linux-stable.git/drivers/cpufreq, branch v5.4.277

cpufreq: imx6q: Don't disable 792 Mhz OPP unnecessarily

2023-12-08T07:44:28+00:00

[ Upstream commit 2e4e0984c7d696cc74cf2fd7e7f62997f0e9ebe6 ]

For a 900MHz i.MX6ULL CPU the 792MHz OPP is disabled. There is no
convincing reason to disable this OPP. If a CPU can run at 900MHz,
it should also be able to cope with 792MHz. Looking at the voltage
level of 792MHz in [1] (page 24, table 10. "Operating Ranges") the
current defined OPP is above the minimum. So the voltage level
shouldn't be a problem. However in [2] (page 24, table 10.
"Operating Ranges"), it is not mentioned that 792MHz OPP isn't
allowed. Change it to only disable 792MHz OPP for i.MX6ULL types
below 792 MHz.

[1] https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/data-sheet/IMX6ULLIEC.pdf
[2] https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/data-sheet/IMX6ULLCEC.pdf

Fixes: 0aa9abd4c212 ("cpufreq: imx6q: check speed grades for i.MX6ULL")
Signed-off-by: Christoph Niedermaier 
Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut 
Reviewed-by: Fabio Estevam 
[ Viresh: Edited subject ]
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

cpufreq: imx6q: don't warn for disabling a non-existing frequency

2023-12-08T07:44:28+00:00

[ Upstream commit 11a3b0ac33d95aa84be426e801f800997262a225 ]

It is confusing if a warning is given for disabling a non-existent
frequency of the operating performance points (OPP). In this case
the function dev_pm_opp_disable() returns -ENODEV. Check the return
value and avoid the output of a warning in this case. Avoid code
duplication by using a separate function.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Niedermaier 
[ Viresh : Updated commit subject ]
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar 
Stable-dep-of: 2e4e0984c7d6 ("cpufreq: imx6q: Don't disable 792 Mhz OPP unnecessarily")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

cpufreq: brcmstb-avs-cpufreq: Fix -Warray-bounds bug

2023-09-23T08:59:56+00:00

commit e520d0b6be950ce3738cf4b9bd3b392be818f1dc upstream.

Allocate extra space for terminating element at:

drivers/cpufreq/brcmstb-avs-cpufreq.c:
449         table[i].frequency = CPUFREQ_TABLE_END;

and add code comment to make this clear.

This fixes the following -Warray-bounds warning seen after building
ARM with multi_v7_defconfig (GCC 13):
In function 'brcm_avs_get_freq_table',
    inlined from 'brcm_avs_cpufreq_init' at drivers/cpufreq/brcmstb-avs-cpufreq.c:623:15:
drivers/cpufreq/brcmstb-avs-cpufreq.c:449:28: warning: array subscript 5 is outside array bounds of 'void[60]' [-Warray-bounds=]
  449 |         table[i].frequency = CPUFREQ_TABLE_END;
In file included from include/linux/node.h:18,
                 from include/linux/cpu.h:17,
                 from include/linux/cpufreq.h:12,
                 from drivers/cpufreq/brcmstb-avs-cpufreq.c:44:
In function 'devm_kmalloc_array',
    inlined from 'devm_kcalloc' at include/linux/device.h:328:9,
    inlined from 'brcm_avs_get_freq_table' at drivers/cpufreq/brcmstb-avs-cpufreq.c:437:10,
    inlined from 'brcm_avs_cpufreq_init' at drivers/cpufreq/brcmstb-avs-cpufreq.c:623:15:
include/linux/device.h:323:16: note: at offset 60 into object of size 60 allocated by 'devm_kmalloc'
  323 |         return devm_kmalloc(dev, bytes, flags);
      |                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

This helps with the ongoing efforts to tighten the FORTIFY_SOURCE
routines on memcpy() and help us make progress towards globally
enabling -Warray-bounds.

Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/324
Fixes: de322e085995 ("cpufreq: brcmstb-avs-cpufreq: AVS CPUfreq driver for Broadcom STB SoCs")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva 
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli 
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

cpufreq: Fix the race condition while updating the transition_task of policy

2023-09-23T08:59:53+00:00

[ Upstream commit 61bfbf7951ba561dcbdd5357702d3cbc2d447812 ]

The field 'transition_task' of policy structure is used to track the
task which is performing the frequency transition. Using this field to
print a warning once detect a case where the same task is calling
_begin() again before completing the preivous frequency transition via
the _end().

However, there is a potential race condition in _end() and _begin() APIs
while updating the field 'transition_task' of policy, the scenario is
depicted below:

             Task A                            Task B

        /* 1st freq transition */
        Invoke _begin() {
                ...
                ...
        }
                                        /* 2nd freq transition */
                                        Invoke _begin() {
                                                ... //waiting for A to
                                                ... //clear
                                                ... //transition_ongoing
                                                ... //in _end() for
                                                ... //the 1st transition
                                                        |
        Change the frequency                            |
                                                        |
        Invoke _end() {                                 |
                ...                                     |
                ...                                     |
                transition_ongoing = false;             V
                                                transition_ongoing = true;
                                                transition_task = current;
                transition_task = NULL;
                ... //A overwrites the task
                ... //performing the transition
                ... //result in error warning.
        }

To fix this race condition, the transition_lock of policy structure is
now acquired before updating policy structure in _end() API. Which ensure
that only one task can update the 'transition_task' field at a time.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/b3c61d8a-d52d-3136-fbf0-d1de9f1ba411@huawei.com/
Fixes: ca654dc3a93d ("cpufreq: Catch double invocations of cpufreq_freq_transition_begin/end")
Signed-off-by: Liao Chang 
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar 
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

cpufreq: powernow-k8: Use related_cpus instead of cpus in driver.exit()

2023-09-23T08:59:41+00:00

[ Upstream commit 03997da042dac73c69e60d91942c727c76828b65 ]

Since the 'cpus' field of policy structure will become empty in the
cpufreq core API, it is better to use 'related_cpus' in the exit()
callback of driver.

Fixes: c3274763bfc3 ("cpufreq: powernow-k8: Initialize per-cpu data-structures properly")
Signed-off-by: Liao Chang 
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

cpufreq: intel_pstate: Drop ACPI _PSS states table patching

2023-08-11T09:53:53+00:00

commit e8a0e30b742f76ebd0f3b196973df4bf65d8fbbb upstream.

After making acpi_processor_get_platform_limit() use the "no limit"
value for its frequency QoS request when _PPC returns 0, it is not
necessary to replace the frequency corresponding to the first _PSS
return package entry with the maximum turbo frequency of the given
CPU in intel_pstate_init_acpi_perf_limits() any more, so drop the
code doing that along with the comment explaining it.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 
Tested-by: Hagar Hemdan 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

cpufreq: armada-37xx: stop using 0 as NULL pointer

2023-02-06T06:52:41+00:00

[ Upstream commit 08f0adb193c008de640fde34a2e00a666c01d77c ]

Use NULL for NULL pointer to fix the following sparse warning:
drivers/cpufreq/armada-37xx-cpufreq.c:448:32: sparse: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer

Signed-off-by: Miles Chen 
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

cpufreq: Add Tegra234 to cpufreq-dt-platdev blocklist

2023-02-06T06:52:41+00:00

[ Upstream commit 01c5bb0cc2a39fbc56ff9a5ef28b79447f0c2351 ]

Tegra234 platform uses the tegra194-cpufreq driver, so add it
to the blocklist in cpufreq-dt-platdev driver to avoid the cpufreq
driver registration from there.

Signed-off-by: Sumit Gupta 
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

cpufreq: Init completion before kobject_init_and_add()

2023-01-18T10:41:46+00:00

commit 5c51054896bcce1d33d39fead2af73fec24f40b6 upstream.

In cpufreq_policy_alloc(), it will call uninitialed completion in
cpufreq_sysfs_release() when kobject_init_and_add() fails. And
that will cause a crash such as the following page fault in complete:

BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: fffffffffffffff8
[..]
RIP: 0010:complete+0x98/0x1f0
[..]
Call Trace:
 kobject_put+0x1be/0x4c0
 cpufreq_online.cold+0xee/0x1fd
 cpufreq_add_dev+0x183/0x1e0
 subsys_interface_register+0x3f5/0x4e0
 cpufreq_register_driver+0x3b7/0x670
 acpi_cpufreq_init+0x56c/0x1000 [acpi_cpufreq]
 do_one_initcall+0x13d/0x780
 do_init_module+0x1c3/0x630
 load_module+0x6e67/0x73b0
 __do_sys_finit_module+0x181/0x240
 do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

Fixes: 4ebe36c94aed ("cpufreq: Fix kobject memleak")
Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Liu 
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar 
Cc: 5.2+  # 5.2+
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

cpufreq: amd_freq_sensitivity: Add missing pci_dev_put()

2023-01-18T10:40:55+00:00

[ Upstream commit 91fda1f88c0968f1491ab150bb01690525af150a ]

pci_get_device() will increase the reference count for the returned
pci_dev. We need to use pci_dev_put() to decrease the reference count
after using pci_get_device(). Let's add it.

Fixes: 59a3b3a8db16 ("cpufreq: AMD: Ignore the check for ProcFeedback in ST/CZ")
Signed-off-by: Xiongfeng Wang 
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin