linux-stable.git/drivers/acpi, branch v4.14.45

ACPICA: acpi: acpica: fix acpi operand cache leak in nseval.c

2018-05-30T05:52:31+00:00

[ Upstream commit 97f3c0a4b0579b646b6b10ae5a3d59f0441cc12c ]

I found an ACPI cache leak in ACPI early termination and boot continuing case.

When early termination occurs due to malicious ACPI table, Linux kernel
terminates ACPI function and continues to boot process. While kernel terminates
ACPI function, kmem_cache_destroy() reports Acpi-Operand cache leak.

Boot log of ACPI operand cache leak is as follows:
>[    0.464168] ACPI: Added _OSI(Module Device)
>[    0.467022] ACPI: Added _OSI(Processor Device)
>[    0.469376] ACPI: Added _OSI(3.0 _SCP Extensions)
>[    0.471647] ACPI: Added _OSI(Processor Aggregator Device)
>[    0.477997] ACPI Error: Null stack entry at ffff880215c0aad8 (20170303/exresop-174)
>[    0.482706] ACPI Exception: AE_AML_INTERNAL, While resolving operands for [opcode_name unavailable] (20170303/dswexec-461)
>[    0.487503] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed [\DBG] (Node ffff88021710ab40), AE_AML_INTERNAL (20170303/psparse-543)
>[    0.492136] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed [\_SB._INI] (Node ffff88021710a618), AE_AML_INTERNAL (20170303/psparse-543)
>[    0.497683] ACPI: Interpreter enabled
>[    0.499385] ACPI: (supports S0)
>[    0.501151] ACPI: Using IOAPIC for interrupt routing
>[    0.503342] ACPI Error: Null stack entry at ffff880215c0aad8 (20170303/exresop-174)
>[    0.506522] ACPI Exception: AE_AML_INTERNAL, While resolving operands for [opcode_name unavailable] (20170303/dswexec-461)
>[    0.510463] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed [\DBG] (Node ffff88021710ab40), AE_AML_INTERNAL (20170303/psparse-543)
>[    0.514477] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed [\_PIC] (Node ffff88021710ab18), AE_AML_INTERNAL (20170303/psparse-543)
>[    0.518867] ACPI Exception: AE_AML_INTERNAL, Evaluating _PIC (20170303/bus-991)
>[    0.522384] kmem_cache_destroy Acpi-Operand: Slab cache still has objects
>[    0.524597] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.12.0-rc5 #26
>[    0.526795] Hardware name: innotek gmb_h virtual_box/virtual_box, BIOS virtual_box 12/01/2006
>[    0.529668] Call Trace:
>[    0.530811]  ? dump_stack+0x5c/0x81
>[    0.532240]  ? kmem_cache_destroy+0x1aa/0x1c0
>[    0.533905]  ? acpi_os_delete_cache+0xa/0x10
>[    0.535497]  ? acpi_ut_delete_caches+0x3f/0x7b
>[    0.537237]  ? acpi_terminate+0xa/0x14
>[    0.538701]  ? acpi_init+0x2af/0x34f
>[    0.540008]  ? acpi_sleep_proc_init+0x27/0x27
>[    0.541593]  ? do_one_initcall+0x4e/0x1a0
>[    0.543008]  ? kernel_init_freeable+0x19e/0x21f
>[    0.546202]  ? rest_init+0x80/0x80
>[    0.547513]  ? kernel_init+0xa/0x100
>[    0.548817]  ? ret_from_fork+0x25/0x30
>[    0.550587] vgaarb: loaded
>[    0.551716] EDAC MC: Ver: 3.0.0
>[    0.553744] PCI: Probing PCI hardware
>[    0.555038] PCI host bridge to bus 0000:00
> ... Continue to boot and log is omitted ...

I analyzed this memory leak in detail and found acpi_ns_evaluate() function
only removes Info->return_object in AE_CTRL_RETURN_VALUE case. But, when errors
occur, the status value is not AE_CTRL_RETURN_VALUE, and Info->return_object is
also not null. Therefore, this causes acpi operand memory leak.

This cache leak causes a security threat because an old kernel (<= 4.9) shows
memory locations of kernel functions in stack dump. Some malicious users
could use this information to neutralize kernel ASLR.

I made a patch to fix ACPI operand cache leak.

Signed-off-by: Seunghun Han 
Signed-off-by: Erik Schmauss 
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ACPICA: Fix memory leak on unusual memory leak

2018-05-30T05:52:31+00:00

[ Upstream commit 1c29c372b2d1d2415601041532745ce859f24126 ]

Fixes a single-object memory leak on a store-to-reference method
invocation. ACPICA BZ 1439.

Signed-off-by: Bob Moore 
Signed-off-by: Erik Schmauss 
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ACPICA: Events: add a return on failure from acpi_hw_register_read

2018-05-30T05:52:31+00:00

[ Upstream commit b4c0de312613ca676db5bd7e696a44b56795612a ]

This ensures that acpi_ev_fixed_event_detect() does not use fixed_status
and and fixed_enable as uninitialized variables.

Signed-off-by: Erik Schmauss 
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ACPI: acpi_pad: Fix memory leak in power saving threads

2018-05-30T05:52:27+00:00

[ Upstream commit 8b29d29abc484d638213dd79a18a95ae7e5bb402 ]

Fix once per second (round_robin_time) memory leak of about 1 KB in
each acpi_pad kernel idling thread that is activated.

Found by testing with kmemleak.

Signed-off-by: Lenny Szubowicz 
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ACPI / button: make module loadable when booted in non-ACPI mode

2018-05-09T07:51:49+00:00

commit ac1e55b1fdb27c1b07a0a6fe519f1291ff1e7d40 upstream.

Modules such as nouveau.ko and i915.ko have a link time dependency on
acpi_lid_open(), and due to its use of acpi_bus_register_driver(),
the button.ko module that provides it is only loadable when booted in
ACPI mode. However, the ACPI button driver can be built into the core
kernel as well, in which case the dependency can always be satisfied,
and the dependent modules can be loaded regardless of whether the
system was booted in ACPI mode or not.

So let's fix this asymmetry by making the ACPI button driver loadable
as a module even if not booted in ACPI mode, so it can provide the
acpi_lid_open() symbol in the same way as when built into the kernel.

Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel 
[ rjw: Minor adjustments of comments, whitespace and names. ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ACPI / video: Only default only_lcd to true on Win8-ready _desktops_

2018-04-29T09:33:18+00:00

commit 53fa1f6e8a5958da698a31edf366ffe90596b490 upstream.

Commit 5928c281524f (ACPI / video: Default lcd_only to true on Win8-ready
and newer machines) made only_lcd default to true on all machines where
acpi_osi_is_win8() returns true, including laptops.

The purpose of this is to avoid the bogus / non-working acpi backlight
interface which many newer BIOS-es define on desktop machines.

But this is causing a regression on some laptops, specifically on the
Dell XPS 13 2013 model, which does not have the LCD flag set for its
fully functional ACPI backlight interface.

Rather then DMI quirking our way out of this, this commits changes the
logic for setting only_lcd to true, to only do this on machines with
a desktop (or server) dmi chassis-type.

Note that we cannot simply only check the chassis-type and not register
the backlight interface based on that as there are some laptops and
tablets which have their chassis-type set to "3" aka desktop. Hopefully
the combination of checking the LCD flag, but only on devices with
a desktop(ish) chassis-type will avoid the needs for DMI quirks for this,
or at least limit the amount of DMI quirks which we need to a minimum.

Fixes: 5928c281524f (ACPI / video: Default lcd_only to true on Win8-ready and newer machines)
Reported-and-tested-by: James Hogan 
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede 
Cc: 4.15+  # 4.15+
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ACPI / EC: Restore polling during noirq suspend/resume phases

2018-04-26T09:02:19+00:00

[ Upstream commit 3cd091a773936c54344a519f7ee1379ccb620bee ]

Commit 662591461c4b (ACPI / EC: Drop EC noirq hooks to fix a
regression) modified the ACPI EC driver so that it doesn't switch
over to busy polling mode during noirq stages of system suspend and
resume in an attempt to fix an issue resulting from that behavior.

However, that modification introduced a system resume regression on
Thinkpad X240, so make the EC driver switch over to the polling mode
during noirq stages of system suspend and resume again, which
effectively reverts the problematic commit.

Fixes: 662591461c4b (ACPI / EC: Drop EC noirq hooks to fix a regression)
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=197863
Reported-by: Markus Demleitner 
Tested-by: Markus Demleitner 
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ACPI / scan: Use acpi_bus_get_status() to initialize ACPI_TYPE_DEVICE devs

2018-04-26T09:02:16+00:00

[ Upstream commit 63347db0affadcbccd5613116ea8431c70139b3e ]

The acpi_get_bus_status wrapper for acpi_bus_get_status_handle has some
code to handle certain device quirks, in some cases we also need this
quirk handling for the initial _STA call.

Specifically on some devices calling _STA before all _DEP dependencies
are met results in errors like these:

[    0.123579] ACPI Error: No handler for Region [ECRM] (00000000ba9edc4c)
               [GenericSerialBus] (20170831/evregion-166)
[    0.123601] ACPI Error: Region GenericSerialBus (ID=9) has no handler
               (20170831/exfldio-299)
[    0.123618] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed
               \_SB.I2C1.BAT1._STA, AE_NOT_EXIST (20170831/psparse-550)

acpi_get_bus_status already has code to avoid this, so by using it we
also silence these errors from the initial _STA call.

Note that in order for the acpi_get_bus_status handling for this to work,
we initialize dep_unmet to 1 until acpi_device_dep_initialize gets called,
this means that battery devices will be instantiated with an initial
status of 0. This is not a problem, acpi_bus_attach will get called soon
after the instantiation anyways and it will update the status as first
point of order.

Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede 
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ACPI / bus: Do not call _STA on battery devices with unmet dependencies

2018-04-26T09:02:16+00:00

[ Upstream commit 54ddce7062242036402242242c07c60c0b505f84 ]

The battery code uses acpi_device->dep_unmet to check for unmet deps and
if there are unmet deps it does not bind to the device to avoid errors
about missing OpRegions when calling ACPI methods on the device.

The missing OpRegions when there are unmet deps problem also applies to
the _STA method of some battery devices and calling it too early results
in errors like these:

[    0.123579] ACPI Error: No handler for Region [ECRM] (00000000ba9edc4c)
               [GenericSerialBus] (20170831/evregion-166)
[    0.123601] ACPI Error: Region GenericSerialBus (ID=9) has no handler
               (20170831/exfldio-299)
[    0.123618] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed
               \_SB.I2C1.BAT1._STA, AE_NOT_EXIST (20170831/psparse-550)

This commit fixes these errors happening when acpi_get_bus_status gets
called by checking dep_unmet for battery devices and reporting a status
of 0 until all dependencies are met.

Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede 
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ACPI: processor_perflib: Do not send _PPC change notification if not ready

2018-04-26T09:02:16+00:00

[ Upstream commit ba1edb9a5125a617d612f98eead14b9b84e75c3a ]

The following warning was triggered after resumed from S3 -
if all the nonboot CPUs were put offline before suspend:

[ 1840.329515] unchecked MSR access error: RDMSR from 0x771 at rIP: 0xffffffff86061e3a (native_read_msr+0xa/0x30)
[ 1840.329516] Call Trace:
[ 1840.329521]  __rdmsr_on_cpu+0x33/0x50
[ 1840.329525]  generic_exec_single+0x81/0xb0
[ 1840.329527]  smp_call_function_single+0xd2/0x100
[ 1840.329530]  ? acpi_ds_result_pop+0xdd/0xf2
[ 1840.329532]  ? acpi_ds_create_operand+0x215/0x23c
[ 1840.329534]  rdmsrl_on_cpu+0x57/0x80
[ 1840.329536]  ? cpumask_next+0x1b/0x20
[ 1840.329538]  ? rdmsrl_on_cpu+0x57/0x80
[ 1840.329541]  intel_pstate_update_perf_limits+0xf3/0x220
[ 1840.329544]  ? notifier_call_chain+0x4a/0x70
[ 1840.329546]  intel_pstate_set_policy+0x4e/0x150
[ 1840.329548]  cpufreq_set_policy+0xcd/0x2f0
[ 1840.329550]  cpufreq_update_policy+0xb2/0x130
[ 1840.329552]  ? cpufreq_update_policy+0x130/0x130
[ 1840.329556]  acpi_processor_ppc_has_changed+0x65/0x80
[ 1840.329558]  acpi_processor_notify+0x80/0x100
[ 1840.329561]  acpi_ev_notify_dispatch+0x44/0x5c
[ 1840.329563]  acpi_os_execute_deferred+0x14/0x20
[ 1840.329565]  process_one_work+0x193/0x3c0
[ 1840.329567]  worker_thread+0x35/0x3b0
[ 1840.329569]  kthread+0x125/0x140
[ 1840.329571]  ? process_one_work+0x3c0/0x3c0
[ 1840.329572]  ? kthread_park+0x60/0x60
[ 1840.329575]  ? do_syscall_64+0x67/0x180
[ 1840.329577]  ret_from_fork+0x25/0x30
[ 1840.329585] unchecked MSR access error: WRMSR to 0x774 (tried to write 0x0000000000000000) at rIP: 0xffffffff86061f78 (native_write_msr+0x8/0x30)
[ 1840.329586] Call Trace:
[ 1840.329587]  __wrmsr_on_cpu+0x37/0x40
[ 1840.329589]  generic_exec_single+0x81/0xb0
[ 1840.329592]  smp_call_function_single+0xd2/0x100
[ 1840.329594]  ? acpi_ds_create_operand+0x215/0x23c
[ 1840.329595]  ? cpumask_next+0x1b/0x20
[ 1840.329597]  wrmsrl_on_cpu+0x57/0x70
[ 1840.329598]  ? rdmsrl_on_cpu+0x57/0x80
[ 1840.329599]  ? wrmsrl_on_cpu+0x57/0x70
[ 1840.329602]  intel_pstate_hwp_set+0xd3/0x150
[ 1840.329604]  intel_pstate_set_policy+0x119/0x150
[ 1840.329606]  cpufreq_set_policy+0xcd/0x2f0
[ 1840.329607]  cpufreq_update_policy+0xb2/0x130
[ 1840.329610]  ? cpufreq_update_policy+0x130/0x130
[ 1840.329613]  acpi_processor_ppc_has_changed+0x65/0x80
[ 1840.329615]  acpi_processor_notify+0x80/0x100
[ 1840.329617]  acpi_ev_notify_dispatch+0x44/0x5c
[ 1840.329619]  acpi_os_execute_deferred+0x14/0x20
[ 1840.329620]  process_one_work+0x193/0x3c0
[ 1840.329622]  worker_thread+0x35/0x3b0
[ 1840.329624]  kthread+0x125/0x140
[ 1840.329625]  ? process_one_work+0x3c0/0x3c0
[ 1840.329626]  ? kthread_park+0x60/0x60
[ 1840.329628]  ? do_syscall_64+0x67/0x180
[ 1840.329631]  ret_from_fork+0x25/0x30

This is because if there's only one online CPU, the MSR_PM_ENABLE
(package wide)can not be enabled after resumed, due to
intel_pstate_hwp_enable() will only be invoked on AP's online
process after resumed - if there's no AP online, the HWP remains
disabled after resumed (BIOS has disabled it in S3). Then if
there comes a _PPC change notification which touches HWP register
during this stage, the warning is triggered.

Since we don't call acpi_processor_register_performance() when
HWP is enabled, the pr->performance will be NULL. When this is
NULL we don't need to do _PPC change notification.

Reported-by: Doug Smythies 
Suggested-by: Srinivas Pandruvada 
Signed-off-by: Yu Chen 
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman