linux-stable.git/drivers/clk, branch v4.9.129

clk: clk-fixed-factor: Clear OF_POPULATED flag in case of failure

2018-09-26T06:36:31+00:00

[ Upstream commit f6dab4233d6b64d719109040503b567f71fbfa01 ]

Fixed factor clock has two initializations at of_clk_init() time
and during platform driver probe. Before of_clk_init() call,
node is marked as populated and so its probe never gets called.

During of_clk_init() fixed factor clock registration may fail if
any of its parent clock is not registered. In this case, it doesn't
get chance to retry registration from probe. Clear OF_POPULATED
flag if fixed factor clock registration fails so that clock
registration is attempted again from probe.

Signed-off-by: Rajan Vaja 
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

clk: imx6ul: fix missing of_node_put()

2018-09-26T06:36:31+00:00

[ Upstream commit 11177e7a7aaef95935592072985526ebf0a3df43 ]

of_find_compatible_node() is returning a device node with refcount
incremented and must be explicitly decremented after the last use
which is right after the us in of_iomap() here.

Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire 
Fixes: 787b4271a6a0 ("clk: imx: add imx6ul clk tree support")
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

clk: rockchip: Add pclk_rkpwm_pmu to PMU critical clocks in rk3399

2018-09-15T07:43:00+00:00

[ Upstream commit 640332d1a089909df08bc9f3e42888a2019c66e2 ]

PWM2 is commonly used to control voltage of PWM regulator of VDD_LOG in
RK3399. On the Firefly-RK3399 board, PWM2 outputs 40 KHz square wave
from power on and the VDD_LOG is about 0.9V. When the kernel boots
normally into the system, the PWM2 keeps outputing PWM signal.

But the kernel hangs randomly after "Starting kernel ..." line on that
board. When it happens, PWM2 outputs high level which causes VDD_LOG
drops to 0.4V below the normal operating voltage.

By adding "pclk_rkpwm_pmu" to the rk3399_pmucru_critical_clocks array,
PWM clock is ensured to be prepared at startup and the PWM2 output is
normal. After repeated tests, the early boot hang is gone.

This patch works on both Firefly-RK3399 and ROC-RK3399-PC boards.

Signed-off-by: Levin Du 
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

clk: rockchip: fix clk_i2sout parent selection bits on rk3399

2018-09-05T07:20:11+00:00

commit a64ad008980c65d38e6cf6858429c78e6b740c41 upstream.

Register, shift and mask were wrong according to datasheet.

Fixes: 115510053e5e ("clk: rockchip: add clock controller for the RK3399")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alberto Panizzo 
Signed-off-by: Anthony Brandon 
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

clk: at91: PLL recalc_rate() now using cached MUL and DIV values

2018-07-03T09:23:13+00:00

commit a982e45dc150da3a08907b6dd676b735391704b4 upstream.

When a USB device is connected to the USB host port on the SAM9N12 then
you get "-62" error which seems to indicate USB replies from the device
are timing out. Based on a logic sniffer, I saw the USB bus was running
at half speed.

The PLL code uses cached MUL and DIV values which get set in set_rate()
and applied in prepare(), but the recalc_rate() function instead
queries the hardware instead of using these cached values. Therefore,
if recalc_rate() is called between a set_rate() and prepare(), the
wrong frequency is calculated and later the USB clock divider for the
SAM9N12 SOC will be configured for an incorrect clock.

In my case, the PLL hardware was set to 96 Mhz before the OHCI
driver loads, and therefore the usb clock divider was being set
to /2 even though the OHCI driver set the PLL to 48 Mhz.

As an alternative explanation, I noticed this was fixed in the past by
87e2ed338f1b ("clk: at91: fix recalc_rate implementation of PLL
driver") but the bug was later re-introduced by 1bdf02326b71 ("clk:
at91: make use of syscon/regmap internally").

Fixes: 1bdf02326b71 ("clk: at91: make use of syscon/regmap internally)
Cc: 
Signed-off-by: Marcin Ziemianowicz 
Acked-by: Boris Brezillon 
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

clk: renesas: cpg-mssr: Stop using printk format %pCr

2018-07-03T09:23:06+00:00

commit ef4b0be62641d296cf4c0ad8f75ab83ab066ed51 upstream.

Printk format "%pCr" will be removed soon, as clk_get_rate() must not be
called in atomic context.

Replace it by open-coding the operation.  This is safe here, as the code
runs in task context.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1527845302-12159-2-git-send-email-geert+renesas@glider.be
To: Jia-Ju Bai 
To: Jonathan Corbet 
To: Michael Turquette 
To: Stephen Boyd 
To: Zhang Rui 
To: Eduardo Valentin 
To: Eric Anholt 
To: Stefan Wahren 
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman 
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky 
Cc: Petr Mladek 
Cc: Linus Torvalds 
Cc: Steven Rostedt 
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven 
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.5+
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven 
Acked-by: Stephen Boyd 
Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

clk: samsung: exynos3250: Fix PLL rates

2018-05-25T14:13:12+00:00

[ Upstream commit a8321e7887410a2b2e80ab89d1ef7b30562658ea ]

Rates declared in PLL rate tables should match exactly rates calculated
from PLL coefficients. If that is not the case, rate of the PLL's child clock
might be set not as expected. For instance, if in the PLL rates table we have
a 393216000 Hz entry and the real value as returned by the PLL's recalc_rate
callback is 393216003, after setting PLL's clk rate to 393216000 clk_get_rate
will return 393216003. If we now attempt to set rate of a PLL's child divider
clock to 393216000/2 its rate will be 131072001, rather than 196608000.
That is, the divider will be set to 3 instead of 2, because 393216003/2 is
greater than 196608000.

To fix this issue declared rates are changed to exactly match rates generated
by the PLL, as calculated from the P, M, S, K coefficients.

In this patch an erroneous P value for 74176002 output frequency is also
corrected.

Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda 
Acked-by: Chanwoo Choi 
Acked-by: Tomasz Figa 
Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

clk: samsung: exynos5250: Fix PLL rates

2018-05-25T14:13:12+00:00

[ Upstream commit 2ac051eeabaa411ef89ae7cd5bb8e60cb41ad780 ]

Rates declared in PLL rate tables should match exactly rates calculated
from PLL coefficients. If that is not the case, rate of the PLL's child clock
might be set not as expected. For instance, if in the PLL rates table we have
a 393216000 Hz entry and the real value as returned by the PLL's recalc_rate
callback is 393216003, after setting PLL's clk rate to 393216000 clk_get_rate
will return 393216003. If we now attempt to set rate of a PLL's child divider
clock to 393216000/2 its rate will be 131072001, rather than 196608000.
That is, the divider will be set to 3 instead of 2, because 393216003/2 is
greater than 196608000.

To fix this issue declared rates are changed to exactly match rates generated
by the PLL, as calculated from the P, M, S, K coefficients.

Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda 
Acked-by: Chanwoo Choi 
Acked-by: Tomasz Figa 
Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

clk: samsung: exynos5433: Fix PLL rates

2018-05-25T14:13:11+00:00

[ Upstream commit ab0447845cffc0fd752df2ccd6b4e34006000ce4 ]

Rates declared in PLL rate tables should match exactly rates calculated from
the PLL coefficients. If that is not the case, rate of the PLL's child clock
might be set not as expected. For instance, if in the PLL rates table we have
a 393216000 Hz entry and the real value as returned by the PLL's recalc_rate
callback is 393216003, after setting PLL's clk rate to 393216000 clk_get_rate
will return 393216003. If we now attempt to set rate of a PLL's child divider
clock to 393216000/2 its rate will be 131072001, rather than 196608000.
That is, the divider will be set to 3 instead of 2, because 393216003/2 is
greater than 196608000.

To fix this issue declared rates are changed to exactly match rates generated
by the PLL, as calculated from the P, M, S, K coefficients.

Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda 
Acked-by: Tomasz Figa 
Acked-by: Chanwoo Choi 
Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

clk: samsung: exynos5260: Fix PLL rates

2018-05-25T14:13:11+00:00

[ Upstream commit cdb68fbd4e7962be742c4f29475220c5bf28d8a5 ]

Rates declared in PLL rate tables should match exactly rates calculated from
the PLL coefficients. If that is not the case, rate of the PLL's child clock
might be set not as expected. For instance, if in the PLL rates table we have
a 393216000 Hz entry and the real value as returned by the PLL's recalc_rate
callback is 393216003, after setting PLL's clk rate to 393216000 clk_get_rate
will return 393216003. If we now attempt to set rate of a PLL's child divider
clock to 393216000/2 its rate will be 131072001, rather than 196608000.
That is, the divider will be set to 3 instead of 2, because 393216003/2 is
greater than 196608000.

To fix this issue declared rates are changed to exactly match rates generated
by the PLL, as calculated from the P, M, S, K coefficients.

Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda 
Acked-by: Tomasz Figa 
Acked-by: Chanwoo Choi 
Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman