<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>linux-stable.git/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_device_queue_manager.c, branch linux-5.9.y</title>
<subtitle>Linux kernel stable tree</subtitle>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/'/>
<entry>
<title>drm/amdkfd: fix a memory leak issue</title>
<updated>2020-09-15T22:16:04+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Dennis Li</name>
<email>Dennis.Li@amd.com</email>
</author>
<published>2020-09-02T09:11:09+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=087d764159996ae378b08c0fdd557537adfd6899'/>
<id>087d764159996ae378b08c0fdd557537adfd6899</id>
<content type='text'>
In the resume stage of GPU recovery, start_cpsch will call pm_init
which set pm-&gt;allocated as false, cause the next pm_release_ib has
no chance to release ib memory.

Add pm_release_ib in stop_cpsch which will be called in the suspend
stage of GPU recovery.

Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling &lt;Felix.Kuehling@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Dennis Li &lt;Dennis.Li@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher &lt;alexander.deucher@amd.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
In the resume stage of GPU recovery, start_cpsch will call pm_init
which set pm-&gt;allocated as false, cause the next pm_release_ib has
no chance to release ib memory.

Add pm_release_ib in stop_cpsch which will be called in the suspend
stage of GPU recovery.

Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling &lt;Felix.Kuehling@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Dennis Li &lt;Dennis.Li@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher &lt;alexander.deucher@amd.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>drm/kfd: fix a system crash issue during GPU recovery</title>
<updated>2020-09-15T22:15:28+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Dennis Li</name>
<email>Dennis.Li@amd.com</email>
</author>
<published>2020-09-02T04:57:59+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=66a5710beaf42903d553378f609166034bd219c7'/>
<id>66a5710beaf42903d553378f609166034bd219c7</id>
<content type='text'>
The crash log as the below:

[Thu Aug 20 23:18:14 2020] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI
[Thu Aug 20 23:18:14 2020] CPU: 152 PID: 1837 Comm: kworker/152:1 Tainted: G           OE     5.4.0-42-generic #46~18.04.1-Ubuntu
[Thu Aug 20 23:18:14 2020] Hardware name: GIGABYTE G482-Z53-YF/MZ52-G40-00, BIOS R12 05/13/2020
[Thu Aug 20 23:18:14 2020] Workqueue: events amdgpu_ras_do_recovery [amdgpu]
[Thu Aug 20 23:18:14 2020] RIP: 0010:evict_process_queues_cpsch+0xc9/0x130 [amdgpu]
[Thu Aug 20 23:18:14 2020] Code: 49 8d 4d 10 48 39 c8 75 21 eb 44 83 fa 03 74 36 80 78 72 00 74 0c 83 ab 68 01 00 00 01 41 c6 45 41 00 48 8b 00 48 39 c8 74 25 &lt;80&gt; 78 70 00 c6 40 6d 01 74 ee 8b 50 28 c6 40 70 00 83 ab 60 01 00
[Thu Aug 20 23:18:14 2020] RSP: 0018:ffffb29b52f6fc90 EFLAGS: 00010213
[Thu Aug 20 23:18:14 2020] RAX: 1c884edb0a118914 RBX: ffff8a0d45ff3c00 RCX: ffff8a2d83e41038
[Thu Aug 20 23:18:14 2020] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000082 RDI: ffff8a0e2e4178c0
[Thu Aug 20 23:18:14 2020] RBP: ffffb29b52f6fcb0 R08: 0000000000001b64 R09: 0000000000000004
[Thu Aug 20 23:18:14 2020] R10: ffffb29b52f6fb78 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff8a0d45ff3d28
[Thu Aug 20 23:18:14 2020] R13: ffff8a2d83e41028 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
[Thu Aug 20 23:18:14 2020] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8a0e2e400000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[Thu Aug 20 23:18:14 2020] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[Thu Aug 20 23:18:14 2020] CR2: 000055c783c0e6a8 CR3: 00000034a1284000 CR4: 0000000000340ee0
[Thu Aug 20 23:18:14 2020] Call Trace:
[Thu Aug 20 23:18:14 2020]  kfd_process_evict_queues+0x43/0xd0 [amdgpu]
[Thu Aug 20 23:18:14 2020]  kfd_suspend_all_processes+0x60/0xf0 [amdgpu]
[Thu Aug 20 23:18:14 2020]  kgd2kfd_suspend.part.7+0x43/0x50 [amdgpu]
[Thu Aug 20 23:18:14 2020]  kgd2kfd_pre_reset+0x46/0x60 [amdgpu]
[Thu Aug 20 23:18:14 2020]  amdgpu_amdkfd_pre_reset+0x1a/0x20 [amdgpu]
[Thu Aug 20 23:18:14 2020]  amdgpu_device_gpu_recover+0x377/0xf90 [amdgpu]
[Thu Aug 20 23:18:14 2020]  ? amdgpu_ras_error_query+0x1b8/0x2a0 [amdgpu]
[Thu Aug 20 23:18:14 2020]  amdgpu_ras_do_recovery+0x159/0x190 [amdgpu]
[Thu Aug 20 23:18:14 2020]  process_one_work+0x20f/0x400
[Thu Aug 20 23:18:14 2020]  worker_thread+0x34/0x410

When GPU hang, user process will fail to create a compute queue whose
struct object will be freed later, but driver wrongly add this queue to
queue list of the proccess. And then kfd_process_evict_queues will
access a freed memory, which cause a system crash.

v2:
The failure to execute_queues should probably not be reported to
the caller of create_queue, because the queue was already created.
Therefore change to ignore the return value from execute_queues.

Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling &lt;Felix.Kuehling@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Dennis Li &lt;Dennis.Li@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher &lt;alexander.deucher@amd.com&gt;
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
The crash log as the below:

[Thu Aug 20 23:18:14 2020] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI
[Thu Aug 20 23:18:14 2020] CPU: 152 PID: 1837 Comm: kworker/152:1 Tainted: G           OE     5.4.0-42-generic #46~18.04.1-Ubuntu
[Thu Aug 20 23:18:14 2020] Hardware name: GIGABYTE G482-Z53-YF/MZ52-G40-00, BIOS R12 05/13/2020
[Thu Aug 20 23:18:14 2020] Workqueue: events amdgpu_ras_do_recovery [amdgpu]
[Thu Aug 20 23:18:14 2020] RIP: 0010:evict_process_queues_cpsch+0xc9/0x130 [amdgpu]
[Thu Aug 20 23:18:14 2020] Code: 49 8d 4d 10 48 39 c8 75 21 eb 44 83 fa 03 74 36 80 78 72 00 74 0c 83 ab 68 01 00 00 01 41 c6 45 41 00 48 8b 00 48 39 c8 74 25 &lt;80&gt; 78 70 00 c6 40 6d 01 74 ee 8b 50 28 c6 40 70 00 83 ab 60 01 00
[Thu Aug 20 23:18:14 2020] RSP: 0018:ffffb29b52f6fc90 EFLAGS: 00010213
[Thu Aug 20 23:18:14 2020] RAX: 1c884edb0a118914 RBX: ffff8a0d45ff3c00 RCX: ffff8a2d83e41038
[Thu Aug 20 23:18:14 2020] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000082 RDI: ffff8a0e2e4178c0
[Thu Aug 20 23:18:14 2020] RBP: ffffb29b52f6fcb0 R08: 0000000000001b64 R09: 0000000000000004
[Thu Aug 20 23:18:14 2020] R10: ffffb29b52f6fb78 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff8a0d45ff3d28
[Thu Aug 20 23:18:14 2020] R13: ffff8a2d83e41028 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
[Thu Aug 20 23:18:14 2020] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8a0e2e400000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[Thu Aug 20 23:18:14 2020] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[Thu Aug 20 23:18:14 2020] CR2: 000055c783c0e6a8 CR3: 00000034a1284000 CR4: 0000000000340ee0
[Thu Aug 20 23:18:14 2020] Call Trace:
[Thu Aug 20 23:18:14 2020]  kfd_process_evict_queues+0x43/0xd0 [amdgpu]
[Thu Aug 20 23:18:14 2020]  kfd_suspend_all_processes+0x60/0xf0 [amdgpu]
[Thu Aug 20 23:18:14 2020]  kgd2kfd_suspend.part.7+0x43/0x50 [amdgpu]
[Thu Aug 20 23:18:14 2020]  kgd2kfd_pre_reset+0x46/0x60 [amdgpu]
[Thu Aug 20 23:18:14 2020]  amdgpu_amdkfd_pre_reset+0x1a/0x20 [amdgpu]
[Thu Aug 20 23:18:14 2020]  amdgpu_device_gpu_recover+0x377/0xf90 [amdgpu]
[Thu Aug 20 23:18:14 2020]  ? amdgpu_ras_error_query+0x1b8/0x2a0 [amdgpu]
[Thu Aug 20 23:18:14 2020]  amdgpu_ras_do_recovery+0x159/0x190 [amdgpu]
[Thu Aug 20 23:18:14 2020]  process_one_work+0x20f/0x400
[Thu Aug 20 23:18:14 2020]  worker_thread+0x34/0x410

When GPU hang, user process will fail to create a compute queue whose
struct object will be freed later, but driver wrongly add this queue to
queue list of the proccess. And then kfd_process_evict_queues will
access a freed memory, which cause a system crash.

v2:
The failure to execute_queues should probably not be reported to
the caller of create_queue, because the queue was already created.
Therefore change to ignore the return value from execute_queues.

Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling &lt;Felix.Kuehling@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Dennis Li &lt;Dennis.Li@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher &lt;alexander.deucher@amd.com&gt;
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>drm/amdkfd: Support navy_flounder KFD</title>
<updated>2020-07-15T16:46:55+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Chengming Gui</name>
<email>Jack.Gui@amd.com</email>
</author>
<published>2020-06-02T08:15:56+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=de89b2e456f7f37ae4680c6a063eeb5bd09cf148'/>
<id>de89b2e456f7f37ae4680c6a063eeb5bd09cf148</id>
<content type='text'>
Add KFD support for Navy Flounder.

Signed-off-by: Chengming Gui &lt;Jack.Gui@amd.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Tao Zhou &lt;tao.zhou1@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher &lt;alexander.deucher@amd.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Add KFD support for Navy Flounder.

Signed-off-by: Chengming Gui &lt;Jack.Gui@amd.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Tao Zhou &lt;tao.zhou1@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher &lt;alexander.deucher@amd.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>drm/amdkfd: Fix circular locking dependency warning</title>
<updated>2020-07-01T05:59:27+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Mukul Joshi</name>
<email>mukul.joshi@amd.com</email>
</author>
<published>2020-06-24T17:47:12+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=d69fd951e60ae48c8dd100aa8ceb799ab965f9b3'/>
<id>d69fd951e60ae48c8dd100aa8ceb799ab965f9b3</id>
<content type='text'>
[  150.887733] ======================================================
[  150.893903] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
[  150.905917] ------------------------------------------------------
[  150.912129] kfdtest/4081 is trying to acquire lock:
[  150.917002] ffff8f7f3762e118 (&amp;mm-&gt;mmap_sem#2){++++}, at:
                                 __might_fault+0x3e/0x90
[  150.924490]
               but task is already holding lock:
[  150.930320] ffff8f7f49d229e8 (&amp;dqm-&gt;lock_hidden){+.+.}, at:
                                destroy_queue_cpsch+0x29/0x210 [amdgpu]
[  150.939432]
               which lock already depends on the new lock.

[  150.947603]
               the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[  150.955074]
               -&gt; #3 (&amp;dqm-&gt;lock_hidden){+.+.}:
[  150.960822]        __mutex_lock+0xa1/0x9f0
[  150.964996]        evict_process_queues_cpsch+0x22/0x120 [amdgpu]
[  150.971155]        kfd_process_evict_queues+0x3b/0xc0 [amdgpu]
[  150.977054]        kgd2kfd_quiesce_mm+0x25/0x60 [amdgpu]
[  150.982442]        amdgpu_amdkfd_evict_userptr+0x35/0x70 [amdgpu]
[  150.988615]        amdgpu_mn_invalidate_hsa+0x41/0x60 [amdgpu]
[  150.994448]        __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start+0xa4/0x240
[  151.000714]        copy_page_range+0xd70/0xd80
[  151.005159]        dup_mm+0x3ca/0x550
[  151.008816]        copy_process+0x1bdc/0x1c70
[  151.013183]        _do_fork+0x76/0x6c0
[  151.016929]        __x64_sys_clone+0x8c/0xb0
[  151.021201]        do_syscall_64+0x4a/0x1d0
[  151.025404]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
[  151.030977]
               -&gt; #2 (&amp;adev-&gt;notifier_lock){+.+.}:
[  151.036993]        __mutex_lock+0xa1/0x9f0
[  151.041168]        amdgpu_mn_invalidate_hsa+0x30/0x60 [amdgpu]
[  151.047019]        __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start+0xa4/0x240
[  151.053277]        copy_page_range+0xd70/0xd80
[  151.057722]        dup_mm+0x3ca/0x550
[  151.061388]        copy_process+0x1bdc/0x1c70
[  151.065748]        _do_fork+0x76/0x6c0
[  151.069499]        __x64_sys_clone+0x8c/0xb0
[  151.073765]        do_syscall_64+0x4a/0x1d0
[  151.077952]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
[  151.083523]
               -&gt; #1 (mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start){+.+.}:
[  151.090833]        change_protection+0x802/0xab0
[  151.095448]        mprotect_fixup+0x187/0x2d0
[  151.099801]        setup_arg_pages+0x124/0x250
[  151.104251]        load_elf_binary+0x3a4/0x1464
[  151.108781]        search_binary_handler+0x6c/0x210
[  151.113656]        __do_execve_file.isra.40+0x7f7/0xa50
[  151.118875]        do_execve+0x21/0x30
[  151.122632]        call_usermodehelper_exec_async+0x17e/0x190
[  151.128393]        ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30
[  151.132489]
               -&gt; #0 (&amp;mm-&gt;mmap_sem#2){++++}:
[  151.138064]        __lock_acquire+0x11a1/0x1490
[  151.142597]        lock_acquire+0x90/0x180
[  151.146694]        __might_fault+0x68/0x90
[  151.150879]        read_sdma_queue_counter+0x5f/0xb0 [amdgpu]
[  151.156693]        update_sdma_queue_past_activity_stats+0x3b/0x90 [amdgpu]
[  151.163725]        destroy_queue_cpsch+0x1ae/0x210 [amdgpu]
[  151.169373]        pqm_destroy_queue+0xf0/0x250 [amdgpu]
[  151.174762]        kfd_ioctl_destroy_queue+0x32/0x70 [amdgpu]
[  151.180577]        kfd_ioctl+0x223/0x400 [amdgpu]
[  151.185284]        ksys_ioctl+0x8f/0xb0
[  151.189118]        __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
[  151.193389]        do_syscall_64+0x4a/0x1d0
[  151.197569]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
[  151.203141]
               other info that might help us debug this:

[  151.211140] Chain exists of:
                 &amp;mm-&gt;mmap_sem#2 --&gt; &amp;adev-&gt;notifier_lock --&gt; &amp;dqm-&gt;lock_hidden

[  151.222535]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

[  151.228447]        CPU0                    CPU1
[  151.232971]        ----                    ----
[  151.237502]   lock(&amp;dqm-&gt;lock_hidden);
[  151.241254]                                lock(&amp;adev-&gt;notifier_lock);
[  151.247774]                                lock(&amp;dqm-&gt;lock_hidden);
[  151.254038]   lock(&amp;mm-&gt;mmap_sem#2);

This commit fixes the warning by ensuring get_user() is not called
while reading SDMA stats with dqm_lock held as get_user() could cause a
page fault which leads to the circular locking scenario.

Signed-off-by: Mukul Joshi &lt;mukul.joshi@amd.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling &lt;Felix.Kuehling@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher &lt;alexander.deucher@amd.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
[  150.887733] ======================================================
[  150.893903] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
[  150.905917] ------------------------------------------------------
[  150.912129] kfdtest/4081 is trying to acquire lock:
[  150.917002] ffff8f7f3762e118 (&amp;mm-&gt;mmap_sem#2){++++}, at:
                                 __might_fault+0x3e/0x90
[  150.924490]
               but task is already holding lock:
[  150.930320] ffff8f7f49d229e8 (&amp;dqm-&gt;lock_hidden){+.+.}, at:
                                destroy_queue_cpsch+0x29/0x210 [amdgpu]
[  150.939432]
               which lock already depends on the new lock.

[  150.947603]
               the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[  150.955074]
               -&gt; #3 (&amp;dqm-&gt;lock_hidden){+.+.}:
[  150.960822]        __mutex_lock+0xa1/0x9f0
[  150.964996]        evict_process_queues_cpsch+0x22/0x120 [amdgpu]
[  150.971155]        kfd_process_evict_queues+0x3b/0xc0 [amdgpu]
[  150.977054]        kgd2kfd_quiesce_mm+0x25/0x60 [amdgpu]
[  150.982442]        amdgpu_amdkfd_evict_userptr+0x35/0x70 [amdgpu]
[  150.988615]        amdgpu_mn_invalidate_hsa+0x41/0x60 [amdgpu]
[  150.994448]        __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start+0xa4/0x240
[  151.000714]        copy_page_range+0xd70/0xd80
[  151.005159]        dup_mm+0x3ca/0x550
[  151.008816]        copy_process+0x1bdc/0x1c70
[  151.013183]        _do_fork+0x76/0x6c0
[  151.016929]        __x64_sys_clone+0x8c/0xb0
[  151.021201]        do_syscall_64+0x4a/0x1d0
[  151.025404]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
[  151.030977]
               -&gt; #2 (&amp;adev-&gt;notifier_lock){+.+.}:
[  151.036993]        __mutex_lock+0xa1/0x9f0
[  151.041168]        amdgpu_mn_invalidate_hsa+0x30/0x60 [amdgpu]
[  151.047019]        __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start+0xa4/0x240
[  151.053277]        copy_page_range+0xd70/0xd80
[  151.057722]        dup_mm+0x3ca/0x550
[  151.061388]        copy_process+0x1bdc/0x1c70
[  151.065748]        _do_fork+0x76/0x6c0
[  151.069499]        __x64_sys_clone+0x8c/0xb0
[  151.073765]        do_syscall_64+0x4a/0x1d0
[  151.077952]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
[  151.083523]
               -&gt; #1 (mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start){+.+.}:
[  151.090833]        change_protection+0x802/0xab0
[  151.095448]        mprotect_fixup+0x187/0x2d0
[  151.099801]        setup_arg_pages+0x124/0x250
[  151.104251]        load_elf_binary+0x3a4/0x1464
[  151.108781]        search_binary_handler+0x6c/0x210
[  151.113656]        __do_execve_file.isra.40+0x7f7/0xa50
[  151.118875]        do_execve+0x21/0x30
[  151.122632]        call_usermodehelper_exec_async+0x17e/0x190
[  151.128393]        ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30
[  151.132489]
               -&gt; #0 (&amp;mm-&gt;mmap_sem#2){++++}:
[  151.138064]        __lock_acquire+0x11a1/0x1490
[  151.142597]        lock_acquire+0x90/0x180
[  151.146694]        __might_fault+0x68/0x90
[  151.150879]        read_sdma_queue_counter+0x5f/0xb0 [amdgpu]
[  151.156693]        update_sdma_queue_past_activity_stats+0x3b/0x90 [amdgpu]
[  151.163725]        destroy_queue_cpsch+0x1ae/0x210 [amdgpu]
[  151.169373]        pqm_destroy_queue+0xf0/0x250 [amdgpu]
[  151.174762]        kfd_ioctl_destroy_queue+0x32/0x70 [amdgpu]
[  151.180577]        kfd_ioctl+0x223/0x400 [amdgpu]
[  151.185284]        ksys_ioctl+0x8f/0xb0
[  151.189118]        __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
[  151.193389]        do_syscall_64+0x4a/0x1d0
[  151.197569]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
[  151.203141]
               other info that might help us debug this:

[  151.211140] Chain exists of:
                 &amp;mm-&gt;mmap_sem#2 --&gt; &amp;adev-&gt;notifier_lock --&gt; &amp;dqm-&gt;lock_hidden

[  151.222535]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

[  151.228447]        CPU0                    CPU1
[  151.232971]        ----                    ----
[  151.237502]   lock(&amp;dqm-&gt;lock_hidden);
[  151.241254]                                lock(&amp;adev-&gt;notifier_lock);
[  151.247774]                                lock(&amp;dqm-&gt;lock_hidden);
[  151.254038]   lock(&amp;mm-&gt;mmap_sem#2);

This commit fixes the warning by ensuring get_user() is not called
while reading SDMA stats with dqm_lock held as get_user() could cause a
page fault which leads to the circular locking scenario.

Signed-off-by: Mukul Joshi &lt;mukul.joshi@amd.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling &lt;Felix.Kuehling@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher &lt;alexander.deucher@amd.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>drm/amdkfd: label internally used symbols as static</title>
<updated>2020-07-01T05:59:23+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Nirmoy Das</name>
<email>nirmoy.das@amd.com</email>
</author>
<published>2020-06-18T14:12:34+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=204d8998ce5997b34d785381fa16d4f900fb0624'/>
<id>204d8998ce5997b34d785381fa16d4f900fb0624</id>
<content type='text'>
Used sparse(make C=1) to find these loose ends.

v2:
removed unwanted extra line

Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das &lt;nirmoy.das@amd.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher &lt;alexander.deucher@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher &lt;alexander.deucher@amd.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Used sparse(make C=1) to find these loose ends.

v2:
removed unwanted extra line

Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das &lt;nirmoy.das@amd.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher &lt;alexander.deucher@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher &lt;alexander.deucher@amd.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>drm/amdkfd: Support Sienna_Cichlid KFD v4</title>
<updated>2020-07-01T05:59:11+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Yong Zhao</name>
<email>Yong.Zhao@amd.com</email>
</author>
<published>2019-10-01T21:42:20+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=3a2f0c813b42996a8fdb14da2cd828156a6fdd12'/>
<id>3a2f0c813b42996a8fdb14da2cd828156a6fdd12</id>
<content type='text'>
v4: drop get_tile_config, comment out other callbacks

Signed-off-by: Yong Zhao &lt;Yong.Zhao@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher &lt;alexander.deucher@amd.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
v4: drop get_tile_config, comment out other callbacks

Signed-off-by: Yong Zhao &lt;Yong.Zhao@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher &lt;alexander.deucher@amd.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>drm/amdkfd: Track SDMA utilization per process</title>
<updated>2020-05-28T18:00:50+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Mukul Joshi</name>
<email>mukul.joshi@amd.com</email>
</author>
<published>2020-05-27T00:06:04+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=32cb59f3136248c40062f6fe3edfba13c516b30c'/>
<id>32cb59f3136248c40062f6fe3edfba13c516b30c</id>
<content type='text'>
Track SDMA usage on a per process basis and report it through sysfs.
The value in the sysfs file indicates the amount of time SDMA has
been in-use by this process since the creation of the process.
This value is in microsecond granularity.

Signed-off-by: Mukul Joshi &lt;mukul.joshi@amd.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling &lt;Felix.Kuehling@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher &lt;alexander.deucher@amd.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Track SDMA usage on a per process basis and report it through sysfs.
The value in the sysfs file indicates the amount of time SDMA has
been in-use by this process since the creation of the process.
This value is in microsecond granularity.

Signed-off-by: Mukul Joshi &lt;mukul.joshi@amd.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling &lt;Felix.Kuehling@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher &lt;alexander.deucher@amd.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>drm/amdkfd: Use a systematic method to calculate queue mask bit</title>
<updated>2020-05-01T19:19:08+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Yong Zhao</name>
<email>Yong.Zhao@amd.com</email>
</author>
<published>2020-03-04T21:52:41+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=d09f85d52ad6d1da9d6b8aecca6b81e0b4750afb'/>
<id>d09f85d52ad6d1da9d6b8aecca6b81e0b4750afb</id>
<content type='text'>
The queue mask used for set_resources always assumes the queue number
per pipe is 8, so KFD needs to align with that by using function
amdgpu_queue_mask_bit_to_set_resource_bit().

Signed-off-by: Yong Zhao &lt;Yong.Zhao@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher &lt;alexander.deucher@amd.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
The queue mask used for set_resources always assumes the queue number
per pipe is 8, so KFD needs to align with that by using function
amdgpu_queue_mask_bit_to_set_resource_bit().

