commit 6e34e1f23d780978da65968327cbba6d7013a73f upstream.

The busy percent calculated for the Knights Landing (KNL) platform
is 1024 times smaller than the correct busy value.  This causes
performance to get stuck at the lowest ratio.

The scaling algorithm used for KNL is performance-based, but it still
looks at the CPU load to set the scaled busy factor to 0 when the
load is less than 1 percent.  In this case, since the computed load
is 1024x smaller than it should be, the scaled busy factor will
always be 0, irrespective of CPU business.

This needs a fix similar to the turbostat one in commit b2b34dfe4d9a
(tools/power turbostat: KNL workaround for %Busy and Avg_MHz).

For this reason, add one more callback to processor-specific
callbacks to specify an MPERF multiplier represented by a number of
bit positions to shift the value of that register to the left to
copmensate for its rate difference with respect to the TSC.  This
shift value is used during CPU busy calculations.

Fixes: ffb810563c (intel_pstate: Avoid getting stuck in high P-states when idle)
Reported-and-tested-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
[ rjw: Changelog ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

* pm-cpufreq:
  cpufreq: conservative: Allow down_threshold to take values from 1 to 10
  Revert "cpufreq: schedutil: Reduce frequencies slower"

* pm-cpuidle:
  cpuidle: dt: Add missing 'of_node_put()'

* pm-devfreq:
  PM / devfreq: exynos-ppmu: Staticize event list
  PM / devfreq: exynos-ppmu: Handle return value of clk_prepare_enable
  PM / devfreq: exynos-nocp: Handle return value of clk_prepare_enable

Commit 27ed3cd2ebf4 (cpufreq: conservative: Fix the logic in frequency
decrease checking) removed the 10 point substraction when comparing the
load against down_threshold but did not remove the related limit for the
down_threshold value.  As a result, down_threshold lower than 11 is not
allowed even though values from 1 to 10 do work correctly too. The
comment ("cannot be lower than 11 otherwise freq will not fall") also
does not apply after removing the substraction.

For this reason, allow down_threshold to take any value from 1 to 99
and fix the related comment.

Fixes: 27ed3cd2ebf4 (cpufreq: conservative: Fix the logic in frequency decrease checking)
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Wilczyński <twilczynski@naver.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: 3.10+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.10+
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

* intel_pstate:
  cpufreq: intel_pstate: Avoid division by 0 in min_perf_pct_min()

* pm-sleep:
  Revert "ACPI / sleep: Ignore spurious SCI wakeups from suspend-to-idle"

Commit c5a2ee7dde89 (cpufreq: intel_pstate: Active mode P-state
limits rework) incorrectly assumed that pstate.turbo_pstate would
always be nonzero for CPU0 in min_perf_pct_min() if
cpufreq_register_driver() had succeeded which may not be the case
in virtualized environments.

If that assumption doesn't hold, it leads to an early crash on boot
in intel_pstate_register_driver(), so add a sanity check to
min_perf_pct_min() to prevent the crash from happening.

Fixes: c5a2ee7dde89 (cpufreq: intel_pstate: Active mode P-state limits rework)
Reported-and-tested-by: Jongman Heo <jongman.heo@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

* pm-cpufreq:
  cpufreq: kirkwood-cpufreq:- Handle return value of clk_prepare_enable()
  cpufreq: cpufreq_register_driver() should return -ENODEV if init fails

clk_prepare_enable() can fail here and we must check its return value.

Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

For a driver that does not set the CPUFREQ_STICKY flag, if all of the
->init() calls fail, cpufreq_register_driver() should return an error.
This will prevent the driver from loading.

Fixes: ce1bcfe94db8 (cpufreq: check cpufreq_policy_list instead of scanning policies for all CPUs)
Cc: 4.0+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.0+
Signed-off-by: David Arcari <darcari@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

* intel_pstate:
  cpufreq: intel_pstate: Document the current behavior and user interface

* pm-cpufreq:
  cpufreq: dbx500: add a Kconfig symbol

* pm-cpufreq-sched:
  cpufreq: schedutil: use now as reference when aggregating shared policy requests

Moving the cooling code into the cpufreq driver caused a possible build failure
when the cpu_thermal helper code is a loadable module or disabled:

drivers/cpufreq/dbx500-cpufreq.o: In function `dbx500_cpufreq_ready':
dbx500-cpufreq.c:(.text.dbx500_cpufreq_ready+0x4): undefined reference to `cpufreq_cooling_register'

This adds the same dependency that we have in other cpufreq drivers,
forcing the driver to be disabled when we can't possibly link it.

Fixes: 19678ffb9fd6 (cpufreq: dbx500: Manage cooling device from cpufreq driver)
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>