amd.com&gt;
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler &lt;daniel.wheeler@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher &lt;alexander.deucher@amd.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
[Why &amp; How]
Whether we really enter idle optimizations are decided within DC.
Printing into dmesg before calling the DC API gives an incorrect
indication that we are entering idle optimization in cases where its
disabled manually.

To fix this, remove the print in DM and add them in DC

Reviewed-by: Alvin Lee &lt;alvin.lee2@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Aurabindo Pillai &lt;aurabindo.pillai@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Tom Chung &lt;chiahsuan.chung@amd.com&gt;
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler &lt;daniel.wheeler@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher &lt;alexander.deucher@amd.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>drm/amd/display: Reduce HPD Detection Interval for IPS</title>
<updated>2024-10-28T20:34:46+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Fangzhi Zuo</name>
<email>Jerry.Zuo@amd.com</email>
</author>
<published>2024-10-15T18:22:32+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=a88b19b13fb41a3fa03ec67b5f57cc267fbfb160'/>
<id>a88b19b13fb41a3fa03ec67b5f57cc267fbfb160</id>
<content type='text'>
Fix DP Compliance test 4.2.1.3, 4.2.2.8, 4.3.1.12, 4.3.1.13
when IPS enabled.

Original HPD detection interval is set to 5s which violates DP
compliance.
Reduce the interval parameter, such that link training can be
finished within 5 seconds.

Fixes: afca033f10d3 ("drm/amd/display: Add periodic detection for IPS")
Reviewed-by: Roman Li &lt;roman.li@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Fangzhi Zuo &lt;Jerry.Zuo@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Tom Chung &lt;chiahsuan.chung@amd.com&gt;
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler &lt;daniel.wheeler@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher &lt;alexander.deucher@amd.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Fix DP Compliance test 4.2.1.3, 4.2.2.8, 4.3.1.12, 4.3.1.13
when IPS enabled.

Original HPD detection interval is set to 5s which violates DP
compliance.
Reduce the interval parameter, such that link training can be
finished within 5 seconds.

Fixes: afca033f10d3 ("drm/amd/display: Add periodic detection for IPS")
Reviewed-by: Roman Li &lt;roman.li@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Fangzhi Zuo &lt;Jerry.Zuo@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Tom Chung &lt;chiahsuan.chung@amd.com&gt;
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler &lt;daniel.wheeler@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher &lt;alexander.deucher@amd.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>drm/amd/display: Increase idle worker HPD detection time</title>
<updated>2024-10-15T15:22:54+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Roman Li</name>
<email>Roman.Li@amd.com</email>
</author>
<published>2024-09-30T22:07:16+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=60612f75992d96955fb7154468c58d5d168cf1ab'/>
<id>60612f75992d96955fb7154468c58d5d168cf1ab</id>
<content type='text'>
[Why]
Idle worker thread waits HPD_DETECTION_TIME for HPD processing complete.
Some displays require longer time for that.

[How]
Increase HPD_DETECTION_TIME to 100ms.

Reviewed-by: Sun peng Li &lt;sunpeng.li@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Roman Li &lt;Roman.Li@amd.com&gt;
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler &lt;daniel.wheeler@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher &lt;alexander.deucher@amd.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
[Why]
Idle worker thread waits HPD_DETECTION_TIME for HPD processing complete.
Some displays require longer time for that.

[How]
Increase HPD_DETECTION_TIME to 100ms.

Reviewed-by: Sun peng Li &lt;sunpeng.li@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Roman Li &lt;Roman.Li@amd.com&gt;
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler &lt;daniel.wheeler@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher &lt;alexander.deucher@amd.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>drm/amd/display: Align static screen idle worker with IPX mode</title>
<updated>2024-10-07T18:16:19+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Roman Li</name>
<email>Roman.Li@amd.com</email>
</author>
<published>2024-09-26T20:36:15+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=442702b490246df4b926fa36bac09193b231f100'/>
<id>442702b490246df4b926fa36bac09193b231f100</id>
<content type='text'>
[Why]
Idle worker thread serves for periodic detection of HPD while system is in IPS2.
Currently it is used in headless and static screen scenarios.
IPX can be configured not to execute IPS2 for static screen.
In this case idle worker is redundant.

[How]
Only use periodic detection for static screen if IPS is fully enabled.

Reviewed-by: Sun peng Li &lt;sunpeng.li@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Roman Li &lt;Roman.Li@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Siqueira &lt;rodrigo.siqueira@amd.com&gt;
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler &lt;daniel.wheeler@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher &lt;alexander.deucher@amd.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
[Why]
Idle worker thread serves for periodic detection of HPD while system is in IPS2.
Currently it is used in headless and static screen scenarios.
IPX can be configured not to execute IPS2 for static screen.
In this case idle worker is redundant.

[How]
Only use periodic detection for static screen if IPS is fully enabled.

Reviewed-by: Sun peng Li &lt;sunpeng.li@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Roman Li &lt;Roman.Li@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Siqueira &lt;rodrigo.siqueira@amd.com&gt;
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler &lt;daniel.wheeler@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher &lt;alexander.deucher@amd.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>drm/amd/display: Run idle optimizations at end of vblank handler</title>
<updated>2024-07-27T21:30:58+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Leo Li</name>
<email>sunpeng.li@amd.com</email>
</author>
<published>2024-07-11T18:38:11+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=17e68f89132b9ee4b144358b49e5df404b314181'/>
<id>17e68f89132b9ee4b144358b49e5df404b314181</id>
<content type='text'>
[Why &amp; How]
1. After allowing idle optimizations, hw programming is disallowed.
2. Before hw programming, we need to disallow idle optimizations.

Otherwise, in scenario 1, we will immediately kick hw out of idle
optimizations with register access.

Scenario 2 is less of a concern, since any register access will kick
hw out of idle optimizations. But we'll do it early for correctness.

Signed-off-by: Leo Li &lt;sunpeng.li@amd.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Aurabindo Pillai &lt;aurabindo.pillai@amd.com&gt;
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler &lt;daniel.wheeler@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Siqueira &lt;rodrigo.siqueira@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher &lt;alexander.deucher@amd.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
[Why &amp; How]
1. After allowing idle optimizations, hw programming is disallowed.
2. Before hw programming, we need to disallow idle optimizations.

Otherwise, in scenario 1, we will immediately kick hw out of idle
optimizations with register access.

Scenario 2 is less of a concern, since any register access will kick
hw out of idle optimizations. But we'll do it early for correctness.

Signed-off-by: Leo Li &lt;sunpeng.li@amd.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Aurabindo Pillai &lt;aurabindo.pillai@amd.com&gt;
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler &lt;daniel.wheeler@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Siqueira &lt;rodrigo.siqueira@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher &lt;alexander.deucher@amd.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>drm/amd/display: Let drm_crtc_vblank_on/off manage interrupts</title>
<updated>2024-07-27T21:30:38+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Leo Li</name>
<email>sunpeng.li@amd.com</email>
</author>
<published>2024-07-11T18:31:27+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=7fb363c57522b704e156fc4c5fbcb7ee133fe304'/>
<id>7fb363c57522b704e156fc4c5fbcb7ee133fe304</id>
<content type='text'>
[Why]
We manage interrupts for CRTCs in two places:
1. In manage_dm_interrupts(), when CRTC get enabled or disabled
2. When drm_vblank_get/put() starts or kills the vblank counter, calling
   into amdgpu_dm_crtc_set_vblank()

The interrupts managed by these twp places should be identical.

[How]
Since manage_dm_interrupts() already use drm_crtc_vblank_on/off(), just
move all CRTC interrupt management into amdgpu_dm_crtc_set_vblank().

This has the added benefit of disabling all CRTC and HUBP interrupts
when there are no vblank requestors.

Note that there is a TODO item - unchanged from when it was first
introduced - to properly identify the HUBP instance from the OTG
instance, rather than just assume direct mapping.

Signed-off-by: Leo Li &lt;sunpeng.li@amd.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Aurabindo Pillai &lt;aurabindo.pillai@amd.com&gt;
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler &lt;daniel.wheeler@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Siqueira &lt;rodrigo.siqueira@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher &lt;alexander.deucher@amd.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
[Why]
We manage interrupts for CRTCs in two places:
1. In manage_dm_interrupts(), when CRTC get enabled or disabled
2. When drm_vblank_get/put() starts or kills the vblank counter, calling
   into amdgpu_dm_crtc_set_vblank()

The interrupts managed by these twp places should be identical.

[How]
Since manage_dm_interrupts() already use drm_crtc_vblank_on/off(), just
move all CRTC interrupt management into amdgpu_dm_crtc_set_vblank().

This has the added benefit of disabling all CRTC and HUBP interrupts
when there are no vblank requestors.

Note that there is a TODO item - unchanged from when it was first
introduced - to properly identify the HUBP instance from the OTG
instance, rather than just assume direct mapping.

Signed-off-by: Leo Li &lt;sunpeng.li@amd.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Aurabindo Pillai &lt;aurabindo.pillai@amd.com&gt;
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler &lt;daniel.wheeler@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Siqueira &lt;rodrigo.siqueira@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher &lt;alexander.deucher@amd.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
