<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>linux-stable.git/drivers/base/power, branch v4.19.232</title>
<subtitle>Linux kernel stable tree</subtitle>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/'/>
<entry>
<title>PM: base: power: don't try to use non-existing RTC for storing data</title>
<updated>2021-09-22T09:48:10+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Juergen Gross</name>
<email>jgross@suse.com</email>
</author>
<published>2021-09-03T08:49:36+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=50990255209c11c6452649d2f00884aafbc27166'/>
<id>50990255209c11c6452649d2f00884aafbc27166</id>
<content type='text'>
commit 0560204b360a332c321124dbc5cdfd3364533a74 upstream.

If there is no legacy RTC device, don't try to use it for storing trace
data across suspend/resume.

Cc: &lt;stable@vger.kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross &lt;jgross@suse.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki &lt;rafael@kernel.org&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210903084937.19392-2-jgross@suse.com
Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross &lt;jgross@suse.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
commit 0560204b360a332c321124dbc5cdfd3364533a74 upstream.

If there is no legacy RTC device, don't try to use it for storing trace
data across suspend/resume.

Cc: &lt;stable@vger.kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross &lt;jgross@suse.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki &lt;rafael@kernel.org&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210903084937.19392-2-jgross@suse.com
Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross &lt;jgross@suse.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>PM: runtime: Fix ordering in pm_runtime_get_suppliers()</title>
<updated>2021-04-07T10:48:49+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Adrian Hunter</name>
<email>adrian.hunter@intel.com</email>
</author>
<published>2021-03-26T10:56:18+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=5f40a359356b05ec28a802d6c60babdee3f90e44'/>
<id>5f40a359356b05ec28a802d6c60babdee3f90e44</id>
<content type='text'>
commit c0c33442f7203704aef345647e14c2fb86071001 upstream.

rpm_active indicates how many times the supplier usage_count has been
incremented. Consequently it must be updated after pm_runtime_get_sync() of
the supplier, not before.

Fixes: 4c06c4e6cf63 ("driver core: Fix possible supplier PM-usage counter imbalance")
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter &lt;adrian.hunter@intel.com&gt;
Cc: 5.1+ &lt;stable@vger.kernel.org&gt; # 5.1+
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki &lt;rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
commit c0c33442f7203704aef345647e14c2fb86071001 upstream.

rpm_active indicates how many times the supplier usage_count has been
incremented. Consequently it must be updated after pm_runtime_get_sync() of
the supplier, not before.

Fixes: 4c06c4e6cf63 ("driver core: Fix possible supplier PM-usage counter imbalance")
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter &lt;adrian.hunter@intel.com&gt;
Cc: 5.1+ &lt;stable@vger.kernel.org&gt; # 5.1+
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki &lt;rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>PM: runtime: Fix race getting/putting suppliers at probe</title>
<updated>2021-04-07T10:48:49+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Adrian Hunter</name>
<email>adrian.hunter@intel.com</email>
</author>
<published>2021-03-26T10:56:19+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=4e5e97b164e90b4ad28cf617f3164581cd4f4b11'/>
<id>4e5e97b164e90b4ad28cf617f3164581cd4f4b11</id>
<content type='text'>
commit 9dfacc54a8661bc8be6e08cffee59596ec59f263 upstream.

pm_runtime_put_suppliers() must not decrement rpm_active unless the
consumer is suspended. That is because, otherwise, it could suspend
suppliers for an active consumer.

That can happen as follows:

 static int driver_probe_device(struct device_driver *drv, struct device *dev)
 {
	int ret = 0;

	if (!device_is_registered(dev))
		return -ENODEV;

	dev-&gt;can_match = true;
	pr_debug("bus: '%s': %s: matched device %s with driver %s\n",
		 drv-&gt;bus-&gt;name, __func__, dev_name(dev), drv-&gt;name);

	pm_runtime_get_suppliers(dev);
	if (dev-&gt;parent)
		pm_runtime_get_sync(dev-&gt;parent);

 At this point, dev can runtime suspend so rpm_put_suppliers() can run,
 rpm_active becomes 1 (the lowest value).

	pm_runtime_barrier(dev);
	if (initcall_debug)
		ret = really_probe_debug(dev, drv);
	else
		ret = really_probe(dev, drv);

 Probe callback can have runtime resumed dev, and then runtime put
 so dev is awaiting autosuspend, but rpm_active is 2.

	pm_request_idle(dev);

	if (dev-&gt;parent)
		pm_runtime_put(dev-&gt;parent);

	pm_runtime_put_suppliers(dev);

 Now pm_runtime_put_suppliers() will put the supplier
 i.e. rpm_active 2 -&gt; 1, but consumer can still be active.

	return ret;
 }

Fix by checking the runtime status. For any status other than
RPM_SUSPENDED, rpm_active can be considered to be "owned" by
rpm_[get/put]_suppliers() and pm_runtime_put_suppliers() need do nothing.

Reported-by: Asutosh Das &lt;asutoshd@codeaurora.org&gt;
Fixes: 4c06c4e6cf63 ("driver core: Fix possible supplier PM-usage counter imbalance")
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter &lt;adrian.hunter@intel.com&gt;
Cc: 5.1+ &lt;stable@vger.kernel.org&gt; # 5.1+
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki &lt;rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
commit 9dfacc54a8661bc8be6e08cffee59596ec59f263 upstream.

pm_runtime_put_suppliers() must not decrement rpm_active unless the
consumer is suspended. That is because, otherwise, it could suspend
suppliers for an active consumer.

That can happen as follows:

 static int driver_probe_device(struct device_driver *drv, struct device *dev)
 {
	int ret = 0;

	if (!device_is_registered(dev))
		return -ENODEV;

	dev-&gt;can_match = true;
	pr_debug("bus: '%s': %s: matched device %s with driver %s\n",
		 drv-&gt;bus-&gt;name, __func__, dev_name(dev), drv-&gt;name);

	pm_runtime_get_suppliers(dev);
	if (dev-&gt;parent)
		pm_runtime_get_sync(dev-&gt;parent);

 At this point, dev can runtime suspend so rpm_put_suppliers() can run,
 rpm_active becomes 1 (the lowest value).

	pm_runtime_barrier(dev);
	if (initcall_debug)
		ret = really_probe_debug(dev, drv);
	else
		ret = really_probe(dev, drv);

 Probe callback can have runtime resumed dev, and then runtime put
 so dev is awaiting autosuspend, but rpm_active is 2.

	pm_request_idle(dev);

	if (dev-&gt;parent)
		pm_runtime_put(dev-&gt;parent);

	pm_runtime_put_suppliers(dev);

 Now pm_runtime_put_suppliers() will put the supplier
 i.e. rpm_active 2 -&gt; 1, but consumer can still be active.

	return ret;
 }

Fix by checking the runtime status. For any status other than
RPM_SUSPENDED, rpm_active can be considered to be "owned" by
rpm_[get/put]_suppliers() and pm_runtime_put_suppliers() need do nothing.

Reported-by: Asutosh Das &lt;asutoshd@codeaurora.org&gt;
Fixes: 4c06c4e6cf63 ("driver core: Fix possible supplier PM-usage counter imbalance")
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter &lt;adrian.hunter@intel.com&gt;
Cc: 5.1+ &lt;stable@vger.kernel.org&gt; # 5.1+
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki &lt;rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Revert "PM: runtime: Update device status before letting suppliers suspend"</title>
<updated>2021-03-24T10:07:31+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Rafael J. Wysocki</name>
<email>rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com</email>
</author>
<published>2021-03-19T14:47:25+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=f68e0080674da512f9dbe2cae059c641a076c593'/>
<id>f68e0080674da512f9dbe2cae059c641a076c593</id>
<content type='text'>
commit 0cab893f409c53634d0d818fa414641cbcdb0dab upstream.

Revert commit 44cc89f76464 ("PM: runtime: Update device status
before letting suppliers suspend") that introduced a race condition
into __rpm_callback() which allowed a concurrent rpm_resume() to
run and resume the device prematurely after its status had been
changed to RPM_SUSPENDED by __rpm_callback().

Fixes: 44cc89f76464 ("PM: runtime: Update device status before letting suppliers suspend")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/24dfb6fc-5d54-6ee2-9195-26428b7ecf8a@intel.com/
Reported-by: Adrian Hunter &lt;adrian.hunter@intel.com&gt;
Cc: 4.10+ &lt;stable@vger.kernel.org&gt; # 4.10+
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki &lt;rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson &lt;ulf.hansson@linaro.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
commit 0cab893f409c53634d0d818fa414641cbcdb0dab upstream.

Revert commit 44cc89f76464 ("PM: runtime: Update device status
before letting suppliers suspend") that introduced a race condition
into __rpm_callback() which allowed a concurrent rpm_resume() to
run and resume the device prematurely after its status had been
changed to RPM_SUSPENDED by __rpm_callback().

Fixes: 44cc89f76464 ("PM: runtime: Update device status before letting suppliers suspend")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/24dfb6fc-5d54-6ee2-9195-26428b7ecf8a@intel.com/
Reported-by: Adrian Hunter &lt;adrian.hunter@intel.com&gt;
Cc: 4.10+ &lt;stable@vger.kernel.org&gt; # 4.10+
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki &lt;rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson &lt;ulf.hansson@linaro.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>PM: runtime: Update device status before letting suppliers suspend</title>
<updated>2021-03-11T13:04:59+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Rafael J. Wysocki</name>
<email>rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com</email>
</author>
<published>2021-02-25T18:23:27+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=be0abff9c34659622f564edec20e9cfa9af94120'/>
<id>be0abff9c34659622f564edec20e9cfa9af94120</id>
<content type='text'>
commit 44cc89f764646b2f1f2ea5d1a08b230131707851 upstream.

Because the PM-runtime status of the device is not updated in
__rpm_callback(), attempts to suspend the suppliers of the given
device triggered by rpm_put_suppliers() called by it may fail.

Fix this by making __rpm_callback() update the device's status to
RPM_SUSPENDED before calling rpm_put_suppliers() if the current
status of the device is RPM_SUSPENDING and the callback just invoked
by it has returned 0 (success).

While at it, modify the code in __rpm_callback() to always check
the device's PM-runtime status under its PM lock.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/CAPDyKFqm06KDw_p8WXsM4dijDbho4bb6T4k50UqqvR1_COsp8g@mail.gmail.com/
Fixes: 21d5c57b3726 ("PM / runtime: Use device links")
Reported-by: Elaine Zhang &lt;zhangqing@rock-chips.com&gt;
Diagnosed-by: Ulf Hansson &lt;ulf.hansson@linaro.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki &lt;rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com&gt;
Tested-by: Elaine Zhang &lt;zhangiqng@rock-chips.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson &lt;ulf.hansson@linaro.org&gt;
Cc: 4.10+ &lt;stable@vger.kernel.org&gt; # 4.10+
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki &lt;rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
commit 44cc89f764646b2f1f2ea5d1a08b230131707851 upstream.

Because the PM-runtime status of the device is not updated in
__rpm_callback(), attempts to suspend the suppliers of the given
device triggered by rpm_put_suppliers() called by it may fail.

Fix this by making __rpm_callback() update the device's status to
RPM_SUSPENDED before calling rpm_put_suppliers() if the current
status of the device is RPM_SUSPENDING and the callback just invoked
by it has returned 0 (success).

While at it, modify the code in __rpm_callback() to always check
the device's PM-runtime status under its PM lock.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/CAPDyKFqm06KDw_p8WXsM4dijDbho4bb6T4k50UqqvR1_COsp8g@mail.gmail.com/
Fixes: 21d5c57b3726 ("PM / runtime: Use device links")
Reported-by: Elaine Zhang &lt;zhangqing@rock-chips.com&gt;
Diagnosed-by: Ulf Hansson &lt;ulf.hansson@linaro.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki &lt;rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com&gt;
Tested-by: Elaine Zhang &lt;zhangiqng@rock-chips.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson &lt;ulf.hansson@linaro.org&gt;
Cc: 4.10+ &lt;stable@vger.kernel.org&gt; # 4.10+
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki &lt;rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>PM: sleep: core: Fix the handling of pending runtime resume requests</title>
<updated>2020-09-03T09:24:29+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Rafael J. Wysocki</name>
<email>rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com</email>
</author>
<published>2020-08-24T17:35:31+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=517b087a70a3fc59cdba5dcf99afcb8a2f90a3c7'/>
<id>517b087a70a3fc59cdba5dcf99afcb8a2f90a3c7</id>
<content type='text'>
commit e3eb6e8fba65094328b8dca635d00de74ba75b45 upstream.

It has been reported that system-wide suspend may be aborted in the
absence of any wakeup events due to unforseen interactions of it with
the runtume PM framework.

One failing scenario is when there are multiple devices sharing an
ACPI power resource and runtime-resume needs to be carried out for
one of them during system-wide suspend (for example, because it needs
to be reconfigured before the whole system goes to sleep).  In that
case, the runtime-resume of that device involves turning the ACPI
power resource "on" which in turn causes runtime-resume requests
to be queued up for all of the other devices sharing it.  Those
requests go to the runtime PM workqueue which is frozen during
system-wide suspend, so they are not actually taken care of until
the resume of the whole system, but the pm_runtime_barrier()
call in __device_suspend() sees them and triggers system wakeup
events for them which then cause the system-wide suspend to be
aborted if wakeup source objects are in active use.

Of course, the logic that leads to triggering those wakeup events is
questionable in the first place, because clearly there are cases in
which a pending runtime resume request for a device is not connected
to any real wakeup events in any way (like the one above).  Moreover,
it is racy, because the device may be resuming already by the time
the pm_runtime_barrier() runs and so if the driver doesn't take care
of signaling the wakeup event as appropriate, it will be lost.
However, if the driver does take care of that, the extra
pm_wakeup_event() call in the core is redundant.

Accordingly, drop the conditional pm_wakeup_event() call fron
__device_suspend() and make the latter call pm_runtime_barrier()
alone.  Also modify the comment next to that call to reflect the new
code and extend it to mention the need to avoid unwanted interactions
between runtime PM and system-wide device suspend callbacks.

Fixes: 1e2ef05bb8cf8 ("PM: Limit race conditions between runtime PM and system sleep (v2)")
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki &lt;rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com&gt;
Acked-by: Alan Stern &lt;stern@rowland.harvard.edu&gt;
Reported-by: Utkarsh H Patel &lt;utkarsh.h.patel@intel.com&gt;
Tested-by: Utkarsh H Patel &lt;utkarsh.h.patel@intel.com&gt;
Tested-by: Pengfei Xu &lt;pengfei.xu@intel.com&gt;
Cc: All applicable &lt;stable@vger.kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;

</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
commit e3eb6e8fba65094328b8dca635d00de74ba75b45 upstream.

It has been reported that system-wide suspend may be aborted in the
absence of any wakeup events due to unforseen interactions of it with
the runtume PM framework.

One failing scenario is when there are multiple devices sharing an
ACPI power resource and runtime-resume needs to be carried out for
one of them during system-wide suspend (for example, because it needs
to be reconfigured before the whole system goes to sleep).  In that
case, the runtime-resume of that device involves turning the ACPI
power resource "on" which in turn causes runtime-resume requests
to be queued up for all of the other devices sharing it.  Those
requests go to the runtime PM workqueue which is frozen during
system-wide suspend, so they are not actually taken care of until
the resume of the whole system, but the pm_runtime_barrier()
call in __device_suspend() sees them and triggers system wakeup
events for them which then cause the system-wide suspend to be
aborted if wakeup source objects are in active use.

Of course, the logic that leads to triggering those wakeup events is
questionable in the first place, because clearly there are cases in
which a pending runtime resume request for a device is not connected
to any real wakeup events in any way (like the one above).  Moreover,
it is racy, because the device may be resuming already by the time
the pm_runtime_barrier() runs and so if the driver doesn't take care
of signaling the wakeup event as appropriate, it will be lost.
However, if the driver does take care of that, the extra
pm_wakeup_event() call in the core is redundant.

Accordingly, drop the conditional pm_wakeup_event() call fron
__device_suspend() and make the latter call pm_runtime_barrier()
alone.  Also modify the comment next to that call to reflect the new
code and extend it to mention the need to avoid unwanted interactions
between runtime PM and system-wide device suspend callbacks.

Fixes: 1e2ef05bb8cf8 ("PM: Limit race conditions between runtime PM and system sleep (v2)")
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki &lt;rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com&gt;
Acked-by: Alan Stern &lt;stern@rowland.harvard.edu&gt;
Reported-by: Utkarsh H Patel &lt;utkarsh.h.patel@intel.com&gt;
Tested-by: Utkarsh H Patel &lt;utkarsh.h.patel@intel.com&gt;
Tested-by: Pengfei Xu &lt;pengfei.xu@intel.com&gt;
Cc: All applicable &lt;stable@vger.kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;

</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>driver core: Remove device link creation limitation</title>
<updated>2020-03-20T10:55:58+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Rafael J. Wysocki</name>
<email>rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com</email>
</author>
<published>2019-07-16T15:21:06+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=53a895ff19bd3424605b804530c43d065eab262b'/>
<id>53a895ff19bd3424605b804530c43d065eab262b</id>
<content type='text'>
commit 515db266a9dace92b0cbaed9a6044dd5304b8ca9 upstream.

If device_link_add() is called for a consumer/supplier pair with an
existing device link between them and the existing link's type is
not in agreement with the flags passed to that function by its
caller, NULL will be returned.  That is seriously inconvenient,
because it forces the callers of device_link_add() to worry about
what others may or may not do even if that is not relevant to them
for any other reasons.

It turns out, however, that this limitation can be made go away
relatively easily.

The underlying observation is that if DL_FLAG_STATELESS has been
passed to device_link_add() in flags for the given consumer/supplier
pair at least once, calling either device_link_del() or
device_link_remove() to release the link returned by it should work,
but there are no other requirements associated with that flag.  In
turn, if at least one of the callers of device_link_add() for the
given consumer/supplier pair has not passed DL_FLAG_STATELESS to it
in flags, the driver core should track the status of the link and act
on it as appropriate (ie. the link should be treated as "managed").
This means that DL_FLAG_STATELESS needs to be set for managed device
links and it should be valid to call device_link_del() or
device_link_remove() to drop references to them in certain
sutiations.

To allow that to happen, introduce a new (internal) device link flag
called DL_FLAG_MANAGED and make device_link_add() set it automatically
whenever DL_FLAG_STATELESS is not passed to it.  Also make it take
additional references to existing device links that were previously
stateless (that is, with DL_FLAG_STATELESS set and DL_FLAG_MANAGED
unset) and will need to be managed going forward and initialize
their status (which has been DL_STATE_NONE so far).

Accordingly, when a managed device link is dropped automatically
by the driver core, make it clear DL_FLAG_MANAGED, reset the link's
status back to DL_STATE_NONE and drop the reference to it associated
with DL_FLAG_MANAGED instead of just deleting it right away (to
allow it to stay around in case it still needs to be released
explicitly by someone).

With that, since setting DL_FLAG_STATELESS doesn't mean that the
device link in question is not managed any more, replace all of the
status-tracking checks against DL_FLAG_STATELESS with analogous
checks against DL_FLAG_MANAGED and update the documentation to
reflect these changes.

While at it, make device_link_add() reject flags that it does not
recognize, including DL_FLAG_MANAGED.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki &lt;rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Saravana Kannan &lt;saravanak@google.com&gt;
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski &lt;m.szyprowski@samsung.com&gt;
Review-by: Saravana Kannan &lt;saravanak@google.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/2305283.AStDPdUUnE@kreacher
Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan &lt;saravanak@google.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;

</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
commit 515db266a9dace92b0cbaed9a6044dd5304b8ca9 upstream.

If device_link_add() is called for a consumer/supplier pair with an
existing device link between them and the existing link's type is
not in agreement with the flags passed to that function by its
caller, NULL will be returned.  That is seriously inconvenient,
because it forces the callers of device_link_add() to worry about
what others may or may not do even if that is not relevant to them
for any other reasons.

It turns out, however, that this limitation can be made go away
relatively easily.

The underlying observation is that if DL_FLAG_STATELESS has been
passed to device_link_add() in flags for the given consumer/supplier
pair at least once, calling either device_link_del() or
device_link_remove() to release the link returned by it should work,
but there are no other requirements associated with that flag.  In
turn, if at least one of the callers of device_link_add() for the
given consumer/supplier pair has not passed DL_FLAG_STATELESS to it
in flags, the driver core should track the status of the link and act
on it as appropriate (ie. the link should be treated as "managed").
This means that DL_FLAG_STATELESS needs to be set for managed device
links and it should be valid to call device_link_del() or
device_link_remove() to drop references to them in certain
sutiations.

To allow that to happen, introduce a new (internal) device link flag
called DL_FLAG_MANAGED and make device_link_add() set it automatically
whenever DL_FLAG_STATELESS is not passed to it.  Also make it take
additional references to existing device links that were previously
stateless (that is, with DL_FLAG_STATELESS set and DL_FLAG_MANAGED
unset) and will need to be managed going forward and initialize
their status (which has been DL_STATE_NONE so far).

Accordingly, when a managed device link is dropped automatically
by the driver core, make it clear DL_FLAG_MANAGED, reset the link's
status back to DL_STATE_NONE and drop the reference to it associated
with DL_FLAG_MANAGED instead of just deleting it right away (to
allow it to stay around in case it still needs to be released
explicitly by someone).

With that, since setting DL_FLAG_STATELESS doesn't mean that the
device link in question is not managed any more, replace all of the
status-tracking checks against DL_FLAG_STATELESS with analogous
checks against DL_FLAG_MANAGED and update the documentation to
reflect these changes.

While at it, make device_link_add() reject flags that it does not
recognize, including DL_FLAG_MANAGED.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki &lt;rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Saravana Kannan &lt;saravanak@google.com&gt;
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski &lt;m.szyprowski@samsung.com&gt;
Review-by: Saravana Kannan &lt;saravanak@google.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/2305283.AStDPdUUnE@kreacher
Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan &lt;saravanak@google.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;

</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>PM: core: Fix handling of devices deleted during system-wide resume</title>
<updated>2020-02-11T12:34:03+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Rafael J. Wysocki</name>
<email>rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com</email>
</author>
<published>2020-01-22T23:11:24+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=76d587bd579a08ddcd51274c6d9fff4e885e184d'/>
<id>76d587bd579a08ddcd51274c6d9fff4e885e184d</id>
<content type='text'>
commit 0552e05fdfea191a2cf3a0abd33574b5ef9ca818 upstream.

If a device is deleted by one of its system-wide resume callbacks
(for example, because it does not appear to be present or accessible
any more) along with its children, the resume of the children may
continue leading to use-after-free errors and other issues
(potentially).

Namely, if the device's children are resumed asynchronously, their
resume may have been scheduled already before the device's callback
runs and so the device may be deleted while dpm_wait_for_superior()
is being executed for them.  The memory taken up by the parent device
object may be freed then while dpm_wait() is waiting for the parent's
resume callback to complete, which leads to a use-after-free.
Moreover, the resume of the children is really not expected to
continue after they have been unregistered, so it must be terminated
right away in that case.

To address this problem, modify dpm_wait_for_superior() to check
if the target device is still there in the system-wide PM list of
devices and if so, to increment its parent's reference counter, both
under dpm_list_mtx which prevents device_del() running for the child
from dropping the parent's reference counter prematurely.

If the device is not present in the system-wide PM list of devices
any more, the resume of it cannot continue, so check that again after
dpm_wait() returns, which means that the parent's callback has been
completed, and pass the result of that check to the caller of
dpm_wait_for_superior() to allow it to abort the device's resume
if it is not there any more.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/1579568452-27253-1-git-send-email-chanho.min@lge.com
Reported-by: Chanho Min &lt;chanho.min@lge.com&gt;
Cc: All applicable &lt;stable@vger.kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki &lt;rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com&gt;
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;

</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
commit 0552e05fdfea191a2cf3a0abd33574b5ef9ca818 upstream.

If a device is deleted by one of its system-wide resume callbacks
(for example, because it does not appear to be present or accessible
any more) along with its children, the resume of the children may
continue leading to use-after-free errors and other issues
(potentially).

Namely, if the device's children are resumed asynchronously, their
resume may have been scheduled already before the device's callback
runs and so the device may be deleted while dpm_wait_for_superior()
is being executed for them.  The memory taken up by the parent device
object may be freed then while dpm_wait() is waiting for the parent's
resume callback to complete, which leads to a use-after-free.
Moreover, the resume of the children is really not expected to
continue after they have been unregistered, so it must be terminated
right away in that case.

To address this problem, modify dpm_wait_for_superior() to check
if the target device is still there in the system-wide PM list of
devices and if so, to increment its parent's reference counter, both
under dpm_list_mtx which prevents device_del() running for the child
from dropping the parent's reference counter prematurely.

If the device is not present in the system-wide PM list of devices
any more, the resume of it cannot continue, so check that again after
dpm_wait() returns, which means that the parent's callback has been
completed, and pass the result of that check to the caller of
dpm_wait_for_superior() to allow it to abort the device's resume
if it is not there any more.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/1579568452-27253-1-git-send-email-chanho.min@lge.com
Reported-by: Chanho Min &lt;chanho.min@lge.com&gt;
Cc: All applicable &lt;stable@vger.kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki &lt;rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com&gt;
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;

</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>PM: sleep: Fix possible overflow in pm_system_cancel_wakeup()</title>
<updated>2020-01-27T13:51:01+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Rafael J. Wysocki</name>
<email>rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com</email>
</author>
<published>2019-07-15T11:03:48+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=9311fd211ad6d9779ceae504d63ee1d810f42503'/>
<id>9311fd211ad6d9779ceae504d63ee1d810f42503</id>
<content type='text'>
[ Upstream commit 2933954b71f10d392764f95eec0f0aa2d103054b ]

It is not actually guaranteed that pm_abort_suspend will be
nonzero when pm_system_cancel_wakeup() is called which may lead to
subtle issues, so make it use atomic_dec_if_positive() instead of
atomic_dec() for the safety sake.

Fixes: 33e4f80ee69b ("ACPI / PM: Ignore spurious SCI wakeups from suspend-to-idle")
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki &lt;rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com&gt;
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner &lt;tglx@linutronix.de&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
[ Upstream commit 2933954b71f10d392764f95eec0f0aa2d103054b ]

It is not actually guaranteed that pm_abort_suspend will be
nonzero when pm_system_cancel_wakeup() is called which may lead to
subtle issues, so make it use atomic_dec_if_positive() instead of
atomic_dec() for the safety sake.

Fixes: 33e4f80ee69b ("ACPI / PM: Ignore spurious SCI wakeups from suspend-to-idle")
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki &lt;rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com&gt;
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner &lt;tglx@linutronix.de&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>driver core: Fix PM-runtime for links added during consumer probe</title>
<updated>2020-01-27T13:50:26+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Rafael J. Wysocki</name>
<email>rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com</email>
</author>
<published>2019-02-19T16:53:26+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.tavy.me/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=4fe1e6caac16b7bd20eacc1c363351e5d533ac35'/>
<id>4fe1e6caac16b7bd20eacc1c363351e5d533ac35</id>
<content type='text'>
[ Upstream commit 36003d4cf57ca431fb3f94d317bcca426a2394d6 ]

Commit 4c06c4e6cf63 ("driver core: Fix possible supplier PM-usage
counter imbalance") introduced a regression that causes suppliers
to be suspended prematurely for device links added during consumer
driver probe if the initial PM-runtime status of the consumer is
"suspended" and the consumer is resumed after adding the link and
before pm_runtime_put_suppliers() is called.  In that case,
pm_runtime_put_suppliers() will drop the rpm_active refcount for
the link by one and (since rpm_active is equal to two after the
preceding consumer resume) the supplier's PM-runtime usage counter
will be decremented, which may cause the supplier to suspend even
though the consumer's PM-runtime status is "active".

For this reason, partially revert commit 4c06c4e6cf63 as the problem
it tried to fix needs to be addressed somewhat differently, and
change pm_runtime_get_suppliers() and pm_runtime_put_suppliers() so
that the latter only drops rpm_active references acquired by the
former.  [This requires adding a new field to struct device_link,
but I coulnd't find a cleaner way to address the issue that would
work in all cases.]

This causes pm_runtime_put_suppliers() to effectively ignore device
links added during consumer probe, so device_link_add() doesn't need
to worry about ensuring that suppliers will remain active after
pm_runtime_put_suppliers() for links created with DL_FLAG_RPM_ACTIVE
set and it only needs to bump up rpm_active by one for those links,
so pm_runtime_active_link() is not necessary any more.

Fixes: 4c06c4e6cf63 ("driver core: Fix possible supplier PM-usage counter imbalance")
Reported-by: Jon Hunter &lt;jonathanh@nvidia.com&gt;
Tested-by: Jon Hunter &lt;jonathanh@nvidia.com&gt;
Tested-by: Ulf Hansson &lt;ulf.hansson@linaro.org&gt;
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson &lt;ulf.hansson@linaro.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki &lt;rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com&gt;
Tested-by: Thierry Reding &lt;treding@nvidia.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
[ Upstream commit 36003d4cf57ca431fb3f94d317bcca426a2394d6 ]

Commit 4c06c4e6cf63 ("driver core: Fix possible supplier PM-usage
counter imbalance") introduced a regression that causes suppliers
to be suspended prematurely for device links added during consumer
driver probe if the initial PM-runtime status of the consumer is
"suspended" and the consumer is resumed after adding the link and
before pm_runtime_put_suppliers() is called.  In that case,
pm_runtime_put_suppliers() will drop the rpm_active refcount for
the link by one and (since rpm_active is equal to two after the
preceding consumer resume) the supplier's PM-runtime usage counter
will be decremented, which may cause the supplier to suspend even
though the consumer's PM-runtime status is "active".

For this reason, partially revert commit 4c06c4e6cf63 as the problem
it tried to fix needs to be addressed somewhat differently, and
change pm_runtime_get_suppliers() and pm_runtime_put_suppliers() so
that the latter only drops rpm_active references acquired by the
former.  [This requires adding a new field to struct device_link,
but I coulnd't find a cleaner way to address the issue that would
work in all cases.]

This causes pm_runtime_put_suppliers() to effectively ignore device
links added during consumer probe, so device_link_add() doesn't need
to worry about ensuring that suppliers will remain active after
pm_runtime_put_suppliers() for links created with DL_FLAG_RPM_ACTIVE
set and it only needs to bump up rpm_active by one for those links,
so pm_runtime_active_link() is not necessary any more.

Fixes: 4c06c4e6cf63 ("driver core: Fix possible supplier PM-usage counter imbalance")
Reported-by: Jon Hunter &lt;jonathanh@nvidia.com&gt;
Tested-by: Jon Hunter &lt;jonathanh@nvidia.com&gt;
Tested-by: Ulf Hansson &lt;ulf.hansson@linaro.org&gt;
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson &lt;ulf.hansson@linaro.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki &lt;rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com&gt;
Tested-by: Thierry Reding &lt;treding@nvidia.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