Signed-off-by: Yong Zhao &lt;Yong.Zhao@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher &lt;alexander.deucher@amd.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>drm/amdkfd: Enable over-subscription with &gt;1 GWS queue</title>
<updated>2020-04-28T20:20:30+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Joseph Greathouse</name>
<email>Joseph.Greathouse@amd.com</email>
</author>
<published>2019-09-18T19:49:57+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=b8020b0304c8f44e5e29f0b1a04d31e0bf68d26a'/>
<id>b8020b0304c8f44e5e29f0b1a04d31e0bf68d26a</id>
<content type='text'>
The current GWS usage model will only allows a single GWS-enabled
process to be active on the GPU at once. This ensures that a
barrier-using kernel gets a known amount of GPU hardware, to
prevent deadlock due to inability to go beyond the GWS barrier.

The HWS watches how many GWS entries are assigned to each process,
and goes into over-subscription mode when two processes need more
than the 64 that are available. The current KFD method for working
with this is to allocate all 64 GWS entries to each GWS-capable
process.

When more than one GWS-enabled process is in the runlist, we must
make sure the runlist is in over-subscription mode, so that the
HWS gets a chained RUN_LIST packet and continues scheduling
kernels.

Signed-off-by: Joseph Greathouse &lt;Joseph.Greathouse@amd.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling &lt;Felix.Kuehling@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Felix Kuehling &lt;Felix.Kuehling@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher &lt;alexander.deucher@amd.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
The current GWS usage model will only allows a single GWS-enabled
process to be active on the GPU at once. This ensures that a
barrier-using kernel gets a known amount of GPU hardware, to
prevent deadlock due to inability to go beyond the GWS barrier.

The HWS watches how many GWS entries are assigned to each process,
and goes into over-subscription mode when two processes need more
than the 64 that are available. The current KFD method for working
with this is to allocate all 64 GWS entries to each GWS-capable
process.

When more than one GWS-enabled process is in the runlist, we must
make sure the runlist is in over-subscription mode, so that the
HWS gets a chained RUN_LIST packet and continues scheduling
kernels.

Signed-off-by: Joseph Greathouse &lt;Joseph.Greathouse@amd.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling &lt;Felix.Kuehling@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Felix Kuehling &lt;Felix.Kuehling@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher &lt;alexander.deucher@amd.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>drm/amdkfd: change SDMA MQD memory type</title>
<updated>2020-02-28T21:59:20+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Eric Huang</name>
<email>JinhuiEric.Huang@amd.com</email>
</author>
<published>2020-02-26T19:13:51+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=f2cc50cefd0f209b4ee87206660d2554a7be7ae0'/>
<id>f2cc50cefd0f209b4ee87206660d2554a7be7ae0</id>
<content type='text'>
SDMA MQD memory type is NC that causes MQD data overwritten
accidentally by an old stable cache line. Changing it to UC
default for GART will fix the issue.

The mqd_gfx9 parameter is meant for control stacks that are
allocated together with user mode queue MQDs. Setting
mqd_gfx9 to true maps the control stack pages as NC.
Here it was accidentally applied to SDMA MQDs,
which are allocated together with the HIQ MQD. Setting
the mqd_gfx9 to false avoids that.

Signed-off-by: Eric Huang &lt;jinhuieric.huang@amd.com&gt;
Acked-by: Yong Zhao &lt;Yong.Zhao@amd.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling &lt;Felix.Kuehling@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher &lt;alexander.deucher@amd.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
SDMA MQD memory type is NC that causes MQD data overwritten
accidentally by an old stable cache line. Changing it to UC
default for GART will fix the issue.

The mqd_gfx9 parameter is meant for control stacks that are
allocated together with user mode queue MQDs. Setting
mqd_gfx9 to true maps the control stack pages as NC.
Here it was accidentally applied to SDMA MQDs,
which are allocated together with the HIQ MQD. Setting
the mqd_gfx9 to false avoids that.

Signed-off-by: Eric Huang &lt;jinhuieric.huang@amd.com&gt;
Acked-by: Yong Zhao &lt;Yong.Zhao@amd.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling &lt;Felix.Kuehling@amd.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher &lt;alexander.deucher@amd.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
