linux-stable.git/drivers/char, branch v5.4.26

ipmi_si: Avoid spurious errors for optional IRQs

2020-03-18T06:17:52+00:00

commit 443d372d6a96cd94ad119e5c14bb4d63a536a7f6 upstream.

Although the IRQ assignment in ipmi_si driver is optional,
platform_get_irq() spews error messages unnecessarily:
  ipmi_si dmi-ipmi-si.0: IRQ index 0 not found

Fix this by switching to platform_get_irq_optional().

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4.x
Cc: John Donnelly 
Fixes: 7723f4c5ecdb ("driver core: platform: Add an error message to platform_get_irq*()")
Reported-and-tested-by: Patrick Vo 
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai 
Message-Id: <20200205093146.1352-1-tiwai@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Corey Minyard 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ipmi:ssif: Handle a possible NULL pointer reference

2020-03-05T15:43:35+00:00

[ Upstream commit 6b8526d3abc02c08a2f888e8c20b7ac9e5776dfe ]

In error cases a NULL can be passed to memcpy.  The length will always
be zero, so it doesn't really matter, but go ahead and check for NULL,
anyway, to be more precise and avoid static analysis errors.

Reported-by: kbuild test robot 
Signed-off-by: Corey Minyard 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

tpm: Initialize crypto_id of allocated_banks to HASH_ALGO__LAST

2020-02-28T16:22:13+00:00

commit dc10e4181c05a2315ddc375e963b7c763b5ee0df upstream.

chip->allocated_banks, an array of tpm_bank_info structures, contains the
list of TPM algorithm IDs of allocated PCR banks. It also contains the
corresponding ID of the crypto subsystem, so that users of the TPM driver
can calculate a digest for a PCR extend operation.

However, if there is no mapping between TPM algorithm ID and crypto ID, the
crypto_id field of tpm_bank_info remains set to zero (the array is
allocated and initialized with kcalloc() in tpm2_get_pcr_allocation()).
Zero should not be used as value for unknown mappings, as it is a valid
crypto ID (HASH_ALGO_MD4).

Thus, initialize crypto_id to HASH_ALGO__LAST.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.1.x
Fixes: 879b589210a9 ("tpm: retrieve digest size of unknown algorithms with PCR read")
Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu 
Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel 
Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen 
Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

char: hpet: Fix out-of-bounds read bug

2020-02-24T07:36:59+00:00

[ Upstream commit 98c49f1746ac44ccc164e914b9a44183fad09f51 ]

Currently, there is an out-of-bounds read on array hpetp->hp_dev
in the following for loop:

870         for (i = 0; i < hdp->hd_nirqs; i++)
871                 hpetp->hp_dev[i].hd_hdwirq = hdp->hd_irq[i];

This is due to the recent change from one-element array to
flexible-array member in struct hpets:

104 struct hpets {
	...
113         struct hpet_dev hp_dev[];
114 };

This change affected the total size of the dynamic memory
allocation, decreasing it by one time the size of struct hpet_dev.

Fix this by adjusting the allocation size when calling
struct_size().

Fixes: 987f028b8637c ("char: hpet: Use flexible-array member")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva 
Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa 
Acked-by: Eric Biggers 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200129022613.GA24281@embeddedor.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

char/random: silence a lockdep splat with printk()

2020-02-24T07:36:26+00:00

[ Upstream commit 1b710b1b10eff9d46666064ea25f079f70bc67a8 ]

Sergey didn't like the locking order,

uart_port->lock  ->  tty_port->lock

uart_write (uart_port->lock)
  __uart_start
    pl011_start_tx
      pl011_tx_chars
        uart_write_wakeup
          tty_port_tty_wakeup
            tty_port_default
              tty_port_tty_get (tty_port->lock)

but those code is so old, and I have no clue how to de-couple it after
checking other locks in the splat. There is an onging effort to make all
printk() as deferred, so until that happens, workaround it for now as a
short-term fix.

LTP: starting iogen01 (export LTPROOT; rwtest -N iogen01 -i 120s -s
read,write -Da -Dv -n 2 500b:$TMPDIR/doio.f1.$$
1000b:$TMPDIR/doio.f2.$$)
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
------------------------------------------------------
doio/49441 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff008b7cff7290 (&(&zone->lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: rmqueue+0x138/0x2050

but task is already holding lock:
60ff000822352818 (&pool->lock/1){-.-.}, at: start_flush_work+0xd8/0x3f0

  which lock already depends on the new lock.

  the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

  -> #4 (&pool->lock/1){-.-.}:
       lock_acquire+0x320/0x360
       _raw_spin_lock+0x64/0x80
       __queue_work+0x4b4/0xa10
       queue_work_on+0xac/0x11c
       tty_schedule_flip+0x84/0xbc
       tty_flip_buffer_push+0x1c/0x28
       pty_write+0x98/0xd0
       n_tty_write+0x450/0x60c
       tty_write+0x338/0x474
       __vfs_write+0x88/0x214
       vfs_write+0x12c/0x1a4
       redirected_tty_write+0x90/0xdc
       do_loop_readv_writev+0x140/0x180
       do_iter_write+0xe0/0x10c
       vfs_writev+0x134/0x1cc
       do_writev+0xbc/0x130
       __arm64_sys_writev+0x58/0x8c
       el0_svc_handler+0x170/0x240
       el0_sync_handler+0x150/0x250
       el0_sync+0x164/0x180

  -> #3 (&(&port->lock)->rlock){-.-.}:
       lock_acquire+0x320/0x360
       _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x7c/0x9c
       tty_port_tty_get+0x24/0x60
       tty_port_default_wakeup+0x1c/0x3c
       tty_port_tty_wakeup+0x34/0x40
       uart_write_wakeup+0x28/0x44
       pl011_tx_chars+0x1b8/0x270
       pl011_start_tx+0x24/0x70
       __uart_start+0x5c/0x68
       uart_write+0x164/0x1c8
       do_output_char+0x33c/0x348
       n_tty_write+0x4bc/0x60c
       tty_write+0x338/0x474
       redirected_tty_write+0xc0/0xdc
       do_loop_readv_writev+0x140/0x180
       do_iter_write+0xe0/0x10c
       vfs_writev+0x134/0x1cc
       do_writev+0xbc/0x130
       __arm64_sys_writev+0x58/0x8c
       el0_svc_handler+0x170/0x240
       el0_sync_handler+0x150/0x250
       el0_sync+0x164/0x180

  -> #2 (&port_lock_key){-.-.}:
       lock_acquire+0x320/0x360
       _raw_spin_lock+0x64/0x80
       pl011_console_write+0xec/0x2cc
       console_unlock+0x794/0x96c
       vprintk_emit+0x260/0x31c
       vprintk_default+0x54/0x7c
       vprintk_func+0x218/0x254
       printk+0x7c/0xa4
       register_console+0x734/0x7b0
       uart_add_one_port+0x734/0x834
       pl011_register_port+0x6c/0xac
       sbsa_uart_probe+0x234/0x2ec
       platform_drv_probe+0xd4/0x124
       really_probe+0x250/0x71c
       driver_probe_device+0xb4/0x200
       __device_attach_driver+0xd8/0x188
       bus_for_each_drv+0xbc/0x110
       __device_attach+0x120/0x220
       device_initial_probe+0x20/0x2c
       bus_probe_device+0x54/0x100
       device_add+0xae8/0xc2c
       platform_device_add+0x278/0x3b8
       platform_device_register_full+0x238/0x2ac
       acpi_create_platform_device+0x2dc/0x3a8
       acpi_bus_attach+0x390/0x3cc
       acpi_bus_attach+0x108/0x3cc
       acpi_bus_attach+0x108/0x3cc
       acpi_bus_attach+0x108/0x3cc
       acpi_bus_scan+0x7c/0xb0
       acpi_scan_init+0xe4/0x304
       acpi_init+0x100/0x114
       do_one_initcall+0x348/0x6a0
       do_initcall_level+0x190/0x1fc
       do_basic_setup+0x34/0x4c
       kernel_init_freeable+0x19c/0x260
       kernel_init+0x18/0x338
       ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18

  -> #1 (console_owner){-...}:
       lock_acquire+0x320/0x360
       console_lock_spinning_enable+0x6c/0x7c
       console_unlock+0x4f8/0x96c
       vprintk_emit+0x260/0x31c
       vprintk_default+0x54/0x7c
       vprintk_func+0x218/0x254
       printk+0x7c/0xa4
       get_random_u64+0x1c4/0x1dc
       shuffle_pick_tail+0x40/0xac
       __free_one_page+0x424/0x710
       free_one_page+0x70/0x120
       __free_pages_ok+0x61c/0xa94
       __free_pages_core+0x1bc/0x294
       memblock_free_pages+0x38/0x48
       __free_pages_memory+0xcc/0xfc
       __free_memory_core+0x70/0x78
       free_low_memory_core_early+0x148/0x18c
       memblock_free_all+0x18/0x54
       mem_init+0xb4/0x17c
       mm_init+0x14/0x38
       start_kernel+0x19c/0x530

  -> #0 (&(&zone->lock)->rlock){..-.}:
       validate_chain+0xf6c/0x2e2c
       __lock_acquire+0x868/0xc2c
       lock_acquire+0x320/0x360
       _raw_spin_lock+0x64/0x80
       rmqueue+0x138/0x2050
       get_page_from_freelist+0x474/0x688
       __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x3b4/0x18dc
       alloc_pages_current+0xd0/0xe0
       alloc_slab_page+0x2b4/0x5e0
       new_slab+0xc8/0x6bc
       ___slab_alloc+0x3b8/0x640
       kmem_cache_alloc+0x4b4/0x588
       __debug_object_init+0x778/0x8b4
       debug_object_init_on_stack+0x40/0x50
       start_flush_work+0x16c/0x3f0
       __flush_work+0xb8/0x124
       flush_work+0x20/0x30
       xlog_cil_force_lsn+0x88/0x204 [xfs]
       xfs_log_force_lsn+0x128/0x1b8 [xfs]
       xfs_file_fsync+0x3c4/0x488 [xfs]
       vfs_fsync_range+0xb0/0xd0
       generic_write_sync+0x80/0xa0 [xfs]
       xfs_file_buffered_aio_write+0x66c/0x6e4 [xfs]
       xfs_file_write_iter+0x1a0/0x218 [xfs]
       __vfs_write+0x1cc/0x214
       vfs_write+0x12c/0x1a4
       ksys_write+0xb0/0x120
       __arm64_sys_write+0x54/0x88
       el0_svc_handler+0x170/0x240
       el0_sync_handler+0x150/0x250
       el0_sync+0x164/0x180

       other info that might help us debug this:

 Chain exists of:
   &(&zone->lock)->rlock --> &(&port->lock)->rlock --> &pool->lock/1

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(&pool->lock/1);
                               lock(&(&port->lock)->rlock);
                               lock(&pool->lock/1);
  lock(&(&zone->lock)->rlock);

                *** DEADLOCK ***

4 locks held by doio/49441:
 #0: a0ff00886fc27408 (sb_writers#8){.+.+}, at: vfs_write+0x118/0x1a4
 #1: 8fff00080810dfe0 (&xfs_nondir_ilock_class){++++}, at:
xfs_ilock+0x2a8/0x300 [xfs]
 #2: ffff9000129f2390 (rcu_read_lock){....}, at:
rcu_lock_acquire+0x8/0x38
 #3: 60ff000822352818 (&pool->lock/1){-.-.}, at:
start_flush_work+0xd8/0x3f0

               stack backtrace:
CPU: 48 PID: 49441 Comm: doio Tainted: G        W
Hardware name: HPE Apollo 70             /C01_APACHE_MB         , BIOS
L50_5.13_1.11 06/18/2019
Call trace:
 dump_backtrace+0x0/0x248
 show_stack+0x20/0x2c
 dump_stack+0xe8/0x150
 print_circular_bug+0x368/0x380
 check_noncircular+0x28c/0x294
 validate_chain+0xf6c/0x2e2c
 __lock_acquire+0x868/0xc2c
 lock_acquire+0x320/0x360
 _raw_spin_lock+0x64/0x80
 rmqueue+0x138/0x2050
 get_page_from_freelist+0x474/0x688
 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x3b4/0x18dc
 alloc_pages_current+0xd0/0xe0
 alloc_slab_page+0x2b4/0x5e0
 new_slab+0xc8/0x6bc
 ___slab_alloc+0x3b8/0x640
 kmem_cache_alloc+0x4b4/0x588
 __debug_object_init+0x778/0x8b4
 debug_object_init_on_stack+0x40/0x50
 start_flush_work+0x16c/0x3f0
 __flush_work+0xb8/0x124
 flush_work+0x20/0x30
 xlog_cil_force_lsn+0x88/0x204 [xfs]
 xfs_log_force_lsn+0x128/0x1b8 [xfs]
 xfs_file_fsync+0x3c4/0x488 [xfs]
 vfs_fsync_range+0xb0/0xd0
 generic_write_sync+0x80/0xa0 [xfs]
 xfs_file_buffered_aio_write+0x66c/0x6e4 [xfs]
 xfs_file_write_iter+0x1a0/0x218 [xfs]
 __vfs_write+0x1cc/0x214
 vfs_write+0x12c/0x1a4
 ksys_write+0xb0/0x120
 __arm64_sys_write+0x54/0x88
 el0_svc_handler+0x170/0x240
 el0_sync_handler+0x150/0x250
 el0_sync+0x164/0x180

Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky 
Signed-off-by: Qian Cai 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1573679785-21068-1-git-send-email-cai@lca.pw
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

drivers: ipmi: fix off-by-one bounds check that leads to a out-of-bounds write

2020-02-19T18:53:05+00:00

commit e0354d147e5889b5faa12e64fa38187aed39aad4 upstream.

The end of buffer check is off-by-one since the check is against
an index that is pre-incremented before a store to buf[]. Fix this
adjusting the bounds check appropriately.

Addresses-Coverity: ("Out-of-bounds write")
Fixes: 51bd6f291583 ("Add support for IPMB driver")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King 
Message-Id: <20200114144031.358003-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Asmaa Mnebhi 
Signed-off-by: Corey Minyard 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ttyprintk: fix a potential deadlock in interrupt context issue

2020-02-05T21:22:41+00:00

commit 9a655c77ff8fc65699a3f98e237db563b37c439b upstream.

tpk_write()/tpk_close() could be interrupted when holding a mutex, then
in timer handler tpk_write() may be called again trying to acquire same
mutex, lead to deadlock.

Google syzbot reported this issue with CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP
enabled:

BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at
kernel/locking/mutex.c:938
in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 0, name: swapper/1
1 lock held by swapper/1/0:
...
Call Trace:
  
  dump_stack+0x197/0x210
  ___might_sleep.cold+0x1fb/0x23e
  __might_sleep+0x95/0x190
  __mutex_lock+0xc5/0x13c0
  mutex_lock_nested+0x16/0x20
  tpk_write+0x5d/0x340
  resync_tnc+0x1b6/0x320
  call_timer_fn+0x1ac/0x780
  run_timer_softirq+0x6c3/0x1790
  __do_softirq+0x262/0x98c
  irq_exit+0x19b/0x1e0
  smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a3/0x610
  apic_timer_interrupt+0xf/0x20
  

See link https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=2eeef62ee31f9460ad65 for
more details.

Fix it by using spinlock in process context instead of mutex and having
interrupt disabled in critical section.

Reported-by: syzbot+2eeef62ee31f9460ad65@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan 
Cc: Arnd Bergmann 
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200113034842.435-1-zhenzhong.duan@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

hwrng: omap3-rom - Fix missing clock by probing with device tree

2020-01-26T09:01:03+00:00

[ Upstream commit 0c0ef9ea6f3f0d5979dc7b094b0a184c1a94716b ]

Commit 0ed266d7ae5e ("clk: ti: omap3: cleanup unnecessary clock aliases")
removed old omap3 clock framework aliases but caused omap3-rom-rng to
stop working with clock not found error.

Based on discussions on the mailing list it was requested by Tero Kristo
that it would be best to fix this issue by probing omap3-rom-rng using
device tree to provide a proper clk property. The other option would be
to add back the missing clock alias, but that does not help moving things
forward with removing old legacy platform_data.

Let's also add a proper device tree binding and keep it together with
the fix.

Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Aaro Koskinen 
Cc: Adam Ford 
Cc: Pali Rohár 
Cc: Rob Herring 
Cc: Sebastian Reichel 
Cc: Tero Kristo 
Fixes: 0ed266d7ae5e ("clk: ti: omap3: cleanup unnecessary clock aliases")
Reported-by: Aaro Koskinen 
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren 
Acked-by: Rob Herring 
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

ipmi: Fix memory leak in __ipmi_bmc_register

2020-01-26T09:01:02+00:00

commit 4aa7afb0ee20a97fbf0c5bab3df028d5fb85fdab upstream.

In the impelementation of __ipmi_bmc_register() the allocated memory for
bmc should be released in case ida_simple_get() fails.

Fixes: 68e7e50f195f ("ipmi: Don't use BMC product/dev ids in the BMC name")
Signed-off-by: Navid Emamdoost 
Message-Id: <20191021200649.1511-1-navid.emamdoost@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Corey Minyard 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

tpm: Handle negative priv->response_len in tpm_common_read()

2020-01-14T19:08:21+00:00

commit a430e67d9a2c62a8c7b315b99e74de02018d0a96 upstream.

The priv->response_length can hold the size of an response or an negative
error code, and the tpm_common_read() needs to handle both cases correctly.
Changed the type of response_length to signed and accounted for negative
value in tpm_common_read().

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: d23d12484307 ("tpm: fix invalid locking in NONBLOCKING mode")
Reported-by: Laura Abbott 
Signed-off-by: Tadeusz Struk 
Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen 
Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman