linux-stable.git/drivers/acpi, branch v3.18.3

ACPI / PM: Fix PM initialization for devices that are not present

2015-01-16T14:59:55+00:00

commit 1b1f3e1699a9886f1070f94171097ab4ccdbfc95 upstream.

If an ACPI device object whose _STA returns 0 (not present and not
functional) has _PR0 or _PS0, its power_manageable flag will be set
and acpi_bus_init_power() will return 0 for it.  Consequently, if
such a device object is passed to the ACPI device PM functions, they
will attempt to carry out the requested operation on the device,
although they should not do that for devices that are not present.

To fix that problem make acpi_bus_init_power() return an error code
for devices that are not present which will cause power_manageable to
be cleared for them as appropriate in acpi_bus_get_power_flags().
However, the lists of power resources should not be freed for the
device in that case, so modify acpi_bus_get_power_flags() to keep
those lists even if acpi_bus_init_power() returns an error.
Accordingly, when deciding whether or not the lists of power
resources need to be freed, acpi_free_power_resources_lists()
should check the power.flags.power_resources flag instead of
flags.power_manageable, so make that change too.

Furthermore, if acpi_bus_attach() sees that flags.initialized is
unset for the given device, it should reset the power management
settings of the device and re-initialize them from scratch instead
of relying on the previous settings (the device may have appeared
after being not present previously, for example), so make it use
the 'valid' flag of the D0 power state as the initial value of
flags.power_manageable for it and call acpi_bus_init_power() to
discover its current power state.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ACPI / video: Add some Samsung models to disable_native_backlight list

2015-01-16T14:59:55+00:00

commit 7d0b93499f4879ddbc75d594f4ea216ba964f78e upstream.

Several Samsung laptop models (SAMSUNG 870Z5E/880Z5E/680Z5E and
SAMSUNG 370R4E/370R4V/370R5E/3570RE/370R5V) do not have a working
native backlight control interface so restore their acpi_videoX
interface.

Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84221
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84651
For SAMSUNG 870Z5E/880Z5E/680Z5E:
Reported-and-tested-by: Brent Saner 
Reported-by: Vitaliy Filippov 
Reported-by: Laszlo KREKACS 
For SAMSUNG 370R4E/370R4V/370R5E/3570RE/370R5V:
Reported-by: Vladimir Perepechin 
Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu 
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ACPI / video: update the skip case for acpi_video_device_in_dod()

2015-01-16T14:59:53+00:00

commit b4df463678fb9c6dae9548dbb7545993779fd416 upstream.

If the firmware has declared more than 8 video output devices, and the
one that control the internal panel's backlight is listed after the
first 8 output devices, the _DOD will not include it due to the current
i915 operation region implementation. As a result, we will not create a
backlight device for it while we should. Solve this problem by special
case the firmware that has 8+ output devices in that if we see such a
firmware, we do not test if the device is in _DOD list. The creation of
the backlight device will also enable the firmware to emit events on
backlight hotkey press when the acpi_osi= cmdline option is specified on
those affected ASUS laptops.

Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70241
Reported-and-tested-by: Oleksij Rempel 
Reported-and-tested-by: Dmitry Tunin 
Reported-and-tested-by: Jimbo 
Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu 
Acked-by: Jani Nikula 
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki 
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ACPI / video: update condition to check if device is in _DOD list

2014-12-01T01:09:18+00:00

Commit 0b8db271f159 ("ACPI / video: check _DOD list when creating
backlight devices") checks if the video device is in the bind devices
list to decide if we should create backlight device for it, that causes
problem for one Dell Latitude E6410, where none of the video output
devices are properly bound due to the way how we did the comparing
between its _ADR and the _DOD's values. Solve this problem by comparing
the lower 12 bits of both the device's _ADR and the _DOD's values instead
of relying on bind result.

Fixes: 0b8db271f159 ("ACPI / video: check _DOD list when creating backlight devices")
Reported-and-tested-by: Brian Norris 
Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu 
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki

ACPI / PM: Ignore wakeup setting if the ACPI companion can't wake up

2014-11-20T00:24:16+00:00

As reported by Dmitry, on some Chromebooks there are devices with
corresponding ACPI objects and with unusual system wakeup
configuration.  Namely, they technically are wakeup-capable, but the
wakeup is handled via a platform-specific out-of-band mechanism and
the ACPI PM layer has no information on the wakeup capability.  As
a result, device_may_wakeup(dev) called from acpi_dev_suspend_late()
returns 'true' for those devices, but the wakeup.flags.valid flag is
unset for the corresponding ACPI device objects, so acpi_device_wakeup()
reproducibly fails for them causing acpi_dev_suspend_late() to return
an error code.  The entire system suspend is then aborted and the
machines in question cannot suspend at all.

Address the problem by ignoring the device_may_wakeup(dev) return
value in acpi_dev_suspend_late() if the ACPI companion of the device
being handled has wakeup.flags.valid unset (in which case it is clear
that the wakeup is supposed to be handled by other means).

This fixes a regression introduced by commit a76e9bd89ae7 (i2c:
attach/detach I2C client device to the ACPI power domain) as the
affected systems could suspend and resume successfully before that
commit.

Fixes: a76e9bd89ae7 (i2c: attach/detach I2C client device to the ACPI power domain)
Reported-by: Dmitry Torokhov 
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Torokhov 
Cc: 3.13+  # 3.13+
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki

Merge branch 'acpi-blacklist'

2014-11-14T14:17:17+00:00

* acpi-blacklist:
  ACPI / blacklist: blacklist Win8 OSI for Dell Vostro 3546

Merge branches 'acpi-scan' and 'acpi-ec'

2014-10-31T21:24:44+00:00

* acpi-scan:
  ACPI: Use ACPI companion to match only the first physical device

* acpi-ec:
  ACPI / EC: Fix regression due to conflicting firmware behavior between Samsung and Acer.
  Revert "ACPI / EC: Add support to disallow QR_EC to be issued before completing previous QR_EC"

ACPI / blacklist: blacklist Win8 OSI for Dell Vostro 3546

2014-10-30T00:32:43+00:00

The wireless hotkey of Dell Vostro 3546 does not work with Win8 OSI. Due
to insufficient documentation for the driver implementation, blacklist
it as a workaround.

Signed-off-by: Adam Lee 
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki

ACPI / EC: Fix regression due to conflicting firmware behavior between Samsung and Acer.

2014-10-29T15:52:35+00:00

It is reported that Samsung laptops that need to poll events are broken by
the following commit:
 Commit 3afcf2ece453e1a8c2c6de19cdf06da3772a1b08
 Subject: ACPI / EC: Add support to disallow QR_EC to be issued when SCI_EVT isn't set

The behaviors of the 2 vendor firmwares are conflict:
 1. Acer: OSPM shouldn't issue QR_EC unless SCI_EVT is set, firmware
         automatically sets SCI_EVT as long as there is event queued up.
 2. Samsung: OSPM should issue QR_EC whatever SCI_EVT is set, firmware
            returns 0 when there is no event queued up.

This patch is a quick fix to distinguish the behaviors to make Acer
behavior only effective for Acer EC firmware so that the breakages on
Samsung EC firmware can be avoided.

Fixes: 3afcf2ece453 (ACPI / EC: Add support to disallow QR_EC to be issued ...)
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44161
Reported-and-tested-by: Ortwin Glück 
Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng 
Cc: 3.17+  # 3.17+
[ rjw : Subject ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki

Revert "ACPI / EC: Add support to disallow QR_EC to be issued before completing previous QR_EC"

2014-10-29T15:48:33+00:00

It is reported that the following commit breaks Samsung hardware:
 Commit: 558e4736f2e1b0e6323adf7a5e4df77ed6cfc1a4.
 Subject: ACPI / EC: Add support to disallow QR_EC to be issued before
          completing previous QR_EC

Which means the Samsung behavior conflicts with the Acer behavior.

1. Samsung may behave like:
   [ +event 1 ] SCI_EVT set
   [ +event 2 ] SCI_EVT set
                              write QR_EC
                              read event
   [ -event 1 ] SCI_EVT clear
   Without the above commit, Samsung can work:
   [ +event 1 ] SCI_EVT set
   [ +event 2 ] SCI_EVT set
                              write QR_EC
                              CAN prepare next QR_EC as SCI_EVT=1
                              read event
   [ -event 1 ] SCI_EVT clear
                              write QR_EC
                              read event
   [ -event 2 ] SCI_EVT clear
   With the above commit, Samsung cannot work:
   [ +event 1 ] SCI_EVT set
   [ +event 2 ] SCI_EVT set
                              write QR_EC
                              read event
   [ -event 1 ] SCI_EVT clear
                              CANNOT prepare next QR_EC as SCI_EVT=0
2. Acer may behave like:
   [ +event 1 ] SCI_EVT set
   [ +event 2 ]
                              write QR_EC
                              read event
   [ -event 1 ] SCI_EVT clear
   [ +event 2 ] SCI_EVT set
   Without the above commit, Acer cannot work when there is only 1 event:
   [ +event 1 ] SCI_EVT set
                              write QR_EC
                              can prepared next QR_EC as SCI_EVT=1
                              read event
   [ -event 1 ] SCI_EVT clear
                              CANNOT write QR_EC as SCI_EVT=0
   With the above commit, Acer can work:
   [ +event 1 ] SCI_EVT set
   [ +event 2 ]
                              write QR_EC
                              read event
   [ -event 1 ] SCI_EVT set
                              can prepare next QR_EC because SCI_EVT=0
                              CAN write QR_EC as SCI_EVT=1

Since Acer can also work with only the following commit applied:
 Commit: 3afcf2ece453e1a8c2c6de19cdf06da3772a1b08
 Subject: ACPI / EC: Add support to disallow QR_EC to be issued when
          SCI_EVT isn't set
commit 558e4736f2e1b0e6323adf7a5e4df77ed6cfc1a4 can be reverted.

Fixes: 558e4736f2e1 (ACPI / EC: Add support to disallow QR_EC to be issued ...)
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44161
Reported-and-tested-by: Ortwin Glück 
Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng 
Cc: 3.17+  # 3.17+
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki