linux-stable.git/drivers/block/loop.c, branch v4.4.172

loop: Fix double mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex) in loop_control_ioctl()

2019-01-26T08:42:52+00:00

commit 628bd85947091830a8c4872adfd5ed1d515a9cf2 upstream.

Commit 0a42e99b58a20883 ("loop: Get rid of loop_index_mutex") forgot to
remove mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex) from loop_control_ioctl() when
replacing loop_index_mutex with loop_ctl_mutex.

Fixes: 0a42e99b58a20883 ("loop: Get rid of loop_index_mutex")
Reported-by: syzbot 
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei 
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara 
Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa 
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

loop: Get rid of loop_index_mutex

2019-01-26T08:42:52+00:00

commit 0a42e99b58a208839626465af194cfe640ef9493 upstream.

Now that loop_ctl_mutex is global, just get rid of loop_index_mutex as
there is no good reason to keep these two separate and it just
complicates the locking.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara 
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

loop: Fold __loop_release into loop_release

2019-01-26T08:42:51+00:00

commit 967d1dc144b50ad005e5eecdfadfbcfb399ffff6 upstream.

__loop_release() has a single call site. Fold it there. This is
currently not a huge win but it will make following replacement of
loop_index_mutex more obvious.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara 
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

block/loop: Use global lock for ioctl() operation.

2019-01-26T08:42:51+00:00

commit 310ca162d779efee8a2dc3731439680f3e9c1e86 upstream.

syzbot is reporting NULL pointer dereference [1] which is caused by
race condition between ioctl(loop_fd, LOOP_CLR_FD, 0) versus
ioctl(other_loop_fd, LOOP_SET_FD, loop_fd) due to traversing other
loop devices at loop_validate_file() without holding corresponding
lo->lo_ctl_mutex locks.

Since ioctl() request on loop devices is not frequent operation, we don't
need fine grained locking. Let's use global lock in order to allow safe
traversal at loop_validate_file().

Note that syzbot is also reporting circular locking dependency between
bdev->bd_mutex and lo->lo_ctl_mutex [2] which is caused by calling
blkdev_reread_part() with lock held. This patch does not address it.

[1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=f3cfe26e785d85f9ee259f385515291d21bd80a3
[2] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=bf154052f0eea4bc7712499e4569505907d15889

Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa 
Reported-by: syzbot 
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara 
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara 
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

loop: remember whether sysfs_create_group() was done

2018-07-17T09:31:46+00:00

commit d3349b6b3c373ac1fbfb040b810fcee5e2adc7e0 upstream.

syzbot is hitting WARN() triggered by memory allocation fault
injection [1] because loop module is calling sysfs_remove_group()
when sysfs_create_group() failed.
Fix this by remembering whether sysfs_create_group() succeeded.

[1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=3f86c0edf75c86d2633aeb9dd69eccc70bc7e90b

Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa 
Reported-by: syzbot 
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman 

Renamed sysfs_ready -> sysfs_inited.

Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

loop: add recursion validation to LOOP_CHANGE_FD

2018-07-17T09:31:46+00:00

commit d2ac838e4cd7e5e9891ecc094d626734b0245c99 upstream.

Refactor the validation code used in LOOP_SET_FD so it is also used in
LOOP_CHANGE_FD.  Otherwise it is possible to construct a set of loop
devices that all refer to each other.  This can lead to a infinite
loop in starting with "while (is_loop_device(f)) .." in loop_set_fd().

Fix this by refactoring out the validation code and using it for
LOOP_CHANGE_FD as well as LOOP_SET_FD.

Reported-by: syzbot+4349872271ece473a7c91190b68b4bac7c5dbc87@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+40bd32c4d9a3cc12a339@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+769c54e66f994b041be7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+0a89a9ce473936c57065@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o 
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

block/loop: fix deadlock after loop_set_status

2018-04-24T07:32:03+00:00

commit 1e047eaab3bb5564f25b41e9cd3a053009f4e789 upstream.

syzbot is reporting deadlocks at __blkdev_get() [1].

----------------------------------------
[   92.493919] systemd-udevd   D12696   525      1 0x00000000
[   92.495891] Call Trace:
[   92.501560]  schedule+0x23/0x80
[   92.502923]  schedule_preempt_disabled+0x5/0x10
[   92.504645]  __mutex_lock+0x416/0x9e0
[   92.510760]  __blkdev_get+0x73/0x4f0
[   92.512220]  blkdev_get+0x12e/0x390
[   92.518151]  do_dentry_open+0x1c3/0x2f0
[   92.519815]  path_openat+0x5d9/0xdc0
[   92.521437]  do_filp_open+0x7d/0xf0
[   92.527365]  do_sys_open+0x1b8/0x250
[   92.528831]  do_syscall_64+0x6e/0x270
[   92.530341]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x42/0xb7

[   92.931922] 1 lock held by systemd-udevd/525:
[   92.933642]  #0: 00000000a2849e25 (&bdev->bd_mutex){+.+.}, at: __blkdev_get+0x73/0x4f0
----------------------------------------

The reason of deadlock turned out that wait_event_interruptible() in
blk_queue_enter() got stuck with bdev->bd_mutex held at __blkdev_put()
due to q->mq_freeze_depth == 1.

----------------------------------------
[   92.787172] a.out           S12584   634    633 0x80000002
[   92.789120] Call Trace:
[   92.796693]  schedule+0x23/0x80
[   92.797994]  blk_queue_enter+0x3cb/0x540
[   92.803272]  generic_make_request+0xf0/0x3d0
[   92.807970]  submit_bio+0x67/0x130
[   92.810928]  submit_bh_wbc+0x15e/0x190
[   92.812461]  __block_write_full_page+0x218/0x460
[   92.815792]  __writepage+0x11/0x50
[   92.817209]  write_cache_pages+0x1ae/0x3d0
[   92.825585]  generic_writepages+0x5a/0x90
[   92.831865]  do_writepages+0x43/0xd0
[   92.836972]  __filemap_fdatawrite_range+0xc1/0x100
[   92.838788]  filemap_write_and_wait+0x24/0x70
[   92.840491]  __blkdev_put+0x69/0x1e0
[   92.841949]  blkdev_close+0x16/0x20
[   92.843418]  __fput+0xda/0x1f0
[   92.844740]  task_work_run+0x87/0xb0
[   92.846215]  do_exit+0x2f5/0xba0
[   92.850528]  do_group_exit+0x34/0xb0
[   92.852018]  SyS_exit_group+0xb/0x10
[   92.853449]  do_syscall_64+0x6e/0x270
[   92.854944]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x42/0xb7

[   92.943530] 1 lock held by a.out/634:
[   92.945105]  #0: 00000000a2849e25 (&bdev->bd_mutex){+.+.}, at: __blkdev_put+0x3c/0x1e0
----------------------------------------

The reason of q->mq_freeze_depth == 1 turned out that loop_set_status()
forgot to call blk_mq_unfreeze_queue() at error paths for
info->lo_encrypt_type != NULL case.

----------------------------------------
[   37.509497] CPU: 2 PID: 634 Comm: a.out Tainted: G        W        4.16.0+ #457
[   37.513608] Hardware name: VMware, Inc. VMware Virtual Platform/440BX Desktop Reference Platform, BIOS 6.00 05/19/2017
[   37.518832] RIP: 0010:blk_freeze_queue_start+0x17/0x40
[   37.521778] RSP: 0018:ffffb0c2013e7c60 EFLAGS: 00010246
[   37.524078] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8b07b1519798 RCX: 0000000000000000
[   37.527015] RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: ffffb0c2013e7cc0 RDI: ffff8b07b1519798
[   37.529934] RBP: ffffb0c2013e7cc0 R08: 0000000000000008 R09: 47a189966239b898
[   37.532684] R10: dad78b99b278552f R11: 9332dca72259d5ef R12: ffff8b07acd73678
[   37.535452] R13: 0000000000004c04 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff8b07b841e940
[   37.538186] FS:  00007fede33b9740(0000) GS:ffff8b07b8e80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[   37.541168] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[   37.543590] CR2: 00000000206fdf18 CR3: 0000000130b30006 CR4: 00000000000606e0
[   37.546410] Call Trace:
[   37.547902]  blk_freeze_queue+0x9/0x30
[   37.549968]  loop_set_status+0x67/0x3c0 [loop]
[   37.549975]  loop_set_status64+0x3b/0x70 [loop]
[   37.549986]  lo_ioctl+0x223/0x810 [loop]
[   37.549995]  blkdev_ioctl+0x572/0x980
[   37.550003]  block_ioctl+0x34/0x40
[   37.550006]  do_vfs_ioctl+0xa7/0x6d0
[   37.550017]  ksys_ioctl+0x6b/0x80
[   37.573076]  SyS_ioctl+0x5/0x10
[   37.574831]  do_syscall_64+0x6e/0x270
[   37.576769]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x42/0xb7
----------------------------------------

[1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=cd662bc3f6022c0979d01a262c318fab2ee9b56f

Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa 
Reported-by: syzbot 
Fixes: ecdd09597a572513 ("block/loop: fix race between I/O and set_status")
Cc: Ming Lei 
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov 
Cc: stable 
Cc: Jens Axboe 
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

Fix loop device flush before configure v3

2018-04-13T17:50:19+00:00

[ Upstream commit 6460495709aeb651896bc8e5c134b2e4ca7d34a8 ]

While installing SLES-12 (based on v4.4), I found that the installer
will stall for 60+ seconds during LVM disk scan.  The root cause was
determined to be the removal of a bound device check in loop_flush()
by commit b5dd2f6047ca ("block: loop: improve performance via blk-mq").

Restoring this check, examining ->lo_state as set by loop_set_fd()
eliminates the bad behavior.

Test method:
modprobe loop max_loop=64
dd if=/dev/zero of=disk bs=512 count=200K
for((i=0;i<4;i++))do losetup -f disk; done
mkfs.ext4 -F /dev/loop0
for((i=0;i<4;i++))do mkdir t$i; mount /dev/loop$i t$i;done
for f in `ls /dev/loop[0-9]*|sort`; do \
	echo $f; dd if=$f of=/dev/null  bs=512 count=1; \
	done

Test output:  stock          patched
/dev/loop0    18.1217e-05    8.3842e-05
/dev/loop1     6.1114e-05    0.000147979
/dev/loop10    0.414701      0.000116564
/dev/loop11    0.7474        6.7942e-05
/dev/loop12    0.747986      8.9082e-05
/dev/loop13    0.746532      7.4799e-05
/dev/loop14    0.480041      9.3926e-05
/dev/loop15    1.26453       7.2522e-05

Note that from loop10 onward, the device is not mounted, yet the
stock kernel consumes several orders of magnitude more wall time
than it does for a mounted device.
(Thanks for Mike Galbraith , give a changelog review.)

Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke 
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei 
Signed-off-by: James Wang 
Fixes: b5dd2f6047ca ("block: loop: improve performance via blk-mq")
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

loop: Fix lost writes caused by missing flag

2018-03-18T10:17:49+00:00

commit 1d037577c323e5090ce281e96bc313ab2eee5be2 upstream.

The following commit:

commit aa4d86163e4e ("block: loop: switch to VFS ITER_BVEC")

replaced __do_lo_send_write(), which used ITER_KVEC iterators, with
lo_write_bvec() which uses ITER_BVEC iterators.  In this change, though,
the WRITE flag was lost:

-       iov_iter_kvec(&from, ITER_KVEC | WRITE, &kvec, 1, len);
+       iov_iter_bvec(&i, ITER_BVEC, bvec, 1, bvec->bv_len);

This flag is necessary for the DAX case because we make decisions based on
whether or not the iterator is a READ or a WRITE in dax_iomap_actor() and
in dax_iomap_rw().

We end up going through this path in configurations where we combine a PMEM
device with 4k sectors, a loopback device and DAX.  The consequence of this
missed flag is that what we intend as a write actually turns into a read in
the DAX code, so no data is ever written.

The very simplest test case is to create a loopback device and try and
write a small string to it, then hexdump a few bytes of the device to see
if the write took.  Without this patch you read back all zeros, with this
you read back the string you wrote.

For XFS this causes us to fail or panic during the following xfstests:

	xfs/074 xfs/078 xfs/216 xfs/217 xfs/250

For ext4 we have a similar issue where writes never happen, but we don't
currently have any xfstests that use loopback and show this issue.

Fix this by restoring the WRITE flag argument to iov_iter_bvec().  This
causes the xfstests to all pass.

Cc: Al Viro 
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: commit aa4d86163e4e ("block: loop: switch to VFS ITER_BVEC")
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig 
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei 
Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler 
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

loop: fix concurrent lo_open/lo_release

2018-02-03T16:04:24+00:00

commit ae6650163c66a7eff1acd6eb8b0f752dcfa8eba5 upstream.

范龙飞 reports that KASAN can report a use-after-free in __lock_acquire.
The reason is due to insufficient serialization in lo_release(), which
will continue to use the loop device even after it has decremented the
lo_refcnt to zero.

In the meantime, another process can come in, open the loop device
again as it is being shut down. Confusion ensues.

Reported-by: 范龙飞 
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds 
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe 
Cc: Ben Hutchings 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman