Nobody seems to call ata_sff_busy_sleep(), so we can get rid of it... Signed-off-by: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@omp.ru> Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
Remove the repeated word "Transfer" in comments. Signed-off-by: Shaomin Deng <dengshaomin@cdjrlc.com> Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
When returning false, ata_sff_altstatus() does not return any status
value, resulting in a compilation warning in ata_sff_lost_interrupt()
("uninitialized symbol 'status'"). Fix this by initializing the local
variable "status" to 0.
Fixes: 03c0e84f9c1e ("ata: libata-sff: refactor ata_sff_altstatus()")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
In ata_sff_dev_classify(), replace a string of the *if* statements checking the device's class with the *switch* statement that fits better here... While at it, fix the multi-line comment style in the vicinity... Signed-off-by: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@omp.ru> Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
Add the explicit error and status register fields to 'struct ata_taskfile'
using the anonymous *union*s ('struct ide_taskfile' had that for ages!) and
update the libata taskfile code accordingly. There should be no object code
changes resulting from that...
Signed-off-by: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@omp.ru>
Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
The driver's calls to ata_sff_altstatus() are mostly surrounded by some clumsy checks. Refactor ata_sff_altstatus() to include the repetitive checks and return a 'bool' result indicating if the alternate status register exists or not. While at it, further update the 'kernel-doc' comment -- the alternate status register has never been a part of the taskfile, despite what Jeff and co. think! :-) In ata_sff_lost_interrupt(), wrap the ata_sff_altstatus() call in a WARN_ON_ONCE() check to issue a warning if the device control register does not exist. And while at it, fix the strange argument indentation in the ata_port_warn() call following the call to ata_sff_altstatus(). Signed-off-by: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@omp.ru> Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
Commit 41dec29bcb05 ("libata: introduce sff_set_devctl() method") left some
clumsy checks surrounding calls to ata_sff_set_devctl() which Jeff Garzik
suggested to factor out... and I never followed up. :-(
At last, refactor ata_sff_set_devctl() to include the repetitive checks and
return a 'bool' result indicating if the device control register exists or
not.
While at it, further update the 'kernel-doc' comment -- the device control
register has never been a part of the taskfile, despite what Jeff and co.
think! :-)
Signed-off-by: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@omp.ru>
Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
ata_resources_present() returns 1 if the primary/secondary channel's PCI resources are present, 0 if not -- the 'bool' type fits somewhat better here than 'int'... Use the *= operator, while at it... Signed-off-by: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@omp.ru> Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
ata_devchk() returns 1 if a device is present, 0 if not -- the 'bool' type clearly fits better here than 'unsigned int'... Signed-off-by: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@omp.ru> Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
ata_std_prereset() always returns 0, hence the check in ata_sff_prereset()
is pointless and thus it also can return only 0 (however, we cannot change
the prototypes of ata_{sff|std}_prereset() as they implement the driver's
prereset() method).
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with the SVACE static
analysis tool.
Signed-off-by: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@omp.ru>
Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>