linux-stable.git/drivers/base/power/runtime.c, branch v4.19.321

PM / wakeirq: support enabling wake-up irq after runtime_suspend called

2023-08-11T09:45:40+00:00

[ Upstream commit 259714100d98b50bf04d36a21bf50ca8b829fc11 ]

When the dedicated wake IRQ is level trigger, and it uses the
device's low-power status as the wakeup source, that means if the
device is not in low-power state, the wake IRQ will be triggered
if enabled; For this case, need enable the wake IRQ after running
the device's ->runtime_suspend() which make it enter low-power state.

e.g.
Assume the wake IRQ is a low level trigger type, and the wakeup
signal comes from the low-power status of the device.
The wakeup signal is low level at running time (0), and becomes
high level when the device enters low-power state (runtime_suspend
(1) is called), a wakeup event at (2) make the device exit low-power
state, then the wakeup signal also becomes low level.

                ------------------
               |           ^     ^|
----------------           |     | --------------
 |<---(0)--->|<--(1)--|   (3)   (2)    (4)

if enable the wake IRQ before running runtime_suspend during (0),
a wake IRQ will arise, it causes resume immediately;
it works if enable wake IRQ ( e.g. at (3) or (4)) after running
->runtime_suspend().

This patch introduces a new status WAKE_IRQ_DEDICATED_REVERSE to
optionally support enabling wake IRQ after running ->runtime_suspend().

Suggested-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 
Signed-off-by: Chunfeng Yun 
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 
Stable-dep-of: 8527beb12087 ("PM: sleep: wakeirq: fix wake irq arming")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

PM: runtime: Do not call __rpm_callback() from rpm_idle()

2023-01-18T10:30:07+00:00

[ Upstream commit bc80c2e438dcbfcf748452ec0f7ad5b79ff3ad88 ]

Calling __rpm_callback() from rpm_idle() after adding device links
support to the former is a clear mistake.

Not only it causes rpm_idle() to carry out unnecessary actions, but it
is also against the assumption regarding the stability of PM-runtime
status across __rpm_callback() invocations, because rpm_suspend() and
rpm_resume() may run in parallel with __rpm_callback() when it is called
by rpm_idle() and the device's PM-runtime status can be updated by any
of them.

Fixes: 21d5c57b3726 ("PM / runtime: Use device links")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/36aed941-a73e-d937-2721-4f0decd61ce0@quicinc.com
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 
Reviewed-by: Adrian Hunter 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

PM: runtime: Improve path in rpm_idle() when no callback

2023-01-18T10:30:07+00:00

[ Upstream commit 5a2bd1b1c64e1ac5627db3767ac465f18606315c ]

When pm_runtime_no_callbacks() has been called for a struct device to set
the dev->power.no_callbacks flag for it, it enables rpm_idle() to take a
slightly quicker path by assuming that a ->runtime_idle() callback would
have returned 0 to indicate success.

A device that does not have the dev->power.no_callbacks flag set for it,
may still be missing a corresponding ->runtime_idle() callback, in which
case the slower path in rpm_idle() is taken. Let's improve the behaviour
for this case, by aligning code to the quicker path.

Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson 
Acked-by: Alan Stern 
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 
Stable-dep-of: bc80c2e438dc ("PM: runtime: Do not call __rpm_callback() from rpm_idle()")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

PM: runtime: Fix ordering in pm_runtime_get_suppliers()

2021-04-07T10:48:49+00:00

commit c0c33442f7203704aef345647e14c2fb86071001 upstream.

rpm_active indicates how many times the supplier usage_count has been
incremented. Consequently it must be updated after pm_runtime_get_sync() of
the supplier, not before.

Fixes: 4c06c4e6cf63 ("driver core: Fix possible supplier PM-usage counter imbalance")
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter 
Cc: 5.1+  # 5.1+
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

PM: runtime: Fix race getting/putting suppliers at probe

2021-04-07T10:48:49+00:00

commit 9dfacc54a8661bc8be6e08cffee59596ec59f263 upstream.

pm_runtime_put_suppliers() must not decrement rpm_active unless the
consumer is suspended. That is because, otherwise, it could suspend
suppliers for an active consumer.

That can happen as follows:

 static int driver_probe_device(struct device_driver *drv, struct device *dev)
 {
	int ret = 0;

	if (!device_is_registered(dev))
		return -ENODEV;

	dev->can_match = true;
	pr_debug("bus: '%s': %s: matched device %s with driver %s\n",
		 drv->bus->name, __func__, dev_name(dev), drv->name);

	pm_runtime_get_suppliers(dev);
	if (dev->parent)
		pm_runtime_get_sync(dev->parent);

 At this point, dev can runtime suspend so rpm_put_suppliers() can run,
 rpm_active becomes 1 (the lowest value).

	pm_runtime_barrier(dev);
	if (initcall_debug)
		ret = really_probe_debug(dev, drv);
	else
		ret = really_probe(dev, drv);

 Probe callback can have runtime resumed dev, and then runtime put
 so dev is awaiting autosuspend, but rpm_active is 2.

	pm_request_idle(dev);

	if (dev->parent)
		pm_runtime_put(dev->parent);

	pm_runtime_put_suppliers(dev);

 Now pm_runtime_put_suppliers() will put the supplier
 i.e. rpm_active 2 -> 1, but consumer can still be active.

	return ret;
 }

Fix by checking the runtime status. For any status other than
RPM_SUSPENDED, rpm_active can be considered to be "owned" by
rpm_[get/put]_suppliers() and pm_runtime_put_suppliers() need do nothing.

Reported-by: Asutosh Das 
Fixes: 4c06c4e6cf63 ("driver core: Fix possible supplier PM-usage counter imbalance")
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter 
Cc: 5.1+  # 5.1+
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

Revert "PM: runtime: Update device status before letting suppliers suspend"

2021-03-24T10:07:31+00:00

commit 0cab893f409c53634d0d818fa414641cbcdb0dab upstream.

Revert commit 44cc89f76464 ("PM: runtime: Update device status
before letting suppliers suspend") that introduced a race condition
into __rpm_callback() which allowed a concurrent rpm_resume() to
run and resume the device prematurely after its status had been
changed to RPM_SUSPENDED by __rpm_callback().

Fixes: 44cc89f76464 ("PM: runtime: Update device status before letting suppliers suspend")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/24dfb6fc-5d54-6ee2-9195-26428b7ecf8a@intel.com/
Reported-by: Adrian Hunter 
Cc: 4.10+  # 4.10+
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

PM: runtime: Update device status before letting suppliers suspend

2021-03-11T13:04:59+00:00

commit 44cc89f764646b2f1f2ea5d1a08b230131707851 upstream.

Because the PM-runtime status of the device is not updated in
__rpm_callback(), attempts to suspend the suppliers of the given
device triggered by rpm_put_suppliers() called by it may fail.

Fix this by making __rpm_callback() update the device's status to
RPM_SUSPENDED before calling rpm_put_suppliers() if the current
status of the device is RPM_SUSPENDING and the callback just invoked
by it has returned 0 (success).

While at it, modify the code in __rpm_callback() to always check
the device's PM-runtime status under its PM lock.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/CAPDyKFqm06KDw_p8WXsM4dijDbho4bb6T4k50UqqvR1_COsp8g@mail.gmail.com/
Fixes: 21d5c57b3726 ("PM / runtime: Use device links")
Reported-by: Elaine Zhang 
Diagnosed-by: Ulf Hansson 
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 
Tested-by: Elaine Zhang 
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson 
Cc: 4.10+  # 4.10+
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

driver core: Remove device link creation limitation

2020-03-20T10:55:58+00:00

commit 515db266a9dace92b0cbaed9a6044dd5304b8ca9 upstream.

If device_link_add() is called for a consumer/supplier pair with an
existing device link between them and the existing link's type is
not in agreement with the flags passed to that function by its
caller, NULL will be returned.  That is seriously inconvenient,
because it forces the callers of device_link_add() to worry about
what others may or may not do even if that is not relevant to them
for any other reasons.

It turns out, however, that this limitation can be made go away
relatively easily.

The underlying observation is that if DL_FLAG_STATELESS has been
passed to device_link_add() in flags for the given consumer/supplier
pair at least once, calling either device_link_del() or
device_link_remove() to release the link returned by it should work,
but there are no other requirements associated with that flag.  In
turn, if at least one of the callers of device_link_add() for the
given consumer/supplier pair has not passed DL_FLAG_STATELESS to it
in flags, the driver core should track the status of the link and act
on it as appropriate (ie. the link should be treated as "managed").
This means that DL_FLAG_STATELESS needs to be set for managed device
links and it should be valid to call device_link_del() or
device_link_remove() to drop references to them in certain
sutiations.

To allow that to happen, introduce a new (internal) device link flag
called DL_FLAG_MANAGED and make device_link_add() set it automatically
whenever DL_FLAG_STATELESS is not passed to it.  Also make it take
additional references to existing device links that were previously
stateless (that is, with DL_FLAG_STATELESS set and DL_FLAG_MANAGED
unset) and will need to be managed going forward and initialize
their status (which has been DL_STATE_NONE so far).

Accordingly, when a managed device link is dropped automatically
by the driver core, make it clear DL_FLAG_MANAGED, reset the link's
status back to DL_STATE_NONE and drop the reference to it associated
with DL_FLAG_MANAGED instead of just deleting it right away (to
allow it to stay around in case it still needs to be released
explicitly by someone).

With that, since setting DL_FLAG_STATELESS doesn't mean that the
device link in question is not managed any more, replace all of the
status-tracking checks against DL_FLAG_STATELESS with analogous
checks against DL_FLAG_MANAGED and update the documentation to
reflect these changes.

While at it, make device_link_add() reject flags that it does not
recognize, including DL_FLAG_MANAGED.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 
Reviewed-by: Saravana Kannan 
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski 
Review-by: Saravana Kannan 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/2305283.AStDPdUUnE@kreacher
Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

driver core: Fix PM-runtime for links added during consumer probe

2020-01-27T13:50:26+00:00

[ Upstream commit 36003d4cf57ca431fb3f94d317bcca426a2394d6 ]

Commit 4c06c4e6cf63 ("driver core: Fix possible supplier PM-usage
counter imbalance") introduced a regression that causes suppliers
to be suspended prematurely for device links added during consumer
driver probe if the initial PM-runtime status of the consumer is
"suspended" and the consumer is resumed after adding the link and
before pm_runtime_put_suppliers() is called.  In that case,
pm_runtime_put_suppliers() will drop the rpm_active refcount for
the link by one and (since rpm_active is equal to two after the
preceding consumer resume) the supplier's PM-runtime usage counter
will be decremented, which may cause the supplier to suspend even
though the consumer's PM-runtime status is "active".

For this reason, partially revert commit 4c06c4e6cf63 as the problem
it tried to fix needs to be addressed somewhat differently, and
change pm_runtime_get_suppliers() and pm_runtime_put_suppliers() so
that the latter only drops rpm_active references acquired by the
former.  [This requires adding a new field to struct device_link,
but I coulnd't find a cleaner way to address the issue that would
work in all cases.]

This causes pm_runtime_put_suppliers() to effectively ignore device
links added during consumer probe, so device_link_add() doesn't need
to worry about ensuring that suppliers will remain active after
pm_runtime_put_suppliers() for links created with DL_FLAG_RPM_ACTIVE
set and it only needs to bump up rpm_active by one for those links,
so pm_runtime_active_link() is not necessary any more.

Fixes: 4c06c4e6cf63 ("driver core: Fix possible supplier PM-usage counter imbalance")
Reported-by: Jon Hunter 
Tested-by: Jon Hunter 
Tested-by: Ulf Hansson 
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson 
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 
Tested-by: Thierry Reding 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

driver core: Fix possible supplier PM-usage counter imbalance

2020-01-27T13:50:22+00:00

[ Upstream commit 4c06c4e6cf63d7f3d5dfe62593a073253d750a59 ]

If a stateless device link to a certain supplier with
DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME set in the flags is added and then removed by the
consumer driver's probe callback, the supplier's PM-runtime usage
counter will be nonzero after that which effectively causes the
supplier to remain "always on" going forward.

Namely, device_link_add() called to add the link invokes
device_link_rpm_prepare() which notices that the consumer driver is
probing, so it increments the supplier's PM-runtime usage counter
with the assumption that the link will stay around until
pm_runtime_put_suppliers() is called by driver_probe_device(),
but if the link goes away before that point, the supplier's
PM-runtime usage counter will remain nonzero.

To prevent that from happening, first rework pm_runtime_get_suppliers()
and pm_runtime_put_suppliers() to use the rpm_active refounts of device
links and make the latter only drop rpm_active and the supplier's
PM-runtime usage counter for each link by one, unless rpm_active is
one already for it.  Next, modify device_link_add() to bump up the
new link's rpm_active refcount and the suppliers PM-runtime usage
counter by two, to prevent pm_runtime_put_suppliers(), if it is
called subsequently, from suspending the supplier prematurely (in
case its PM-runtime usage counter goes down to 0 in there).

Due to the way rpm_put_suppliers() works, this change does not
affect runtime suspend of the consumer ends of new device links (or,
generally, device links for which DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME has just been
set).

Fixes: e2f3cd831a28 ("driver core: Fix handling of runtime PM flags in device_link_add()")
Reported-by: Ulf Hansson 
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson 
Tested-by: Ulf Hansson 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin