linux-stable.git/drivers/acpi, branch v5.2.20

ACPI / LPSS: Save/restore LPSS private registers also on Lynxpoint

2019-10-05T11:14:14+00:00

commit 57b3006492a4c11b2d4a772b5b2905d544a32037 upstream.

My assumption in commit b53548f9d9e4 ("spi: pxa2xx: Remove LPSS private
register restoring during resume") that Intel Lynxpoint and compatible
based chipsets may not need LPSS private registers saving and restoring
over suspend/resume cycle turned out to be false on Intel Broadwell.

Curtis Malainey sent a patch bringing above change back and reported the
LPSS SPI Chip Select control was lost over suspend/resume cycle on
Broadwell machine.

Instead of reverting above commit lets add LPSS private register
saving/restoring also for all LPSS SPI, I2C and UART controllers on
Lynxpoint and compatible chipset to make sure context is not lost in
case nothing else preserves it like firmware or if LPSS is always on.

Fixes: b53548f9d9e4 ("spi: pxa2xx: Remove LPSS private register restoring during resume")
Reported-by: Curtis Malainey 
Tested-by: Curtis Malainey 
Cc: 5.0+  # 5.0+
Signed-off-by: Jarkko Nikula 
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko 
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ACPI / PCI: fix acpi_pci_irq_enable() memory leak

2019-10-05T11:13:53+00:00

[ Upstream commit 29b49958cf73b439b17fa29e9a25210809a6c01c ]

In acpi_pci_irq_enable(), 'entry' is allocated by kzalloc() in
acpi_pci_irq_check_entry() (invoked from acpi_pci_irq_lookup()). However,
it is not deallocated if acpi_pci_irq_valid() returns false, leading to a
memory leak. To fix this issue, free 'entry' before returning 0.

Fixes: e237a5518425 ("x86/ACPI/PCI: Recognize that Interrupt Line 255 means "not connected"")
Signed-off-by: Wenwen Wang 
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

ACPI: custom_method: fix memory leaks

2019-10-05T11:13:52+00:00

[ Upstream commit 03d1571d9513369c17e6848476763ebbd10ec2cb ]

In cm_write(), 'buf' is allocated through kzalloc(). In the following
execution, if an error occurs, 'buf' is not deallocated, leading to memory
leaks. To fix this issue, free 'buf' before returning the error.

Fixes: 526b4af47f44 ("ACPI: Split out custom_method functionality into an own driver")
Signed-off-by: Wenwen Wang 
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

ACPI / CPPC: do not require the _PSD method

2019-10-05T11:13:50+00:00

[ Upstream commit 4c4cdc4c63853fee48c02e25c8605fb65a6c9924 ]

According to the ACPI 6.3 specification, the _PSD method is optional
when using CPPC.  The underlying assumption is that each CPU can change
frequency independently from all other CPUs; _PSD is provided to tell
the OS that some processors can NOT do that.

However, the acpi_get_psd() function returns ENODEV if there is no _PSD
method present, or an ACPI error status if an error occurs when evaluating
_PSD, if present.  This makes _PSD mandatory when using CPPC, in violation
of the specification, and only on Linux.

This has forced some firmware writers to provide a dummy _PSD, even though
it is irrelevant, but only because Linux requires it; other OSPMs follow
the spec.  We really do not want to have OS specific ACPI tables, though.

So, correct acpi_get_psd() so that it does not return an error if there
is no _PSD method present, but does return a failure when the method can
not be executed properly.  This allows _PSD to be optional as it should
be.

Signed-off-by: Al Stone 
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

ACPI / APEI: Release resources if gen_pool_add() fails

2019-10-05T11:13:44+00:00

[ Upstream commit 6abc7622271dc520f241462e2474c71723638851 ]

Destroy ghes_estatus_pool and release memory allocated via vmalloc() on
errors in ghes_estatus_pool_init() in order to avoid memory leaks.

 [ bp: do the labels properly and with descriptive names and massage. ]

Signed-off-by: Liguang Zhang 
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov 
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1563173924-47479-1-git-send-email-zhangliguang@linux.alibaba.com
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

ACPI / processor: don't print errors for processorIDs == 0xff

2019-10-05T11:13:36+00:00

[ Upstream commit 2c2b005f549544c13ef4cfb0e4842949066889bc ]

Some platforms define their processors in this manner:
    Device (SCK0)
    {
	Name (_HID, "ACPI0004" /* Module Device */)  // _HID: Hardware ID
	Name (_UID, "CPUSCK0")  // _UID: Unique ID
	Processor (CP00, 0x00, 0x00000410, 0x06){}
	Processor (CP01, 0x02, 0x00000410, 0x06){}
	Processor (CP02, 0x04, 0x00000410, 0x06){}
	Processor (CP03, 0x06, 0x00000410, 0x06){}
	Processor (CP04, 0x01, 0x00000410, 0x06){}
	Processor (CP05, 0x03, 0x00000410, 0x06){}
	Processor (CP06, 0x05, 0x00000410, 0x06){}
	Processor (CP07, 0x07, 0x00000410, 0x06){}
	Processor (CP08, 0xFF, 0x00000410, 0x06){}
	Processor (CP09, 0xFF, 0x00000410, 0x06){}
	Processor (CP0A, 0xFF, 0x00000410, 0x06){}
	Processor (CP0B, 0xFF, 0x00000410, 0x06){}
...

The processors marked as 0xff are invalid, there are only 8 of them in
this case.

So do not print an error on ids == 0xff, just print an info message.
Actually, we could return ENODEV even on the first CPU with ID 0xff, but
ACPI spec does not forbid the 0xff value to be a processor ID. Given
0xff could be a correct one, we would break working systems if we
returned ENODEV.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby 
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

ACPI: video: Add new hw_changes_brightness quirk, set it on PB Easynote MZ35

2019-10-01T07:01:44+00:00

[ Upstream commit 4f7f96453b462b3de0fa18d18fe983960bb5ee7f ]

Some machines change the brightness themselves when a brightness hotkey
gets pressed, despite us telling them not to. This causes the brightness to
go two steps up / down when the hotkey is pressed. This is esp. a problem
on older machines with only a few brightness levels.

This commit adds a new hw_changes_brightness quirk which makes
acpi_video_device_notify() only call backlight_force_update(...,
BACKLIGHT_UPDATE_HOTKEY) and not do anything else, notifying userspace
that the brightness was changed and leaving it at that fixing the dual
step problem.

BugLink: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204077
Reported-by: Kacper Piwiński 
Tested-by: Kacper Piwiński 
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede 
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

ACPI/IORT: Fix off-by-one check in iort_dev_find_its_id()

2019-08-16T08:11:05+00:00

[ Upstream commit 5a46d3f71d5e5a9f82eabc682f996f1281705ac7 ]

Static analysis identified that index comparison against ITS entries in
iort_dev_find_its_id() is off by one.

Update the comparison condition and clarify the resulting error
message.

Fixes: 4bf2efd26d76 ("ACPI: Add new IORT functions to support MSI domain handling")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20190613065410.GB16334@mwanda/
Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo 
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter 
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi 
Cc: Dan Carpenter 
Cc: Will Deacon 
Cc: Hanjun Guo 
Cc: Sudeep Holla 
Cc: Catalin Marinas 
Cc: Robin Murphy 
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

ACPI: blacklist: fix clang warning for unused DMI table

2019-08-06T17:08:08+00:00

[ Upstream commit b80d6a42bdc97bdb6139107d6034222e9843c6e2 ]

When CONFIG_DMI is disabled, we only have a tentative declaration,
which causes a warning from clang:

drivers/acpi/blacklist.c:20:35: error: tentative array definition assumed to have one element [-Werror]
static const struct dmi_system_id acpi_rev_dmi_table[] __initconst;

As the variable is not actually used here, hide it entirely
in an #ifdef to shut up the warning.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann 
Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor 
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

ACPICA: Clear status of GPEs on first direct enable

2019-07-26T07:10:30+00:00

[ Upstream commit 44758bafa53602f2581a6857bb20b55d4d8ad5b2 ]

ACPI GPEs (other than the EC one) can be enabled in two situations.
First, the GPEs with existing _Lxx and _Exx methods are enabled
implicitly by ACPICA during system initialization. Second, the
GPEs without these methods (like GPEs listed by _PRW objects for
wakeup devices) need to be enabled directly by the code that is
going to use them (e.g. ACPI power management or device drivers).

In the former case, if the status of a given GPE is set to start
with, its handler method (either _Lxx or _Exx) needs to be invoked
to take care of the events (possibly) signaled before the GPE was
enabled. In the latter case, however, the first caller of
acpi_enable_gpe() for a given GPE should not be expected to care
about any events that might be signaled through it earlier. In
that case, it is better to clear the status of the GPE before
enabling it, to prevent stale events from triggering unwanted
actions (like spurious system resume, for example).

For this reason, modify acpi_ev_add_gpe_reference() to take an
additional boolean argument indicating whether or not the GPE
status needs to be cleared when its reference counter changes from
zero to one and make acpi_enable_gpe() pass TRUE to it through
that new argument.

Fixes: 18996f2db918 ("ACPICA: Events: Stop unconditionally clearing ACPI IRQs during suspend/resume")
Reported-by: Furquan Shaikh
Tested-by: Furquan Shaikh
Tested-by: Mika Westerberg
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin