linux-stable.git/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_device_queue_manager.c, branch linux-6.14.y Linux kernel stable tree drm/amdkfd: Have kfd driver use same PASID values from graphic driver 2025-05-29T09:13:29+00:00 Xiaogang Chen xiaogang.chen@amd.com 2025-01-13T23:35:59+00:00 2f29b8ab643e2ba40f425369f671b2b376e1ec95 [ Upstream commit 8544374c0f82edb285779f21b149826fe2c2977c ] Current kfd driver has its own PASID value for a kfd process and uses it to locate vm at interrupt handler or mapping between kfd process and vm. That design is not working when a physical gpu device has multiple spatial partitions, ex: adev in CPX mode. This patch has kfd driver use same pasid values that graphic driver generated which is per vm per pasid. These pasid values are passed to fw/hardware. We do not need change interrupt handler though more pasid values are used. Also, pasid values at log are replaced by user process pid; pasid values are not exposed to user. Users see their process pids that have meaning in user space. Signed-off-by: Xiaogang Chen <xiaogang.chen@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 8544374c0f82edb285779f21b149826fe2c2977c ]

Current kfd driver has its own PASID value for a kfd process and uses it to
locate vm at interrupt handler or mapping between kfd process and vm. That
design is not working when a physical gpu device has multiple spatial
partitions, ex: adev in CPX mode. This patch has kfd driver use same pasid
values that graphic driver generated which is per vm per pasid.

These pasid values are passed to fw/hardware. We do not need change interrupt
handler though more pasid values are used. Also, pasid values at log are
replaced by user process pid; pasid values are not exposed to user. Users see
their process pids that have meaning in user space.

Signed-off-by: Xiaogang Chen <xiaogang.chen@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
drm/amdkfd: Set per-process flags only once cik/vi 2025-05-29T09:12:52+00:00 Harish Kasiviswanathan Harish.Kasiviswanathan@amd.com 2025-01-14T19:07:24+00:00 f5c692998cf16e8e74ac1b4057224d4bdf4f7242 [ Upstream commit 289e68503a4533b014f8447e2af28ad44c92c221 ] Set per-process static sh_mem config only once during process initialization. Move all static changes from update_qpd() which is called each time a queue is created to set_cache_memory_policy() which is called once during process initialization. set_cache_memory_policy() is currently defined only for cik and vi family. So this commit only focuses on these two. A separate commit will address other asics. Signed-off-by: Harish Kasiviswanathan <Harish.Kasiviswanathan@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Amber Lin <Amber.Lin@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 289e68503a4533b014f8447e2af28ad44c92c221 ]

Set per-process static sh_mem config only once during process
initialization. Move all static changes from update_qpd() which is
called each time a queue is created to set_cache_memory_policy() which
is called once during process initialization.

set_cache_memory_policy() is currently defined only for cik and vi
family. So this commit only focuses on these two. A separate commit will
address other asics.

Signed-off-by: Harish Kasiviswanathan <Harish.Kasiviswanathan@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Amber Lin <Amber.Lin@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
drm/amdkfd: Fix Circular Locking Dependency in 'svm_range_cpu_invalidate_pagetables' 2025-04-10T12:44:17+00:00 Srinivasan Shanmugam srinivasan.shanmugam@amd.com 2025-02-24T08:16:32+00:00 d86ba913bbfd1afafacbfb750001ffc6bfe29da0 [ Upstream commit fddc45026311c05a5355fd34b9dc0a1d7eaef4a2 ] This commit addresses a circular locking dependency in the svm_range_cpu_invalidate_pagetables function. The function previously held a lock while determining whether to perform an unmap or eviction operation, which could lead to deadlocks. Fixes the below: [ 223.418794] ====================================================== [ 223.418820] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 223.418845] 6.12.0-amdstaging-drm-next-lol-050225 #14 Tainted: G U OE [ 223.418869] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 223.418889] kfdtest/3939 is trying to acquire lock: [ 223.418906] ffff8957552eae38 (&dqm->lock_hidden){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: evict_process_queues_cpsch+0x43/0x210 [amdgpu] [ 223.419302] but task is already holding lock: [ 223.419303] ffff8957556b83b0 (&prange->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: svm_range_cpu_invalidate_pagetables+0x9d/0x850 [amdgpu] [ 223.419447] Console: switching to colour dummy device 80x25 [ 223.419477] [IGT] amd_basic: executing [ 223.419599] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 223.419611] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 223.419621] -> #2 (&prange->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 223.419636] __mutex_lock+0x85/0xe20 [ 223.419647] mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30 [ 223.419656] svm_range_validate_and_map+0x2f1/0x15b0 [amdgpu] [ 223.419954] svm_range_set_attr+0xe8c/0x1710 [amdgpu] [ 223.420236] svm_ioctl+0x46/0x50 [amdgpu] [ 223.420503] kfd_ioctl_svm+0x50/0x90 [amdgpu] [ 223.420763] kfd_ioctl+0x409/0x6d0 [amdgpu] [ 223.421024] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x95/0xd0 [ 223.421036] x64_sys_call+0x1205/0x20d0 [ 223.421047] do_syscall_64+0x87/0x140 [ 223.421056] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 223.421068] -> #1 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 223.421084] __ww_mutex_lock.constprop.0+0xab/0x1560 [ 223.421095] ww_mutex_lock+0x2b/0x90 [ 223.421103] amdgpu_amdkfd_alloc_gtt_mem+0xcc/0x2b0 [amdgpu] [ 223.421361] add_queue_mes+0x3bc/0x440 [amdgpu] [ 223.421623] unhalt_cpsch+0x1ae/0x240 [amdgpu] [ 223.421888] kgd2kfd_start_sched+0x5e/0xd0 [amdgpu] [ 223.422148] amdgpu_amdkfd_start_sched+0x3d/0x50 [amdgpu] [ 223.422414] amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_handler+0x132/0x270 [amdgpu] [ 223.422662] process_one_work+0x21e/0x680 [ 223.422673] worker_thread+0x190/0x330 [ 223.422682] kthread+0xe7/0x120 [ 223.422690] ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x60 [ 223.422699] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 223.422708] -> #0 (&dqm->lock_hidden){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 223.422723] __lock_acquire+0x16f4/0x2810 [ 223.422734] lock_acquire+0xd1/0x300 [ 223.422742] __mutex_lock+0x85/0xe20 [ 223.422751] mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30 [ 223.422760] evict_process_queues_cpsch+0x43/0x210 [amdgpu] [ 223.423025] kfd_process_evict_queues+0x8a/0x1d0 [amdgpu] [ 223.423285] kgd2kfd_quiesce_mm+0x43/0x90 [amdgpu] [ 223.423540] svm_range_cpu_invalidate_pagetables+0x4a7/0x850 [amdgpu] [ 223.423807] __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start+0x1f5/0x250 [ 223.423819] copy_page_range+0x1e94/0x1ea0 [ 223.423829] copy_process+0x172f/0x2ad0 [ 223.423839] kernel_clone+0x9c/0x3f0 [ 223.423847] __do_sys_clone+0x66/0x90 [ 223.423856] __x64_sys_clone+0x25/0x30 [ 223.423864] x64_sys_call+0x1d7c/0x20d0 [ 223.423872] do_syscall_64+0x87/0x140 [ 223.423880] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 223.423891] other info that might help us debug this: [ 223.423903] Chain exists of: &dqm->lock_hidden --> reservation_ww_class_mutex --> &prange->lock [ 223.423926] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 223.423935] CPU0 CPU1 [ 223.423942] ---- ---- [ 223.423949] lock(&prange->lock); [ 223.423958] lock(reservation_ww_class_mutex); [ 223.423970] lock(&prange->lock); [ 223.423981] lock(&dqm->lock_hidden); [ 223.423990] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 223.423999] 5 locks held by kfdtest/3939: [ 223.424006] #0: ffffffffb82b4fc0 (dup_mmap_sem){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: copy_process+0x1387/0x2ad0 [ 223.424026] #1: ffff89575eda81b0 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: copy_process+0x13a8/0x2ad0 [ 223.424046] #2: ffff89575edaf3b0 (&mm->mmap_lock/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: copy_process+0x13e4/0x2ad0 [ 223.424066] #3: ffffffffb82e76e0 (mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: copy_page_range+0x1cea/0x1ea0 [ 223.424088] #4: ffff8957556b83b0 (&prange->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: svm_range_cpu_invalidate_pagetables+0x9d/0x850 [amdgpu] [ 223.424365] stack backtrace: [ 223.424374] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 3939 Comm: kfdtest Tainted: G U OE 6.12.0-amdstaging-drm-next-lol-050225 #14 [ 223.424392] Tainted: [U]=USER, [O]=OOT_MODULE, [E]=UNSIGNED_MODULE [ 223.424401] Hardware name: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. X570 AORUS PRO WIFI/X570 AORUS PRO WIFI, BIOS F36a 02/16/2022 [ 223.424416] Call Trace: [ 223.424423] <TASK> [ 223.424430] dump_stack_lvl+0x9b/0xf0 [ 223.424441] dump_stack+0x10/0x20 [ 223.424449] print_circular_bug+0x275/0x350 [ 223.424460] check_noncircular+0x157/0x170 [ 223.424469] ? __bfs+0xfd/0x2c0 [ 223.424481] __lock_acquire+0x16f4/0x2810 [ 223.424490] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ 223.424505] lock_acquire+0xd1/0x300 [ 223.424514] ? evict_process_queues_cpsch+0x43/0x210 [amdgpu] [ 223.424783] __mutex_lock+0x85/0xe20 [ 223.424792] ? evict_process_queues_cpsch+0x43/0x210 [amdgpu] [ 223.425058] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ 223.425067] ? mark_held_locks+0x54/0x90 [ 223.425076] ? evict_process_queues_cpsch+0x43/0x210 [amdgpu] [ 223.425339] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ 223.425350] mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30 [ 223.425358] ? mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30 [ 223.425367] evict_process_queues_cpsch+0x43/0x210 [amdgpu] [ 223.425631] kfd_process_evict_queues+0x8a/0x1d0 [amdgpu] [ 223.425893] kgd2kfd_quiesce_mm+0x43/0x90 [amdgpu] [ 223.426156] svm_range_cpu_invalidate_pagetables+0x4a7/0x850 [amdgpu] [ 223.426423] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ 223.426436] __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start+0x1f5/0x250 [ 223.426450] copy_page_range+0x1e94/0x1ea0 [ 223.426461] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ 223.426474] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ 223.426484] ? lock_acquire+0xd1/0x300 [ 223.426494] ? copy_process+0x1718/0x2ad0 [ 223.426502] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ 223.426510] ? sched_clock_noinstr+0x9/0x10 [ 223.426519] ? local_clock_noinstr+0xe/0xc0 [ 223.426528] ? copy_process+0x1718/0x2ad0 [ 223.426537] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ 223.426550] copy_process+0x172f/0x2ad0 [ 223.426569] kernel_clone+0x9c/0x3f0 [ 223.426577] ? __schedule+0x4c9/0x1b00 [ 223.426586] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ 223.426594] ? sched_clock_noinstr+0x9/0x10 [ 223.426602] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ 223.426610] ? local_clock_noinstr+0xe/0xc0 [ 223.426619] ? schedule+0x107/0x1a0 [ 223.426629] __do_sys_clone+0x66/0x90 [ 223.426643] __x64_sys_clone+0x25/0x30 [ 223.426652] x64_sys_call+0x1d7c/0x20d0 [ 223.426661] do_syscall_64+0x87/0x140 [ 223.426671] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ 223.426679] ? common_nsleep+0x44/0x50 [ 223.426690] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ 223.426698] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0x52/0xd0 [ 223.426709] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ 223.426717] ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0xcc/0x200 [ 223.426727] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ 223.426736] ? do_syscall_64+0x93/0x140 [ 223.426748] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ 223.426756] ? up_write+0x1c/0x1e0 [ 223.426765] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ 223.426775] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ 223.426783] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0x52/0xd0 [ 223.426792] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ 223.426800] ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0xcc/0x200 [ 223.426810] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ 223.426818] ? do_syscall_64+0x93/0x140 [ 223.426826] ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0xcc/0x200 [ 223.426836] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ 223.426844] ? do_syscall_64+0x93/0x140 [ 223.426853] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ 223.426861] ? irqentry_exit+0x6b/0x90 [ 223.426869] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ 223.426877] ? exc_page_fault+0xa7/0x2c0 [ 223.426888] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 223.426898] RIP: 0033:0x7f46758eab57 [ 223.426906] Code: ba 04 00 f3 0f 1e fa 64 48 8b 04 25 10 00 00 00 45 31 c0 31 d2 31 f6 bf 11 00 20 01 4c 8d 90 d0 02 00 00 b8 38 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 41 41 89 c0 85 c0 75 2c 64 48 8b 04 25 10 00 [ 223.426930] RSP: 002b:00007fff5c3e5188 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000038 [ 223.426943] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f4675f8c040 RCX: 00007f46758eab57 [ 223.426954] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000001200011 [ 223.426965] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 223.426975] R10: 00007f4675e81a50 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000001 [ 223.426986] R13: 00007fff5c3e5470 R14: 00007fff5c3e53e0 R15: 00007fff5c3e5410 [ 223.427004] </TASK> v2: To resolve this issue, the allocation of the process context buffer (`proc_ctx_bo`) has been moved from the `add_queue_mes` function to the `pqm_create_queue` function. This change ensures that the buffer is allocated only when the first queue for a process is created and only if the Micro Engine Scheduler (MES) is enabled. (Felix) v3: Fix typo s/Memory Execution Scheduler (MES)/Micro Engine Scheduler in commit message. (Lijo) Fixes: 438b39ac74e2 ("drm/amdkfd: pause autosuspend when creating pdd") Cc: Jesse Zhang <jesse.zhang@amd.com> Cc: Yunxiang Li <Yunxiang.Li@amd.com> Cc: Philip Yang <Philip.Yang@amd.com> Cc: Alex Sierra <alex.sierra@amd.com> Cc: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com> Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Srinivasan Shanmugam <srinivasan.shanmugam@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit fddc45026311c05a5355fd34b9dc0a1d7eaef4a2 ]

This commit addresses a circular locking dependency in the
svm_range_cpu_invalidate_pagetables function. The function previously
held a lock while determining whether to perform an unmap or eviction
operation, which could lead to deadlocks.

Fixes the below:

[  223.418794] ======================================================
[  223.418820] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
[  223.418845] 6.12.0-amdstaging-drm-next-lol-050225 #14 Tainted: G     U     OE
[  223.418869] ------------------------------------------------------
[  223.418889] kfdtest/3939 is trying to acquire lock:
[  223.418906] ffff8957552eae38 (&dqm->lock_hidden){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: evict_process_queues_cpsch+0x43/0x210 [amdgpu]
[  223.419302]
               but task is already holding lock:
[  223.419303] ffff8957556b83b0 (&prange->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: svm_range_cpu_invalidate_pagetables+0x9d/0x850 [amdgpu]
[  223.419447] Console: switching to colour dummy device 80x25
[  223.419477] [IGT] amd_basic: executing
[  223.419599]
               which lock already depends on the new lock.

[  223.419611]
               the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[  223.419621]
               -> #2 (&prange->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
[  223.419636]        __mutex_lock+0x85/0xe20
[  223.419647]        mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30
[  223.419656]        svm_range_validate_and_map+0x2f1/0x15b0 [amdgpu]
[  223.419954]        svm_range_set_attr+0xe8c/0x1710 [amdgpu]
[  223.420236]        svm_ioctl+0x46/0x50 [amdgpu]
[  223.420503]        kfd_ioctl_svm+0x50/0x90 [amdgpu]
[  223.420763]        kfd_ioctl+0x409/0x6d0 [amdgpu]
[  223.421024]        __x64_sys_ioctl+0x95/0xd0
[  223.421036]        x64_sys_call+0x1205/0x20d0
[  223.421047]        do_syscall_64+0x87/0x140
[  223.421056]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
[  223.421068]
               -> #1 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
[  223.421084]        __ww_mutex_lock.constprop.0+0xab/0x1560
[  223.421095]        ww_mutex_lock+0x2b/0x90
[  223.421103]        amdgpu_amdkfd_alloc_gtt_mem+0xcc/0x2b0 [amdgpu]
[  223.421361]        add_queue_mes+0x3bc/0x440 [amdgpu]
[  223.421623]        unhalt_cpsch+0x1ae/0x240 [amdgpu]
[  223.421888]        kgd2kfd_start_sched+0x5e/0xd0 [amdgpu]
[  223.422148]        amdgpu_amdkfd_start_sched+0x3d/0x50 [amdgpu]
[  223.422414]        amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_handler+0x132/0x270 [amdgpu]
[  223.422662]        process_one_work+0x21e/0x680
[  223.422673]        worker_thread+0x190/0x330
[  223.422682]        kthread+0xe7/0x120
[  223.422690]        ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x60
[  223.422699]        ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
[  223.422708]
               -> #0 (&dqm->lock_hidden){+.+.}-{3:3}:
[  223.422723]        __lock_acquire+0x16f4/0x2810
[  223.422734]        lock_acquire+0xd1/0x300
[  223.422742]        __mutex_lock+0x85/0xe20
[  223.422751]        mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30
[  223.422760]        evict_process_queues_cpsch+0x43/0x210 [amdgpu]
[  223.423025]        kfd_process_evict_queues+0x8a/0x1d0 [amdgpu]
[  223.423285]        kgd2kfd_quiesce_mm+0x43/0x90 [amdgpu]
[  223.423540]        svm_range_cpu_invalidate_pagetables+0x4a7/0x850 [amdgpu]
[  223.423807]        __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start+0x1f5/0x250
[  223.423819]        copy_page_range+0x1e94/0x1ea0
[  223.423829]        copy_process+0x172f/0x2ad0
[  223.423839]        kernel_clone+0x9c/0x3f0
[  223.423847]        __do_sys_clone+0x66/0x90
[  223.423856]        __x64_sys_clone+0x25/0x30
[  223.423864]        x64_sys_call+0x1d7c/0x20d0
[  223.423872]        do_syscall_64+0x87/0x140
[  223.423880]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
[  223.423891]
               other info that might help us debug this:

[  223.423903] Chain exists of:
                 &dqm->lock_hidden --> reservation_ww_class_mutex --> &prange->lock

[  223.423926]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

[  223.423935]        CPU0                    CPU1
[  223.423942]        ----                    ----
[  223.423949]   lock(&prange->lock);
[  223.423958]                                lock(reservation_ww_class_mutex);
[  223.423970]                                lock(&prange->lock);
[  223.423981]   lock(&dqm->lock_hidden);
[  223.423990]
                *** DEADLOCK ***

[  223.423999] 5 locks held by kfdtest/3939:
[  223.424006]  #0: ffffffffb82b4fc0 (dup_mmap_sem){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: copy_process+0x1387/0x2ad0
[  223.424026]  #1: ffff89575eda81b0 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: copy_process+0x13a8/0x2ad0
[  223.424046]  #2: ffff89575edaf3b0 (&mm->mmap_lock/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: copy_process+0x13e4/0x2ad0
[  223.424066]  #3: ffffffffb82e76e0 (mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: copy_page_range+0x1cea/0x1ea0
[  223.424088]  #4: ffff8957556b83b0 (&prange->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: svm_range_cpu_invalidate_pagetables+0x9d/0x850 [amdgpu]
[  223.424365]
               stack backtrace:
[  223.424374] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 3939 Comm: kfdtest Tainted: G     U     OE      6.12.0-amdstaging-drm-next-lol-050225 #14
[  223.424392] Tainted: [U]=USER, [O]=OOT_MODULE, [E]=UNSIGNED_MODULE
[  223.424401] Hardware name: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. X570 AORUS PRO WIFI/X570 AORUS PRO WIFI, BIOS F36a 02/16/2022
[  223.424416] Call Trace:
[  223.424423]  <TASK>
[  223.424430]  dump_stack_lvl+0x9b/0xf0
[  223.424441]  dump_stack+0x10/0x20
[  223.424449]  print_circular_bug+0x275/0x350
[  223.424460]  check_noncircular+0x157/0x170
[  223.424469]  ? __bfs+0xfd/0x2c0
[  223.424481]  __lock_acquire+0x16f4/0x2810
[  223.424490]  ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
[  223.424505]  lock_acquire+0xd1/0x300
[  223.424514]  ? evict_process_queues_cpsch+0x43/0x210 [amdgpu]
[  223.424783]  __mutex_lock+0x85/0xe20
[  223.424792]  ? evict_process_queues_cpsch+0x43/0x210 [amdgpu]
[  223.425058]  ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
[  223.425067]  ? mark_held_locks+0x54/0x90
[  223.425076]  ? evict_process_queues_cpsch+0x43/0x210 [amdgpu]
[  223.425339]  ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
[  223.425350]  mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30
[  223.425358]  ? mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30
[  223.425367]  evict_process_queues_cpsch+0x43/0x210 [amdgpu]
[  223.425631]  kfd_process_evict_queues+0x8a/0x1d0 [amdgpu]
[  223.425893]  kgd2kfd_quiesce_mm+0x43/0x90 [amdgpu]
[  223.426156]  svm_range_cpu_invalidate_pagetables+0x4a7/0x850 [amdgpu]
[  223.426423]  ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
[  223.426436]  __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start+0x1f5/0x250
[  223.426450]  copy_page_range+0x1e94/0x1ea0
[  223.426461]  ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
[  223.426474]  ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
[  223.426484]  ? lock_acquire+0xd1/0x300
[  223.426494]  ? copy_process+0x1718/0x2ad0
[  223.426502]  ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
[  223.426510]  ? sched_clock_noinstr+0x9/0x10
[  223.426519]  ? local_clock_noinstr+0xe/0xc0
[  223.426528]  ? copy_process+0x1718/0x2ad0
[  223.426537]  ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
[  223.426550]  copy_process+0x172f/0x2ad0
[  223.426569]  kernel_clone+0x9c/0x3f0
[  223.426577]  ? __schedule+0x4c9/0x1b00
[  223.426586]  ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
[  223.426594]  ? sched_clock_noinstr+0x9/0x10
[  223.426602]  ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
[  223.426610]  ? local_clock_noinstr+0xe/0xc0
[  223.426619]  ? schedule+0x107/0x1a0
[  223.426629]  __do_sys_clone+0x66/0x90
[  223.426643]  __x64_sys_clone+0x25/0x30
[  223.426652]  x64_sys_call+0x1d7c/0x20d0
[  223.426661]  do_syscall_64+0x87/0x140
[  223.426671]  ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
[  223.426679]  ? common_nsleep+0x44/0x50
[  223.426690]  ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
[  223.426698]  ? trace_hardirqs_off+0x52/0xd0
[  223.426709]  ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
[  223.426717]  ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0xcc/0x200
[  223.426727]  ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
[  223.426736]  ? do_syscall_64+0x93/0x140
[  223.426748]  ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
[  223.426756]  ? up_write+0x1c/0x1e0
[  223.426765]  ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
[  223.426775]  ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
[  223.426783]  ? trace_hardirqs_off+0x52/0xd0
[  223.426792]  ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
[  223.426800]  ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0xcc/0x200
[  223.426810]  ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
[  223.426818]  ? do_syscall_64+0x93/0x140
[  223.426826]  ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0xcc/0x200
[  223.426836]  ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
[  223.426844]  ? do_syscall_64+0x93/0x140
[  223.426853]  ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
[  223.426861]  ? irqentry_exit+0x6b/0x90
[  223.426869]  ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
[  223.426877]  ? exc_page_fault+0xa7/0x2c0
[  223.426888]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
[  223.426898] RIP: 0033:0x7f46758eab57
[  223.426906] Code: ba 04 00 f3 0f 1e fa 64 48 8b 04 25 10 00 00 00 45 31 c0 31 d2 31 f6 bf 11 00 20 01 4c 8d 90 d0 02 00 00 b8 38 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 41 41 89 c0 85 c0 75 2c 64 48 8b 04 25 10 00
[  223.426930] RSP: 002b:00007fff5c3e5188 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000038
[  223.426943] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f4675f8c040 RCX: 00007f46758eab57
[  223.426954] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000001200011
[  223.426965] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
[  223.426975] R10: 00007f4675e81a50 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000001
[  223.426986] R13: 00007fff5c3e5470 R14: 00007fff5c3e53e0 R15: 00007fff5c3e5410
[  223.427004]  </TASK>

v2: To resolve this issue, the allocation of the process context buffer
(`proc_ctx_bo`) has been moved from the `add_queue_mes` function to the
`pqm_create_queue` function. This change ensures that the buffer is
allocated only when the first queue for a process is created and only if
the Micro Engine Scheduler (MES) is enabled. (Felix)

v3: Fix typo s/Memory Execution Scheduler (MES)/Micro Engine Scheduler
in commit message. (Lijo)

Fixes: 438b39ac74e2 ("drm/amdkfd: pause autosuspend when creating pdd")
Cc: Jesse Zhang <jesse.zhang@amd.com>
Cc: Yunxiang Li <Yunxiang.Li@amd.com>
Cc: Philip Yang <Philip.Yang@amd.com>
Cc: Alex Sierra <alex.sierra@amd.com>
Cc: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>
Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Srinivasan Shanmugam <srinivasan.shanmugam@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
drm/amd/amdkfd: Evict all queues even HWS remove queue failed 2025-03-12T18:59:21+00:00 Yifan Zha Yifan.Zha@amd.com 2025-03-05T05:14:55+00:00 0882ca4eecfe8b0013f339144acf886a0a0de41f [Why] If reset is detected and kfd need to evict working queues, HWS moving queue will be failed. Then remaining queues are not evicted and in active state. After reset done, kfd uses HWS to termination remaining activated queues but HWS is resetted. So remove queue will be failed again. [How] Keep removing all queues even if HWS returns failed. It will not affect cpsch as it checks reset_domain->sem. v2: If any queue failed, evict queue returns error. v3: Declare err inside the if-block. Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Yifan Zha <Yifan.Zha@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> (cherry picked from commit 42c854b8fb0cce512534aa2b7141948e80c6ebb0) Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org 
[Why]
If reset is detected and kfd need to evict working queues, HWS moving queue will be failed.
Then remaining queues are not evicted and in active state.

After reset done, kfd uses HWS to termination remaining activated queues but HWS is resetted.
So remove queue will be failed again.

[How]
Keep removing all queues even if HWS returns failed.
It will not affect cpsch as it checks reset_domain->sem.

v2: If any queue failed, evict queue returns error.
v3: Declare err inside the if-block.

Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Yifan Zha <Yifan.Zha@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
(cherry picked from commit 42c854b8fb0cce512534aa2b7141948e80c6ebb0)
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
drm/amdkfd: Block per-queue reset when halt_if_hws_hang=1 2025-01-28T21:22:02+00:00 Jay Cornwall jay.cornwall@amd.com 2025-01-16T20:36:39+00:00 f214b7beb00621b983e67ce97477afc3ab4b38f4 The purpose of halt_if_hws_hang is to preserve GPU state for driver debugging when queue preemption fails. Issuing per-queue reset may kill wavefronts which caused the preemption failure. Signed-off-by: Jay Cornwall <jay.cornwall@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Kim <Jonathan.Kim@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.12.x 
The purpose of halt_if_hws_hang is to preserve GPU state for driver
debugging when queue preemption fails. Issuing per-queue reset may
kill wavefronts which caused the preemption failure.

Signed-off-by: Jay Cornwall <jay.cornwall@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Kim <Jonathan.Kim@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.12.x
drm/amdkfd: Failed to check various return code 2024-12-18T17:18:11+00:00 Andrew Martin Andrew.Martin@amd.com 2024-12-10T16:50:13+00:00 88a45aa6083be000dc18c38a339acb1fd2f9831c This patch checks and warns if pdd is NULL. Signed-off-by: Andrew Martin <Andrew.Martin@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Harish Kasiviswanathan <Harish.Kasiviswanathan@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> 
This patch checks and warns if pdd is NULL.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Martin <Andrew.Martin@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Harish Kasiviswanathan <Harish.Kasiviswanathan@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
drm/amdkfd: pause autosuspend when creating pdd 2024-12-10T15:26:18+00:00 Jesse.zhang@amd.com Jesse.zhang@amd.com 2024-12-05T09:41:26+00:00 438b39ac74e2a9dc0a5c9d653b7d8066877e86b1 When using MES creating a pdd will require talking to the GPU to setup the relevant context. The code here forgot to wake up the GPU in case it was in suspend, this causes KVM to EFAULT for passthrough GPU for example. This issue can be masked if the GPU was woken up by other things (e.g. opening the KMS node) first and have not yet gone to sleep. v4: do the allocation of proc_ctx_bo in a lazy fashion when the first queue is created in a process (Felix) Signed-off-by: Jesse Zhang <jesse.zhang@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Yunxiang Li <Yunxiang.Li@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org 
When using MES creating a pdd will require talking to the GPU to
setup the relevant context. The code here forgot to wake up the GPU
in case it was in suspend, this causes KVM to EFAULT for passthrough
GPU for example. This issue can be masked if the GPU was woken up by
other things (e.g. opening the KMS node) first and have not yet gone to sleep.

v4: do the allocation of proc_ctx_bo in a lazy fashion
when the first queue is created in a process (Felix)

Signed-off-by: Jesse Zhang <jesse.zhang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Yunxiang Li <Yunxiang.Li@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
drm/amd/amdkfd: add/remove kfd queues on start/stop KFD scheduling 2024-11-11T17:22:39+00:00 Shaoyun Liu shaoyun.liu@amd.com 2024-10-04T16:00:36+00:00 af5661c7c708b1923a1761fe12527c2b85ad47ba Add back kfd queues in start scheduling that originally been removed on stop scheduling. Signed-off-by: Shaoyun Liu <shaoyun.liu@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Philip Yang <Philip.Yang@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> 
Add back kfd queues in start scheduling that originally been
removed on stop scheduling.

Signed-off-by: Shaoyun Liu <shaoyun.liu@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Philip Yang <Philip.Yang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
drm/amdkfd: remove extra use of volatile 2024-10-24T22:04:49+00:00 Victor Zhao Victor.Zhao@amd.com 2024-10-22T13:48:13+00:00 b6890efb597a19cc8bb45e0c2375292fd1f338de as the adding of mb() should be sufficient in function unmap_queues_cpsch, remove the add of volatile type as recommended Signed-off-by: Victor Zhao <Victor.Zhao@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> 
as the adding of mb() should be sufficient in function unmap_queues_cpsch,
remove the add of volatile type as recommended

Signed-off-by: Victor Zhao <Victor.Zhao@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
drm/amdkfd: fix the hang caused by the write reorder to fence_addr 2024-10-22T21:50:39+00:00 Victor Zhao Victor.Zhao@amd.com 2024-10-17T08:20:40+00:00 8834456163a1b372a85891751e51cafbf443a2d8 make sure KFD_FENCE_INIT write to fence_addr before pm_send_query_status called, to avoid qcm fence timeout caused by incorrect ordering. Signed-off-by: Victor Zhao <Victor.Zhao@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Philip Yang <Philip.Yang@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> 
make sure KFD_FENCE_INIT write to fence_addr before pm_send_query_status
called, to avoid qcm fence timeout caused by incorrect ordering.

Signed-off-by: Victor Zhao <Victor.Zhao@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Philip Yang <Philip.Yang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>