linux-stable.git/drivers/cpufreq, branch v5.4.232

cpufreq: armada-37xx: stop using 0 as NULL pointer

2023-02-06T06:52:41+00:00

[ Upstream commit 08f0adb193c008de640fde34a2e00a666c01d77c ]

Use NULL for NULL pointer to fix the following sparse warning:
drivers/cpufreq/armada-37xx-cpufreq.c:448:32: sparse: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer

Signed-off-by: Miles Chen 
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

cpufreq: Add Tegra234 to cpufreq-dt-platdev blocklist

2023-02-06T06:52:41+00:00

[ Upstream commit 01c5bb0cc2a39fbc56ff9a5ef28b79447f0c2351 ]

Tegra234 platform uses the tegra194-cpufreq driver, so add it
to the blocklist in cpufreq-dt-platdev driver to avoid the cpufreq
driver registration from there.

Signed-off-by: Sumit Gupta 
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

cpufreq: Init completion before kobject_init_and_add()

2023-01-18T10:41:46+00:00

commit 5c51054896bcce1d33d39fead2af73fec24f40b6 upstream.

In cpufreq_policy_alloc(), it will call uninitialed completion in
cpufreq_sysfs_release() when kobject_init_and_add() fails. And
that will cause a crash such as the following page fault in complete:

BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: fffffffffffffff8
[..]
RIP: 0010:complete+0x98/0x1f0
[..]
Call Trace:
 kobject_put+0x1be/0x4c0
 cpufreq_online.cold+0xee/0x1fd
 cpufreq_add_dev+0x183/0x1e0
 subsys_interface_register+0x3f5/0x4e0
 cpufreq_register_driver+0x3b7/0x670
 acpi_cpufreq_init+0x56c/0x1000 [acpi_cpufreq]
 do_one_initcall+0x13d/0x780
 do_init_module+0x1c3/0x630
 load_module+0x6e67/0x73b0
 __do_sys_finit_module+0x181/0x240
 do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

Fixes: 4ebe36c94aed ("cpufreq: Fix kobject memleak")
Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Liu 
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar 
Cc: 5.2+  # 5.2+
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

cpufreq: amd_freq_sensitivity: Add missing pci_dev_put()

2023-01-18T10:40:55+00:00

[ Upstream commit 91fda1f88c0968f1491ab150bb01690525af150a ]

pci_get_device() will increase the reference count for the returned
pci_dev. We need to use pci_dev_put() to decrease the reference count
after using pci_get_device(). Let's add it.

Fixes: 59a3b3a8db16 ("cpufreq: AMD: Ignore the check for ProcFeedback in ST/CZ")
Signed-off-by: Xiongfeng Wang 
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

x86/devicetable: Move x86 specific macro out of generic code

2022-10-07T07:16:54+00:00

commit ba5bade4cc0d2013cdf5634dae554693c968a090 upstream.

There is no reason that this gunk is in a generic header file. The wildcard
defines need to stay as they are required by file2alias.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner 
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov 
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman 
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200320131508.736205164@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

cpufreq: pmac32-cpufreq: Fix refcount leak bug

2022-07-21T18:59:24+00:00

[ Upstream commit ccd7567d4b6cf187fdfa55f003a9e461ee629e36 ]

In pmac_cpufreq_init_MacRISC3(), we need to add corresponding
of_node_put() for the three node pointers whose refcount have
been incremented by of_find_node_by_name().

Signed-off-by: Liang He 
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

Revert "cpufreq: Fix possible race in cpufreq online error path"

2022-06-14T16:11:36+00:00

[ Upstream commit 85f0e42bd65d01b351d561efb38e584d4c596553 ]

This reverts commit f346e96267cd76175d6c201b40f770c0116a8a04.

The commit tried to fix a possible real bug but it made it even worse.
The fix was simply buggy as now an error out to out_offline_policy or
out_exit_policy will try to release a semaphore which was never taken in
the first place. This works fine only if we failed late, i.e. via
out_destroy_policy.

Fixes: f346e96267cd ("cpufreq: Fix possible race in cpufreq online error path")
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar 
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

cpufreq: Fix possible race in cpufreq online error path

2022-06-14T16:11:33+00:00

[ Upstream commit f346e96267cd76175d6c201b40f770c0116a8a04 ]

When cpufreq online fails, the policy->cpus mask is not cleared and
policy->rwsem is released too early, so the driver can be invoked
via the cpuinfo_cur_freq sysfs attribute while its ->offline() or
->exit() callbacks are being run.

Take policy->clk as an example:

static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu)
{
  ...
  // policy->cpus != 0 at this time
  down_write(&policy->rwsem);
  ret = cpufreq_add_dev_interface(policy);
  up_write(&policy->rwsem);

  return 0;

out_destroy_policy:
	for_each_cpu(j, policy->real_cpus)
		remove_cpu_dev_symlink(policy, get_cpu_device(j));
    up_write(&policy->rwsem);
...
out_exit_policy:
  if (cpufreq_driver->exit)
    cpufreq_driver->exit(policy);
      clk_put(policy->clk);
      // policy->clk is a wild pointer
...
                                    ^
                                    |
                            Another process access
                            __cpufreq_get
                              cpufreq_verify_current_freq
                                cpufreq_generic_get
                                  // acces wild pointer of policy->clk;
                                    |
                                    |
out_offline_policy:                 |
  cpufreq_policy_free(policy);      |
    // deleted here, and will wait for no body reference
    cpufreq_policy_put_kobj(policy);
}

Address this by modifying cpufreq_online() to release policy->rwsem
in the error path after the driver callbacks have run and to clear
policy->cpus before releasing the semaphore.

Fixes: 7106e02baed4 ("cpufreq: release policy->rwsem on error")
Signed-off-by: Schspa Shi 
[ rjw: Subject and changelog edits ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

cpufreq: fix memory leak in sun50i_cpufreq_nvmem_probe

2022-05-09T07:03:25+00:00

[ Upstream commit 1aa24a8f3b5133dae4bc1e57427e345445f3e902 ]

--------------------------------------------
unreferenced object 0xffff000010742a00 (size 128):
  comm "swapper/0", pid 1, jiffies 4294902015 (age 1187.652s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
    00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
  backtrace:
    [<00000000b4dfebaa>] __kmalloc+0x338/0x474
    [<00000000d6e716db>] sun50i_cpufreq_nvmem_probe+0xc4/0x36c
    [<000000007d6082a0>] platform_probe+0x98/0x11c
    [<00000000c990f549>] really_probe+0x234/0x5a0
    [<000000002d9fecc6>] __driver_probe_device+0x194/0x224
    [<00000000cf0b94fa>] driver_probe_device+0x64/0x13c
    [<00000000f238e4cf>] __device_attach_driver+0xf8/0x180
    [<000000006720e418>] bus_for_each_drv+0xf8/0x160
    [<00000000df4f14f6>] __device_attach+0x174/0x29c
    [<00000000782002fb>] device_initial_probe+0x20/0x30
    [<00000000c2681b06>] bus_probe_device+0xfc/0x110
    [<00000000964cf3bd>] device_add+0x5f0/0xcd0
    [<000000004b9264e3>] platform_device_add+0x198/0x390
    [<00000000fa82a9d0>] platform_device_register_full+0x178/0x210
    [<000000009a5daf13>] sun50i_cpufreq_init+0xf8/0x168
    [<000000000377cc7c>] do_one_initcall+0xe4/0x570
--------------------------------------------

if sun50i_cpufreq_get_efuse failed, then opp_tables leak.

Fixes: f328584f7bff ("cpufreq: Add sun50i nvmem based CPU scaling driver")
Signed-off-by: Xiaobing Luo 
Reviewed-by: Samuel Holland 
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

cpufreq: Fix initialization of min and max frequency QoS requests

2022-01-27T08:19:44+00:00

[ Upstream commit 521223d8b3ec078f670c7c35a1a04b1b2af07966 ]

The min and max frequency QoS requests in the cpufreq core are
initialized to whatever the current min and max frequency values are
at the init time, but if any of these values change later (for
example, cpuinfo.max_freq is updated by the driver), these initial
request values will be limiting the CPU frequency unnecessarily
unless they are changed by user space via sysfs.

To address this, initialize min_freq_req and max_freq_req to
FREQ_QOS_MIN_DEFAULT_VALUE and FREQ_QOS_MAX_DEFAULT_VALUE,
respectively, so they don't really limit anything until user
space updates them.

Reported-by: Srinivas Pandruvada 
Tested-by: Srinivas Pandruvada 
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin