linux-stable.git/drivers/firmware/google, branch linux-5.10.y

firmware: google: Unregister driver_info on failure

2024-12-14T18:47:44+00:00

[ Upstream commit 32b0901e141f6d4cf49d820b53eb09b88b1f72f7 ]

When platform_device_register_full() returns error, the gsmi_init() returns
without unregister gsmi_driver_info, fix by add missing
platform_driver_unregister() when platform_device_register_full() failed.

Fixes: 8942b2d5094b ("gsmi: Add GSMI commands to log S0ix info")
Signed-off-by: Yuan Can 
Acked-by: Brian Norris 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241015131344.20272-1-yuancan@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Tzung-Bi Shih 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

firmware: coreboot: framebuffer: Ignore reserved pixel color bits

2023-03-11T15:39:54+00:00

commit e6acaf25cba14661211bb72181c35dd13b24f5b3 upstream.

The coreboot framebuffer doesn't support transparency, its 'reserved'
bit field is merely padding for byte/word alignment of pixel colors [1].
When trying to match the framebuffer to a simplefb format, the kernel
driver unnecessarily requires the format's transparency bit field to
exactly match this padding, even if the former is zero-width.

Due to a coreboot bug [2] (fixed upstream), some boards misreport the
reserved field's size as equal to its position (0x18 for both on a
'Lick' Chromebook), and the driver fails to probe where it would have
otherwise worked fine with e.g. the a8r8g8b8 or x8r8g8b8 formats.

Remove the transparency comparison with reserved bits. When the
bits-per-pixel and other color components match, transparency will
already be in a subset of the reserved field. Not forcing it to match
reserved bits allows the driver to work on the boards which misreport
the reserved field. It also enables using simplefb formats that don't
have transparency bits, although this doesn't currently happen due to
format support and ordering in linux/platform_data/simplefb.h.

[1] https://review.coreboot.org/plugins/gitiles/coreboot/+/4.19/src/commonlib/include/commonlib/coreboot_tables.h#255
[2] https://review.coreboot.org/plugins/gitiles/coreboot/+/4.13/src/drivers/intel/fsp2_0/graphics.c#82

Signed-off-by: Alper Nebi Yasak 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230122190433.195941-1-alpernebiyasak@gmail.com
Cc: Salvatore Bonaccorso 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

gsmi: fix null-deref in gsmi_get_variable

2023-01-24T06:20:00+00:00

commit a769b05eeed7accc4019a1ed9799dd72067f1ce8 upstream.

We can get EFI variables without fetching the attribute, so we must
allow for that in gsmi.

commit 859748255b43 ("efi: pstore: Omit efivars caching EFI varstore
access layer") added a new get_variable call with attr=NULL, which
triggers panic in gsmi.

Fixes: 74c5b31c6618 ("driver: Google EFI SMI")
Cc: stable 
Signed-off-by: Khazhismel Kumykov 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230118010212.1268474-1-khazhy@google.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

firmware: coreboot: Register bus in module init

2022-11-25T16:45:53+00:00

commit 65946690ed8d972fdb91a74ee75ac0f0f0d68321 upstream.

The coreboot_table driver registers a coreboot bus while probing a
"coreboot_table" device representing the coreboot table memory region.
Probing this device (i.e., registering the bus) is a dependency for the
module_init() functions of any driver for this bus (e.g.,
memconsole-coreboot.c / memconsole_driver_init()).

With synchronous probe, this dependency works OK, as the link order in
the Makefile ensures coreboot_table_driver_init() (and thus,
coreboot_table_probe()) completes before a coreboot device driver tries
to add itself to the bus.

With asynchronous probe, however, coreboot_table_probe() may race with
memconsole_driver_init(), and so we're liable to hit one of these two:

1. coreboot_driver_register() eventually hits "[...] the bus was not
   initialized.", and the memconsole driver fails to register; or
2. coreboot_driver_register() gets past #1, but still races with
   bus_register() and hits some other undefined/crashing behavior (e.g.,
   in driver_find() [1])

We can resolve this by registering the bus in our initcall, and only
deferring "device" work (scanning the coreboot memory region and
creating sub-devices) to probe().

[1] Example failure, using 'driver_async_probe=*' kernel command line:

[    0.114217] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000010
...
[    0.114307] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.1.0-rc1 #63
[    0.114316] Hardware name: Google Scarlet (DT)
...
[    0.114488] Call trace:
[    0.114494]  _raw_spin_lock+0x34/0x60
[    0.114502]  kset_find_obj+0x28/0x84
[    0.114511]  driver_find+0x30/0x50
[    0.114520]  driver_register+0x64/0x10c
[    0.114528]  coreboot_driver_register+0x30/0x3c
[    0.114540]  memconsole_driver_init+0x24/0x30
[    0.114550]  do_one_initcall+0x154/0x2e0
[    0.114560]  do_initcall_level+0x134/0x160
[    0.114571]  do_initcalls+0x60/0xa0
[    0.114579]  do_basic_setup+0x28/0x34
[    0.114588]  kernel_init_freeable+0xf8/0x150
[    0.114596]  kernel_init+0x2c/0x12c
[    0.114607]  ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
[    0.114624] Code: 5280002b 1100054a b900092a f9800011 (885ffc01)
[    0.114631] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

Fixes: b81e3140e412 ("firmware: coreboot: Make bus registration symmetric")
Cc: 
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris 
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck 
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221019180934.1.If29e167d8a4771b0bf4a39c89c6946ed764817b9@changeid
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

firmware: google: Test spinlock on panic path to avoid lockups

2022-10-26T11:25:37+00:00

[ Upstream commit 3e081438b8e639cc76ef1a5ce0c1bd8a154082c7 ]

Currently the gsmi driver registers a panic notifier as well as
reboot and die notifiers. The callbacks registered are called in
atomic and very limited context - for instance, panic disables
preemption and local IRQs, also all secondary CPUs (not executing
the panic path) are shutdown.

With that said, taking a spinlock in this scenario is a dangerous
invitation for lockup scenarios. So, fix that by checking if the
spinlock is free to acquire in the panic notifier callback - if not,
bail-out and avoid a potential hang.

Fixes: 74c5b31c6618 ("driver: Google EFI SMI")
Cc: Andrew Morton 
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel 
Cc: David Gow 
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman 
Cc: Julius Werner 
Cc: Petr Mladek 
Reviewed-by: Evan Green 
Signed-off-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220909200755.189679-1-gpiccoli@igalia.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

firmware: google: Properly state IOMEM dependency

2022-04-08T12:40:28+00:00

[ Upstream commit 37fd83916da2e4cae03d350015c82a67b1b334c4 ]

The Google Coreboot implementation requires IOMEM functions
(memmremap, memunmap, devm_memremap), but does not specify this is its
Kconfig. This results in build errors when HAS_IOMEM is not set, such as
on some UML configurations:

/usr/bin/ld: drivers/firmware/google/coreboot_table.o: in function `coreboot_table_probe':
coreboot_table.c:(.text+0x311): undefined reference to `memremap'
/usr/bin/ld: coreboot_table.c:(.text+0x34e): undefined reference to `memunmap'
/usr/bin/ld: drivers/firmware/google/memconsole-coreboot.o: in function `memconsole_probe':
memconsole-coreboot.c:(.text+0x12d): undefined reference to `memremap'
/usr/bin/ld: memconsole-coreboot.c:(.text+0x17e): undefined reference to `devm_memremap'
/usr/bin/ld: memconsole-coreboot.c:(.text+0x191): undefined reference to `memunmap'
/usr/bin/ld: drivers/firmware/google/vpd.o: in function `vpd_section_destroy.isra.0':
vpd.c:(.text+0x300): undefined reference to `memunmap'
/usr/bin/ld: drivers/firmware/google/vpd.o: in function `vpd_section_init':
vpd.c:(.text+0x382): undefined reference to `memremap'
/usr/bin/ld: vpd.c:(.text+0x459): undefined reference to `memunmap'
/usr/bin/ld: drivers/firmware/google/vpd.o: in function `vpd_probe':
vpd.c:(.text+0x59d): undefined reference to `memremap'
/usr/bin/ld: vpd.c:(.text+0x5d3): undefined reference to `memunmap'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status

Fixes: a28aad66da8b ("firmware: coreboot: Collapse platform drivers into bus core")
Acked-By: anton ivanov 
Acked-By: Julius Werner 
Signed-off-by: David Gow 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220225041502.1901806-1-davidgow@google.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

firmware: Update Kconfig help text for Google firmware

2022-01-27T09:54:28+00:00

commit d185a3466f0cd5af8f1c5c782c53bc0e6f2e7136 upstream.

The help text for GOOGLE_FIRMWARE states that it should only be
enabled when building a kernel for Google's own servers.  However,
many of the drivers dependent on it are also useful on Chromebooks or
on any platform using coreboot.

Update the help text to reflect this double duty.

Fixes: d384d6f43d1e ("firmware: google memconsole: Add coreboot support")
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner 
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20180618225540.GD14131@decadent.org.uk
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

efi: gsmi: fix false dependency on CONFIG_EFI_VARS

2020-09-29T17:40:57+00:00

The gsmi code does not actually rely on CONFIG_EFI_VARS, since it only
uses the efivars abstraction that is included unconditionally when
CONFIG_EFI is defined. CONFIG_EFI_VARS controls the inclusion of the
code that exposes the sysfs entries, and which has been deprecated for
some time.

Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel

firmware: google: vpd: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member

2020-06-16T04:08:21+00:00

There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21

Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva

firmware: google: memconsole: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member

2020-06-16T04:08:16+00:00

There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21

Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva