linux-stable.git/drivers/gpio, branch v5.17.7

gpio: mvebu: drop pwm base assignment

2022-05-12T10:32:40+00:00

[ Upstream commit e5f6e5d554ac274f9c8ba60078103d0425b93c19 ]

pwmchip_add() unconditionally assigns the base ID dynamically. Commit
f9a8ee8c8bcd1 ("pwm: Always allocate PWM chip base ID dynamically")
dropped all base assignment from drivers under drivers/pwm/. It missed
this driver. Fix that.

Fixes: f9a8ee8c8bcd1 ("pwm: Always allocate PWM chip base ID dynamically")
Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach 
Reviewed-by: Uwe Kleine-König 
Acked-by: Linus Walleij 
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

gpio: pca953x: fix irq_stat not updated when irq is disabled (irq_mask not set)

2022-05-12T10:32:27+00:00

commit dba785798526a3282cc4d0f0ea751883715dbbb4 upstream.

When one port's input state get inverted (eg. from low to hight) after
pca953x_irq_setup but before setting irq_mask (by some other driver such as
"gpio-keys"), the next inversion of this port (eg. from hight to low) will not
be triggered any more (because irq_stat is not updated at the first time). Issue
should be fixed after this commit.

Fixes: 89ea8bbe9c3e ("gpio: pca953x.c: add interrupt handling capability")
Signed-off-by: Puyou Lu 
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

gpio: visconti: Fix fwnode of GPIO IRQ

2022-05-12T10:32:26+00:00

commit 171865dab096da1ab980a32eeea5d1b88cd7bc50 upstream.

The fwnode of GPIO IRQ must be set to its own fwnode, not the fwnode of the
parent IRQ. Therefore, this sets own fwnode instead of the parent IRQ fwnode to
GPIO IRQ's.

Fixes: 2ad74f40dacc ("gpio: visconti: Add Toshiba Visconti GPIO support")
Signed-off-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu 
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij 
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

gpiolib: of: fix bounds check for 'gpio-reserved-ranges'

2022-05-12T10:32:17+00:00

commit e75f88efac05bf4e107e4171d8db6d8c3937252d upstream.

Gpiolib interprets the elements of "gpio-reserved-ranges" as "start,size"
because it clears "size" bits starting from the "start" bit in the according
bitmap. So it has to use "greater" instead of "greater or equal" when performs
bounds check to make sure that GPIOs are in the available range.
Previous implementation skipped ranges that include the last GPIO in
the range.

I wrote the mail to the maintainers
(https://lore.kernel.org/linux-gpio/20220412115554.159435-1-andrei.lalaev@emlid.com/T/#u)
of the questioned DTSes (because I couldn't understand how the maintainers
interpreted this property), but I haven't received a response.
Since the questioned DTSes use "gpio-reserved-ranges = <0 4>"
(i.e., the beginning of the range), this patch doesn't affect these DTSes at all.
TBH this patch doesn't break any existing DTSes because none of them
reserve gpios at the end of range.

Fixes: 726cb3ba4969 ("gpiolib: Support 'gpio-reserved-ranges' property")
Signed-off-by: Andrei Lalaev 
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko 
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij 
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

gpio: Request interrupts after IRQ is initialized

2022-04-27T12:41:14+00:00

commit 06fb4ecfeac7e00d6704fa5ed19299f2fefb3cc9 upstream.

Commit 5467801f1fcb ("gpio: Restrict usage of GPIO chip irq members
before initialization") attempted to fix a race condition that lead to a
NULL pointer, but in the process caused a regression for _AEI/_EVT
declared GPIOs.

This manifests in messages showing deferred probing while trying to
allocate IRQs like so:

  amd_gpio AMDI0030:00: Failed to translate GPIO pin 0x0000 to IRQ, err -517
  amd_gpio AMDI0030:00: Failed to translate GPIO pin 0x002C to IRQ, err -517
  amd_gpio AMDI0030:00: Failed to translate GPIO pin 0x003D to IRQ, err -517
  [ .. more of the same .. ]

The code for walking _AEI doesn't handle deferred probing and so this
leads to non-functional GPIO interrupts.

Fix this issue by moving the call to `acpi_gpiochip_request_interrupts`
to occur after gc->irc.initialized is set.

Fixes: 5467801f1fcb ("gpio: Restrict usage of GPIO chip irq members before initialization")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-gpio/BL1PR12MB51577A77F000A008AA694675E2EF9@BL1PR12MB5157.namprd12.prod.outlook.com/
Link: https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198697
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215850
Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/1979
Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/1976
Reported-by: Mario Limonciello 
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello 
Reviewed-by: Shreeya Patel 
Tested-By: Samuel Čavoj 
Tested-By: lukeluk498@gmail.com Link:
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko 
Acked-by: Linus Walleij 
Reviewed-and-tested-by: Takashi Iwai 
Cc: Shreeya Patel 
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

gpio: sim: fix setting and getting multiple lines

2022-04-20T07:36:25+00:00

commit 3836c73e6a2585561af928c6641d74528a8bdfa4 upstream.

We need to take mask into account in the set/get_multiple() callbacks.
Use bitmap_replace() instead of bitmap_copy().

Fixes: cb8c474e79be ("gpio: sim: new testing module")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski 
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

gpiolib: acpi: use correct format characters

2022-04-20T07:36:12+00:00

[ Upstream commit 213d266ebfb1621aab79cfe63388facc520a1381 ]

When compiling with -Wformat, clang emits the following warning:

  gpiolib-acpi.c:393:4: warning: format specifies type 'unsigned char' but the argument has type 'int' [-Wformat]
                        pin);
                        ^~~

So warning that '%hhX' is paired with an 'int' is all just completely
mindless and wrong. Sadly, I can see a different bogus warning reason
why people would want to use '%02hhX'.

Again, the *sane* thing from a human perspective is to use '%02X. But
if the compiler doesn't do any range analysis at all, it could decide
that "Oh, that print format could need up to 8 bytes of space in the
result". Using '%02hhX' would cut that down to two.

And since we use

        char ev_name[5];

and currently use "_%c%02hhX" as the format string, even a compiler
that doesn't notice that "pin <= 255" test that guards this all will
go "OK, that's at most 4 bytes and the final NUL termination, so it's
fine".

While a compiler - like gcc - that only sees that the original source
of the 'pin' value is a 'unsigned short' array, and then doesn't take
the "pin <= 255" into account, will warn like this:

  gpiolib-acpi.c: In function 'acpi_gpiochip_request_interrupt':
  gpiolib-acpi.c:206:24: warning: '%02X' directive writing between 2 and 4 bytes into a region of size 3 [-Wformat-overflow=]
       sprintf(ev_name, "_%c%02X",
                            ^~~~
  gpiolib-acpi.c:206:20: note: directive argument in the range [0, 65535]

because gcc isn't being very good at that argument range analysis either.

In other words, the original use of 'hhx' was bogus to begin with, and
due to *another* compiler warning being bad, and we had that bad code
being written back in 2016 to work around _that_ compiler warning
(commit e40a3ae1f794: "gpio: acpi: work around false-positive
-Wstring-overflow warning").

Sadly, two different bad compiler warnings together does not make for
one good one.

It just makes for even more pain.

End result: I think the simplest and cleanest option is simply the
proposed change which undoes that '%hhX' change for gcc, and replaces
it with just using a slightly bigger stack allocation. It's not like
a 5-byte allocation is in any way likely to have saved any actual stack,
since all the other variables in that function are 'int' or bigger.

False-positive compiler warnings really do make people write worse
code, and that's a problem. But on a scale of bad code, I feel that
extending the buffer trivially is better than adding a pointless cast
that literally makes no sense.

At least in this case the end result isn't unreadable or buggy. We've
had several cases of bad compiler warnings that caused changes that
were actually horrendously wrong.

Fixes: e40a3ae1f794 ("gpio: acpi: work around false-positive -Wstring-overflow warning")
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds 
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

gpio: Restrict usage of GPIO chip irq members before initialization

2022-04-13T17:27:38+00:00

commit 5467801f1fcbdc46bc7298a84dbf3ca1ff2a7320 upstream.

GPIO chip irq members are exposed before they could be completely
initialized and this leads to race conditions.

One such issue was observed for the gc->irq.domain variable which
was accessed through the I2C interface in gpiochip_to_irq() before
it could be initialized by gpiochip_add_irqchip(). This resulted in
Kernel NULL pointer dereference.

Following are the logs for reference :-

kernel: Call Trace:
kernel:  gpiod_to_irq+0x53/0x70
kernel:  acpi_dev_gpio_irq_get_by+0x113/0x1f0
kernel:  i2c_acpi_get_irq+0xc0/0xd0
kernel:  i2c_device_probe+0x28a/0x2a0
kernel:  really_probe+0xf2/0x460
kernel: RIP: 0010:gpiochip_to_irq+0x47/0xc0

To avoid such scenarios, restrict usage of GPIO chip irq members before
they are completely initialized.

Signed-off-by: Shreeya Patel 
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko 
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij 
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

Revert "gpio: Revert regression in sysfs-gpio (gpiolib.c)"

2022-03-15T16:59:08+00:00

This reverts commit fc328a7d1fcce263db0b046917a66f3aa6e68719.

This commit - while attempting to fix a regression - has caused a number
of other problems. As the fallout from it is more significant than the
initial problem itself, revert it for now before we find a correct
solution.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220314192522.GA3031157@roeck-us.net/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20220314155509.552218-1-michael@walle.cc/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211217153555.9413-1-marcelo.jimenez@gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski 
Reported-and-bisected-by: Guenter Roeck 
Reported-by: Michael Walle 
Cc: Thorsten Leemhuis 
Cc: Marcelo Roberto Jimenez 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

gpio: sim: fix a typo

2022-03-10T09:02:19+00:00

Just noticed this when applying Andy's patch. s/childred/children/

Fixes: cb8c474e79be ("gpio: sim: new testing module")
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski 
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko