linux-stable.git/drivers/acpi, branch v5.4.38

ACPICA: Fixes for acpiExec namespace init file

2020-04-23T08:36:39+00:00

[ Upstream commit 9a1ae80412dcaa67a29eecf19de44f32b5f1c357 ]

This is the result of squashing the following ACPICA commit ID's:
6803997e5b4f3635cea6610b51ff69e29d251de3
f31cdf8bfda22fe265c1a176d0e33d311c82a7f7

This change fixes several problems with the support for the
acpi_exec namespace init file (-fi option). Specifically, it
fixes AE_ALREADY_EXISTS errors, as well as various seg faults.

Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/f31cdf8b
Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/6803997e
Signed-off-by: Bob Moore 
Signed-off-by: Erik Kaneda 
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

x86: ACPI: fix CPU hotplug deadlock

2020-04-23T08:36:38+00:00

[ Upstream commit 696ac2e3bf267f5a2b2ed7d34e64131f2287d0ad ]

Similar to commit 0266d81e9bf5 ("acpi/processor: Prevent cpu hotplug
deadlock") except this is for acpi_processor_ffh_cstate_probe():

"The problem is that the work is scheduled on the current CPU from the
hotplug thread associated with that CPU.

It's not required to invoke these functions via the workqueue because
the hotplug thread runs on the target CPU already.

Check whether current is a per cpu thread pinned on the target CPU and
invoke the function directly to avoid the workqueue."

 WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
 ------------------------------------------------------
 cpuhp/1/15 is trying to acquire lock:
 ffffc90003447a28 ((work_completion)(&wfc.work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_work+0x4c6/0x630

 but task is already holding lock:
 ffffffffafa1c0e8 (cpuidle_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cpuidle_pause_and_lock+0x17/0x20

 which lock already depends on the new lock.

 the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

 -> #1 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}:
 cpus_read_lock+0x3e/0xc0
 irq_calc_affinity_vectors+0x5f/0x91
 __pci_enable_msix_range+0x10f/0x9a0
 pci_alloc_irq_vectors_affinity+0x13e/0x1f0
 pci_alloc_irq_vectors_affinity at drivers/pci/msi.c:1208
 pqi_ctrl_init+0x72f/0x1618 [smartpqi]
 pqi_pci_probe.cold.63+0x882/0x892 [smartpqi]
 local_pci_probe+0x7a/0xc0
 work_for_cpu_fn+0x2e/0x50
 process_one_work+0x57e/0xb90
 worker_thread+0x363/0x5b0
 kthread+0x1f4/0x220
 ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50

 -> #0 ((work_completion)(&wfc.work)){+.+.}-{0:0}:
 __lock_acquire+0x2244/0x32a0
 lock_acquire+0x1a2/0x680
 __flush_work+0x4e6/0x630
 work_on_cpu+0x114/0x160
 acpi_processor_ffh_cstate_probe+0x129/0x250
 acpi_processor_evaluate_cst+0x4c8/0x580
 acpi_processor_get_power_info+0x86/0x740
 acpi_processor_hotplug+0xc3/0x140
 acpi_soft_cpu_online+0x102/0x1d0
 cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x197/0x1120
 cpuhp_thread_fun+0x252/0x2f0
 smpboot_thread_fn+0x255/0x440
 kthread+0x1f4/0x220
 ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50

 other info that might help us debug this:

 Chain exists of:
 (work_completion)(&wfc.work) --> cpuhp_state-up --> cpuidle_lock

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

 CPU0                    CPU1
 ----                    ----
 lock(cpuidle_lock);
                         lock(cpuhp_state-up);
                         lock(cpuidle_lock);
 lock((work_completion)(&wfc.work));

 *** DEADLOCK ***

 3 locks held by cpuhp/1/15:
 #0: ffffffffaf51ab10 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: cpuhp_thread_fun+0x69/0x2f0
 #1: ffffffffaf51ad40 (cpuhp_state-up){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: cpuhp_thread_fun+0x69/0x2f0
 #2: ffffffffafa1c0e8 (cpuidle_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cpuidle_pause_and_lock+0x17/0x20

 Call Trace:
 dump_stack+0xa0/0xea
 print_circular_bug.cold.52+0x147/0x14c
 check_noncircular+0x295/0x2d0
 __lock_acquire+0x2244/0x32a0
 lock_acquire+0x1a2/0x680
 __flush_work+0x4e6/0x630
 work_on_cpu+0x114/0x160
 acpi_processor_ffh_cstate_probe+0x129/0x250
 acpi_processor_evaluate_cst+0x4c8/0x580
 acpi_processor_get_power_info+0x86/0x740
 acpi_processor_hotplug+0xc3/0x140
 acpi_soft_cpu_online+0x102/0x1d0
 cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x197/0x1120
 cpuhp_thread_fun+0x252/0x2f0
 smpboot_thread_fn+0x255/0x440
 kthread+0x1f4/0x220
 ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50

Signed-off-by: Qian Cai 
Tested-by: Borislav Petkov 
[ rjw: Subject ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

acpi/nfit: improve bounds checking for 'func'

2020-04-21T07:04:52+00:00

commit 01091c496f920e634ea84b689f480c39016752a8 upstream.

The 'func' variable can come from the user in the __nd_ioctl().  If it's
too high then the (1 << func) shift in acpi_nfit_clear_to_send() is
undefined.  In acpi_nfit_ctl() we pass 'func' to test_bit(func, &dsm_mask)
which could result in an out of bounds access.

To fix these issues, I introduced the NVDIMM_CMD_MAX (31) define and
updated nfit_dsm_revid() to use that define as well instead of magic
numbers.

Fixes: 11189c1089da ("acpi/nfit: Fix command-supported detection")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter 
Reviewed-by: Dan Williams 
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200225161927.hvftuq7kjn547fyj@kili.mountain
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

Revert "ACPI: EC: Do not clear boot_ec_is_ecdt in acpi_ec_add()"

2020-04-21T07:04:50+00:00

This reverts commit ce7a61a0d57d2dd613941d8aef82a5b54fb2e396 which is
commit 65a691f5f8f0bb63d6a82eec7b0ffd193d8d8a5f upstream.

Rafael writes:
	It has not been marked for -stable or otherwise requested to be
	included AFAICS.  Also it depends on other mainline commits that
	have not been included into 5.6.5.

Reported-by: Toralf Förster 
Reported-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 
Cc: Sasha Levin 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ACPI: PM: s2idle: Refine active GPEs check

2020-04-17T08:50:09+00:00

commit d5406284ff803a578ca503373624312770319054 upstream.

The check for any active GPEs added by commit fdde0ff8590b ("ACPI:
PM: s2idle: Prevent spurious SCIs from waking up the system") turns
out to be insufficiently precise to prevent some systems from
resuming prematurely due to a spurious EC wakeup, so refine it
by first checking if any GPEs other than the EC GPE are active
and skipping all of the SCIs coming from the EC that do not produce
any genuine wakeup events after processing.

Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206629
Fixes: fdde0ff8590b ("ACPI: PM: s2idle: Prevent spurious SCIs from waking up the system")
Reported-by: Ondřej Caletka 
Tested-by: Ondřej Caletka 
Cc: 5.4+  # 5.4+
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ACPICA: Allow acpi_any_gpe_status_set() to skip one GPE

2020-04-17T08:50:09+00:00

commit 0ce792d660bda990c675eaf14ce09594a9b85cbf upstream.

The check carried out by acpi_any_gpe_status_set() is not precise enough
for the suspend-to-idle implementation in Linux and in some cases it is
necessary make it skip one GPE (specifically, the EC GPE) from the check
to prevent a race condition leading to a premature system resume from
occurring.

For this reason, redefine acpi_any_gpe_status_set() to take the number
of a GPE to skip as an argument.

Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206629
Tested-by: Ondřej Caletka 
Cc: 5.4+  # 5.4+
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ACPI: EC: Do not clear boot_ec_is_ecdt in acpi_ec_add()

2020-04-17T08:50:01+00:00

[ Upstream commit 65a691f5f8f0bb63d6a82eec7b0ffd193d8d8a5f ]

The reason for clearing boot_ec_is_ecdt in acpi_ec_add() (if a
PNP0C09 device object matching the ECDT boot EC had been found in
the namespace) was to cause acpi_ec_ecdt_start() to return early,
but since the latter does not look at boot_ec_is_ecdt any more,
acpi_ec_add() need not clear it.

Moreover, doing that may be confusing as it may cause "DSDT" to be
printed instead of "ECDT" in the EC initialization completion
message, so stop doing it.

While at it, split the EC initialization completion message into
two messages, one regarding the boot EC and another one printed
regardless of whether or not the EC at hand is the boot one.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

ACPI: PM: Add acpi_[un]register_wakeup_handler()

2020-04-13T08:48:08+00:00

commit ddfd9dcf270ce23ed1985b66fcfa163920e2e1b8 upstream.

Since commit fdde0ff8590b ("ACPI: PM: s2idle: Prevent spurious SCIs from
waking up the system") the SCI triggering without there being a wakeup
cause recognized by the ACPI sleep code will no longer wakeup the system.

This works as intended, but this is a problem for devices where the SCI
is shared with another device which is also a wakeup source.

In the past these, from the pov of the ACPI sleep code, spurious SCIs
would still cause a wakeup so the wakeup from the device sharing the
interrupt would actually wakeup the system. This now no longer works.

This is a problem on e.g. Bay Trail-T and Cherry Trail devices where
some peripherals (typically the XHCI controller) can signal a
Power Management Event (PME) to the Power Management Controller (PMC)
to wakeup the system, this uses the same interrupt as the SCI.
These wakeups are handled through a special INT0002 ACPI device which
checks for events in the GPE0a_STS for this and takes care of acking
the PME so that the shared interrupt stops triggering.

The change to the ACPI sleep code to ignore the spurious SCI, causes
the system to no longer wakeup on these PME events. To make things
worse this means that the INT0002 device driver interrupt handler will
no longer run, causing the PME to not get cleared and resulting in the
system hanging. Trying to wakeup the system after such a PME through e.g.
the power button no longer works.

Add an acpi_register_wakeup_handler() function which registers
a handler to be called from acpi_s2idle_wake() and when the handler
returns true, return true from acpi_s2idle_wake().

The INT0002 driver will use this mechanism to check the GPE0a_STS
register from acpi_s2idle_wake() and to tell the system to wakeup
if a PME is signaled in the register.

Fixes: fdde0ff8590b ("ACPI: PM: s2idle: Prevent spurious SCIs from waking up the system")
Cc: 5.4+  # 5.4+
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede 
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ACPI: PM: s2idle: Rework ACPI events synchronization

2020-04-01T09:01:29+00:00

commit 024aa8732acb7d2503eae43c3fe3504d0a8646d0 upstream.

Note that the EC GPE processing need not be synchronized in
acpi_s2idle_wake() after invoking acpi_ec_dispatch_gpe(), because
that function checks the GPE status and dispatches its handler if
need be and the SCI action handler is not going to run anyway at
that point.

Moreover, it is better to drain all of the pending ACPI events
before restoring the working-state configuration of GPEs in
acpi_s2idle_restore(), because those events are likely to be related
to system wakeup, in which case they will not be relevant going
forward.

Rework the code to take these observations into account.

Tested-by: Kenneth R. Crudup 
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

x86/mm: split vmalloc_sync_all()

2020-03-25T07:25:58+00:00

commit 763802b53a427ed3cbd419dbba255c414fdd9e7c upstream.

Commit 3f8fd02b1bf1 ("mm/vmalloc: Sync unmappings in
__purge_vmap_area_lazy()") introduced a call to vmalloc_sync_all() in
the vunmap() code-path.  While this change was necessary to maintain
correctness on x86-32-pae kernels, it also adds additional cycles for
architectures that don't need it.

Specifically on x86-64 with CONFIG_VMAP_STACK=y some people reported
severe performance regressions in micro-benchmarks because it now also
calls the x86-64 implementation of vmalloc_sync_all() on vunmap().  But
the vmalloc_sync_all() implementation on x86-64 is only needed for newly
created mappings.

To avoid the unnecessary work on x86-64 and to gain the performance
back, split up vmalloc_sync_all() into two functions:

	* vmalloc_sync_mappings(), and
	* vmalloc_sync_unmappings()

Most call-sites to vmalloc_sync_all() only care about new mappings being
synchronized.  The only exception is the new call-site added in the
above mentioned commit.

Shile Zhang directed us to a report of an 80% regression in reaim
throughput.

Fixes: 3f8fd02b1bf1 ("mm/vmalloc: Sync unmappings in __purge_vmap_area_lazy()")
Reported-by: kernel test robot 
Reported-by: Shile Zhang 
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel 
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton 
Tested-by: Borislav Petkov 
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 	[GHES]
Cc: Dave Hansen 
Cc: Andy Lutomirski 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Cc: Thomas Gleixner 
Cc: Ingo Molnar 
Cc: 
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191009124418.8286-1-joro@8bytes.org
Link: https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/lkp@lists.01.org/thread/4D3JPPHBNOSPFK2KEPC6KGKS6J25AIDB/
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191113095530.228959-1-shile.zhang@linux.alibaba.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman