linux-stable.git/drivers/acpi, branch v5.4.285 Linux kernel stable tree ACPI: button: Add DMI quirk for Samsung Galaxy Book2 to fix initial lid detection issue 2024-11-08T15:20:51+00:00 Shubham Panwar shubiisp8@gmail.com 2024-10-20T09:50:46+00:00 507f393403ccf312683defb43704dc84326678b1 commit 8fa73ee44daefc884c53a25158c25a4107eb5a94 upstream. Add a DMI quirk for Samsung Galaxy Book2 to fix an initial lid state detection issue. The _LID device incorrectly returns the lid status as "closed" during boot, causing the system to enter a suspend loop right after booting. The quirk ensures that the correct lid state is reported initially, preventing the system from immediately suspending after startup. It only addresses the initial lid state detection and ensures proper system behavior upon boot. Signed-off-by: Shubham Panwar <shubiisp8@gmail.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241020095045.6036-2-shubiisp8@gmail.com [ rjw: Changelog edits ] Cc: All applicable <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 8fa73ee44daefc884c53a25158c25a4107eb5a94 upstream.

Add a DMI quirk for Samsung Galaxy Book2 to fix an initial lid state
detection issue.

The _LID device incorrectly returns the lid status as "closed" during
boot, causing the system to enter a suspend loop right after booting.

The quirk ensures that the correct lid state is reported initially,
preventing the system from immediately suspending after startup.  It
only addresses the initial lid state detection and ensures proper
system behavior upon boot.

Signed-off-by: Shubham Panwar <shubiisp8@gmail.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241020095045.6036-2-shubiisp8@gmail.com
[ rjw: Changelog edits ]
Cc: All applicable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
ACPI: resource: Add LG 16T90SP to irq1_level_low_skip_override[] 2024-11-08T15:20:51+00:00 Christian Heusel christian@heusel.eu 2024-10-17T11:16:26+00:00 0fdb503758578ec65594ae70e39fa71e995228cc commit 53f1a907d36fb3aa02a4d34073bcec25823a6c74 upstream. The LG Gram Pro 16 2-in-1 (2024) the 16T90SP has its keybopard IRQ (1) described as ActiveLow in the DSDT, which the kernel overrides to EdgeHigh which breaks the keyboard. Add the 16T90SP to the irq1_level_low_skip_override[] quirk table to fix this. Reported-by: Dirk Holten <dirk.holten@gmx.de> Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219382 Cc: All applicable <stable@vger.kernel.org> Suggested-by: Dirk Holten <dirk.holten@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Christian Heusel <christian@heusel.eu> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241017-lg-gram-pro-keyboard-v2-1-7c8fbf6ff718@heusel.eu Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 53f1a907d36fb3aa02a4d34073bcec25823a6c74 upstream.

The LG Gram Pro 16 2-in-1 (2024) the 16T90SP has its keybopard IRQ (1)
described as ActiveLow in the DSDT, which the kernel overrides to EdgeHigh
which breaks the keyboard.

Add the 16T90SP to the irq1_level_low_skip_override[] quirk table to fix
this.

Reported-by: Dirk Holten <dirk.holten@gmx.de>
Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219382
Cc: All applicable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Suggested-by: Dirk Holten <dirk.holten@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Christian Heusel <christian@heusel.eu>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241017-lg-gram-pro-keyboard-v2-1-7c8fbf6ff718@heusel.eu
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
ACPI: battery: Fix possible crash when unregistering a battery hook 2024-11-08T15:20:43+00:00 Armin Wolf W_Armin@gmx.de 2024-10-01T21:28:34+00:00 c47843a831e0eae007ad7e848d208e675ba4c132 [ Upstream commit 76959aff14a0012ad6b984ec7686d163deccdc16 ] When a battery hook returns an error when adding a new battery, then the battery hook is automatically unregistered. However the battery hook provider cannot know that, so it will later call battery_hook_unregister() on the already unregistered battery hook, resulting in a crash. Fix this by using the list head to mark already unregistered battery hooks as already being unregistered so that they can be ignored by battery_hook_unregister(). Fixes: fa93854f7a7e ("battery: Add the battery hooking API") Signed-off-by: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241001212835.341788-3-W_Armin@gmx.de Cc: All applicable <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 76959aff14a0012ad6b984ec7686d163deccdc16 ]

When a battery hook returns an error when adding a new battery, then
the battery hook is automatically unregistered.
However the battery hook provider cannot know that, so it will later
call battery_hook_unregister() on the already unregistered battery
hook, resulting in a crash.

Fix this by using the list head to mark already unregistered battery
hooks as already being unregistered so that they can be ignored by
battery_hook_unregister().

Fixes: fa93854f7a7e ("battery: Add the battery hooking API")
Signed-off-by: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241001212835.341788-3-W_Armin@gmx.de
Cc: All applicable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ACPI: battery: Simplify battery hook locking 2024-11-08T15:20:43+00:00 Armin Wolf W_Armin@gmx.de 2024-10-01T21:28:33+00:00 b5b7d4a012844586d0da3a6dafcbb339907d5f65 [ Upstream commit 86309cbed26139e1caae7629dcca1027d9a28e75 ] Move the conditional locking from __battery_hook_unregister() into battery_hook_unregister() and rename the low-level function to simplify the locking during battery hook removal. Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Pali Rohár <pali@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241001212835.341788-2-W_Armin@gmx.de Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Stable-dep-of: 76959aff14a0 ("ACPI: battery: Fix possible crash when unregistering a battery hook") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit 86309cbed26139e1caae7629dcca1027d9a28e75 ]

Move the conditional locking from __battery_hook_unregister()
into battery_hook_unregister() and rename the low-level function
to simplify the locking during battery hook removal.

Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Pali Rohár <pali@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241001212835.341788-2-W_Armin@gmx.de
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Stable-dep-of: 76959aff14a0 ("ACPI: battery: Fix possible crash when unregistering a battery hook")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ACPI: resource: Add Asus ExpertBook B2502CVA to irq1_level_low_skip_override[] 2024-11-08T15:20:42+00:00 Hans de Goede hdegoede@redhat.com 2024-09-27T14:16:06+00:00 af40b4297a50d730e956c6ed96a8d9460b0a70a7 commit 056301e7c7c886f96d799edd36f3406cc30e1822 upstream. Like other Asus ExpertBook models the B2502CVA has its keybopard IRQ (1) described as ActiveLow in the DSDT, which the kernel overrides to EdgeHigh which breaks the keyboard. Add the B2502CVA to the irq1_level_low_skip_override[] quirk table to fix this. Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217760 Cc: All applicable <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240927141606.66826-4-hdegoede@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 056301e7c7c886f96d799edd36f3406cc30e1822 upstream.

Like other Asus ExpertBook models the B2502CVA has its keybopard IRQ (1)
described as ActiveLow in the DSDT, which the kernel overrides to EdgeHigh
which breaks the keyboard.

Add the B2502CVA to the irq1_level_low_skip_override[] quirk table to fix
this.

Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217760
Cc: All applicable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240927141606.66826-4-hdegoede@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
ACPI: resource: Add Asus Vivobook X1704VAP to irq1_level_low_skip_override[] 2024-11-08T15:20:42+00:00 Hans de Goede hdegoede@redhat.com 2024-09-27T14:16:05+00:00 fc2c013638127a7b75ae0cf16cb70e8bb7fcf9fd commit 2f80ce0b78c340e332f04a5801dee5e4ac8cfaeb upstream. Like other Asus Vivobook models the X1704VAP has its keybopard IRQ (1) described as ActiveLow in the DSDT, which the kernel overrides to EdgeHigh which breaks the keyboard. Add the X1704VAP to the irq1_level_low_skip_override[] quirk table to fix this. Reported-by: Lamome Julien <julien.lamome@wanadoo.fr> Closes: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1078696 Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/1226760b-4699-4529-bf57-6423938157a3@wanadoo.fr/ Cc: All applicable <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240927141606.66826-3-hdegoede@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 
commit 2f80ce0b78c340e332f04a5801dee5e4ac8cfaeb upstream.

Like other Asus Vivobook models the X1704VAP has its keybopard IRQ (1)
described as ActiveLow in the DSDT, which the kernel overrides to EdgeHigh
which breaks the keyboard.

Add the X1704VAP to the irq1_level_low_skip_override[] quirk table to fix
this.

Reported-by: Lamome Julien <julien.lamome@wanadoo.fr>
Closes: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1078696
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/1226760b-4699-4529-bf57-6423938157a3@wanadoo.fr/
Cc: All applicable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240927141606.66826-3-hdegoede@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
ACPICA: iasl: handle empty connection_node 2024-11-08T15:20:37+00:00 Aleksandrs Vinarskis alex.vinarskis@gmail.com 2024-08-11T21:33:44+00:00 f3b2acb1b6d18c3d9633763cd127c7413ace252d [ Upstream commit a0a2459b79414584af6c46dd8c6f866d8f1aa421 ] ACPICA commit 6c551e2c9487067d4b085333e7fe97e965a11625 Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/6c551e2c Signed-off-by: Aleksandrs Vinarskis <alex.vinarskis@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit a0a2459b79414584af6c46dd8c6f866d8f1aa421 ]

ACPICA commit 6c551e2c9487067d4b085333e7fe97e965a11625

Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/6c551e2c
Signed-off-by: Aleksandrs Vinarskis <alex.vinarskis@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ACPICA: check null return of ACPI_ALLOCATE_ZEROED() in acpi_db_convert_to_package() 2024-11-08T15:20:37+00:00 Pei Xiao xiaopei01@kylinos.cn 2024-07-18T06:05:48+00:00 402b4c6b7500c7cca6972d2456a4a422801035b5 [ Upstream commit a5242874488eba2b9062985bf13743c029821330 ] ACPICA commit 4d4547cf13cca820ff7e0f859ba83e1a610b9fd0 ACPI_ALLOCATE_ZEROED() may fail, elements might be NULL and will cause NULL pointer dereference later. Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/4d4547cf Signed-off-by: Pei Xiao <xiaopei01@kylinos.cn> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/tencent_4A21A2865B8B0A0D12CAEBEB84708EDDB505@qq.com [ rjw: Subject and changelog edits ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit a5242874488eba2b9062985bf13743c029821330 ]

ACPICA commit 4d4547cf13cca820ff7e0f859ba83e1a610b9fd0

ACPI_ALLOCATE_ZEROED() may fail, elements might be NULL and will cause
NULL pointer dereference later.

Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/4d4547cf
Signed-off-by: Pei Xiao <xiaopei01@kylinos.cn>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/tencent_4A21A2865B8B0A0D12CAEBEB84708EDDB505@qq.com
[ rjw: Subject and changelog edits ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ACPI: EC: Do not release locks during operation region accesses 2024-11-08T15:20:37+00:00 Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com 2024-07-04T16:26:54+00:00 bcb4a23f035dfec2c3a97153b8985da6e162daa3 [ Upstream commit dc171114926ec390ab90f46534545420ec03e458 ] It is not particularly useful to release locks (the EC mutex and the ACPI global lock, if present) and re-acquire them immediately thereafter during EC address space accesses in acpi_ec_space_handler(). First, releasing them for a while before grabbing them again does not really help anyone because there may not be enough time for another thread to acquire them. Second, if another thread successfully acquires them and carries out a new EC write or read in the middle if an operation region access in progress, it may confuse the EC firmware, especially after the burst mode has been enabled. Finally, manipulating the locks after writing or reading every single byte of data is overhead that it is better to avoid. Accordingly, modify the code to carry out EC address space accesses entirely without releasing the locks. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/12473338.O9o76ZdvQC@rjwysocki.net Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit dc171114926ec390ab90f46534545420ec03e458 ]

It is not particularly useful to release locks (the EC mutex and the
ACPI global lock, if present) and re-acquire them immediately thereafter
during EC address space accesses in acpi_ec_space_handler().

First, releasing them for a while before grabbing them again does not
really help anyone because there may not be enough time for another
thread to acquire them.

Second, if another thread successfully acquires them and carries out
a new EC write or read in the middle if an operation region access in
progress, it may confuse the EC firmware, especially after the burst
mode has been enabled.

Finally, manipulating the locks after writing or reading every single
byte of data is overhead that it is better to avoid.

Accordingly, modify the code to carry out EC address space accesses
entirely without releasing the locks.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/12473338.O9o76ZdvQC@rjwysocki.net
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ACPICA: Fix memory leak if acpi_ps_get_next_field() fails 2024-11-08T15:20:37+00:00 Armin Wolf W_Armin@gmx.de 2024-04-14T19:50:33+00:00 f2c2c674cb5ddba59eabd9fababb76636ae7b254 [ Upstream commit e6169a8ffee8a012badd8c703716e761ce851b15 ] ACPICA commit 1280045754264841b119a5ede96cd005bc09b5a7 If acpi_ps_get_next_field() fails, the previously created field list needs to be properly disposed before returning the status code. Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/12800457 Signed-off-by: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de> [ rjw: Rename local variable to avoid compiler confusion ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> 
[ Upstream commit e6169a8ffee8a012badd8c703716e761ce851b15 ]

ACPICA commit 1280045754264841b119a5ede96cd005bc09b5a7

If acpi_ps_get_next_field() fails, the previously created field list
needs to be properly disposed before returning the status code.

Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/12800457
Signed-off-by: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de>
[ rjw: Rename local variable to avoid compiler confusion ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>