linux-stable.git/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu, branch v5.4.192

drm/amdkfd: Fix Incorrect VMIDs passed to HWS

2022-04-20T07:19:36+00:00

[ Upstream commit b7dfbd2e601f3fee545bc158feceba4f340fe7cf ]

Compute-only GPUs have more than 8 VMIDs allocated to KFD. Fix
this by passing correct number of VMIDs to HWS

v2: squash in warning fix (Alex)

Signed-off-by: Tushar Patel 
Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling 
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

drm/amd: Add USBC connector ID

2022-04-20T07:19:36+00:00

[ Upstream commit c5c948aa894a831f96fccd025e47186b1ee41615 ]

[Why&How] Add a dedicated AMDGPU specific ID for use with
newer ASICs that support USB-C output

Signed-off-by: Aurabindo Pillai 
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher 
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

drm/amdkfd: Fix -Wstrict-prototypes from amdgpu_amdkfd_gfx_10_0_get_functions()

2022-04-15T12:18:41+00:00

This patch is for linux-5.4.y only, it has no equivalent change
upstream.

When building x86_64 allmodconfig with tip of tree clang, there is an
instance of -Wstrict-prototypes:

  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gfx_v10.c:168:59: error: a function declaration without a prototype is deprecated in all versions of C [-Werror,-Wstrict-prototypes]
  struct kfd2kgd_calls *amdgpu_amdkfd_gfx_10_0_get_functions()
                                                            ^
                                                             void
  1 error generated.

amdgpu_amdkfd_gfx_10_0_get_functions() is prototyped properly in
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd.h but its definition in
amdgpu_amdkfd_gfx_v10.c does not have the argument types specified,
which causes the warning. GCC does not warn because it permits an
old-style definition if the prototype has the argument types.

This code was eliminated by commit e392c887df97 ("drm/amdkfd: Use array
to probe kfd2kgd_calls"), which was a part of a larger series that does
not look very suitable for stable. Just fix this one location, as it was
the only instance of this new warning across a variety of builds.

Fixes: 6bdadb207224 ("drm/amdgpu: Add navi10 kfd support for amdgpu (v3)")
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

drm/amdgpu: fix off by one in amdgpu_gfx_kiq_acquire()

2022-04-15T12:18:36+00:00

[ Upstream commit 1647b54ed55d4d48c7199d439f8834626576cbe9 ]

This post-op should be a pre-op so that we do not pass -1 as the bit
number to test_bit().  The current code will loop downwards from 63 to
-1.  After changing to a pre-op, it loops from 63 to 0.

Fixes: 71c37505e7ea ("drm/amdgpu/gfx: move more common KIQ code to amdgpu_gfx.c")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter 
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

drm/amdgpu: Fix recursive locking warning

2022-04-15T12:18:32+00:00

[ Upstream commit 447c7997b62a5115ba4da846dcdee4fc12298a6a ]

Noticed the below warning while running a pytorch workload on vega10
GPUs. Change to trylock to avoid conflicts with already held reservation
locks.

[  +0.000003] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
[  +0.000003] 5.13.0-kfd-rajneesh #1030 Not tainted
[  +0.000004] --------------------------------------------
[  +0.000002] python/4822 is trying to acquire lock:
[  +0.000004] ffff932cd9a259f8 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3},
at: amdgpu_bo_release_notify+0xc4/0x160 [amdgpu]
[  +0.000203]
              but task is already holding lock:
[  +0.000003] ffff932cbb7181f8 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3},
at: ttm_eu_reserve_buffers+0x270/0x470 [ttm]
[  +0.000017]
              other info that might help us debug this:
[  +0.000002]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

[  +0.000003]        CPU0
[  +0.000002]        ----
[  +0.000002]   lock(reservation_ww_class_mutex);
[  +0.000004]   lock(reservation_ww_class_mutex);
[  +0.000003]
               *** DEADLOCK ***

[  +0.000002]  May be due to missing lock nesting notation

[  +0.000003] 7 locks held by python/4822:
[  +0.000003]  #0: ffff932c4ac028d0 (&process->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
kfd_ioctl_map_memory_to_gpu+0x10b/0x320 [amdgpu]
[  +0.000232]  #1: ffff932c55e830a8 (&info->lock#2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_map_memory_to_gpu+0x64/0xf60 [amdgpu]
[  +0.000241]  #2: ffff932cc45b5e68 (&(*mem)->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_map_memory_to_gpu+0xdf/0xf60 [amdgpu]
[  +0.000236]  #3: ffffb2b35606fd28
(reservation_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}-{0:0}, at:
amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_map_memory_to_gpu+0x232/0xf60 [amdgpu]
[  +0.000235]  #4: ffff932cbb7181f8
(reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
ttm_eu_reserve_buffers+0x270/0x470 [ttm]
[  +0.000015]  #5: ffffffffc045f700 (*(sspp++)){....}-{0:0}, at:
drm_dev_enter+0x5/0xa0 [drm]
[  +0.000038]  #6: ffff932c52da7078 (&vm->eviction_lock){+.+.}-{3:3},
at: amdgpu_vm_bo_update_mapping+0xd5/0x4f0 [amdgpu]
[  +0.000195]
              stack backtrace:
[  +0.000003] CPU: 11 PID: 4822 Comm: python Not tainted
5.13.0-kfd-rajneesh #1030
[  +0.000005] Hardware name: GIGABYTE MZ01-CE0-00/MZ01-CE0-00, BIOS F02
08/29/2018
[  +0.000003] Call Trace:
[  +0.000003]  dump_stack+0x6d/0x89
[  +0.000010]  __lock_acquire+0xb93/0x1a90
[  +0.000009]  lock_acquire+0x25d/0x2d0
[  +0.000005]  ? amdgpu_bo_release_notify+0xc4/0x160 [amdgpu]
[  +0.000184]  ? lock_is_held_type+0xa2/0x110
[  +0.000006]  ? amdgpu_bo_release_notify+0xc4/0x160 [amdgpu]
[  +0.000184]  __ww_mutex_lock.constprop.17+0xca/0x1060
[  +0.000007]  ? amdgpu_bo_release_notify+0xc4/0x160 [amdgpu]
[  +0.000183]  ? lock_release+0x13f/0x270
[  +0.000005]  ? lock_is_held_type+0xa2/0x110
[  +0.000006]  ? amdgpu_bo_release_notify+0xc4/0x160 [amdgpu]
[  +0.000183]  amdgpu_bo_release_notify+0xc4/0x160 [amdgpu]
[  +0.000185]  ttm_bo_release+0x4c6/0x580 [ttm]
[  +0.000010]  amdgpu_bo_unref+0x1a/0x30 [amdgpu]
[  +0.000183]  amdgpu_vm_free_table+0x76/0xa0 [amdgpu]
[  +0.000189]  amdgpu_vm_free_pts+0xb8/0xf0 [amdgpu]
[  +0.000189]  amdgpu_vm_update_ptes+0x411/0x770 [amdgpu]
[  +0.000191]  amdgpu_vm_bo_update_mapping+0x324/0x4f0 [amdgpu]
[  +0.000191]  amdgpu_vm_bo_update+0x251/0x610 [amdgpu]
[  +0.000191]  update_gpuvm_pte+0xcc/0x290 [amdgpu]
[  +0.000229]  ? amdgpu_vm_bo_map+0xd7/0x130 [amdgpu]
[  +0.000190]  amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_map_memory_to_gpu+0x912/0xf60
[amdgpu]
[  +0.000234]  kfd_ioctl_map_memory_to_gpu+0x182/0x320 [amdgpu]
[  +0.000218]  kfd_ioctl+0x2b9/0x600 [amdgpu]
[  +0.000216]  ? kfd_ioctl_unmap_memory_from_gpu+0x270/0x270 [amdgpu]
[  +0.000216]  ? lock_release+0x13f/0x270
[  +0.000006]  ? __fget_files+0x107/0x1e0
[  +0.000007]  __x64_sys_ioctl+0x8b/0xd0
[  +0.000007]  do_syscall_64+0x36/0x70
[  +0.000004]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
[  +0.000007] RIP: 0033:0x7fbff90a7317
[  +0.000004] Code: b3 66 90 48 8b 05 71 4b 2d 00 64 c7 00 26 00 00 00
48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 b8 10 00 00 00 0f
05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 41 4b 2d 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48
[  +0.000005] RSP: 002b:00007fbe301fe648 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX:
0000000000000010
[  +0.000006] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fbcc402d820 RCX:
00007fbff90a7317
[  +0.000003] RDX: 00007fbe301fe690 RSI: 00000000c0184b18 RDI:
0000000000000004
[  +0.000003] RBP: 00007fbe301fe690 R08: 0000000000000000 R09:
00007fbcc402d880
[  +0.000003] R10: 0000000002001000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12:
00000000c0184b18
[  +0.000003] R13: 0000000000000004 R14: 00007fbf689593a0 R15:
00007fbcc402d820

Cc: Christian König 
Cc: Felix Kuehling 
Cc: Alex Deucher 

Reviewed-by: Christian König 
Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling 
Signed-off-by: Rajneesh Bhardwaj 
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs: fix refcount leak of a dma_fence obj

2022-04-15T12:18:32+00:00

[ Upstream commit dfced44f122c500004a48ecc8db516bb6a295a1b ]

This issue takes place in an error path in
amdgpu_cs_fence_to_handle_ioctl(). When `info->in.what` falls into
default case, the function simply returns -EINVAL, forgetting to
decrement the reference count of a dma_fence obj, which is bumped
earlier by amdgpu_cs_get_fence(). This may result in reference count
leaks.

Fix it by decreasing the refcount of specific object before returning
the error code.

Reviewed-by: Christian König 
Signed-off-by: Xin Xiong 
Signed-off-by: Xin Tan 
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

drm/amdgpu: disable MMHUB PG for Picasso

2022-03-02T10:41:02+00:00

commit f626dd0ff05043e5a7154770cc7cda66acee33a3 upstream.

MMHUB PG needs to be disabled for Picasso for stability reasons.

Signed-off-by: Evan Quan 
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher 
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher 
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

drm/amdgpu: fix logic inversion in check

2022-02-23T10:59:56+00:00

[ Upstream commit e8ae38720e1a685fd98cfa5ae118c9d07b45ca79 ]

We probably never trigger this, but the logic inside the check is
inverted.

Signed-off-by: Christian König 
Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling 
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

drm/amdgpu: fixup bad vram size on gmc v8

2022-01-27T08:19:45+00:00

[ Upstream commit 11544d77e3974924c5a9c8a8320b996a3e9b2f8b ]

Some boards(like RX550) seem to have garbage in the upper
16 bits of the vram size register.  Check for
this and clamp the size properly.  Fixes
boards reporting bogus amounts of vram.

after add this patch,the maximum GPU VRAM size is 64GB,
otherwise only 64GB vram size will be used.

Signed-off-by: Zongmin Zhou
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

drm/amdgpu: Fix a NULL pointer dereference in amdgpu_connector_lcd_native_mode()

2022-01-27T08:19:32+00:00

[ Upstream commit b220110e4cd442156f36e1d9b4914bb9e87b0d00 ]

In amdgpu_connector_lcd_native_mode(), the return value of
drm_mode_duplicate() is assigned to mode, and there is a dereference
of it in amdgpu_connector_lcd_native_mode(), which will lead to a NULL
pointer dereference on failure of drm_mode_duplicate().

Fix this bug add a check of mode.

This bug was found by a static analyzer. The analysis employs
differential checking to identify inconsistent security operations
(e.g., checks or kfrees) between two code paths and confirms that the
inconsistent operations are not recovered in the current function or
the callers, so they constitute bugs.

Note that, as a bug found by static analysis, it can be a false
positive or hard to trigger. Multiple researchers have cross-reviewed
the bug.

Builds with CONFIG_DRM_AMDGPU=m show no new warnings, and
our static analyzer no longer warns about this code.

Fixes: d38ceaf99ed0 ("drm/amdgpu: add core driver (v4)")
Signed-off-by: Zhou Qingyang 
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin