linux-stable.git/drivers/gpio, branch v5.4.201 Linux kernel stable tree gpio: mvebu/pwm: Refuse requests with inverted polarity 2022-05-25T07:14:37+00:00 Uwe Kleine-König u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de 2022-05-11T07:58:56+00:00 d1915d9c9fa3b2690c1092fce1b78d5e63adc983 [ Upstream commit 3ecb10175b1f776f076553c24e2689e42953fef5 ] The driver doesn't take struct pwm_state::polarity into account when configuring the hardware, so refuse requests for inverted polarity. Fixes: 757642f9a584 ("gpio: mvebu: Add limited PWM support") Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 3ecb10175b1f776f076553c24e2689e42953fef5 ]

The driver doesn't take struct pwm_state::polarity into account when
configuring the hardware, so refuse requests for inverted polarity.

Fixes: 757642f9a584 ("gpio: mvebu: Add limited PWM support")
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
gpio: gpio-vf610: do not touch other bits when set the target bit 2022-05-25T07:14:37+00:00 Haibo Chen haibo.chen@nxp.com 2022-05-11T02:15:04+00:00 3fdd67e83c4221408dea5c3de330d1644f699732 [ Upstream commit 9bf3ac466faa83d51a8fe9212131701e58fdef74 ] For gpio controller contain register PDDR, when set one target bit, current logic will clear all other bits, this is wrong. Use operator '|=' to fix it. Fixes: 659d8a62311f ("gpio: vf610: add imx7ulp support") Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: Haibo Chen <haibo.chen@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 9bf3ac466faa83d51a8fe9212131701e58fdef74 ]

For gpio controller contain register PDDR, when set one target bit,
current logic will clear all other bits, this is wrong. Use operator
'|=' to fix it.

Fixes: 659d8a62311f ("gpio: vf610: add imx7ulp support")
Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Haibo Chen <haibo.chen@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
gpiolib: of: fix bounds check for 'gpio-reserved-ranges' 2022-05-12T10:23:40+00:00 Andrei Lalaev andrei.lalaev@emlid.com 2022-04-15T07:07:11+00:00 d403ff32e56665390186ab29aa3c3a0c616cf38b commit e75f88efac05bf4e107e4171d8db6d8c3937252d upstream. Gpiolib interprets the elements of "gpio-reserved-ranges" as "start,size" because it clears "size" bits starting from the "start" bit in the according bitmap. So it has to use "greater" instead of "greater or equal" when performs bounds check to make sure that GPIOs are in the available range. Previous implementation skipped ranges that include the last GPIO in the range. I wrote the mail to the maintainers (https://lore.kernel.org/linux-gpio/20220412115554.159435-1-andrei.lalaev@emlid.com/T/#u) of the questioned DTSes (because I couldn't understand how the maintainers interpreted this property), but I haven't received a response. Since the questioned DTSes use "gpio-reserved-ranges = <0 4>" (i.e., the beginning of the range), this patch doesn't affect these DTSes at all. TBH this patch doesn't break any existing DTSes because none of them reserve gpios at the end of range. Fixes: 726cb3ba4969 ("gpiolib: Support 'gpio-reserved-ranges' property") Signed-off-by: Andrei Lalaev <andrei.lalaev@emlid.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit e75f88efac05bf4e107e4171d8db6d8c3937252d upstream.

Gpiolib interprets the elements of "gpio-reserved-ranges" as "start,size"
because it clears "size" bits starting from the "start" bit in the according
bitmap. So it has to use "greater" instead of "greater or equal" when performs
bounds check to make sure that GPIOs are in the available range.
Previous implementation skipped ranges that include the last GPIO in
the range.

I wrote the mail to the maintainers
(https://lore.kernel.org/linux-gpio/20220412115554.159435-1-andrei.lalaev@emlid.com/T/#u)
of the questioned DTSes (because I couldn't understand how the maintainers
interpreted this property), but I haven't received a response.
Since the questioned DTSes use "gpio-reserved-ranges = <0 4>"
(i.e., the beginning of the range), this patch doesn't affect these DTSes at all.
TBH this patch doesn't break any existing DTSes because none of them
reserve gpios at the end of range.

Fixes: 726cb3ba4969 ("gpiolib: Support 'gpio-reserved-ranges' property")
Signed-off-by: Andrei Lalaev <andrei.lalaev@emlid.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
gpiolib: acpi: use correct format characters 2022-04-20T07:19:35+00:00 Linus Torvalds torvalds@linux-foundation.org 2022-03-19T23:21:09+00:00 8cefae8c40df9edbc103b13a43e49b41d2090a05 [ Upstream commit 213d266ebfb1621aab79cfe63388facc520a1381 ] When compiling with -Wformat, clang emits the following warning: gpiolib-acpi.c:393:4: warning: format specifies type 'unsigned char' but the argument has type 'int' [-Wformat] pin); ^~~ So warning that '%hhX' is paired with an 'int' is all just completely mindless and wrong. Sadly, I can see a different bogus warning reason why people would want to use '%02hhX'. Again, the *sane* thing from a human perspective is to use '%02X. But if the compiler doesn't do any range analysis at all, it could decide that "Oh, that print format could need up to 8 bytes of space in the result". Using '%02hhX' would cut that down to two. And since we use char ev_name[5]; and currently use "_%c%02hhX" as the format string, even a compiler that doesn't notice that "pin <= 255" test that guards this all will go "OK, that's at most 4 bytes and the final NUL termination, so it's fine". While a compiler - like gcc - that only sees that the original source of the 'pin' value is a 'unsigned short' array, and then doesn't take the "pin <= 255" into account, will warn like this: gpiolib-acpi.c: In function 'acpi_gpiochip_request_interrupt': gpiolib-acpi.c:206:24: warning: '%02X' directive writing between 2 and 4 bytes into a region of size 3 [-Wformat-overflow=] sprintf(ev_name, "_%c%02X", ^~~~ gpiolib-acpi.c:206:20: note: directive argument in the range [0, 65535] because gcc isn't being very good at that argument range analysis either. In other words, the original use of 'hhx' was bogus to begin with, and due to *another* compiler warning being bad, and we had that bad code being written back in 2016 to work around _that_ compiler warning (commit e40a3ae1f794: "gpio: acpi: work around false-positive -Wstring-overflow warning"). Sadly, two different bad compiler warnings together does not make for one good one. It just makes for even more pain. End result: I think the simplest and cleanest option is simply the proposed change which undoes that '%hhX' change for gcc, and replaces it with just using a slightly bigger stack allocation. It's not like a 5-byte allocation is in any way likely to have saved any actual stack, since all the other variables in that function are 'int' or bigger. False-positive compiler warnings really do make people write worse code, and that's a problem. But on a scale of bad code, I feel that extending the buffer trivially is better than adding a pointless cast that literally makes no sense. At least in this case the end result isn't unreadable or buggy. We've had several cases of bad compiler warnings that caused changes that were actually horrendously wrong. Fixes: e40a3ae1f794 ("gpio: acpi: work around false-positive -Wstring-overflow warning") Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 213d266ebfb1621aab79cfe63388facc520a1381 ]

When compiling with -Wformat, clang emits the following warning:

  gpiolib-acpi.c:393:4: warning: format specifies type 'unsigned char' but the argument has type 'int' [-Wformat]
                        pin);
                        ^~~

So warning that '%hhX' is paired with an 'int' is all just completely
mindless and wrong. Sadly, I can see a different bogus warning reason
why people would want to use '%02hhX'.

Again, the *sane* thing from a human perspective is to use '%02X. But
if the compiler doesn't do any range analysis at all, it could decide
that "Oh, that print format could need up to 8 bytes of space in the
result". Using '%02hhX' would cut that down to two.

And since we use

        char ev_name[5];

and currently use "_%c%02hhX" as the format string, even a compiler
that doesn't notice that "pin <= 255" test that guards this all will
go "OK, that's at most 4 bytes and the final NUL termination, so it's
fine".

While a compiler - like gcc - that only sees that the original source
of the 'pin' value is a 'unsigned short' array, and then doesn't take
the "pin <= 255" into account, will warn like this:

  gpiolib-acpi.c: In function 'acpi_gpiochip_request_interrupt':
  gpiolib-acpi.c:206:24: warning: '%02X' directive writing between 2 and 4 bytes into a region of size 3 [-Wformat-overflow=]
       sprintf(ev_name, "_%c%02X",
                            ^~~~
  gpiolib-acpi.c:206:20: note: directive argument in the range [0, 65535]

because gcc isn't being very good at that argument range analysis either.

In other words, the original use of 'hhx' was bogus to begin with, and
due to *another* compiler warning being bad, and we had that bad code
being written back in 2016 to work around _that_ compiler warning
(commit e40a3ae1f794: "gpio: acpi: work around false-positive
-Wstring-overflow warning").

Sadly, two different bad compiler warnings together does not make for
one good one.

It just makes for even more pain.

End result: I think the simplest and cleanest option is simply the
proposed change which undoes that '%hhX' change for gcc, and replaces
it with just using a slightly bigger stack allocation. It's not like
a 5-byte allocation is in any way likely to have saved any actual stack,
since all the other variables in that function are 'int' or bigger.

False-positive compiler warnings really do make people write worse
code, and that's a problem. But on a scale of bad code, I feel that
extending the buffer trivially is better than adding a pointless cast
that literally makes no sense.

At least in this case the end result isn't unreadable or buggy. We've
had several cases of bad compiler warnings that caused changes that
were actually horrendously wrong.

Fixes: e40a3ae1f794 ("gpio: acpi: work around false-positive -Wstring-overflow warning")
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
gpio: ts4900: Do not set DAT and OE together 2022-03-16T12:21:46+00:00 Mark Featherston mark@embeddedTS.com 2022-03-10T01:16:16+00:00 54fd6b2eb1d7ad842686ab6a64b46c638d438bc1 [ Upstream commit 03fe003547975680fdb9ff5ab0e41cb68276c4f2 ] This works around an issue with the hardware where both OE and DAT are exposed in the same register. If both are updated simultaneously, the harware makes no guarantees that OE or DAT will actually change in any given order and may result in a glitch of a few ns on a GPIO pin when changing direction and value in a single write. Setting direction to input now only affects OE bit. Setting direction to output updates DAT first, then OE. Fixes: 9c6686322d74 ("gpio: add Technologic I2C-FPGA gpio support") Signed-off-by: Mark Featherston <mark@embeddedTS.com> Signed-off-by: Kris Bahnsen <kris@embeddedTS.com> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 03fe003547975680fdb9ff5ab0e41cb68276c4f2 ]

This works around an issue with the hardware where both OE and
DAT are exposed in the same register. If both are updated
simultaneously, the harware makes no guarantees that OE or DAT
will actually change in any given order and may result in a
glitch of a few ns on a GPIO pin when changing direction and value
in a single write.

Setting direction to input now only affects OE bit. Setting
direction to output updates DAT first, then OE.

Fixes: 9c6686322d74 ("gpio: add Technologic I2C-FPGA gpio support")
Signed-off-by: Mark Featherston <mark@embeddedTS.com>
Signed-off-by: Kris Bahnsen <kris@embeddedTS.com>
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
gpio: tegra186: Fix chip_data type confusion 2022-03-02T10:41:17+00:00 Marc Zyngier maz@kernel.org 2022-02-11T09:39:04+00:00 1fb051bbbce313fd89b091188f5287b8b6393865 commit d1e972ace42390de739cde87d96043dcbe502286 upstream. The tegra186 GPIO driver makes the assumption that the pointer returned by irq_data_get_irq_chip_data() is a pointer to a tegra_gpio structure. Unfortunately, it is actually a pointer to the inner gpio_chip structure, as mandated by the gpiolib infrastructure. Nice try. The saving grace is that the gpio_chip is the first member of tegra_gpio, so the bug has gone undetected since... forever. Fix it by performing a container_of() on the pointer. This results in no additional code, and makes it possible to understand how the whole thing works. Fixes: 5b2b135a87fc ("gpio: Add Tegra186 support") Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Cc: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220211093904.1112679-1-maz@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit d1e972ace42390de739cde87d96043dcbe502286 upstream.

The tegra186 GPIO driver makes the assumption that the pointer
returned by irq_data_get_irq_chip_data() is a pointer to a
tegra_gpio structure. Unfortunately, it is actually a pointer
to the inner gpio_chip structure, as mandated by the gpiolib
infrastructure. Nice try.

The saving grace is that the gpio_chip is the first member of
tegra_gpio, so the bug has gone undetected since... forever.

Fix it by performing a container_of() on the pointer. This results
in no additional code, and makes it possible to understand how
the whole thing works.

Fixes: 5b2b135a87fc ("gpio: Add Tegra186 support")
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220211093904.1112679-1-maz@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
gpio: aspeed: Convert aspeed_gpio.lock to raw_spinlock 2022-01-27T08:19:43+00:00 Iwona Winiarska iwona.winiarska@intel.com 2021-12-04T17:10:26+00:00 2481ee0ce59cae61dcad426e659b0d24e10abe5e [ Upstream commit 61a7904b6ace99b1bde0d0e867fa3097f5c8cee2 ] The gpio-aspeed driver implements an irq_chip which need to be invoked from hardirq context. Since spin_lock() can sleep with PREEMPT_RT, it is no longer legal to invoke it while interrupts are disabled. This also causes lockdep to complain about: [ 0.649797] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] because aspeed_gpio.lock (spin_lock_t) is taken under irq_desc.lock (raw_spinlock_t). Let's use of raw_spinlock_t instead of spinlock_t. Signed-off-by: Iwona Winiarska <iwona.winiarska@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 61a7904b6ace99b1bde0d0e867fa3097f5c8cee2 ]

The gpio-aspeed driver implements an irq_chip which need to be invoked
from hardirq context. Since spin_lock() can sleep with PREEMPT_RT, it is
no longer legal to invoke it while interrupts are disabled.
This also causes lockdep to complain about:
[    0.649797] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
because aspeed_gpio.lock (spin_lock_t) is taken under irq_desc.lock
(raw_spinlock_t).
Let's use of raw_spinlock_t instead of spinlock_t.

Signed-off-by: Iwona Winiarska <iwona.winiarska@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
gpiolib: acpi: Do not set the IRQ type if the IRQ is already in use 2022-01-27T08:19:41+00:00 Hans de Goede hdegoede@redhat.com 2021-11-25T20:30:10+00:00 009d6d9fea8c7d696138dbcc463c6558cdc8cdb9 [ Upstream commit bdfd6ab8fdccd8b138837efff66f4a1911496378 ] If the IRQ is already in use, then acpi_dev_gpio_irq_get_by() really should not change the type underneath the current owner. I specifically hit an issue with this an a Chuwi Hi8 Super (CWI509) Bay Trail tablet, when the Boot OS selection in the BIOS is set to Android. In this case _STA for a MAX17047 ACPI I2C device wrongly returns 0xf and the _CRS resources for this device include a GpioInt pointing to a GPIO already in use by an _AEI handler, with a different type then specified in the _CRS for the MAX17047 device. Leading to the acpi_dev_gpio_irq_get() call done by the i2c-core-acpi.c code changing the type breaking the _AEI handler. Now this clearly is a bug in the DSDT of this tablet (in Android mode), but in general calling irq_set_irq_type() on an IRQ which already is in use seems like a bad idea. Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit bdfd6ab8fdccd8b138837efff66f4a1911496378 ]

If the IRQ is already in use, then acpi_dev_gpio_irq_get_by() really
should not change the type underneath the current owner.

I specifically hit an issue with this an a Chuwi Hi8 Super (CWI509) Bay
Trail tablet, when the Boot OS selection in the BIOS is set to Android.
In this case _STA for a MAX17047 ACPI I2C device wrongly returns 0xf and
the _CRS resources for this device include a GpioInt pointing to a GPIO
already in use by an _AEI handler, with a different type then specified
in the _CRS for the MAX17047 device. Leading to the acpi_dev_gpio_irq_get()
call done by the i2c-core-acpi.c code changing the type breaking the
_AEI handler.

Now this clearly is a bug in the DSDT of this tablet (in Android mode),
but in general calling irq_set_irq_type() on an IRQ which already is
in use seems like a bad idea.

Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
gpio: pca953x: Improve bias setting 2021-10-20T09:40:15+00:00 Andy Shevchenko andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com 2021-09-23T22:46:40+00:00 2880dc1302360c186c52b9270abcd49ddce43e4a commit 55a9968c7e139209a9e93d4ca4321731bea5fc95 upstream. The commit 15add06841a3 ("gpio: pca953x: add ->set_config implementation") introduced support for bias setting. However this, due to being half-baked, brought potential issues: - the turning bias via disabling makes the pin floating for a while; - once enabled, bias can't be disabled. Fix all these by adding support for bias disabling and move the disabling part under the corresponding conditional. While at it, add support for default setting, since it's cheap to add. Fixes: 15add06841a3 ("gpio: pca953x: add ->set_config implementation") Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 55a9968c7e139209a9e93d4ca4321731bea5fc95 upstream.

The commit 15add06841a3 ("gpio: pca953x: add ->set_config implementation")
introduced support for bias setting. However this, due to being half-baked,
brought potential issues:
 - the turning bias via disabling makes the pin floating for a while;
 - once enabled, bias can't be disabled.

Fix all these by adding support for bias disabling and move the disabling
part under the corresponding conditional.

While at it, add support for default setting, since it's cheap to add.

Fixes: 15add06841a3 ("gpio: pca953x: add ->set_config implementation")
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
gpio: uniphier: Fix void functions to remove return value 2021-09-30T08:09:23+00:00 Kunihiko Hayashi hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com 2021-09-16T11:19:35+00:00 23716d7153fc0b8c8b594925a87816a3db6344da [ Upstream commit 2dd824cca3407bc9a2bd11b00f6e117b66fcfcf1 ] The return type of irq_chip.irq_mask() and irq_chip.irq_unmask() should be void. Fixes: dbe776c2ca54 ("gpio: uniphier: add UniPhier GPIO controller driver") Signed-off-by: Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 2dd824cca3407bc9a2bd11b00f6e117b66fcfcf1 ]

The return type of irq_chip.irq_mask() and irq_chip.irq_unmask() should
be void.

Fixes: dbe776c2ca54 ("gpio: uniphier: add UniPhier GPIO controller driver")
Signed-off-by: Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com>
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>