linux-stable.git/drivers/ata, branch v5.4.223

ata: ahci: Match EM_MAX_SLOTS with SATA_PMP_MAX_PORTS

2022-10-29T08:20:34+00:00

commit 1e41e693f458eef2d5728207dbd327cd3b16580a upstream.

UBSAN complains about array-index-out-of-bounds:
[ 1.980703] kernel: UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in /build/linux-9H675w/linux-5.15.0/drivers/ata/libahci.c:968:41
[ 1.980709] kernel: index 15 is out of range for type 'ahci_em_priv [8]'
[ 1.980713] kernel: CPU: 0 PID: 209 Comm: scsi_eh_8 Not tainted 5.15.0-25-generic #25-Ubuntu
[ 1.980716] kernel: Hardware name: System manufacturer System Product Name/P5Q3, BIOS 1102 06/11/2010
[ 1.980718] kernel: Call Trace:
[ 1.980721] kernel: 
[ 1.980723] kernel: show_stack+0x52/0x58
[ 1.980729] kernel: dump_stack_lvl+0x4a/0x5f
[ 1.980734] kernel: dump_stack+0x10/0x12
[ 1.980736] kernel: ubsan_epilogue+0x9/0x45
[ 1.980739] kernel: __ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds.cold+0x44/0x49
[ 1.980742] kernel: ahci_qc_issue+0x166/0x170 [libahci]
[ 1.980748] kernel: ata_qc_issue+0x135/0x240
[ 1.980752] kernel: ata_exec_internal_sg+0x2c4/0x580
[ 1.980754] kernel: ? vprintk_default+0x1d/0x20
[ 1.980759] kernel: ata_exec_internal+0x67/0xa0
[ 1.980762] kernel: sata_pmp_read+0x8d/0xc0
[ 1.980765] kernel: sata_pmp_read_gscr+0x3c/0x90
[ 1.980768] kernel: sata_pmp_attach+0x8b/0x310
[ 1.980771] kernel: ata_eh_revalidate_and_attach+0x28c/0x4b0
[ 1.980775] kernel: ata_eh_recover+0x6b6/0xb30
[ 1.980778] kernel: ? ahci_do_hardreset+0x180/0x180 [libahci]
[ 1.980783] kernel: ? ahci_stop_engine+0xb0/0xb0 [libahci]
[ 1.980787] kernel: ? ahci_do_softreset+0x290/0x290 [libahci]
[ 1.980792] kernel: ? trace_event_raw_event_ata_eh_link_autopsy_qc+0xe0/0xe0
[ 1.980795] kernel: sata_pmp_eh_recover.isra.0+0x214/0x560
[ 1.980799] kernel: sata_pmp_error_handler+0x23/0x40
[ 1.980802] kernel: ahci_error_handler+0x43/0x80 [libahci]
[ 1.980806] kernel: ata_scsi_port_error_handler+0x2b1/0x600
[ 1.980810] kernel: ata_scsi_error+0x9c/0xd0
[ 1.980813] kernel: scsi_error_handler+0xa1/0x180
[ 1.980817] kernel: ? scsi_unjam_host+0x1c0/0x1c0
[ 1.980820] kernel: kthread+0x12a/0x150
[ 1.980823] kernel: ? set_kthread_struct+0x50/0x50
[ 1.980826] kernel: ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
[ 1.980831] kernel: 

This happens because sata_pmp_init_links() initialize link->pmp up to
SATA_PMP_MAX_PORTS while em_priv is declared as 8 elements array.

I can't find the maximum Enclosure Management ports specified in AHCI
spec v1.3.1, but "12.2.1 LED message type" states that "Port Multiplier
Information" can utilize 4 bits, which implies it can support up to 16
ports. Hence, use SATA_PMP_MAX_PORTS as EM_MAX_SLOTS to resolve the
issue.

BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1970074
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng 
Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ata: ahci-imx: Fix MODULE_ALIAS

2022-10-29T08:20:34+00:00

commit 979556f1521a835a059de3b117b9c6c6642c7d58 upstream.

'ahci:' is an invalid prefix, preventing the module from autoloading.
Fix this by using the 'platform:' prefix and DRV_NAME.

Fixes: 9e54eae23bc9 ("ahci_imx: add ahci sata support on imx platforms")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexander Stein 
Reviewed-by: Fabio Estevam 
Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ata: libahci_platform: Sanity check the DT child nodes number

2022-10-26T11:22:56+00:00

[ Upstream commit 3c132ea6508b34956e5ed88d04936983ec230601 ]

Having greater than AHCI_MAX_PORTS (32) ports detected isn't that critical
from the further AHCI-platform initialization point of view since
exceeding the ports upper limit will cause allocating more resources than
will be used afterwards. But detecting too many child DT-nodes doesn't
seem right since it's very unlikely to have it on an ordinary platform. In
accordance with the AHCI specification there can't be more than 32 ports
implemented at least due to having the CAP.NP field of 5 bits wide and the
PI register of dword size. Thus if such situation is found the DTB must
have been corrupted and the data read from it shouldn't be reliable. Let's
consider that as an erroneous situation and halt further resources
allocation.

Note it's logically more correct to have the nports set only after the
initialization value is checked for being sane. So while at it let's make
sure nports is assigned with a correct value.

Signed-off-by: Serge Semin 
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke 
Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

libata: add ATA_HORKAGE_NOLPM for Pioneer BDR-207M and BDR-205

2022-10-05T08:37:42+00:00

commit ea08aec7e77bfd6599489ec430f9f859ab84575a upstream.

Commit 1527f69204fe ("ata: ahci: Add Green Sardine vendor ID as
board_ahci_mobile") added an explicit entry for AMD Green Sardine
AHCI controller using the board_ahci_mobile configuration (this
configuration has later been renamed to board_ahci_low_power).

The board_ahci_low_power configuration enables support for low power
modes.

This explicit entry takes precedence over the generic AHCI controller
entry, which does not enable support for low power modes.

Therefore, when commit 1527f69204fe ("ata: ahci: Add Green Sardine
vendor ID as board_ahci_mobile") was backported to stable kernels,
it make some Pioneer optical drives, which was working perfectly fine
before the commit was backported, stop working.

The real problem is that the Pioneer optical drives do not handle low
power modes correctly. If these optical drives would have been tested
on another AHCI controller using the board_ahci_low_power configuration,
this issue would have been detected earlier.

Unfortunately, the board_ahci_low_power configuration is only used in
less than 15% of the total AHCI controller entries, so many devices
have never been tested with an AHCI controller with low power modes.

Fixes: 1527f69204fe ("ata: ahci: Add Green Sardine vendor ID as board_ahci_mobile")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: Jaap Berkhout 
Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel 
Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello 
Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ata: libata-eh: Add missing command name

2022-08-25T09:18:18+00:00

commit d3122bf9aa4c974f5e2c0112f799757b3a2779da upstream.

Add the missing command name for ATA_CMD_NCQ_NON_DATA to
ata_get_cmd_name().

Fixes: 661ce1f0c4a6 ("libata/libsas: Define ATA_CMD_NCQ_NON_DATA")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal 
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ata: libata-core: fix NULL pointer deref in ata_host_alloc_pinfo()

2022-06-22T12:11:20+00:00

[ Upstream commit bf476fe22aa1851bab4728e0c49025a6a0bea307 ]

In an unlikely (and probably wrong?) case that the 'ppi' parameter of
ata_host_alloc_pinfo() points to an array starting with a NULL pointer,
there's going to be a kernel oops as the 'pi' local variable won't get
reassigned from the initial value of NULL. Initialize 'pi' instead to
'&ata_dummy_port_info' to fix the possible kernel oops for good...

Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with the SVACE static
analysis tool.

Signed-off-by: Sergey Shtylyov 
Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

ata: libata-transport: fix {dma|pio|xfer}_mode sysfs files

2022-06-14T16:12:02+00:00

commit 72aad489f992871e908ff6d9055b26c6366fb864 upstream.

The {dma|pio}_mode sysfs files are incorrectly documented as having a
list of the supported DMA/PIO transfer modes, while the corresponding
fields of the *struct* ata_device hold the transfer mode IDs, not masks.

To match these docs, the {dma|pio}_mode (and even xfer_mode!) sysfs
files are handled by the ata_bitfield_name_match() macro which leads to
reading such kind of nonsense from them:

$ cat /sys/class/ata_device/dev3.0/pio_mode
XFER_UDMA_7, XFER_UDMA_6, XFER_UDMA_5, XFER_UDMA_4, XFER_MW_DMA_4,
XFER_PIO_6, XFER_PIO_5, XFER_PIO_4, XFER_PIO_3, XFER_PIO_2, XFER_PIO_1,
XFER_PIO_0

Using the correct ata_bitfield_name_search() macro fixes that:

$ cat /sys/class/ata_device/dev3.0/pio_mode
XFER_PIO_4

While fixing the file documentation, somewhat reword the {dma|pio}_mode
file doc and add a note about being mostly useful for PATA devices to
the xfer_mode file doc...

Fixes: d9027470b886 ("[libata] Add ATA transport class")
Signed-off-by: Sergey Shtylyov 
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ata: pata_octeon_cf: Fix refcount leak in octeon_cf_probe

2022-06-14T16:11:57+00:00

[ Upstream commit 10d6bdf532902be1d8aa5900b3c03c5671612aa2 ]

of_find_device_by_node() takes reference, we should use put_device()
to release it when not need anymore.
Add missing put_device() to avoid refcount leak.

Fixes: 43f01da0f279 ("MIPS/OCTEON/ata: Convert pata_octeon_cf.c to use device tree.")
Signed-off-by: Miaoqian Lin 
Reviewed-by: Sergey Shtylyov 
Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

ata: pata_marvell: Check the 'bmdma_addr' beforing reading

2022-04-27T11:50:48+00:00

commit aafa9f958342db36c17ac2a7f1b841032c96feb4 upstream.

Before detecting the cable type on the dma bar, the driver should check
whether the 'bmdma_addr' is zero, which means the adapter does not
support DMA, otherwise we will get the following error:

[    5.146634] Bad IO access at port 0x1 (return inb(port))
[    5.147206] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 303 at lib/iomap.c:44 ioread8+0x4a/0x60
[    5.150856] RIP: 0010:ioread8+0x4a/0x60
[    5.160238] Call Trace:
[    5.160470]  
[    5.160674]  marvell_cable_detect+0x6e/0xc0 [pata_marvell]
[    5.161728]  ata_eh_recover+0x3520/0x6cc0
[    5.168075]  ata_do_eh+0x49/0x3c0

Signed-off-by: Zheyu Ma 
Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ata: libata-core: Disable READ LOG DMA EXT for Samsung 840 EVOs

2022-04-20T07:19:37+00:00

[ Upstream commit 5399752299396a3c9df6617f4b3c907d7aa4ded8 ]

Samsung' 840 EVO with the latest firmware (EXT0DB6Q) locks up with
the a message: "READ LOG DMA EXT failed, trying PIO" during boot.

Initially this was discovered because it caused a crash
with the sata_dwc_460ex controller on a WD MyBook Live DUO.

The reporter "Tice Rex" which has the unique opportunity that he
has two Samsung 840 EVO SSD! One with the older firmware "EXT0BB0Q"
which booted fine and didn't expose "READ LOG DMA EXT". But the
newer/latest firmware "EXT0DB6Q" caused the headaches.

BugLink: https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/issues/9505
Signed-off-by: Christian Lamparter 
Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin