linux-stable.git/drivers/cpufreq, branch v4.4.201

cpufreq: Avoid cpufreq_suspend() deadlock on system shutdown

2019-10-29T08:13:31+00:00

commit 65650b35133ff20f0c9ef0abd5c3c66dbce3ae57 upstream.

It is incorrect to set the cpufreq syscore shutdown callback pointer
to cpufreq_suspend(), because that function cannot be run in the
syscore stage of system shutdown for two reasons: (a) it may attempt
to carry out actions depending on devices that have already been shut
down at that point and (b) the RCU synchronization carried out by it
may not be able to make progress then.

The latter issue has been present since commit 45975c7d21a1 ("rcu:
Define RCU-sched API in terms of RCU for Tree RCU PREEMPT builds"),
but the former one has been there since commit 90de2a4aa9f3 ("cpufreq:
suspend cpufreq governors on shutdown") regardless.

Fix that by dropping cpufreq_syscore_ops altogether and making
device_shutdown() call cpufreq_suspend() directly before shutting
down devices, which is along the lines of what system-wide power
management does.

Fixes: 45975c7d21a1 ("rcu: Define RCU-sched API in terms of RCU for Tree RCU PREEMPT builds")
Fixes: 90de2a4aa9f3 ("cpufreq: suspend cpufreq governors on shutdown")
Reported-by: Ville Syrjälä 
Tested-by: Ville Syrjälä 
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar 
Cc: 4.0+  # 4.0+
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

cpufreq/pasemi: fix use-after-free in pas_cpufreq_cpu_init()

2019-08-25T08:52:47+00:00

[ Upstream commit e0a12445d1cb186d875410d093a00d215bec6a89 ]

The cpu variable is still being used in the of_get_property() call
after the of_node_put() call, which may result in use-after-free.

Fixes: a9acc26b75f6 ("cpufreq/pasemi: fix possible object reference leak")
Signed-off-by: Wen Yang 
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar 
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

cpufreq: pmac32: fix possible object reference leak

2019-06-11T10:24:01+00:00

[ Upstream commit 8d10dc28a9ea6e8c02e825dab28699f3c72b02d9 ]

The call to of_find_node_by_name returns a node pointer with refcount
incremented thus it must be explicitly decremented after the last
usage.

Detected by coccinelle with the following warnings:
./drivers/cpufreq/pmac32-cpufreq.c:557:2-8: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 552, but without a corresponding object release within this function.
./drivers/cpufreq/pmac32-cpufreq.c:569:1-7: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 552, but without a corresponding object release within this function.
./drivers/cpufreq/pmac32-cpufreq.c:598:1-7: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 587, but without a corresponding object release within this function.

Signed-off-by: Wen Yang 
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" 
Cc: Viresh Kumar 
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt 
Cc: Paul Mackerras 
Cc: Michael Ellerman 
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

cpufreq/pasemi: fix possible object reference leak

2019-06-11T10:24:01+00:00

[ Upstream commit a9acc26b75f652f697e02a9febe2ab0da648a571 ]

The call to of_get_cpu_node returns a node pointer with refcount
incremented thus it must be explicitly decremented after the last
usage.

Detected by coccinelle with the following warnings:
./drivers/cpufreq/pasemi-cpufreq.c:212:1-7: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 147, but without a corresponding object release within this function.
./drivers/cpufreq/pasemi-cpufreq.c:220:1-7: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 147, but without a corresponding object release within this function.

Signed-off-by: Wen Yang 
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" 
Cc: Viresh Kumar 
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

cpufreq: ppc_cbe: fix possible object reference leak

2019-06-11T10:24:01+00:00

[ Upstream commit 233298032803f2802fe99892d0de4ab653bfece4 ]

The call to of_get_cpu_node returns a node pointer with refcount
incremented thus it must be explicitly decremented after the last
usage.

Detected by coccinelle with the following warnings:
./drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq.c:89:2-8: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 76, but without a corresponding object release within this function.
./drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq.c:89:2-8: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 76, but without a corresponding object release within this function.

Signed-off-by: Wen Yang 
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" 
Cc: Viresh Kumar 
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

cpufreq: pxa2xx: remove incorrect __init annotation

2019-03-23T07:44:36+00:00

commit 9505b98ccddc454008ca7efff90044e3e857c827 upstream.

pxa_cpufreq_init_voltages() is marked __init but usually inlined into
the non-__init pxa_cpufreq_init() function. When building with clang,
it can stay as a standalone function in a discarded section, and produce
this warning:

WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x616a00): Section mismatch in reference from the function pxa_cpufreq_init() to the function .init.text:pxa_cpufreq_init_voltages()
The function pxa_cpufreq_init() references
the function __init pxa_cpufreq_init_voltages().
This is often because pxa_cpufreq_init lacks a __init
annotation or the annotation of pxa_cpufreq_init_voltages is wrong.

Fixes: 50e77fcd790e ("ARM: pxa: remove __init from cpufreq_driver->init()")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann 
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar 
Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor 
Acked-by: Robert Jarzmik 
Cc: All applicable 
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

cpufreq: tegra124: add missing of_node_put()

2019-03-23T07:44:36+00:00

commit 446fae2bb5395f3028d8e3aae1508737e5a72ea1 upstream.

of_cpu_device_node_get() will increase the refcount of device_node,
it is necessary to call of_node_put() at the end to release the
refcount.

Fixes: 9eb15dbbfa1a2 ("cpufreq: Add cpufreq driver for Tegra124")
Cc:  # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li 
Acked-by: Thierry Reding 
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

cpufreq: Use struct kobj_attribute instead of struct global_attr

2019-03-23T07:44:21+00:00

commit 625c85a62cb7d3c79f6e16de3cfa972033658250 upstream.

The cpufreq_global_kobject is created using kobject_create_and_add()
helper, which assigns the kobj_type as dynamic_kobj_ktype and show/store
routines are set to kobj_attr_show() and kobj_attr_store().

These routines pass struct kobj_attribute as an argument to the
show/store callbacks. But all the cpufreq files created using the
cpufreq_global_kobject expect the argument to be of type struct
attribute. Things work fine currently as no one accesses the "attr"
argument. We may not see issues even if the argument is used, as struct
kobj_attribute has struct attribute as its first element and so they
will both get same address.

But this is logically incorrect and we should rather use struct
kobj_attribute instead of struct global_attr in the cpufreq core and
drivers and the show/store callbacks should take struct kobj_attribute
as argument instead.

This bug is caught using CFI CLANG builds in android kernel which
catches mismatch in function prototypes for such callbacks.

Reported-by: Donghee Han 
Reported-by: Sangkyu Kim 
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar 
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

cpufreq: imx6q: add return value check for voltage scale

2018-12-01T08:46:34+00:00

[ Upstream commit 6ef28a04d1ccf718eee069b72132ce4aa1e52ab9 ]

Add return value check for voltage scale when ARM clock
rate change fail.

Signed-off-by: Anson Huang 
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar 
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

cpufreq: Fix new policy initialization during limits updates via sysfs

2018-07-03T09:21:26+00:00

commit c7d1f119c48f64bebf0fa1e326af577c6152fe30 upstream.

If the policy limits are updated via cpufreq_update_policy() and
subsequently via sysfs, the limits stored in user_policy may be
set incorrectly.

For example, if both min and max are set via sysfs to the maximum
available frequency, user_policy.min and user_policy.max will also
be the maximum.  If a policy notifier triggered by
cpufreq_update_policy() lowers both the min and the max at this
point, that change is not reflected by the user_policy limits, so
if the max is updated again via sysfs to the same lower value,
then user_policy.max will be lower than user_policy.min which
shouldn't happen.  In particular, if one of the policy CPUs is
then taken offline and back online, cpufreq_set_policy() will
fail for it due to a failing limits check.

To prevent that from happening, initialize the min and max fields
of the new_policy object to the ones stored in user_policy that
were previously set via sysfs.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Wangtao 
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar 
[ rjw: Subject & changelog ]
Cc: All applicable 
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman