<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>linux-stable.git/drivers/block, branch linux-5.4.y</title>
<subtitle>Linux kernel stable tree</subtitle>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/'/>
<entry>
<title>drbd: add missing kref_get in handle_write_conflicts</title>
<updated>2025-08-28T14:21:24+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Sarah Newman</name>
<email>srn@prgmr.com</email>
</author>
<published>2025-06-27T09:57:28+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=0336bfe9c237476bd7c45605a36ca79c2bca62e5'/>
<id>0336bfe9c237476bd7c45605a36ca79c2bca62e5</id>
<content type='text'>
[ Upstream commit 00c9c9628b49e368d140cfa61d7df9b8922ec2a8 ]

With `two-primaries` enabled, DRBD tries to detect "concurrent" writes
and handle write conflicts, so that even if you write to the same sector
simultaneously on both nodes, they end up with the identical data once
the writes are completed.

In handling "superseeded" writes, we forgot a kref_get,
resulting in a premature drbd_destroy_device and use after free,
and further to kernel crashes with symptoms.

Relevance: No one should use DRBD as a random data generator, and apparently
all users of "two-primaries" handle concurrent writes correctly on layer up.
That is cluster file systems use some distributed lock manager,
and live migration in virtualization environments stops writes on one node
before starting writes on the other node.

Which means that other than for "test cases",
this code path is never taken in real life.

FYI, in DRBD 9, things are handled differently nowadays.  We still detect
"write conflicts", but no longer try to be smart about them.
We decided to disconnect hard instead: upper layers must not submit concurrent
writes. If they do, that's their fault.

Signed-off-by: Sarah Newman &lt;srn@prgmr.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Lars Ellenberg &lt;lars@linbit.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Christoph Böhmwalder &lt;christoph.boehmwalder@linbit.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250627095728.800688-1-christoph.boehmwalder@linbit.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe &lt;axboe@kernel.dk&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
[ Upstream commit 00c9c9628b49e368d140cfa61d7df9b8922ec2a8 ]

With `two-primaries` enabled, DRBD tries to detect "concurrent" writes
and handle write conflicts, so that even if you write to the same sector
simultaneously on both nodes, they end up with the identical data once
the writes are completed.

In handling "superseeded" writes, we forgot a kref_get,
resulting in a premature drbd_destroy_device and use after free,
and further to kernel crashes with symptoms.

Relevance: No one should use DRBD as a random data generator, and apparently
all users of "two-primaries" handle concurrent writes correctly on layer up.
That is cluster file systems use some distributed lock manager,
and live migration in virtualization environments stops writes on one node
before starting writes on the other node.

Which means that other than for "test cases",
this code path is never taken in real life.

FYI, in DRBD 9, things are handled differently nowadays.  We still detect
"write conflicts", but no longer try to be smart about them.
We decided to disconnect hard instead: upper layers must not submit concurrent
writes. If they do, that's their fault.

Signed-off-by: Sarah Newman &lt;srn@prgmr.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Lars Ellenberg &lt;lars@linbit.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Christoph Böhmwalder &lt;christoph.boehmwalder@linbit.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250627095728.800688-1-christoph.boehmwalder@linbit.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe &lt;axboe@kernel.dk&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>sunvdc: Balance device refcount in vdc_port_mpgroup_check</title>
<updated>2025-08-28T14:21:23+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Ma Ke</name>
<email>make24@iscas.ac.cn</email>
</author>
<published>2025-07-19T07:58:56+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=944474274e9082aabc597f1b6bb6822f46188c41'/>
<id>944474274e9082aabc597f1b6bb6822f46188c41</id>
<content type='text'>
commit 63ce53724637e2e7ba51fe3a4f78351715049905 upstream.

Using device_find_child() to locate a probed virtual-device-port node
causes a device refcount imbalance, as device_find_child() internally
calls get_device() to increment the device’s reference count before
returning its pointer. vdc_port_mpgroup_check() directly returns true
upon finding a matching device without releasing the reference via
put_device(). We should call put_device() to decrement refcount.

As comment of device_find_child() says, 'NOTE: you will need to drop
the reference with put_device() after use'.

Found by code review.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 3ee70591d6c4 ("sunvdc: prevent sunvdc panic when mpgroup disk added to guest domain")
Signed-off-by: Ma Ke &lt;make24@iscas.ac.cn&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250719075856.3447953-1-make24@iscas.ac.cn
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe &lt;axboe@kernel.dk&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
commit 63ce53724637e2e7ba51fe3a4f78351715049905 upstream.

Using device_find_child() to locate a probed virtual-device-port node
causes a device refcount imbalance, as device_find_child() internally
calls get_device() to increment the device’s reference count before
returning its pointer. vdc_port_mpgroup_check() directly returns true
upon finding a matching device without releasing the reference via
put_device(). We should call put_device() to decrement refcount.

As comment of device_find_child() says, 'NOTE: you will need to drop
the reference with put_device() after use'.

Found by code review.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 3ee70591d6c4 ("sunvdc: prevent sunvdc panic when mpgroup disk added to guest domain")
Signed-off-by: Ma Ke &lt;make24@iscas.ac.cn&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250719075856.3447953-1-make24@iscas.ac.cn
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe &lt;axboe@kernel.dk&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>aoe: clean device rq_list in aoedev_downdev()</title>
<updated>2025-06-27T10:02:57+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Justin Sanders</name>
<email>jsanders.devel@gmail.com</email>
</author>
<published>2025-06-10T17:05:59+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=ed52e9652ba41d362e9ec923077f6da23336f269'/>
<id>ed52e9652ba41d362e9ec923077f6da23336f269</id>
<content type='text'>
[ Upstream commit 7f90d45e57cb2ef1f0adcaf925ddffdfc5e680ca ]

An aoe device's rq_list contains accepted block requests that are
waiting to be transmitted to the aoe target. This queue was added as
part of the conversion to blk_mq. However, the queue was not cleaned out
when an aoe device is downed which caused blk_mq_freeze_queue() to sleep
indefinitely waiting for those requests to complete, causing a hang. This
fix cleans out the queue before calling blk_mq_freeze_queue().

Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=212665
Fixes: 3582dd291788 ("aoe: convert aoeblk to blk-mq")
Signed-off-by: Justin Sanders &lt;jsanders.devel@gmail.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250610170600.869-1-jsanders.devel@gmail.com
Tested-By: Valentin Kleibel &lt;valentin@vrvis.at&gt;
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe &lt;axboe@kernel.dk&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
[ Upstream commit 7f90d45e57cb2ef1f0adcaf925ddffdfc5e680ca ]

An aoe device's rq_list contains accepted block requests that are
waiting to be transmitted to the aoe target. This queue was added as
part of the conversion to blk_mq. However, the queue was not cleaned out
when an aoe device is downed which caused blk_mq_freeze_queue() to sleep
indefinitely waiting for those requests to complete, causing a hang. This
fix cleans out the queue before calling blk_mq_freeze_queue().

Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=212665
Fixes: 3582dd291788 ("aoe: convert aoeblk to blk-mq")
Signed-off-by: Justin Sanders &lt;jsanders.devel@gmail.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250610170600.869-1-jsanders.devel@gmail.com
Tested-By: Valentin Kleibel &lt;valentin@vrvis.at&gt;
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe &lt;axboe@kernel.dk&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>nbd: don't allow reconnect after disconnect</title>
<updated>2025-03-13T11:42:52+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Yu Kuai</name>
<email>yukuai3@huawei.com</email>
</author>
<published>2025-01-03T09:28:59+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=e70a578487a47d7cf058904141e586684d1c3381'/>
<id>e70a578487a47d7cf058904141e586684d1c3381</id>
<content type='text'>
[ Upstream commit 844b8cdc681612ff24df62cdefddeab5772fadf1 ]

Following process can cause nbd_config UAF:

1) grab nbd_config temporarily;

2) nbd_genl_disconnect() flush all recv_work() and release the
initial reference:

  nbd_genl_disconnect
   nbd_disconnect_and_put
    nbd_disconnect
     flush_workqueue(nbd-&gt;recv_workq)
    if (test_and_clear_bit(NBD_RT_HAS_CONFIG_REF, ...))
     nbd_config_put
     -&gt; due to step 1), reference is still not zero

3) nbd_genl_reconfigure() queue recv_work() again;

  nbd_genl_reconfigure
   config = nbd_get_config_unlocked(nbd)
   if (!config)
   -&gt; succeed
   if (!test_bit(NBD_RT_BOUND, ...))
   -&gt; succeed
   nbd_reconnect_socket
    queue_work(nbd-&gt;recv_workq, &amp;args-&gt;work)

4) step 1) release the reference;

5) Finially, recv_work() will trigger UAF:

  recv_work
   nbd_config_put(nbd)
   -&gt; nbd_config is freed
   atomic_dec(&amp;config-&gt;recv_threads)
   -&gt; UAF

Fix the problem by clearing NBD_RT_BOUND in nbd_genl_disconnect(), so
that nbd_genl_reconfigure() will fail.

Fixes: b7aa3d39385d ("nbd: add a reconfigure netlink command")
Reported-by: syzbot+6b0df248918b92c33e6a@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/675bfb65.050a0220.1a2d0d.0006.GAE@google.com/
Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai &lt;yukuai3@huawei.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig &lt;hch@lst.de&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250103092859.3574648-1-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe &lt;axboe@kernel.dk&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
[ Upstream commit 844b8cdc681612ff24df62cdefddeab5772fadf1 ]

Following process can cause nbd_config UAF:

1) grab nbd_config temporarily;

2) nbd_genl_disconnect() flush all recv_work() and release the
initial reference:

  nbd_genl_disconnect
   nbd_disconnect_and_put
    nbd_disconnect
     flush_workqueue(nbd-&gt;recv_workq)
    if (test_and_clear_bit(NBD_RT_HAS_CONFIG_REF, ...))
     nbd_config_put
     -&gt; due to step 1), reference is still not zero

3) nbd_genl_reconfigure() queue recv_work() again;

  nbd_genl_reconfigure
   config = nbd_get_config_unlocked(nbd)
   if (!config)
   -&gt; succeed
   if (!test_bit(NBD_RT_BOUND, ...))
   -&gt; succeed
   nbd_reconnect_socket
    queue_work(nbd-&gt;recv_workq, &amp;args-&gt;work)

4) step 1) release the reference;

5) Finially, recv_work() will trigger UAF:

  recv_work
   nbd_config_put(nbd)
   -&gt; nbd_config is freed
   atomic_dec(&amp;config-&gt;recv_threads)
   -&gt; UAF

Fix the problem by clearing NBD_RT_BOUND in nbd_genl_disconnect(), so
that nbd_genl_reconfigure() will fail.

Fixes: b7aa3d39385d ("nbd: add a reconfigure netlink command")
Reported-by: syzbot+6b0df248918b92c33e6a@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/675bfb65.050a0220.1a2d0d.0006.GAE@google.com/
Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai &lt;yukuai3@huawei.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig &lt;hch@lst.de&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250103092859.3574648-1-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe &lt;axboe@kernel.dk&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>virtio-blk: don't keep queue frozen during system suspend</title>
<updated>2025-01-09T12:23:32+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Ming Lei</name>
<email>ming.lei@redhat.com</email>
</author>
<published>2024-11-12T12:58:21+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=d738f3215bb4f88911ff4579780a44960c8e0ca5'/>
<id>d738f3215bb4f88911ff4579780a44960c8e0ca5</id>
<content type='text'>
[ Upstream commit 7678abee0867e6b7fb89aa40f6e9f575f755fb37 ]

Commit 4ce6e2db00de ("virtio-blk: Ensure no requests in virtqueues before
deleting vqs.") replaces queue quiesce with queue freeze in virtio-blk's
PM callbacks. And the motivation is to drain inflight IOs before suspending.

block layer's queue freeze looks very handy, but it is also easy to cause
deadlock, such as, any attempt to call into bio_queue_enter() may run into
deadlock if the queue is frozen in current context. There are all kinds
of -&gt;suspend() called in suspend context, so keeping queue frozen in the
whole suspend context isn't one good idea. And Marek reported lockdep
warning[1] caused by virtio-blk's freeze queue in virtblk_freeze().

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/ca16370e-d646-4eee-b9cc-87277c89c43c@samsung.com/

Given the motivation is to drain in-flight IOs, it can be done by calling
freeze &amp; unfreeze, meantime restore to previous behavior by keeping queue
quiesced during suspend.

Cc: Yi Sun &lt;yi.sun@unisoc.com&gt;
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin &lt;mst@redhat.com&gt;
Cc: Jason Wang &lt;jasowang@redhat.com&gt;
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi &lt;stefanha@redhat.com&gt;
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux.dev
Reported-by: Marek Szyprowski &lt;m.szyprowski@samsung.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei &lt;ming.lei@redhat.com&gt;
Acked-by: Stefan Hajnoczi &lt;stefanha@redhat.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241112125821.1475793-1-ming.lei@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe &lt;axboe@kernel.dk&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
[ Upstream commit 7678abee0867e6b7fb89aa40f6e9f575f755fb37 ]

Commit 4ce6e2db00de ("virtio-blk: Ensure no requests in virtqueues before
deleting vqs.") replaces queue quiesce with queue freeze in virtio-blk's
PM callbacks. And the motivation is to drain inflight IOs before suspending.

block layer's queue freeze looks very handy, but it is also easy to cause
deadlock, such as, any attempt to call into bio_queue_enter() may run into
deadlock if the queue is frozen in current context. There are all kinds
of -&gt;suspend() called in suspend context, so keeping queue frozen in the
whole suspend context isn't one good idea. And Marek reported lockdep
warning[1] caused by virtio-blk's freeze queue in virtblk_freeze().

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/ca16370e-d646-4eee-b9cc-87277c89c43c@samsung.com/

Given the motivation is to drain in-flight IOs, it can be done by calling
freeze &amp; unfreeze, meantime restore to previous behavior by keeping queue
quiesced during suspend.

Cc: Yi Sun &lt;yi.sun@unisoc.com&gt;
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin &lt;mst@redhat.com&gt;
Cc: Jason Wang &lt;jasowang@redhat.com&gt;
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi &lt;stefanha@redhat.com&gt;
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux.dev
Reported-by: Marek Szyprowski &lt;m.szyprowski@samsung.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei &lt;ming.lei@redhat.com&gt;
Acked-by: Stefan Hajnoczi &lt;stefanha@redhat.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241112125821.1475793-1-ming.lei@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe &lt;axboe@kernel.dk&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>zram: refuse to use zero sized block device as backing device</title>
<updated>2025-01-09T12:23:29+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Kairui Song</name>
<email>kasong@tencent.com</email>
</author>
<published>2024-12-09T16:57:15+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=9202cc7852e509c69df260a1c410f5c75c18891b'/>
<id>9202cc7852e509c69df260a1c410f5c75c18891b</id>
<content type='text'>
commit be48c412f6ebf38849213c19547bc6d5b692b5e5 upstream.

Patch series "zram: fix backing device setup issue", v2.

This series fixes two bugs of backing device setting:

- ZRAM should reject using a zero sized (or the uninitialized ZRAM
  device itself) as the backing device.
- Fix backing device leaking when removing a uninitialized ZRAM
  device.


This patch (of 2):

Setting a zero sized block device as backing device is pointless, and one
can easily create a recursive loop by setting the uninitialized ZRAM
device itself as its own backing device by (zram0 is uninitialized):

    echo /dev/zram0 &gt; /sys/block/zram0/backing_dev

It's definitely a wrong config, and the module will pin itself, kernel
should refuse doing so in the first place.

By refusing to use zero sized device we avoided misuse cases including
this one above.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241209165717.94215-1-ryncsn@gmail.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241209165717.94215-2-ryncsn@gmail.com
Fixes: 013bf95a83ec ("zram: add interface to specif backing device")
Signed-off-by: Kairui Song &lt;kasong@tencent.com&gt;
Reported-by: Desheng Wu &lt;deshengwu@tencent.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky &lt;senozhatsky@chromium.org&gt;
Cc: &lt;stable@vger.kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton &lt;akpm@linux-foundation.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
commit be48c412f6ebf38849213c19547bc6d5b692b5e5 upstream.

Patch series "zram: fix backing device setup issue", v2.

This series fixes two bugs of backing device setting:

- ZRAM should reject using a zero sized (or the uninitialized ZRAM
  device itself) as the backing device.
- Fix backing device leaking when removing a uninitialized ZRAM
  device.


This patch (of 2):

Setting a zero sized block device as backing device is pointless, and one
can easily create a recursive loop by setting the uninitialized ZRAM
device itself as its own backing device by (zram0 is uninitialized):

    echo /dev/zram0 &gt; /sys/block/zram0/backing_dev

It's definitely a wrong config, and the module will pin itself, kernel
should refuse doing so in the first place.

By refusing to use zero sized device we avoided misuse cases including
this one above.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241209165717.94215-1-ryncsn@gmail.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241209165717.94215-2-ryncsn@gmail.com
Fixes: 013bf95a83ec ("zram: add interface to specif backing device")
Signed-off-by: Kairui Song &lt;kasong@tencent.com&gt;
Reported-by: Desheng Wu &lt;deshengwu@tencent.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky &lt;senozhatsky@chromium.org&gt;
Cc: &lt;stable@vger.kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton &lt;akpm@linux-foundation.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>aoe: fix the potential use-after-free problem in more places</title>
<updated>2024-11-08T15:20:41+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Chun-Yi Lee</name>
<email>joeyli.kernel@gmail.com</email>
</author>
<published>2024-10-02T03:54:58+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=a786265aecf39015418e4f930cc1c14603a01490'/>
<id>a786265aecf39015418e4f930cc1c14603a01490</id>
<content type='text'>
commit 6d6e54fc71ad1ab0a87047fd9c211e75d86084a3 upstream.

For fixing CVE-2023-6270, f98364e92662 ("aoe: fix the potential
use-after-free problem in aoecmd_cfg_pkts") makes tx() calling dev_put()
instead of doing in aoecmd_cfg_pkts(). It avoids that the tx() runs
into use-after-free.

Then Nicolai Stange found more places in aoe have potential use-after-free
problem with tx(). e.g. revalidate(), aoecmd_ata_rw(), resend(), probe()
and aoecmd_cfg_rsp(). Those functions also use aoenet_xmit() to push
packet to tx queue. So they should also use dev_hold() to increase the
refcnt of skb-&gt;dev.

On the other hand, moving dev_put() to tx() causes that the refcnt of
skb-&gt;dev be reduced to a negative value, because corresponding
dev_hold() are not called in revalidate(), aoecmd_ata_rw(), resend(),
probe(), and aoecmd_cfg_rsp(). This patch fixed this issue.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-6270
Fixes: f98364e92662 ("aoe: fix the potential use-after-free problem in aoecmd_cfg_pkts")
Reported-by: Nicolai Stange &lt;nstange@suse.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Chun-Yi Lee &lt;jlee@suse.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20240624064418.27043-1-jlee%40suse.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241002035458.24401-1-jlee@suse.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe &lt;axboe@kernel.dk&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
commit 6d6e54fc71ad1ab0a87047fd9c211e75d86084a3 upstream.

For fixing CVE-2023-6270, f98364e92662 ("aoe: fix the potential
use-after-free problem in aoecmd_cfg_pkts") makes tx() calling dev_put()
instead of doing in aoecmd_cfg_pkts(). It avoids that the tx() runs
into use-after-free.

Then Nicolai Stange found more places in aoe have potential use-after-free
problem with tx(). e.g. revalidate(), aoecmd_ata_rw(), resend(), probe()
and aoecmd_cfg_rsp(). Those functions also use aoenet_xmit() to push
packet to tx queue. So they should also use dev_hold() to increase the
refcnt of skb-&gt;dev.

On the other hand, moving dev_put() to tx() causes that the refcnt of
skb-&gt;dev be reduced to a negative value, because corresponding
dev_hold() are not called in revalidate(), aoecmd_ata_rw(), resend(),
probe(), and aoecmd_cfg_rsp(). This patch fixed this issue.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-6270
Fixes: f98364e92662 ("aoe: fix the potential use-after-free problem in aoecmd_cfg_pkts")
Reported-by: Nicolai Stange &lt;nstange@suse.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Chun-Yi Lee &lt;jlee@suse.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20240624064418.27043-1-jlee%40suse.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241002035458.24401-1-jlee@suse.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe &lt;axboe@kernel.dk&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>drbd: Add NULL check for net_conf to prevent dereference in state validation</title>
<updated>2024-11-08T15:20:33+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Mikhail Lobanov</name>
<email>m.lobanov@rosalinux.ru</email>
</author>
<published>2024-09-09T13:37:36+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=959974bf5dd8bd79d106f5e43e48051db3c4c213'/>
<id>959974bf5dd8bd79d106f5e43e48051db3c4c213</id>
<content type='text'>
commit a5e61b50c9f44c5edb6e134ede6fee8806ffafa9 upstream.

If the net_conf pointer is NULL and the code attempts to access its
fields without a check, it will lead to a null pointer dereference.
Add a NULL check before dereferencing the pointer.

Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.

Fixes: 44ed167da748 ("drbd: rcu_read_lock() and rcu_dereference() for tconn-&gt;net_conf")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mikhail Lobanov &lt;m.lobanov@rosalinux.ru&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240909133740.84297-1-m.lobanov@rosalinux.ru
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe &lt;axboe@kernel.dk&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
commit a5e61b50c9f44c5edb6e134ede6fee8806ffafa9 upstream.

If the net_conf pointer is NULL and the code attempts to access its
fields without a check, it will lead to a null pointer dereference.
Add a NULL check before dereferencing the pointer.

Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.

Fixes: 44ed167da748 ("drbd: rcu_read_lock() and rcu_dereference() for tconn-&gt;net_conf")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mikhail Lobanov &lt;m.lobanov@rosalinux.ru&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240909133740.84297-1-m.lobanov@rosalinux.ru
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe &lt;axboe@kernel.dk&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>drbd: Fix atomicity violation in drbd_uuid_set_bm()</title>
<updated>2024-11-08T15:20:33+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Qiu-ji Chen</name>
<email>chenqiuji666@gmail.com</email>
</author>
<published>2024-09-13T08:35:04+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=9679a6e148d70dbe82d46085b91696fd2bc28e9d'/>
<id>9679a6e148d70dbe82d46085b91696fd2bc28e9d</id>
<content type='text'>
commit 2f02b5af3a4482b216e6a466edecf6ba8450fa45 upstream.

The violation of atomicity occurs when the drbd_uuid_set_bm function is
executed simultaneously with modifying the value of
device-&gt;ldev-&gt;md.uuid[UI_BITMAP]. Consider a scenario where, while
device-&gt;ldev-&gt;md.uuid[UI_BITMAP] passes the validity check when its
value is not zero, the value of device-&gt;ldev-&gt;md.uuid[UI_BITMAP] is
written to zero. In this case, the check in drbd_uuid_set_bm might refer
to the old value of device-&gt;ldev-&gt;md.uuid[UI_BITMAP] (before locking),
which allows an invalid value to pass the validity check, resulting in
inconsistency.

To address this issue, it is recommended to include the data validity
check within the locked section of the function. This modification
ensures that the value of device-&gt;ldev-&gt;md.uuid[UI_BITMAP] does not
change during the validation process, thereby maintaining its integrity.

This possible bug is found by an experimental static analysis tool
developed by our team. This tool analyzes the locking APIs to extract
function pairs that can be concurrently executed, and then analyzes the
instructions in the paired functions to identify possible concurrency
bugs including data races and atomicity violations.

Fixes: 9f2247bb9b75 ("drbd: Protect accesses to the uuid set with a spinlock")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Qiu-ji Chen &lt;chenqiuji666@gmail.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Philipp Reisner &lt;philipp.reisner@linbit.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240913083504.10549-1-chenqiuji666@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe &lt;axboe@kernel.dk&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
commit 2f02b5af3a4482b216e6a466edecf6ba8450fa45 upstream.

The violation of atomicity occurs when the drbd_uuid_set_bm function is
executed simultaneously with modifying the value of
device-&gt;ldev-&gt;md.uuid[UI_BITMAP]. Consider a scenario where, while
device-&gt;ldev-&gt;md.uuid[UI_BITMAP] passes the validity check when its
value is not zero, the value of device-&gt;ldev-&gt;md.uuid[UI_BITMAP] is
written to zero. In this case, the check in drbd_uuid_set_bm might refer
to the old value of device-&gt;ldev-&gt;md.uuid[UI_BITMAP] (before locking),
which allows an invalid value to pass the validity check, resulting in
inconsistency.

To address this issue, it is recommended to include the data validity
check within the locked section of the function. This modification
ensures that the value of device-&gt;ldev-&gt;md.uuid[UI_BITMAP] does not
change during the validation process, thereby maintaining its integrity.

This possible bug is found by an experimental static analysis tool
developed by our team. This tool analyzes the locking APIs to extract
function pairs that can be concurrently executed, and then analyzes the
instructions in the paired functions to identify possible concurrency
bugs including data races and atomicity violations.

Fixes: 9f2247bb9b75 ("drbd: Protect accesses to the uuid set with a spinlock")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Qiu-ji Chen &lt;chenqiuji666@gmail.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Philipp Reisner &lt;philipp.reisner@linbit.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240913083504.10549-1-chenqiuji666@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe &lt;axboe@kernel.dk&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>rbd: don't assume RBD_LOCK_STATE_LOCKED for exclusive mappings</title>
<updated>2024-08-19T03:33:40+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Ilya Dryomov</name>
<email>idryomov@gmail.com</email>
</author>
<published>2024-07-23T16:07:59+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=46c0fa486bb84a29300ff4e4dfa4c0c4676e8a42'/>
<id>46c0fa486bb84a29300ff4e4dfa4c0c4676e8a42</id>
<content type='text'>
commit 2237ceb71f89837ac47c5dce2aaa2c2b3a337a3c upstream.

Every time a watch is reestablished after getting lost, we need to
update the cookie which involves quiescing exclusive lock.  For this,
we transition from RBD_LOCK_STATE_LOCKED to RBD_LOCK_STATE_QUIESCING
roughly for the duration of rbd_reacquire_lock() call.  If the mapping
is exclusive and I/O happens to arrive in this time window, it's failed
with EROFS (later translated to EIO) based on the wrong assumption in
rbd_img_exclusive_lock() -- "lock got released?" check there stopped
making sense with commit a2b1da09793d ("rbd: lock should be quiesced on
reacquire").

To make it worse, any such I/O is added to the acquiring list before
EROFS is returned and this sets up for violating rbd_lock_del_request()
precondition that the request is either on the running list or not on
any list at all -- see commit ded080c86b3f ("rbd: don't move requests
to the running list on errors").  rbd_lock_del_request() ends up
processing these requests as if they were on the running list which
screws up quiescing_wait completion counter and ultimately leads to

    rbd_assert(!completion_done(&amp;rbd_dev-&gt;quiescing_wait));

being triggered on the next watch error.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 06ef84c4e9c4: rbd: rename RBD_LOCK_STATE_RELEASING and releasing_wait
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 637cd060537d ("rbd: new exclusive lock wait/wake code")
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov &lt;idryomov@gmail.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Dongsheng Yang &lt;dongsheng.yang@easystack.cn&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
commit 2237ceb71f89837ac47c5dce2aaa2c2b3a337a3c upstream.

Every time a watch is reestablished after getting lost, we need to
update the cookie which involves quiescing exclusive lock.  For this,
we transition from RBD_LOCK_STATE_LOCKED to RBD_LOCK_STATE_QUIESCING
roughly for the duration of rbd_reacquire_lock() call.  If the mapping
is exclusive and I/O happens to arrive in this time window, it's failed
with EROFS (later translated to EIO) based on the wrong assumption in
rbd_img_exclusive_lock() -- "lock got released?" check there stopped
making sense with commit a2b1da09793d ("rbd: lock should be quiesced on
reacquire").

To make it worse, any such I/O is added to the acquiring list before
EROFS is returned and this sets up for violating rbd_lock_del_request()
precondition that the request is either on the running list or not on
any list at all -- see commit ded080c86b3f ("rbd: don't move requests
to the running list on errors").  rbd_lock_del_request() ends up
processing these requests as if they were on the running list which
screws up quiescing_wait completion counter and ultimately leads to

    rbd_assert(!completion_done(&amp;rbd_dev-&gt;quiescing_wait));

being triggered on the next watch error.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 06ef84c4e9c4: rbd: rename RBD_LOCK_STATE_RELEASING and releasing_wait
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 637cd060537d ("rbd: new exclusive lock wait/wake code")
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov &lt;idryomov@gmail.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Dongsheng Yang &lt;dongsheng.yang@easystack.cn&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
