Based on 1 normalized pattern(s):

  this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify
  it under the terms of the gnu general public license as published by
  the free software foundation version 2 of the license

extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier

  GPL-2.0-only

has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 315 file(s).

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net>
Reviewed-by: Armijn Hemel <armijn@tjaldur.nl>
Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190531190115.503150771@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Using static_cpu_has() is pointless on those paths, convert them to the
boot_cpu_has() variant.

No functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

While the cpuinfo.max_freq value doesn't really matter for
intel_pstate in the active mode, in the passive mode it is used by
governors as the maximum physical frequency of the CPU and the
results of governor computations generally depend on it.  Also it
is made available to user space via sysfs and it should match the
current HW configuration.

For this reason, make intel_pstate update cpuinfo.max_freq for all
CPUs if it detects a global change of turbo frequency settings from
"disable" to "enable" or the other way associated with a _PPC change
notification from the platform firmware.

Note that policy_is_inactive(),  cpufreq_cpu_acquire(),
cpufreq_cpu_release(), and cpufreq_set_policy() need to be made
available to it for this purpose.

Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200759
Reported-by: Gabriele Mazzotta <gabriele.mzt@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Gabriele Mazzotta <gabriele.mzt@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

In some cases, the platform firmware disables or enables turbo
frequencies for all CPUs globally before triggering a _PPC change
notification for one of them.  Obviously, that global change affects
all CPUs, not just the notified one, and it needs to be acted upon by
cpufreq.

The intel_pstate driver is able to detect such global changes of
the settings, but it also needs to update policy limits for all
CPUs if that happens, in particular if turbo frequencies are
enabled globally - to allow them to be used.

For this reason, introduce a new cpufreq driver callback to be
invoked on _PPC notifications, if present, instead of simply
calling cpufreq_update_policy() for the notified CPU and make
intel_pstate use it to trigger policy updates for all CPUs
in the system if global settings change.

Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200759
Reported-by: Gabriele Mazzotta <gabriele.mzt@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Gabriele Mazzotta <gabriele.mzt@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

This driver is Intel-only so loading on anything which is not Intel is
pointless. Prevent it from doing so.

While at it, correct the "not supported" print statement to say CPU
"model" which is what that test does.

Fixes: 076b862c7e44 (cpufreq: intel_pstate: Add reasons for failure and debug messages)
Suggested-by: Erwan Velu <e.velu@criteo.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The ACPI specification states that if the "Guaranteed Performance
Register" is not implemented, the OSPM assumes guaranteed performance
to always be equal to nominal performance.

So for invalid or unimplemented guaranteed performance register, use
nominal performance as guaranteed performance.

This change will fall back to nominal_perf when guranteed_perf is
invalid.  If nominal_perf is also invalid or not present, fall back
to the existing implementation, which is to read from HWP Capabilities
MSR.

Fixes: 86d333a8cc7f ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: Add base_frequency attribute")
Suggested-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Cc: 4.20+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.20+
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

After commit b8bd1581aa61 ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: Rework iowait
boosting to be less aggressive") the handling of the case when
the SCHED_CPUFREQ_IOWAIT flag is set again after a few iterations of
intel_pstate_update_util() is a bit inconsistent, because the
new value of cpu->iowait_boost may be lower than ONE_EIGHTH_FP
if it was set before, but has not dropped down to zero just yet.

Fix that up by ensuring that the new value of cpu->iowait_boost
will always be at least ONE_EIGHTH_FP then.

Fixes: b8bd1581aa61 ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: Rework iowait boosting to be less aggressive")
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The current iowait boosting mechanism in intel_pstate_update_util()
is quite aggressive, as it goes to the maximum P-state right away,
and may cause excessive amounts of energy to be used, which is not
desirable and arguably isn't necessary too.

Follow commit a5a0809bc58e ("cpufreq: schedutil: Make iowait boost
more energy efficient") that reworked the analogous iowait boost
mechanism in the schedutil governor and make the iowait boosting
in intel_pstate_update_util() work along the same lines.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

There is only one caller of intel_pstate_get_base_pstate() and it is
more straightforward to carry out the computation directly in the
caller, so do that and drop intel_pstate_get_base_pstate().

No intentional changes of behavior.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>