linux-stable.git/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu, branch linux-5.16.y

drm/amdgpu/vcn: Fix the register setting for vcn1

2022-04-13T18:03:23+00:00

commit 02fc996d5098f4c3f65bdf6cdb6b28e3f29ba789 upstream.

Correct the code error for setting register UVD_GFX10_ADDR_CONFIG.
Need to use inst_idx, or it only will set VCN0.

Signed-off-by: Emily Deng 
Reviewed-by: James Zhu 
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher 
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

drm/amdgpu: fix off by one in amdgpu_gfx_kiq_acquire()

2022-04-13T18:03:12+00:00

[ Upstream commit 1647b54ed55d4d48c7199d439f8834626576cbe9 ]

This post-op should be a pre-op so that we do not pass -1 as the bit
number to test_bit().  The current code will loop downwards from 63 to
-1.  After changing to a pre-op, it loops from 63 to 0.

Fixes: 71c37505e7ea ("drm/amdgpu/gfx: move more common KIQ code to amdgpu_gfx.c")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter 
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

drm/amdgpu: Fix recursive locking warning

2022-04-13T18:03:00+00:00

[ Upstream commit 447c7997b62a5115ba4da846dcdee4fc12298a6a ]

Noticed the below warning while running a pytorch workload on vega10
GPUs. Change to trylock to avoid conflicts with already held reservation
locks.

[  +0.000003] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
[  +0.000003] 5.13.0-kfd-rajneesh #1030 Not tainted
[  +0.000004] --------------------------------------------
[  +0.000002] python/4822 is trying to acquire lock:
[  +0.000004] ffff932cd9a259f8 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3},
at: amdgpu_bo_release_notify+0xc4/0x160 [amdgpu]
[  +0.000203]
              but task is already holding lock:
[  +0.000003] ffff932cbb7181f8 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3},
at: ttm_eu_reserve_buffers+0x270/0x470 [ttm]
[  +0.000017]
              other info that might help us debug this:
[  +0.000002]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

[  +0.000003]        CPU0
[  +0.000002]        ----
[  +0.000002]   lock(reservation_ww_class_mutex);
[  +0.000004]   lock(reservation_ww_class_mutex);
[  +0.000003]
               *** DEADLOCK ***

[  +0.000002]  May be due to missing lock nesting notation

[  +0.000003] 7 locks held by python/4822:
[  +0.000003]  #0: ffff932c4ac028d0 (&process->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
kfd_ioctl_map_memory_to_gpu+0x10b/0x320 [amdgpu]
[  +0.000232]  #1: ffff932c55e830a8 (&info->lock#2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_map_memory_to_gpu+0x64/0xf60 [amdgpu]
[  +0.000241]  #2: ffff932cc45b5e68 (&(*mem)->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_map_memory_to_gpu+0xdf/0xf60 [amdgpu]
[  +0.000236]  #3: ffffb2b35606fd28
(reservation_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}-{0:0}, at:
amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_map_memory_to_gpu+0x232/0xf60 [amdgpu]
[  +0.000235]  #4: ffff932cbb7181f8
(reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
ttm_eu_reserve_buffers+0x270/0x470 [ttm]
[  +0.000015]  #5: ffffffffc045f700 (*(sspp++)){....}-{0:0}, at:
drm_dev_enter+0x5/0xa0 [drm]
[  +0.000038]  #6: ffff932c52da7078 (&vm->eviction_lock){+.+.}-{3:3},
at: amdgpu_vm_bo_update_mapping+0xd5/0x4f0 [amdgpu]
[  +0.000195]
              stack backtrace:
[  +0.000003] CPU: 11 PID: 4822 Comm: python Not tainted
5.13.0-kfd-rajneesh #1030
[  +0.000005] Hardware name: GIGABYTE MZ01-CE0-00/MZ01-CE0-00, BIOS F02
08/29/2018
[  +0.000003] Call Trace:
[  +0.000003]  dump_stack+0x6d/0x89
[  +0.000010]  __lock_acquire+0xb93/0x1a90
[  +0.000009]  lock_acquire+0x25d/0x2d0
[  +0.000005]  ? amdgpu_bo_release_notify+0xc4/0x160 [amdgpu]
[  +0.000184]  ? lock_is_held_type+0xa2/0x110
[  +0.000006]  ? amdgpu_bo_release_notify+0xc4/0x160 [amdgpu]
[  +0.000184]  __ww_mutex_lock.constprop.17+0xca/0x1060
[  +0.000007]  ? amdgpu_bo_release_notify+0xc4/0x160 [amdgpu]
[  +0.000183]  ? lock_release+0x13f/0x270
[  +0.000005]  ? lock_is_held_type+0xa2/0x110
[  +0.000006]  ? amdgpu_bo_release_notify+0xc4/0x160 [amdgpu]
[  +0.000183]  amdgpu_bo_release_notify+0xc4/0x160 [amdgpu]
[  +0.000185]  ttm_bo_release+0x4c6/0x580 [ttm]
[  +0.000010]  amdgpu_bo_unref+0x1a/0x30 [amdgpu]
[  +0.000183]  amdgpu_vm_free_table+0x76/0xa0 [amdgpu]
[  +0.000189]  amdgpu_vm_free_pts+0xb8/0xf0 [amdgpu]
[  +0.000189]  amdgpu_vm_update_ptes+0x411/0x770 [amdgpu]
[  +0.000191]  amdgpu_vm_bo_update_mapping+0x324/0x4f0 [amdgpu]
[  +0.000191]  amdgpu_vm_bo_update+0x251/0x610 [amdgpu]
[  +0.000191]  update_gpuvm_pte+0xcc/0x290 [amdgpu]
[  +0.000229]  ? amdgpu_vm_bo_map+0xd7/0x130 [amdgpu]
[  +0.000190]  amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_map_memory_to_gpu+0x912/0xf60
[amdgpu]
[  +0.000234]  kfd_ioctl_map_memory_to_gpu+0x182/0x320 [amdgpu]
[  +0.000218]  kfd_ioctl+0x2b9/0x600 [amdgpu]
[  +0.000216]  ? kfd_ioctl_unmap_memory_from_gpu+0x270/0x270 [amdgpu]
[  +0.000216]  ? lock_release+0x13f/0x270
[  +0.000006]  ? __fget_files+0x107/0x1e0
[  +0.000007]  __x64_sys_ioctl+0x8b/0xd0
[  +0.000007]  do_syscall_64+0x36/0x70
[  +0.000004]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
[  +0.000007] RIP: 0033:0x7fbff90a7317
[  +0.000004] Code: b3 66 90 48 8b 05 71 4b 2d 00 64 c7 00 26 00 00 00
48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 b8 10 00 00 00 0f
05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 41 4b 2d 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48
[  +0.000005] RSP: 002b:00007fbe301fe648 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX:
0000000000000010
[  +0.000006] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fbcc402d820 RCX:
00007fbff90a7317
[  +0.000003] RDX: 00007fbe301fe690 RSI: 00000000c0184b18 RDI:
0000000000000004
[  +0.000003] RBP: 00007fbe301fe690 R08: 0000000000000000 R09:
00007fbcc402d880
[  +0.000003] R10: 0000000002001000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12:
00000000c0184b18
[  +0.000003] R13: 0000000000000004 R14: 00007fbf689593a0 R15:
00007fbcc402d820

Cc: Christian König 
Cc: Felix Kuehling 
Cc: Alex Deucher 

Reviewed-by: Christian König 
Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling 
Signed-off-by: Rajneesh Bhardwaj 
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs: fix refcount leak of a dma_fence obj

2022-04-13T18:02:57+00:00

[ Upstream commit dfced44f122c500004a48ecc8db516bb6a295a1b ]

This issue takes place in an error path in
amdgpu_cs_fence_to_handle_ioctl(). When `info->in.what` falls into
default case, the function simply returns -EINVAL, forgetting to
decrement the reference count of a dma_fence obj, which is bumped
earlier by amdgpu_cs_get_fence(). This may result in reference count
leaks.

Fix it by decreasing the refcount of specific object before returning
the error code.

Reviewed-by: Christian König 
Signed-off-by: Xin Xiong 
Signed-off-by: Xin Tan 
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

drm/edid: Split deep color modes between RGB and YUV444

2022-04-08T12:05:58+00:00

[ Upstream commit 4adc33f36d80489339f1b43dfeee96bb9ea8e459 ]

The current code assumes that the RGB444 and YUV444 formats are the
same, but the HDMI 2.0 specification states that:

   The three DC_XXbit bits above only indicate support for RGB 4:4:4 at
   that pixel size. Support for YCBCR 4:4:4 in Deep Color modes is
   indicated with the DC_Y444 bit. If DC_Y444 is set, then YCBCR 4:4:4
   is supported for all modes indicated by the DC_XXbit flags.

So if we have YUV444 support and any DC_XXbit flag set but the DC_Y444
flag isn't, we'll assume that we support that deep colour mode for
YUV444 which breaks the specification.

In order to fix this, let's split the edid_hdmi_dc_modes field in struct
drm_display_info into two fields, one for RGB444 and one for YUV444.

Suggested-by: Ville Syrjälä 
Fixes: d0c94692e0a3 ("drm/edid: Parse and handle HDMI deep color modes.")
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard 
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä 
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220120151625.594595-4-maxime@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

drm/amdgpu: only check for _PR3 on dGPUs

2022-04-08T12:05:19+00:00

commit 85ac2021fe3ace59cc0afd6edf005abad35625b0 upstream.

We don't support runtime pm on APUs.  They support more
dynamic power savings using clock and powergating.

Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello 
Tested-by: Mario Limonciello 
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

drm/amdgpu: move PX checking into amdgpu_device_ip_early_init

2022-04-08T12:05:19+00:00

commit 901e2be20dc55079997ea1885ea77fc72e6826e7 upstream.

We need to set the APU flag from IP discovery before
we evaluate this code.

Acked-by: Evan Quan 
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher 
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

drm/amdgpu: bypass tiling flag check in virtual display case (v2)

2022-03-16T13:26:47+00:00

[ Upstream commit e2b993302f40c4eb714ecf896dd9e1c5be7d4cd7 ]

vkms leverages common amdgpu framebuffer creation, and
also as it does not support FB modifier, there is no need
to check tiling flags when initing framebuffer when virtual
display is enabled.

This can fix below calltrace:

amdgpu 0000:00:08.0: GFX9+ requires FB check based on format modifier
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1023 at drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_display.c:1150 amdgpu_display_framebuffer_init+0x8e7/0xb40 [amdgpu]

v2: check adev->enable_virtual_display instead as vkms can be
	enabled in bare metal as well.

Signed-off-by: Leslie Shi 
Signed-off-by: Guchun Chen 
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher 
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

drm/amdgpu: fix suspend/resume hang regression

2022-03-08T18:14:17+00:00

[ Upstream commit f1ef17011c765495c876fa75435e59eecfdc1ee4 ]

Regression has been reported that suspend/resume may hang with
the previous vm ready check commit.

So bring back the evicted list check as a temp fix.

Bug: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/1922
Fixes: c1a66c3bc425 ("drm/amdgpu: check vm ready by amdgpu_vm->evicting flag")
Reviewed-by: Christian König 
Signed-off-by: Qiang Yu 
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

drm/amdgpu: check vm ready by amdgpu_vm->evicting flag

2022-03-08T18:14:05+00:00

[ Upstream commit c1a66c3bc425ff93774fb2f6eefa67b83170dd7e ]

Workstation application ANSA/META v21.1.4 get this error dmesg when
running CI test suite provided by ANSA/META:
[drm:amdgpu_gem_va_ioctl [amdgpu]] *ERROR* Couldn't update BO_VA (-16)

This is caused by:
1. create a 256MB buffer in invisible VRAM
2. CPU map the buffer and access it causes vm_fault and try to move
   it to visible VRAM
3. force visible VRAM space and traverse all VRAM bos to check if
   evicting this bo is valuable
4. when checking a VM bo (in invisible VRAM), amdgpu_vm_evictable()
   will set amdgpu_vm->evicting, but latter due to not in visible
   VRAM, won't really evict it so not add it to amdgpu_vm->evicted
5. before next CS to clear the amdgpu_vm->evicting, user VM ops
   ioctl will pass amdgpu_vm_ready() (check amdgpu_vm->evicted)
   but fail in amdgpu_vm_bo_update_mapping() (check
   amdgpu_vm->evicting) and get this error log

This error won't affect functionality as next CS will finish the
waiting VM ops. But we'd better clear the error log by checking
the amdgpu_vm->evicting flag in amdgpu_vm_ready() to stop calling
amdgpu_vm_bo_update_mapping() later.

Another reason is amdgpu_vm->evicted list holds all BOs (both
user buffer and page table), but only page table BOs' eviction
prevent VM ops. amdgpu_vm->evicting flag is set only for page
table BOs, so we should use evicting flag instead of evicted list
in amdgpu_vm_ready().

The side effect of this change is: previously blocked VM op (user
buffer in "evicted" list but no page table in it) gets done
immediately.

v2: update commit comments.

Acked-by: Paul Menzel 
Reviewed-by: Christian König 
Signed-off-by: Qiang Yu 
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher 
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin