linux-stable.git/drivers/cpufreq, branch v6.1.142 Linux kernel stable tree Revert "cpufreq: tegra186: Share policy per cluster" 2025-06-27T10:07:40+00:00 Jon Hunter jonathanh@nvidia.com 2025-06-05T12:52:59+00:00 6e8a0aae9fd498485ccbda0568096ec36e9ab932 This reverts commit 89172666228de1cefcacf5bc6f61c6281751d2ed which is upstream commit be4ae8c19492cd6d5de61ccb34ffb3f5ede5eec8. This commit is causing a suspend regression on Tegra186 Jetson TX2 with Linux v6.12.y kernels. This is not seen with Linux v6.15 that includes this change but indicates that there are there changes missing. Therefore, revert this change. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-tegra/bf1dabf7-0337-40e9-8b8e-4e93a0ffd4cc@nvidia.com/ Fixes: 89172666228d ("cpufreq: tegra186: Share policy per cluster") Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
This reverts commit 89172666228de1cefcacf5bc6f61c6281751d2ed which is
upstream commit be4ae8c19492cd6d5de61ccb34ffb3f5ede5eec8.

This commit is causing a suspend regression on Tegra186 Jetson TX2 with
Linux v6.12.y kernels. This is not seen with Linux v6.15 that includes
this change but indicates that there are there changes missing.
Therefore, revert this change.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-tegra/bf1dabf7-0337-40e9-8b8e-4e93a0ffd4cc@nvidia.com/
Fixes: 89172666228d ("cpufreq: tegra186: Share policy per cluster")
Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
cpufreq: scmi: Skip SCMI devices that aren't used by the CPUs 2025-06-27T10:07:33+00:00 Mike Tipton quic_mdtipton@quicinc.com 2025-05-15T03:53:12+00:00 e2d004433e3ed17620703fa1a8564fd386d63ab8 [ Upstream commit 6c9bb86922728c7a4cceb99f131e00dd87514f20 ] Currently, all SCMI devices with performance domains attempt to register a cpufreq driver, even if their performance domains aren't used to control the CPUs. The cpufreq framework only supports registering a single driver, so only the first device will succeed. And if that device isn't used for the CPUs, then cpufreq will scale the wrong domains. To avoid this, return early from scmi_cpufreq_probe() if the probing SCMI device isn't referenced by the CPU device phandles. This keeps the existing assumption that all CPUs are controlled by a single SCMI device. Signed-off-by: Mike Tipton <quic_mdtipton@quicinc.com> Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Tested-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 6c9bb86922728c7a4cceb99f131e00dd87514f20 ]

Currently, all SCMI devices with performance domains attempt to register
a cpufreq driver, even if their performance domains aren't used to
control the CPUs. The cpufreq framework only supports registering a
single driver, so only the first device will succeed. And if that device
isn't used for the CPUs, then cpufreq will scale the wrong domains.

To avoid this, return early from scmi_cpufreq_probe() if the probing
SCMI device isn't referenced by the CPU device phandles.

This keeps the existing assumption that all CPUs are controlled by a
single SCMI device.

Signed-off-by: Mike Tipton <quic_mdtipton@quicinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Tested-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
acpi-cpufreq: Fix nominal_freq units to KHz in get_max_boost_ratio() 2025-06-27T10:07:05+00:00 Gautham R. Shenoy gautham.shenoy@amd.com 2025-05-29T08:51:43+00:00 bcffc2052f59951585e781e59acef9d51e2215d1 commit cb6a85f38f456b086c366e346ebb67ffa70c7243 upstream. commit 083466754596 ("cpufreq: ACPI: Fix max-frequency computation") modified get_max_boost_ratio() to return the nominal_freq advertised in the _CPC object. This was for the purposes of computing the maximum frequency. The frequencies advertised in _CPC objects are in MHz. However, cpufreq expects the frequency to be in KHz. Since the nominal_freq returned by get_max_boost_ratio() was not in KHz but instead in MHz,the cpuinfo_max_frequency that was computed using this nominal_freq was incorrect and an invalid value which resulted in cpufreq reporting the P0 frequency as the cpuinfo_max_freq. Fix this by converting the nominal_freq to KHz before returning the same from get_max_boost_ratio(). Reported-by: Manu Bretelle <chantr4@gmail.com> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/aDaB63tDvbdcV0cg@HQ-GR2X1W2P57/ Fixes: 083466754596 ("cpufreq: ACPI: Fix max-frequency computation") Signed-off-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <gautham.shenoy@amd.com> Cc: 6.14+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 6.14+ Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250529085143.709-1-gautham.shenoy@amd.com Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit cb6a85f38f456b086c366e346ebb67ffa70c7243 upstream.

commit 083466754596 ("cpufreq: ACPI: Fix max-frequency computation")
modified get_max_boost_ratio() to return the nominal_freq advertised
in the _CPC object. This was for the purposes of computing the maximum
frequency. The frequencies advertised in _CPC objects are in
MHz. However, cpufreq expects the frequency to be in KHz. Since the
nominal_freq returned by get_max_boost_ratio() was not in KHz but
instead in MHz,the cpuinfo_max_frequency that was computed using this
nominal_freq was incorrect and an invalid value which resulted in
cpufreq reporting the P0 frequency as the cpuinfo_max_freq.

Fix this by converting the nominal_freq to KHz before returning the
same from get_max_boost_ratio().

Reported-by: Manu Bretelle <chantr4@gmail.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/aDaB63tDvbdcV0cg@HQ-GR2X1W2P57/
Fixes: 083466754596 ("cpufreq: ACPI: Fix max-frequency computation")
Signed-off-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
Cc: 6.14+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 6.14+
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250529085143.709-1-gautham.shenoy@amd.com
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
cpufreq: tegra186: Share policy per cluster 2025-06-04T12:40:08+00:00 Aaron Kling luceoscutum@gmail.com 2025-03-10T05:28:48+00:00 89172666228de1cefcacf5bc6f61c6281751d2ed [ Upstream commit be4ae8c19492cd6d5de61ccb34ffb3f5ede5eec8 ] This functionally brings tegra186 in line with tegra210 and tegra194, sharing a cpufreq policy between all cores in a cluster. Reviewed-by: Sumit Gupta <sumitg@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Aaron Kling <webgeek1234@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit be4ae8c19492cd6d5de61ccb34ffb3f5ede5eec8 ]

This functionally brings tegra186 in line with tegra210 and tegra194,
sharing a cpufreq policy between all cores in a cluster.

Reviewed-by: Sumit Gupta <sumitg@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Aaron Kling <webgeek1234@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
cpufreq: Fix setting policy limits when frequency tables are used 2025-05-09T07:41:36+00:00 Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com 2025-04-25T11:36:21+00:00 15888cd413f8ffdba42396a764c33eff4ef2ec3c commit b79028039f440e7d2c4df6ab243060c4e3803e84 upstream. Commit 7491cdf46b5c ("cpufreq: Avoid using inconsistent policy->min and policy->max") overlooked the fact that policy->min and policy->max were accessed directly in cpufreq_frequency_table_target() and in the functions called by it. Consequently, the changes made by that commit led to problems with setting policy limits. Address this by passing the target frequency limits to __resolve_freq() and cpufreq_frequency_table_target() and propagating them to the functions called by the latter. Fixes: 7491cdf46b5c ("cpufreq: Avoid using inconsistent policy->min and policy->max") Cc: 5.16+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.16+ Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/aAplED3IA_J0eZN0@linaro.org/ Reported-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan.gerhold@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan.gerhold@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lifeng Zheng <zhenglifeng1@huawei.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/5896780.DvuYhMxLoT@rjwysocki.net Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit b79028039f440e7d2c4df6ab243060c4e3803e84 upstream.

Commit 7491cdf46b5c ("cpufreq: Avoid using inconsistent policy->min and
policy->max") overlooked the fact that policy->min and policy->max were
accessed directly in cpufreq_frequency_table_target() and in the
functions called by it.  Consequently, the changes made by that commit
led to problems with setting policy limits.

Address this by passing the target frequency limits to __resolve_freq()
and cpufreq_frequency_table_target() and propagating them to the
functions called by the latter.

Fixes: 7491cdf46b5c ("cpufreq: Avoid using inconsistent policy->min and policy->max")
Cc: 5.16+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.16+
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/aAplED3IA_J0eZN0@linaro.org/
Reported-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan.gerhold@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan.gerhold@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Lifeng Zheng <zhenglifeng1@huawei.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/5896780.DvuYhMxLoT@rjwysocki.net
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
cpufreq: Avoid using inconsistent policy->min and policy->max 2025-05-09T07:41:36+00:00 Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com 2025-04-16T14:12:37+00:00 681400579b88ef35e0e14fcff9c8d205ec0c71c4 commit 7491cdf46b5cbdf123fc84fbe0a07e9e3d7b7620 upstream. Since cpufreq_driver_resolve_freq() can run in parallel with cpufreq_set_policy() and there is no synchronization between them, the former may access policy->min and policy->max while the latter is updating them and it may see intermediate values of them due to the way the update is carried out. Also the compiler is free to apply any optimizations it wants both to the stores in cpufreq_set_policy() and to the loads in cpufreq_driver_resolve_freq() which may result in additional inconsistencies. To address this, use WRITE_ONCE() when updating policy->min and policy->max in cpufreq_set_policy() and use READ_ONCE() for reading them in cpufreq_driver_resolve_freq(). Moreover, rearrange the update in cpufreq_set_policy() to avoid storing intermediate values in policy->min and policy->max with the help of the observation that their new values are expected to be properly ordered upfront. Also modify cpufreq_driver_resolve_freq() to take the possible reverse ordering of policy->min and policy->max, which may happen depending on the ordering of operations when this function and cpufreq_set_policy() run concurrently, into account by always honoring the max when it turns out to be less than the min (in case it comes from thermal throttling or similar). Fixes: 151717690694 ("cpufreq: Make policy min/max hard requirements") Cc: 5.16+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.16+ Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/5907080.DvuYhMxLoT@rjwysocki.net Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 7491cdf46b5cbdf123fc84fbe0a07e9e3d7b7620 upstream.

Since cpufreq_driver_resolve_freq() can run in parallel with
cpufreq_set_policy() and there is no synchronization between them,
the former may access policy->min and policy->max while the latter
is updating them and it may see intermediate values of them due
to the way the update is carried out.  Also the compiler is free
to apply any optimizations it wants both to the stores in
cpufreq_set_policy() and to the loads in cpufreq_driver_resolve_freq()
which may result in additional inconsistencies.

To address this, use WRITE_ONCE() when updating policy->min and
policy->max in cpufreq_set_policy() and use READ_ONCE() for reading
them in cpufreq_driver_resolve_freq().  Moreover, rearrange the update
in cpufreq_set_policy() to avoid storing intermediate values in
policy->min and policy->max with the help of the observation that
their new values are expected to be properly ordered upfront.

Also modify cpufreq_driver_resolve_freq() to take the possible reverse
ordering of policy->min and policy->max, which may happen depending on
the ordering of operations when this function and cpufreq_set_policy()
run concurrently, into account by always honoring the max when it
turns out to be less than the min (in case it comes from thermal
throttling or similar).

Fixes: 151717690694 ("cpufreq: Make policy min/max hard requirements")
Cc: 5.16+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.16+
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/5907080.DvuYhMxLoT@rjwysocki.net
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
cpufreq: cppc: Fix invalid return value in .get() callback 2025-05-02T05:46:54+00:00 Marc Zyngier maz@kernel.org 2025-04-13T10:11:42+00:00 a252684ea1c9da830a1ee2c816d4e3b4d6cd5bfd [ Upstream commit 2b8e6b58889c672e1ae3601d9b2b070be4dc2fbc ] Returning a negative error code in a function with an unsigned return type is a pretty bad idea. It is probably worse when the justification for the change is "our static analisys tool found it". Fixes: cf7de25878a1 ("cppc_cpufreq: Fix possible null pointer dereference") Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lifeng Zheng <zhenglifeng1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 2b8e6b58889c672e1ae3601d9b2b070be4dc2fbc ]

Returning a negative error code in a function with an unsigned
return type is a pretty bad idea. It is probably worse when the
justification for the change is "our static analisys tool found it".

Fixes: cf7de25878a1 ("cppc_cpufreq: Fix possible null pointer dereference")
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Lifeng Zheng <zhenglifeng1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
cpufreq: scpi: Fix null-ptr-deref in scpi_cpufreq_get_rate() 2025-05-02T05:46:54+00:00 Henry Martin bsdhenrymartin@gmail.com 2025-04-08T15:03:54+00:00 da8ee91e532486055ecf88478d38c2f3dc234182 [ Upstream commit 73b24dc731731edf762f9454552cb3a5b7224949 ] cpufreq_cpu_get_raw() can return NULL when the target CPU is not present in the policy->cpus mask. scpi_cpufreq_get_rate() does not check for this case, which results in a NULL pointer dereference. Fixes: 343a8d17fa8d ("cpufreq: scpi: remove arm_big_little dependency") Signed-off-by: Henry Martin <bsdhenrymartin@gmail.com> Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 73b24dc731731edf762f9454552cb3a5b7224949 ]

cpufreq_cpu_get_raw() can return NULL when the target CPU is not present
in the policy->cpus mask. scpi_cpufreq_get_rate() does not check for
this case, which results in a NULL pointer dereference.

Fixes: 343a8d17fa8d ("cpufreq: scpi: remove arm_big_little dependency")
Signed-off-by: Henry Martin <bsdhenrymartin@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
cpufreq: scmi: Fix null-ptr-deref in scmi_cpufreq_get_rate() 2025-05-02T05:46:54+00:00 Henry Martin bsdhenrymartin@gmail.com 2025-04-08T15:03:53+00:00 f9c5423855e3687262d881aeee5cfb3bc8577bff [ Upstream commit 484d3f15cc6cbaa52541d6259778e715b2c83c54 ] cpufreq_cpu_get_raw() can return NULL when the target CPU is not present in the policy->cpus mask. scmi_cpufreq_get_rate() does not check for this case, which results in a NULL pointer dereference. Add NULL check after cpufreq_cpu_get_raw() to prevent this issue. Fixes: 99d6bdf33877 ("cpufreq: add support for CPU DVFS based on SCMI message protocol") Signed-off-by: Henry Martin <bsdhenrymartin@gmail.com> Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 484d3f15cc6cbaa52541d6259778e715b2c83c54 ]

cpufreq_cpu_get_raw() can return NULL when the target CPU is not present
in the policy->cpus mask. scmi_cpufreq_get_rate() does not check for
this case, which results in a NULL pointer dereference.

Add NULL check after cpufreq_cpu_get_raw() to prevent this issue.

Fixes: 99d6bdf33877 ("cpufreq: add support for CPU DVFS based on SCMI message protocol")
Signed-off-by: Henry Martin <bsdhenrymartin@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
cpufreq: Reference count policy in cpufreq_update_limits() 2025-04-25T08:44:00+00:00 Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com 2025-03-28T20:39:08+00:00 0bf87fafc190904bd57a584c2834bc5ea2976103 commit 9e4e249018d208678888bdf22f6b652728106528 upstream. Since acpi_processor_notify() can be called before registering a cpufreq driver or even in cases when a cpufreq driver is not registered at all, cpufreq_update_limits() needs to check if a cpufreq driver is present and prevent it from being unregistered. For this purpose, make it call cpufreq_cpu_get() to obtain a cpufreq policy pointer for the given CPU and reference count the corresponding policy object, if present. Fixes: 5a25e3f7cc53 ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: Driver-specific handling of _PPC updates") Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/Z-ShAR59cTow0KcR@mail-itl Reported-by: Marek Marczykowski-Górecki <marmarek@invisiblethingslab.com> Cc: All applicable <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/1928789.tdWV9SEqCh@rjwysocki.net [do not use __free(cpufreq_cpu_put) in a backport] Signed-off-by: Marek Marczykowski-Górecki <marmarek@invisiblethingslab.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 9e4e249018d208678888bdf22f6b652728106528 upstream.

Since acpi_processor_notify() can be called before registering a cpufreq
driver or even in cases when a cpufreq driver is not registered at all,
cpufreq_update_limits() needs to check if a cpufreq driver is present
and prevent it from being unregistered.

For this purpose, make it call cpufreq_cpu_get() to obtain a cpufreq
policy pointer for the given CPU and reference count the corresponding
policy object, if present.

Fixes: 5a25e3f7cc53 ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: Driver-specific handling of _PPC updates")
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/Z-ShAR59cTow0KcR@mail-itl
Reported-by: Marek Marczykowski-Górecki <marmarek@invisiblethingslab.com>
Cc: All applicable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/1928789.tdWV9SEqCh@rjwysocki.net
[do not use __free(cpufreq_cpu_put) in a backport]
Signed-off-by: Marek Marczykowski-Górecki <marmarek@invisiblethingslab.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>